search
Back to results

Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Rexlemestrocel-L Alone or Combined With Hyaluronic Acid in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain (MSB-DR003)

Primary Purpose

Degenerative Disc Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rexlemestrocel-L
Rexlemestrocel-L + HA Mixture
Placebo
Sponsored by
Mesoblast, Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Disc Disease focused on measuring Chronic Lumbar Back Pain, Low back pain, Back pain, Degenerative Disc Disease, Injection of Degenerated Lumbar Disc, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Neurologic Manifestations, Pain, Spinal Diseases, Stem Cells, Adult Stem Cells, Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor cells (MPCs), Mesoblast, Hyaluronic Acid, Pharmaceutical Solutions, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Immunologic Factors, Pharmacologic Actions, Protective Agents, rexlemestrocel-L, Viscosupplements

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female participants 18 years of age and older
  • If female of childbearing potential, participant is non-pregnant, non-nursing, and agrees to use highly effective methods of contraception for a minimum of 24 months post-treatment
  • Signed informed consent and country-appropriate privacy forms indicating participant is willing to undergo treatment and willing to be available for each examination scheduled over the study duration
  • Have documented diagnosis of moderate radiographic degeneration of an intervertebral disc from L1 to S1, with a disc suspected of causing chronic low back pain (CLBP) associated with moderate radiographic degeneration at a lumbar disc is defined as the following (participant must meet all of the listed conditions):

    1. Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months
    2. Have failed 6 months of conservative back pain care. (Conservative treatment regimens may include any or all of the following: initial rest, medications [e.g., anti-inflammatory, analgesics, narcotics/opioids, muscle relaxants], massage, acupuncture, chiropractic manipulations, activity modification, home-directed lumbar exercise program, and non-invasive pain control treatments or procedures)
    3. Have at a minimum undergone supervised physical therapy, such as daily walking routines, therapeutic exercises, and back education programs specifically for the treatment of low back pain and taken a pain medication for back pain (e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and/or opioid medication).
    4. Change from normal disc morphology of the index disc as defined by radiographic evaluation by the core imaging evaluation provider. Radiographs must show all of the following:
  • A modified Pfirrmann score of 3, 4, 5 or 6 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the index disc
  • Modic Grade II changes or less on MRI at the index disc
  • With or without contained disc protrusion at the index disc on MRI

    e. Low back pain of at least 40mm and not more than 90mm of 100mm on low back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) (average pain over 24 hours)

    f. Leg pain ≤20mm in both legs on a 100mm VAS scale

    g. Oswestry disability index (ODI) score of at least 30 and no more than 90 on a 100 point scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female participants who are pregnant or nursing, or women planning to become pregnant in the first 24 months post-treatment
  • Extreme obesity, as defined by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Guidelines Body Mass Index (BMI > 40)
  • Have undergone a surgical procedure (e.g. discectomy, intradiscal electrothermal therapy, intradiscal radiofrequency, artificial disc replacement, interbody fusion) on the disc at the index or adjacent level
  • Osteoporosis, as defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. A DEXA T-score of ≤ -2.5 will exclude the participant.
  • Any lumbar intradiscal injection, including steroids, into the index or adjacent discs prior to treatment injection, with the exception of the following injections performed at least 2 weeks prior to study treatment:

    1. Contrast medium (discography or other diagnostic injection)
    2. NSAIDs
    3. Nerve-blocking anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine, bupivacaine)
    4. Antibiotics
    5. Saline
  • Have undergone a procedure affecting the structure/biomechanics of the index disc level (e.g., posterolateral fusion)
  • Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms or history of malignancy within the 5 years prior to enrolment on study
  • Have been a recipient of prior allogeneic stem cell/progenitor cell therapy for any indication or autologous stem cell/progenitor cell therapy or other biological intervention to repair the index intervertebral disc
  • An average baseline morphine equivalent dose (MED) of >75mg/day as determined by e-diary entries during the screening period
  • Taking systemic immunosuppressants
  • A medical condition, serious intercurrent illness, or extenuating circumstance that would preclude participation in the study or potentially decrease survival or interfere with ambulation or rehabilitation.
  • Participants involved in spinal litigation, including workman's compensation, unless litigation is complete
  • Are transient or has a severe alcohol or substance abuse problem
  • Clinically significant nerve pain (e.g., chronic radiculopathy or neuropathy)
  • Clinically significant sacroiliac joint pain
  • Compressive pathology due to stenosis or disc protrusion on MRI with associated clinical symptoms defined as leg pain VAS>20mm out of 100mm or neurologic deficit on neurologic exam
  • Disc extrusion with a maximum dimension greater or equal to twice the posterior height of the disc, or disc sequestration in the lumbar spine on MRI as determined by radiographic core lab
  • Modified Pfirrmann score of 7 or 8 at any lumbar level (L1-S1) on MRI evaluation as determined by radiographic core lab
  • Symptomatic involvement of more than one lumbar disc
  • Symptomatic central vertebral canal stenosis as defined by neurogenic claudication
  • Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis Grade 2 and above or Spondylolysis at the index or adjacent level(s)
  • Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy affecting the index disc
  • Spinal deformity defined as lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of the lumbar spine greater than 15 degrees
  • Any fracture of the spine at the index or adjacent levels that has not healed, or clinically compromised vertebral bodies at the index level due to current or past trauma
  • Facet pain at the index level or adjacent segments as determined by a diagnostic medial branch block (a facet block injection is not acceptable for making this determination) to rule out facet joint involvement.
  • Full thickness annular tears in the index level as determined by free flowing contrast media through the annulus fibrosis.

Sites / Locations

  • Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC
  • Tennessee Valley Pain Consultants
  • Arizona Pain Specialists
  • Physicians Research Group
  • TriWest Research Associates, LLC
  • Memorial Orthopaedics Surgical Group
  • Newport Beach Headache and Pain
  • Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Clinical Research
  • UC Davis Spine Center
  • Orthopedic Pain Specialists
  • The Spine Institute
  • Summit Pain Alliance
  • Integrated Pain Management
  • Denver Back Pain Specialists, LLC
  • George Washington University Medical Center
  • Coastal Clinical Research Specialists
  • Shrock Orthopedic Research, LLC
  • Holy Cross Orthopedics Institute
  • Emory Orthopaedics & Spine Center
  • Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
  • Injury Care Medical Center
  • Millennium Pain Center
  • Otrimed Clinical Research
  • Orthopedic Specialists of Louisiana
  • Mayo Clinic
  • MAPS Applied Research Center
  • Innovative Pain Care Center
  • University Clinical Research
  • Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
  • Rochester Regional Health
  • Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates
  • On Site Clinical Solutions, LLC
  • The Center for Clinical Research/ Carolinas Pain Institute
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • DOC Clinical Research
  • Clinical Investigations, LLC
  • Orthopaedic and Spine Specialists
  • RI Hospital-Comprehensive Spine Center
  • Clinical Trials of South Carolina
  • Greenville Pharmaceutical Research, Inc.
  • Texas Back Institute
  • Spine Team Texas
  • Precision Spine Care
  • Ericksen Research & Development, LLC
  • the SMART Clinic
  • Hope Research Institute
  • Virginia iSpine Physicians, PC
  • Monash Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Rexlemestrocel-L

Rexlemestrocel-L + HA

Placebo

Arm Description

Participants received rexlemestrocel-L 2.0 mL injection of approximately 6 million rexlemestrocel-L cells in freeze media mixed in a 1:1 by-volume ratio with saline on Day 0 (Visit 2).

Participants received rexlemestrocel-L 2.0 mL injection of approximately 6 million rexlemestrocel-L cells in freeze media mixed in a 1:1 by-volume ratio with hyaluronic acid (HA) solution on Day 0 (Visit 2).

Participants received saline solution as matching-placebo on Day 0 (Visit 2).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Treatment Success: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Overall treatment success was determined based on number of responders who had composite response at both months 12 and 24 evaluated per specified criteria. A treatment responder with treatment success was defined as a participant who met the 3 criteria of a composite responder analysis as: 50% or greater reduction in the lower-back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score; 15-point or greater reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score; and lack of post-treatment interventions at the treated level as of the study visit (Visits 6 [12 months post-treatment] and 8 [24 months post-treatment]). The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as Bayesian estimate[BE]) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Effectiveness Based on Pain Responders: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
A participant was defined as a pain responder for a given study visit if they achieved at least a 50% reduction from Baseline in the lower-back pain VAS score (average pain over 24 hours), as reported during in-clinic assessment. The participant should be qualified as a pain responder at both 12 and 24 months post-treatment, and must not have received a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Effectiveness Based on Functional Responders: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
A participant was defined as a functional responder for a given study visit if they achieved at least a 15-point reduction from Baseline in ODI score, as reported during in-clinic assessment. The participant should be qualified as a functional responder at both 12 and 24 months post-treatment, and must not have received a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up; any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Effectiveness Based on Treatment Success at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
A treatment responder with treatment success was defined as a participant who met the 3 conditions of a composite responder analysis as: 50% or greater reduction in the lower-back pain VAS score; 15-point or greater reduction in ODI score; and lack of post-treatment interventions at the treated level as of the study visit. The participants qualified as responders if they satisfied the above conditions at the 24-month follow-up visit alone. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Effectiveness Based on Minimal Pain Responders at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
A minimal pain responder was defined as a participant who achieved a lower-back pain VAS score (average pain over 24 hours) of 20 mm or less at the given study visit. The participants qualified as responders if they satisfied the above condition at 24 months post-treatment, and did not receive a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Effectiveness Based on Time to First Intervention Over 24 Months
The effectiveness of the study drug was evaluated based on its ability in increasing the time to additional interventions at the treated level over 24 months post-treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates for the probability (expressed as a percentage) of participants to receive an intervention are presented.
Effectiveness Based on Minimal Disability Responders at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
A minimal disability responder was defined as a participant who achieved an ODI score of 20% or less at the given study visit. The participants qualified as responders if they satisfied the above condition at 24 months post-treatment, and did not receive a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.

Full Information

First Posted
March 25, 2015
Last Updated
September 22, 2022
Sponsor
Mesoblast, Ltd.
Collaborators
Quintiles, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02412735
Brief Title
Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Rexlemestrocel-L Alone or Combined With Hyaluronic Acid in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
Acronym
MSB-DR003
Official Title
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Injection of Rexlemestrocel-L Alone or Combined With Hyaluronic Acid (HA) in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 6, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 15, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 15, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Mesoblast, Ltd.
Collaborators
Quintiles, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Mesoblast's rexlemestrocel-L alone or combined with hyaluronic acid (HA) in participants with chronic low back pain (> 6 months) associated with moderate radiographic degenerative changes of a disc.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Disc Disease
Keywords
Chronic Lumbar Back Pain, Low back pain, Back pain, Degenerative Disc Disease, Injection of Degenerated Lumbar Disc, Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Neurologic Manifestations, Pain, Spinal Diseases, Stem Cells, Adult Stem Cells, Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor cells (MPCs), Mesoblast, Hyaluronic Acid, Pharmaceutical Solutions, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Immunologic Factors, Pharmacologic Actions, Protective Agents, rexlemestrocel-L, Viscosupplements

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
404 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Rexlemestrocel-L
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received rexlemestrocel-L 2.0 mL injection of approximately 6 million rexlemestrocel-L cells in freeze media mixed in a 1:1 by-volume ratio with saline on Day 0 (Visit 2).
Arm Title
Rexlemestrocel-L + HA
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received rexlemestrocel-L 2.0 mL injection of approximately 6 million rexlemestrocel-L cells in freeze media mixed in a 1:1 by-volume ratio with hyaluronic acid (HA) solution on Day 0 (Visit 2).
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received saline solution as matching-placebo on Day 0 (Visit 2).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rexlemestrocel-L
Intervention Description
Rexlemestrocel-L injection
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rexlemestrocel-L + HA Mixture
Intervention Description
Rexlemestrocel-L was combined in 1:1 by-volume ratio with HA solution and the resulting mixture was injected
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Saline control solution
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Treatment Success: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Description
Overall treatment success was determined based on number of responders who had composite response at both months 12 and 24 evaluated per specified criteria. A treatment responder with treatment success was defined as a participant who met the 3 criteria of a composite responder analysis as: 50% or greater reduction in the lower-back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score; 15-point or greater reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score; and lack of post-treatment interventions at the treated level as of the study visit (Visits 6 [12 months post-treatment] and 8 [24 months post-treatment]). The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as Bayesian estimate[BE]) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Effectiveness Based on Pain Responders: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Description
A participant was defined as a pain responder for a given study visit if they achieved at least a 50% reduction from Baseline in the lower-back pain VAS score (average pain over 24 hours), as reported during in-clinic assessment. The participant should be qualified as a pain responder at both 12 and 24 months post-treatment, and must not have received a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months
Title
Effectiveness Based on Functional Responders: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Description
A participant was defined as a functional responder for a given study visit if they achieved at least a 15-point reduction from Baseline in ODI score, as reported during in-clinic assessment. The participant should be qualified as a functional responder at both 12 and 24 months post-treatment, and must not have received a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up; any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months
Title
Effectiveness Based on Treatment Success at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Description
A treatment responder with treatment success was defined as a participant who met the 3 conditions of a composite responder analysis as: 50% or greater reduction in the lower-back pain VAS score; 15-point or greater reduction in ODI score; and lack of post-treatment interventions at the treated level as of the study visit. The participants qualified as responders if they satisfied the above conditions at the 24-month follow-up visit alone. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Effectiveness Based on Minimal Pain Responders at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Description
A minimal pain responder was defined as a participant who achieved a lower-back pain VAS score (average pain over 24 hours) of 20 mm or less at the given study visit. The participants qualified as responders if they satisfied the above condition at 24 months post-treatment, and did not receive a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Effectiveness Based on Time to First Intervention Over 24 Months
Description
The effectiveness of the study drug was evaluated based on its ability in increasing the time to additional interventions at the treated level over 24 months post-treatment. Kaplan-Meier estimates for the probability (expressed as a percentage) of participants to receive an intervention are presented.
Time Frame
Up to Month 24
Title
Effectiveness Based on Minimal Disability Responders at 24 Months: Bayesian Estimated Response Rate
Description
A minimal disability responder was defined as a participant who achieved an ODI score of 20% or less at the given study visit. The participants qualified as responders if they satisfied the above condition at 24 months post-treatment, and did not receive a post-treatment intervention through 24 months' follow-up. Any participant that did not have a minimum of a visit at 3 months (Study Visit 4) was considered a non-responder for this outcome measure. The average response rate (proportion of participants with response presented as BE) was based upon the average of multiple Bayesian simulations.
Time Frame
Month 24
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Low Back Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 Months
Description
Pain intensity was recorded on a horizontal 100 mm VAS and measured as the distance in millimeters from the left origin of the horizontal VAS line and the point indicated by the participant as representing their level of pain. A horizontal 100 mm VAS anchored on the left with the words "No Pain" and on the right with the words "Worst Possible Pain", was used to measure low back pain intensity. Scores were obtained by measuring the distance in millimeters from the left origin of the line (0) to the point indicated with a slash placed by the participant to indicate the participant's level of pain. VAS ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worst possible pain. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male and female participants 18 years of age and older If female of childbearing potential, participant is non-pregnant, non-nursing, and agrees to use highly effective methods of contraception for a minimum of 24 months post-treatment Signed informed consent and country-appropriate privacy forms indicating participant is willing to undergo treatment and willing to be available for each examination scheduled over the study duration Have documented diagnosis of moderate radiographic degeneration of an intervertebral disc from L1 to S1, with a disc suspected of causing chronic low back pain (CLBP) associated with moderate radiographic degeneration at a lumbar disc is defined as the following (participant must meet all of the listed conditions): Chronic low back pain for at least 6 months Have failed 6 months of conservative back pain care. (Conservative treatment regimens may include any or all of the following: initial rest, medications [e.g., anti-inflammatory, analgesics, narcotics/opioids, muscle relaxants], massage, acupuncture, chiropractic manipulations, activity modification, home-directed lumbar exercise program, and non-invasive pain control treatments or procedures) Have at a minimum undergone supervised physical therapy, such as daily walking routines, therapeutic exercises, and back education programs specifically for the treatment of low back pain and taken a pain medication for back pain (e.g. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and/or opioid medication). Change from normal disc morphology of the index disc as defined by radiographic evaluation by the core imaging evaluation provider. Radiographs must show all of the following: A modified Pfirrmann score of 3, 4, 5 or 6 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the index disc Modic Grade II changes or less on MRI at the index disc With or without contained disc protrusion at the index disc on MRI e. Low back pain of at least 40mm and not more than 90mm of 100mm on low back pain visual analogue scale (VAS) (average pain over 24 hours) f. Leg pain ≤20mm in both legs on a 100mm VAS scale g. Oswestry disability index (ODI) score of at least 30 and no more than 90 on a 100 point scale. Exclusion Criteria: Female participants who are pregnant or nursing, or women planning to become pregnant in the first 24 months post-treatment Extreme obesity, as defined by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Guidelines Body Mass Index (BMI > 40) Have undergone a surgical procedure (e.g. discectomy, intradiscal electrothermal therapy, intradiscal radiofrequency, artificial disc replacement, interbody fusion) on the disc at the index or adjacent level Osteoporosis, as defined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. A DEXA T-score of ≤ -2.5 will exclude the participant. Any lumbar intradiscal injection, including steroids, into the index or adjacent discs prior to treatment injection, with the exception of the following injections performed at least 2 weeks prior to study treatment: Contrast medium (discography or other diagnostic injection) NSAIDs Nerve-blocking anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine, bupivacaine) Antibiotics Saline Have undergone a procedure affecting the structure/biomechanics of the index disc level (e.g., posterolateral fusion) Active malignancy or tumor as source of symptoms or history of malignancy within the 5 years prior to enrolment on study Have been a recipient of prior allogeneic stem cell/progenitor cell therapy for any indication or autologous stem cell/progenitor cell therapy or other biological intervention to repair the index intervertebral disc An average baseline morphine equivalent dose (MED) of >75mg/day as determined by e-diary entries during the screening period Taking systemic immunosuppressants A medical condition, serious intercurrent illness, or extenuating circumstance that would preclude participation in the study or potentially decrease survival or interfere with ambulation or rehabilitation. Participants involved in spinal litigation, including workman's compensation, unless litigation is complete Are transient or has a severe alcohol or substance abuse problem Clinically significant nerve pain (e.g., chronic radiculopathy or neuropathy) Clinically significant sacroiliac joint pain Compressive pathology due to stenosis or disc protrusion on MRI with associated clinical symptoms defined as leg pain VAS>20mm out of 100mm or neurologic deficit on neurologic exam Disc extrusion with a maximum dimension greater or equal to twice the posterior height of the disc, or disc sequestration in the lumbar spine on MRI as determined by radiographic core lab Modified Pfirrmann score of 7 or 8 at any lumbar level (L1-S1) on MRI evaluation as determined by radiographic core lab Symptomatic involvement of more than one lumbar disc Symptomatic central vertebral canal stenosis as defined by neurogenic claudication Spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis Grade 2 and above or Spondylolysis at the index or adjacent level(s) Lumbar spondylitis or other undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy affecting the index disc Spinal deformity defined as lumbar scoliosis with a Cobb angle of the lumbar spine greater than 15 degrees Any fracture of the spine at the index or adjacent levels that has not healed, or clinically compromised vertebral bodies at the index level due to current or past trauma Facet pain at the index level or adjacent segments as determined by a diagnostic medial branch block (a facet block injection is not acceptable for making this determination) to rule out facet joint involvement. Full thickness annular tears in the index level as determined by free flowing contrast media through the annulus fibrosis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roger Brown
Organizational Affiliation
Mesoblast, Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tennessee Valley Pain Consultants
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Pain Specialists
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians Research Group
City
Tempe
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85284-2604
Country
United States
Facility Name
TriWest Research Associates, LLC
City
El Cajon
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92020-4124
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Orthopaedics Surgical Group
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Newport Beach Headache and Pain
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Clinical Research
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91105
Country
United States
Facility Name
UC Davis Spine Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95816
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Pain Specialists
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90403
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Spine Institute
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Summit Pain Alliance
City
Santa Rosa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Integrated Pain Management
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94598
Country
United States
Facility Name
Denver Back Pain Specialists, LLC
City
Greenwood Village
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80111
Country
United States
Facility Name
George Washington University Medical Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Coastal Clinical Research Specialists
City
Fernandina Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shrock Orthopedic Research, LLC
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33316
Country
United States
Facility Name
Holy Cross Orthopedics Institute
City
Oakland Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory Orthopaedics & Spine Center
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30329
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Injury Care Medical Center
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Pain Center
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Otrimed Clinical Research
City
Edgewood
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Specialists of Louisiana
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
MAPS Applied Research Center
City
Shakopee
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55379
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innovative Pain Care Center
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89129
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Clinical Research
City
Somerset
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08873
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ainsworth Institute of Pain Management
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rochester Regional Health
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14626
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28204
Country
United States
Facility Name
On Site Clinical Solutions, LLC
City
Morrisville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28117
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Clinical Research/ Carolinas Pain Institute
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
DOC Clinical Research
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45432
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Investigations, LLC
City
Edmond
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73013
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopaedic and Spine Specialists
City
York
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17402
Country
United States
Facility Name
RI Hospital-Comprehensive Spine Center
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02903
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Pharmaceutical Research, Inc.
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Back Institute
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
Spine Team Texas
City
Southlake
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76092
Country
United States
Facility Name
Precision Spine Care
City
Tyler
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ericksen Research & Development, LLC
City
Bountiful
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84010
Country
United States
Facility Name
the SMART Clinic
City
Draper
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84020
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hope Research Institute
City
Saint George
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84790
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia iSpine Physicians, PC
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Monash Medical Center
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Rexlemestrocel-L Alone or Combined With Hyaluronic Acid in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs