search
Back to results

Point of Care Testing Using FebriDx in Primary Care: a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (PREFIX)

Primary Purpose

Lower Resp Tract Infection

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
FebriDx
Sponsored by
University of Southampton
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Lower Resp Tract Infection

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lower respiratory tract infection (defined as in previous studies as an acute cough as the predominant symptom, judged by the GP to be infective in origin, lasting <21 days, and with other symptoms or signs localising to the lower respiratory tract (shortness of breath, sputum, chest pain). This is a definition which we have used in previous studies (22)
  • The clinician has decided that they are likely to prescribe antibiotics in the absence of further diagnostic testing
  • The patient is at the surgery or willing to attend the surgery for a face-to-face assessment
  • The patient (or their parent or legal guardian) can follow the study procedures and is willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have taken antibiotics within the last 30 days
  • Participant (or their parent/guardian) unable to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Other

    Arm Label

    Febridx

    Arm Description

    Undergo FebriDx testing

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Recruitment rate
    The proportion of patients recruited as compared to the number invited to participate
    Antibiotic prescription rate at study visit
    The proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics at the study visit
    Antibiotic prescription rate over entire study period
    The proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics within 30 days of recruitment
    Test failure rate
    The proportion of Febridx tests which fail to provide a valid result
    Ease-of-use scores
    The average ease-of-use score for the device as determined by users. Each user will be asked to grade the device according to a modified US Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) categorisation criteria Within each of the 11 categories, a score of '1' indicates the lowest level of complexity, and the score of '3' indicates the highest level, to derive a measure of complexity (total score range 1 - 33)
    Subsequent healthcare contacts
    The proportion of patients undergoing subsequent healthcare contact
    Subsequent serious complication rate
    The proportion of patients undergoing significant complications (sepsis, ITU admission, or death)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    FebriDx sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of viral infection
    FebriDx sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of viral infection, as determined by comparison of FebriDx result with nasopharyngeal swab analysis by gold-standard viral PCR

    Full Information

    First Posted
    June 8, 2022
    Last Updated
    September 7, 2022
    Sponsor
    University of Southampton
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05534555
    Brief Title
    Point of Care Testing Using FebriDx in Primary Care: a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
    Acronym
    PREFIX
    Official Title
    Point of Care Testing Using FebriDx to Improve Antibiotic Use for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care: a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    October 2022 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    October 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    October 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Southampton

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This is a mixed-methods, multi-centre feasibility study. Formal advice and peer-review with regards to study design was sought from the Southampton Research Design Service (RDS), the NIHR CRN Wessex, and patient contributors during the development of the grant application. We will recruit up to ten GP practices, each given 20-40 FebriDx tests (300 in total). Up to four clinicians per practice will be trained to use the test. A sequential explanatory approach to data collection will be taken (21), with quantitative data analysis in stage one, followed by qualitative interviews with the study's practice participants in stage two.
    Detailed Description
    It can be difficult to tell the difference between viral and bacterial infections. Many patients are therefore prescribed antibiotics unnecessarily. Overuse of antibiotics is leading to a crisis of 'antibiotic resistance', where antibiotics no longer work for some infections. FebriDx ® is a new hand-held test that uses a 'finger-prick' of blood, and within 10 minutes, provides a result that can help clinicians decide whether an infection is likely to be caused by a virus or bacteria. This could help clinicians decide when antibiotics are needed, but the test has not been adequately tested in primary care. We would like to do a future study to test whether FebriDx can safely reduce antibiotic prescriptions in primary care. However, before we do this, we need to do a smaller 'feasibility' study to explore how easy to use the FebriDx test is and, what GPs and patients think of the test, and to help us design a larger future study. Aims Explore whether FebriDx could reduce the use of antibiotics for chest infections in primary care. Explore how feasible it would be to do a large research study in the future using FebriDx Methods We will recruit up to ten GP practices, each given 20-40 FebriDx tests (300 total). Stage one Patients with a chest infection will be invited to participate if their clinician has decided that they are likely to prescribe antibiotics. Following consent, the clinician will record some basic information about the patient, and the patient will undergo the FebriDx test. The clinician will then record whether or not they prescribed antibiotics and if they think the test had an effect on their decision. Patients will also undergo an optional nasopharyngeal swab. Stage two Clinicians and patients will be interviewed on how useful they think FebriDx testing is, and how they think we should design a larger future study.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Lower Resp Tract Infection

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    300 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Febridx
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Undergo FebriDx testing
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    FebriDx
    Intervention Description
    Testing of finger-prick blood sample using FebriDx
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Recruitment rate
    Description
    The proportion of patients recruited as compared to the number invited to participate
    Time Frame
    Six months
    Title
    Antibiotic prescription rate at study visit
    Description
    The proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics at the study visit
    Time Frame
    At study visit (baseline)
    Title
    Antibiotic prescription rate over entire study period
    Description
    The proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics within 30 days of recruitment
    Time Frame
    Within 30 days of recruitment
    Title
    Test failure rate
    Description
    The proportion of Febridx tests which fail to provide a valid result
    Time Frame
    After FebriDx use (baseline)
    Title
    Ease-of-use scores
    Description
    The average ease-of-use score for the device as determined by users. Each user will be asked to grade the device according to a modified US Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) categorisation criteria Within each of the 11 categories, a score of '1' indicates the lowest level of complexity, and the score of '3' indicates the highest level, to derive a measure of complexity (total score range 1 - 33)
    Time Frame
    Six months
    Title
    Subsequent healthcare contacts
    Description
    The proportion of patients undergoing subsequent healthcare contact
    Time Frame
    Within 30 days of recruitment
    Title
    Subsequent serious complication rate
    Description
    The proportion of patients undergoing significant complications (sepsis, ITU admission, or death)
    Time Frame
    Within 30 days of recruitment
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    FebriDx sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of viral infection
    Description
    FebriDx sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for diagnosis of viral infection, as determined by comparison of FebriDx result with nasopharyngeal swab analysis by gold-standard viral PCR
    Time Frame
    Within one year

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    1 Year
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Lower respiratory tract infection (defined as in previous studies as an acute cough as the predominant symptom, judged by the GP to be infective in origin, lasting <21 days, and with other symptoms or signs localising to the lower respiratory tract (shortness of breath, sputum, chest pain). This is a definition which we have used in previous studies (22) The clinician has decided that they are likely to prescribe antibiotics in the absence of further diagnostic testing The patient is at the surgery or willing to attend the surgery for a face-to-face assessment The patient (or their parent or legal guardian) can follow the study procedures and is willing to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients who have taken antibiotics within the last 30 days Participant (or their parent/guardian) unable to provide informed consent
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Christopher Wilcox
    Phone
    02380591759
    Email
    christopher.wilcox@soton.ac.uk
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Nick Francis
    Email
    Nick.francis@soton.ac.uk
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Christopher Wilcox
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Southampton
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Point of Care Testing Using FebriDx in Primary Care: a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs