Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment
Primary Purpose
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vitrectomy
Pneumatic retinopexy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment focused on measuring Retinal detachment, Pneumatic retinopexy, Vitrectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients presenting with acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
- Single retinal break OR group of breaks no larger than one clock hour (30°)
- All break/s in detached retina between 8-4 o'clock
- No significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inferior breaks in detached retina
- Inability to read English language
- Age < 18 years
- Mental incapacity
- Previous vitrectomy (index eye)
- Previous retinal detachment (index eye)
- Inability to maintain the post-operative posturing
- Inability to carry out detailed examination of peripheral retina due to media opacity
Sites / Locations
- Department of Ophthalmology, St Michael's Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Vitrectomy
Pneumatic retinopexy
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Visual acuity
Secondary Outcome Measures
Visual acuity
Subjective visual function
Questionnaire
Anatomical success (complete retinal re-attachment)
Subjective health related quality of life
Questionnaire
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01639209
Brief Title
Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment
Official Title
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Retinal Detachment; Anatomical Success, Functional Success and Impact on Patient Quality of Life
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Unity Health Toronto
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to compare the outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy with the outcomes of vitrectomy (with or without scleral buckle) for the management of retinal detachment, in terms of anatomical success, functional success and impact on patient quality of life.
Detailed Description
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD)is an acute, sight threatening condition, with an incidence of approximately 10 per 100,000 population. Both of the treatments under investigation are widely used and accepted by vitreoretinal surgeons, but randomised, prospective comparison of the two techniques has not been reported in the scientific literature to date. Currently, the management decisions surrounding primary retinal detachment are grounded on a weak evidence base. The findings of this study will allow vitreoretinal surgeons and their patients to select the most appropriate intervention for that individual, in an informed and holistic manner.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment
Keywords
Retinal detachment, Pneumatic retinopexy, Vitrectomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
176 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Vitrectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Pneumatic retinopexy
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Vitrectomy
Intervention Description
Pars plana vitrectomy plus laser/cryotherapy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pneumatic retinopexy
Intervention Description
Pneumatic retinopexy plus laser/cryotherapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual acuity
Time Frame
12 months post intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual acuity
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post intervention
Title
Subjective visual function
Description
Questionnaire
Time Frame
3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
Title
Anatomical success (complete retinal re-attachment)
Time Frame
3, 6 and 12 months post intervention
Title
Subjective health related quality of life
Description
Questionnaire
Time Frame
Baseline and 1 month post intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients presenting with acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
Single retinal break OR group of breaks no larger than one clock hour (30°)
All break/s in detached retina between 8-4 o'clock
No significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy
Exclusion Criteria:
Inferior breaks in detached retina
Inability to read English language
Age < 18 years
Mental incapacity
Previous vitrectomy (index eye)
Previous retinal detachment (index eye)
Inability to maintain the post-operative posturing
Inability to carry out detailed examination of peripheral retina due to media opacity
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rajeev H Muni, FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roxane J Hillier, FRCOphth
Organizational Affiliation
St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Ophthalmology, St Michael's Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5C 2T2
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35953261
Citation
Bansal A, Lee WW, Sarraf D, Sadda SR, Berger AR, Wong DT, Kertes PJ, Kohly RP, Hillier RJ, Muni RH. Persistent subfoveal fluid in pneumatic retinopexy versus pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: posthoc analysis of the PIVOT randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 11:bjophthalmol-2021-320981. doi: 10.1136/bjo-2021-320981. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33885738
Citation
Muni RH, Felfeli T, Sadda SR, Juncal VR, Francisconi CLM, Nittala MG, Lindenberg S, Gunnemann F, Berger AR, Wong DT, Altomare F, Giavedoni LR, Kohly RP, Kertes PJ, Sarraf D, Hillier RJ. Postoperative Photoreceptor Integrity Following Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair: A Post Hoc Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis From the Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 1;139(6):620-627. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0803. Erratum In: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun 1;139(6):679.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32556156
Citation
Muni RH, Francisconi CLM, Felfeli T, Mak MYK, Berger AR, Wong DT, Altomare F, Giavedoni LR, Kohly RP, Kertes PJ, Figueiredo N, Zuo F, Thorpe KE, Hillier RJ. Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Vitrectomy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Post Hoc Exploratory Analysis of the PIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):826-833. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2007.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs