search
Back to results

PooR Embryo Yield Cleavage Stage Versus blaStocyst Embryo Transfer (Pilot) (PRECiSE)

Primary Purpose

Infertility

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
day 3 uterine transfer
day 5 uterine transfer
Sponsored by
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring cleavage embryo, blastocyst, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 44 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First autologous IVF cycle
  • Written, informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned gestational carrier
  • Planned donor egg
  • Morbid obesity: BMI >40
  • History of recurrent pregnancy loss (≥2 spontaneous abortions)
  • Presence of uterine factor infertility
  • Treatment plan includes embryos cultured 'out of protocol'
  • Planned preimplantation genetic testing

Sites / Locations

  • Boston IVF

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

day 3 embryo transfer

day 5 embryo transfer

Arm Description

embryo transfer 3 days after fertilization

embryo transfer 5 days after fertilization

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

live birth
defined as delivery of a live born infant ≥22 weeks of gestation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical pregnancy
defined by confirmation of a gestational sac on ultrasound
Ongoing pregnancy
defined by ultrasound confirmation of a gestational sac with at least one fetal pole with a fetal heartbeat
Multiple pregnancy
defined as twins or higher-order gestations
Time to pregnancy/live birth

Full Information

First Posted
December 4, 2018
Last Updated
January 3, 2023
Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
Boston IVF
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03764865
Brief Title
PooR Embryo Yield Cleavage Stage Versus blaStocyst Embryo Transfer (Pilot)
Acronym
PRECiSE
Official Title
Day 3 vs Day 5 Embryo Transfer for Patients With Low Embryo Numbers Going Through in Vitro Fertilization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Collaborators
Boston IVF

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot study is to test the study protocol for an RCT comparing IVF outcomes between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in patients with five or fewer embryos in a fresh embryo transfer in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Information derived from this RCTwould allow us to maximize the chances of success for these patients undergoing IVF.
Detailed Description
Embryos created with assisted reproductive technology (ART, e.g. in vitro fertilization (IVF)) are commonly transferred into a woman's uterus at either the cleavage stage (day 3 after egg retrieval) or blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval). Until recently, most IVF cycles transferred embryos at the cleavage stage. However, with improvements in in vitro culture technique there has been a steady shift in practice to transfer embryos at the blastocyst stage (day 5 after egg retrieval) as this timing is about the same as when embryos reach the endometrial cavity in natural conception. There now is a general consensus that, for good prognosis patients, those with a high embryo from the IVF cycle, it is beneficial to transfer the embryo on day 5 rather than day 3. The rationale for this is to allow for self-selection of embryos, meaning those that develop to blastocyst in vitro are more likely to be viable in vivo and result in a viable pregnancy. In addition, transferring an embryo on day 5 improves uterine/embryonic synchronicity and thereby improves outcomes. This allows the transfer of fewer embryos and decreases the likelihood of multiples (twins, triplets, etc.). As a result, day 5 transfer has become standard of care for good prognosis patients in the United States. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine1 issued a committee opinion in 2013 to this effect stating that in "good prognosis" patients, blastocyst transfer results in a significant increase in live birth rates compared to transfer of an equal number of cleavage stage embryos (50.5% vs. 30.1%, P< .01)2-5. In addition, for unselected and poor prognosis patients, no high-quality studies have evaluated whether blastocyst transfer increases live birth rates when compared to cleavage stage transfer. It is possible that the attrition of day 3 embryos in vivo is lower than the attrition in vitro and that day 5 transfer leads to loss of embryos that may have survived in vivo. In addition, women undergoing blastocyst culture are expected to have a higher incidence of cycle cancellation due to failure of the embryo to develop to a blastocyst6 and of having fewer embryos cryopreserved (frozen)7. Because of this, in Europe and Asia, day 3 transfer is the most common practice. On the other hand, transferring embryos on day 3 decreases our ability to select the best embryo, increases laboratory costs and may increase multiple pregnancy rates as, typically, more embryos are transferred at this time. In addition, in vivo, day 3 embryos are in transit through the fallopian tube during natural conception and are exposed to a different developmental and nutritional environment than day 3 IVF embryos transferred into the uterine cavity. Thus, it is possible that exposing day 3 embryos to the physiologically premature uterine environment (particularly one that has been subjected to superovulation and thus high levels of estrogen) increases embryo attrition compared to day 5 transfer, particularly in poor prognosis patients. Therefore, a clinical dilemma exists for poor prognosis patients (those with ≤5 embryos available on day 1 after egg retrieval). Currently, many practices in the United States transfer embryos from these patients on day 3 due to the risk of not having embryos available to transfer on day 5. Any remaining embryos are then frozen if they meet criteria on day 5/6. Retrospective data from Boston IVF, BIDMC's affiliated infertility treatment center, demonstrates that the live birth rate per transfer among poor prognosis patients is 18% among those who have a cleavage stage transfer and 38% among those who have a blastocyst transfer. At Boston IVF, about 35% of patients have a day 3 embryo transfer, which is consistent with national trends. For a patient undergoing an IVF cycle at Boston IVF, a physician may choose to transfer an embryo on day 3 or day 5 or allow the laboratory to make that decision, based on the number of embryos the patient has on day 1 after egg retrieval and the patient's age. This decision typically is made prior to the IVF cycle. As demonstrated above, pregnancy rates are far lower in the cleavage stage transfer group and there is the possibility that, within a select cohort of these patients, we are unrealistically raising patient's expectations of a live birth. The purpose of this study is to compare IVF outcomes among poor prognosis patients (≤5 embryos with two pronuclei) who have a day 3 transfer to those who have a day 5 transfer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infertility
Keywords
cleavage embryo, blastocyst, embryo transfer, in vitro fertilization

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
non-inferiority
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
day 3 embryo transfer
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
embryo transfer 3 days after fertilization
Arm Title
day 5 embryo transfer
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
embryo transfer 5 days after fertilization
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
day 3 uterine transfer
Intervention Description
uterine transfer of embryo on day 3 after fertilization (cleavage stage)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
day 5 uterine transfer
Intervention Description
uterine transfer of embryo on day 5 after fertilization (blastocyst stage)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
live birth
Description
defined as delivery of a live born infant ≥22 weeks of gestation
Time Frame
9 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical pregnancy
Description
defined by confirmation of a gestational sac on ultrasound
Time Frame
14 days
Title
Ongoing pregnancy
Description
defined by ultrasound confirmation of a gestational sac with at least one fetal pole with a fetal heartbeat
Time Frame
9 months
Title
Multiple pregnancy
Description
defined as twins or higher-order gestations
Time Frame
9 months
Title
Time to pregnancy/live birth
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
44 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: First autologous IVF cycle Written, informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Planned gestational carrier Planned donor egg Morbid obesity: BMI >40 History of recurrent pregnancy loss (≥2 spontaneous abortions) Presence of uterine factor infertility Treatment plan includes embryos cultured 'out of protocol' Planned preimplantation genetic testing
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Werner Neuhausser, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Boston IVF
City
Waltham
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02451
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23714439
Citation
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinical-assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013 Mar 1;99(3):667-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.01.087.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9886530
Citation
Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3434-40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27357126
Citation
Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16055454
Citation
Papanikolaou EG, D'haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3198-203. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei217. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16540614
Citation
Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1139-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053524.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10593377
Citation
Marek D, Langley M, Gardner DK, Confer N, Doody KM, Doody KJ. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril. 1999 Dec;72(6):1035-40. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00409-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9886498
Citation
Tsirigotis M. Blastocyst stage transfer: pitfalls and benefits. Too soon to abandon current practice? Hum Reprod. 1998 Dec;13(12):3285-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3285. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32000803
Citation
Neuhausser WM, Vaughan DA, Sakkas D, Hacker MR, Toth T, Penzias A. Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECiSE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0870-y.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

PooR Embryo Yield Cleavage Stage Versus blaStocyst Embryo Transfer (Pilot)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs