search
Back to results

Positive Affect as a Source of Resilience for Adults in Chronic Pain (LARKSPUR)

Primary Purpose

Geriatric, Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LARKSPUR
Sponsored by
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Geriatric

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Access to daily internet
  • ≥ 50 years of age
  • Able to read and understand English
  • Physician diagnosis confirmation of FMS AND/OR Score ≥ 13 on the 6-item, self-report fibromyalgia screening tool
  • Report having pain for at least the last three months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment
  • Current behavioral treatment for pain
  • Enrolled in another pain study

Sites / Locations

  • NewYork-Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

LARKSPUR intervention

Attention Control Condition

Arm Description

Lessons in Affect Regulation to Keep Stress and Pain UndeR control

Daily emotion reporting/no intervention

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recruitment as Measured by Rates of Enrollment (Aim 1)
Percent enrolled of total eligible participants.
Retention as Measured by Change in Enrollment
Percentage enrolled at baseline that completed the post-intervention assessment.
Helpfulness, Satisfaction, and Impact as Assessed by Self-Report Participant Feedback Survey (Aim 1)
The feedback survey collected two Likert-scale questions asking whether the participant recommends the intervention: (1) "Would you recommend LARKSPUR to a friend?" and (2) "Would you recommend LARKSPUR to someone else with chronic pain?". Both questions were measured on an 11-point scale, with 0=Definitely Not to 10=Definitely Yes. Higher scores indicate better outcomes for both questions. The two items were analyzed separately, not combined.
Length of Intervention Time as Measured by Number of Weeks to Complete Intervention (Aim 1)
Length of Intervention time as measured by number of weeks the participant took to complete the LARKSPUR intervention program.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in FMS Pain as Measured by PROMIS Pain Intensity - Short Form 3a (Aim 2)
Pain intensity T-scores measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Intensity - Short Form 3a. This 3-item instrument assesses how much a person hurts. The first two items assess pain intensity over a 7-day recall period; the last item asks patients to rate their pain intensity "right now." Respondents report their pain on a 5-point scale: 1=Had no pain, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, 5=Very severe. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 36.3 to 81.8. Lower T-scores represent better outcomes.
Change in FMS Pain as Measured by PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b (Aim 2)
Pain interference T-scores measured by PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b. This 6-item instrument measures self-reported impact of pain on a person's life and extent that pain may interfere with engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities over a 7-day recall period. Respondents report pain interference on a 5-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, and 5=Very much. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 41.0 to 78.3. Lower T-scores represent better outcomes.
Change in Physical Functioning as Measured by PROMIS Physical Functioning Short Form 10a (Aim 2)
Physical function T-scores measured by PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a. This 10-item instrument assesses a patient's abilities and limitations with respect to everyday physical activities. Respondents report limitations on a 5-point scale: 5=Not at all, ..., 3=Somewhat, ..., 1=Cannot do, and abilities to perform activities on a 5-point scale: 5=Without any difficulty, ..., 3=With some difficulty, ..., 1=Unable to do. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 13.5 to 61.9. Higher T-scores represent better outcomes.
Change in Physical Functioning as Measured by PROMIS Fatigue - Short Form 6a (Aim 2)
Fatigue T-scores measured by PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a. This 6-item instrument assesses a patient's a patient's level of fatigue over a 7-day recall period. Respondents report fatigue on a 5-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 33.4 to 76.8. Lower T-scores represent better outcomes.
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R-10) (Aim 2)
The 10-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) asks for participants to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a 4-point scale: 0=Rarely or None of the time, 1=Some or Little of the time, 2=Moderately or Much of the time, 3=Most or Almost all the time. CESD-R-10 mean scores range from 0 (rare depressive symptoms) to 4 (depressive symptoms most or almost all the time).
Change in Positive Affect as Measured by the Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) (Aim 2)
The modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) is a 20-item instrument that measures the extent to which a patient has experienced positive and negative emotions over a chosen time frame; in the version used in this study, we ask for emotions over the past 7 days. Respondents are asked to report the greatest amount of a given emotion on a five-point scale: 0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Moderately, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely. mDES mean scores range from 0 (not at all experienced positive emotion) to 4 (extremely positive emotion).
Change in Positive Affect as Measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-GEN) (Aim 2)
The 20-item self-report Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-GEN) asks participants to describe to what extent they feel different feelings and emotions on average. Respondents answer on a five-point scale: 0=Very slightly or not at all, 1=A little, 2=Moderately, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely. PANAS-GEN mean scores range from 0 (very slightly or not at all positive affect) to 4 (extremely positive affect).
Change in Stress Appraisal as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (Aim 2)
The 10-item version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) assesses the perception of stress over the previous month. Respondents report how often they have experienced perceived stress on a five-point scale: 0=Never, 1=Almost never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Fairly often, 4=Very often. PSS mean scores range from 0 (experienced no or minimal stress) to 4 (experienced very frequent stress).

Full Information

First Posted
April 10, 2021
Last Updated
April 7, 2023
Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Cornell University, Wake Forest University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04869345
Brief Title
Positive Affect as a Source of Resilience for Adults in Chronic Pain
Acronym
LARKSPUR
Official Title
Feasibility of a Positive Affect Skills Intervention for Reducing Racial Disparities in Pain Management
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 27, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 9, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 9, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Cornell University, Wake Forest University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is a chronic musculoskeletal condition characterized by widespread pain and tenderness, and often accompanied by impaired physical functioning, depressed mood, as well as deficits in positive affect (PA).Standard behavioral therapies typically focus on minimizing negative thoughts and emotions associated with pain and yield only modest treatment effects. Efforts are therefore needed to develop more effective psychological treatments for chronic pain by identifying new targets for intervention. The objectives of this Stage I randomized pilot trial are to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and the impact of a previously developed online positive affect (PA) skills intervention -LARKSPUR (Lessons in Affect Regulation to Keep Stress and Pain UndeR control)-in a sample of Hispanic, non-Hispanic other, and non-Hispanic African American patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
Detailed Description
Specific Aims: Aim 1: To maximize relevance and acceptability of content and delivery of LARKSPUR intervention among patients with FMS, a chronic pain population with known deficits in PA. This aim will establish the feasibility (recruitment and retention) and acceptability (helpfulness, satisfaction, and impact) of the multicomponent LARKSPUR intervention in Hispanic, non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic other patients with FMS. Aim 2: To conduct a randomized pilot trial to evaluate the impact of the LARKSPUR intervention in FMS pain (primary outcome), as well PA, depressive symptoms, physical functioning, and stress appraisals (secondary outcomes) and Aim 2a: explore racial/ethnic disparities. For Aim 1, the study team will pilot LARKSPUR to examine feasibility and acceptability of the intervention framework by conducting frequency and descriptive statistics for enrollment rates, number of sessions completed, number of weeks required to complete the intervention, and Likert-scale items assessing satisfaction with the intervention and perceived helpfulness. For Aims 2, FMS patients (target N=90) will be randomized to receive the LARKSPUR content online or to complete daily emotion reports online (control). The researchers hypothesize that intervention participants will report more frequent PA, decreased depressive symptoms, enhanced physical functioning, improved stress appraisals, and reduced FMS pain (intensity and interference) immediately following the intervention (approximately 6-8 wks) and at 1-month post-intervention.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Geriatric, Chronic Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
95 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
LARKSPUR intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Lessons in Affect Regulation to Keep Stress and Pain UndeR control
Arm Title
Attention Control Condition
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Daily emotion reporting/no intervention
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
LARKSPUR
Intervention Description
This intervention used in our prior research consists of skills training exercises designed to increase the frequency of positive affect. The 6 week intervention (5 weeks of content plus one week of home practice) consists of five components: (1) Positive events and gratitude; (2) mindfulness; (3) reappraisal; (4) strength and goals; and(5) acts of kindness. Participants will have up to 8 weeks to complete this intervention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment as Measured by Rates of Enrollment (Aim 1)
Description
Percent enrolled of total eligible participants.
Time Frame
At baseline
Title
Retention as Measured by Change in Enrollment
Description
Percentage enrolled at baseline that completed the post-intervention assessment.
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention)
Title
Helpfulness, Satisfaction, and Impact as Assessed by Self-Report Participant Feedback Survey (Aim 1)
Description
The feedback survey collected two Likert-scale questions asking whether the participant recommends the intervention: (1) "Would you recommend LARKSPUR to a friend?" and (2) "Would you recommend LARKSPUR to someone else with chronic pain?". Both questions were measured on an 11-point scale, with 0=Definitely Not to 10=Definitely Yes. Higher scores indicate better outcomes for both questions. The two items were analyzed separately, not combined.
Time Frame
At week 11 (post-intervention)
Title
Length of Intervention Time as Measured by Number of Weeks to Complete Intervention (Aim 1)
Description
Length of Intervention time as measured by number of weeks the participant took to complete the LARKSPUR intervention program.
Time Frame
At week 11 (post-intervention)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in FMS Pain as Measured by PROMIS Pain Intensity - Short Form 3a (Aim 2)
Description
Pain intensity T-scores measured by PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Pain Intensity - Short Form 3a. This 3-item instrument assesses how much a person hurts. The first two items assess pain intensity over a 7-day recall period; the last item asks patients to rate their pain intensity "right now." Respondents report their pain on a 5-point scale: 1=Had no pain, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, 5=Very severe. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 36.3 to 81.8. Lower T-scores represent better outcomes.
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in FMS Pain as Measured by PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b (Aim 2)
Description
Pain interference T-scores measured by PROMIS Pain Interference - Short Form 6b. This 6-item instrument measures self-reported impact of pain on a person's life and extent that pain may interfere with engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities over a 7-day recall period. Respondents report pain interference on a 5-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, and 5=Very much. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 41.0 to 78.3. Lower T-scores represent better outcomes.
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Physical Functioning as Measured by PROMIS Physical Functioning Short Form 10a (Aim 2)
Description
Physical function T-scores measured by PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a. This 10-item instrument assesses a patient's abilities and limitations with respect to everyday physical activities. Respondents report limitations on a 5-point scale: 5=Not at all, ..., 3=Somewhat, ..., 1=Cannot do, and abilities to perform activities on a 5-point scale: 5=Without any difficulty, ..., 3=With some difficulty, ..., 1=Unable to do. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 13.5 to 61.9. Higher T-scores represent better outcomes.
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Physical Functioning as Measured by PROMIS Fatigue - Short Form 6a (Aim 2)
Description
Fatigue T-scores measured by PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a. This 6-item instrument assesses a patient's a patient's level of fatigue over a 7-day recall period. Respondents report fatigue on a 5-point scale: 1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=Somewhat, 4=Quite a bit, 5=Very much. In the general population, T-scores have a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, and range from 33.4 to 76.8. Lower T-scores represent better outcomes.
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R-10) (Aim 2)
Description
The 10-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) asks for participants to rate how often over the past week they experienced symptoms associated with depression on a 4-point scale: 0=Rarely or None of the time, 1=Some or Little of the time, 2=Moderately or Much of the time, 3=Most or Almost all the time. CESD-R-10 mean scores range from 0 (rare depressive symptoms) to 4 (depressive symptoms most or almost all the time).
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Positive Affect as Measured by the Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) (Aim 2)
Description
The modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) is a 20-item instrument that measures the extent to which a patient has experienced positive and negative emotions over a chosen time frame; in the version used in this study, we ask for emotions over the past 7 days. Respondents are asked to report the greatest amount of a given emotion on a five-point scale: 0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Moderately, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely. mDES mean scores range from 0 (not at all experienced positive emotion) to 4 (extremely positive emotion).
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Positive Affect as Measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-GEN) (Aim 2)
Description
The 20-item self-report Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS-GEN) asks participants to describe to what extent they feel different feelings and emotions on average. Respondents answer on a five-point scale: 0=Very slightly or not at all, 1=A little, 2=Moderately, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely. PANAS-GEN mean scores range from 0 (very slightly or not at all positive affect) to 4 (extremely positive affect).
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Stress Appraisal as Measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (Aim 2)
Description
The 10-item version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) assesses the perception of stress over the previous month. Respondents report how often they have experienced perceived stress on a five-point scale: 0=Never, 1=Almost never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Fairly often, 4=Very often. PSS mean scores range from 0 (experienced no or minimal stress) to 4 (experienced very frequent stress).
Time Frame
At baseline; at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in Affective Reactivity to Stress as Measured by the Daily Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES)
Description
Positive affective reactivity measured by the modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES). Upon completion of each study assessment, participants completed the mDES daily for one week, for a total of three 7-day-long periods. The mDES is a 20-item instrument that measures the extent to which a patient has experienced positive (10 items) and negative (10 items) emotions over a chosen time frame; in the version used in this survey, we ask for emotions over the past 24 hours. Respondents are asked to report the greatest amount of positive affect on a five-point scale: 0=Not at all, 1=A little bit, 2=Moderately, 3=Quite a bit, 4=Extremely. mDES mean scores were computed over the 10 items, ranging from 0 (not at all positive) to 4 (extremely positive).
Time Frame
At baseline, at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)
Title
Change in Affective Reactivity to Stress as Measured by the Daily Inventory of Stressful Events (DISE)
Description
Affective reactivity to stress measured by the Daily Inventory of Stressful Events (DISE). Upon completion of each study assessment, patients completed the DISE daily for one week, for a total of three 7-day-long periods. The DISE is a 7-item self-report instrument in which participants report whether stressful events (argument, work or school stress, home stress, discrimination, close friend stress, other stressors) have occurred within the past 24 hours, indicating "yes" or "no" accordingly for each item. Item scores are averaged, ranging from 0=no stress to 1=highest stress. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Time Frame
At baseline, at week 11 (post-intervention); at week 16 (1 month post intervention)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Access to daily internet ≥ 50 years of age Able to read and understand English Physician diagnosis confirmation of FMS AND/OR Score ≥ 13 on the 6-item, self-report fibromyalgia screening tool Report having pain for at least the last three months Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive impairment Current behavioral treatment for pain Enrolled in another pain study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anthony Ong, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Cornell University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cary Reid, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
NewYork-Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medicine
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Reduced, de-identified data sets containing data collected from patients, will be made available for secondary use at the National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA), a division of ICPSR at the University of Michigan. NACDA is a repository of survey data on aging that has hundreds of social science research data sets available that are drawn from NIA-funded surveys and data collection efforts. NACDA has established protocols for contributors to reliably de-identify survey participants, regardless of whether they have been assembled as part of national random sample surveys or specialized registry data collection efforts. External users may be asked to provide study aims, variables requested, analytic plans, and targeted journals in their data use requests. They will also be asked to not attempt to re-identify participants, either by merging in administrative, census, medical, or other data, or by using a software program that might re-identify participants.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35964867
Citation
Ong AD, Moskowitz JT, Wethington E, Addington EL, Sanni M, Goktas S, Sluys E, Swong S, Kim P, Reid MC. Lessons in Affect Regulation to Keep Stress and Pain UndeR control (LARKSPUR): Design of a randomized controlled trial to increase positive affect in middle-aged and older adults with fibromyalgia. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Sep;120:106880. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106880. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35964867/
Description
This manuscript describes the study design and anticipated analyses for this trial.

Learn more about this trial

Positive Affect as a Source of Resilience for Adults in Chronic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs