Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery
Primary Purpose
Breast Cancer, Mastectomy, Perfusion; Complications
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PlasmaBlade 3.0S
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast cancer, Mastectomy, Perfusion, Hemostasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 18-75 years.
- Choose bilateral mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.
- Have no inflammatory breast cancers.
- Have not had radiotherapy before mastectomy.
- Understand the study purpose, requirements, and risks.
- Be able and willing to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active connective tissue disease.
- History of, or plan to undergo irradiation of the breasts.
Sites / Locations
- Bayview Medical Center
- Johns Hopkins Hospital Outpatient Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Breast flap creation with PlasmaBlade
Breast flap creation with Bovie Cautery
Arm Description
During participant's scheduled bilateral mastectomy, breast flap on one breast will be created using low thermal dissection device (PlasmaBlade) on one breast and standard Bovie cautery in the contralateral breast.
During participant's scheduled bilateral mastectomy, breast flap will be created using standard Bovie cautery on the breast contralateral to the one that was created using PlasmaBlade.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Perfusion
Plastic surgeon objectively assesses degree of perfusion with the SPY Perfusion Assessment system (intra-operative fluorescence imaging system). Plastic surgeon describes perfusion as Left better than Right, Right better than Left, or both sides equally perfused.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Drainage
Patient records amount of drainage (in cc's) from each drain until drain is removed by plastic surgeon.
Pain Scores
Patient records pains scores using Visual Analog Scale (10cm long line upon which patients indicates level of pain)for each side at Day 1, 2, 3, 7, and 30. Scores range from 0-10. Score of 0 corresponds with 0 cm on the line and 10 corresponds with 10cm on the line. 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates most severe pain.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03711916
First Posted
October 17, 2018
Last Updated
June 17, 2019
Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Collaborators
Medtronic
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03711916
Brief Title
Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery
Official Title
Pilot Study: Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery for Mastectomy Breast Flap Creation With Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 17, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 24, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 3, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Collaborators
Medtronic
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Low thermal dissection devices have been introduced as a tool to improve surgical outcomes. PlasmaBlade, a low thermal dissection device, has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection device. Thus, low thermal devices would improve flap perfusion by decreasing the thermal injury resulted by the dissection. Looking into the use of low thermal devices in cases of mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction has not been documented. The aim of this study is to determine if there are clinical flap perfusion, surgical site drainage, and pain scores differences between mastectomy flaps created using low thermal dissection device and those done with the standard care of Bovie cautery in order to warrant a formal study.
Detailed Description
This is a single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing postoperative flap perfusion and surgical site drainage between patients randomized to breast flap creation by PlasmaBlade (low thermal dissection intervention) on one breast and by a Bovie cautery (Control) for the contralateral breast flap. Candidates will have elected to undergo bilateral post-mastectomy immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). Participants meeting inclusion criteria will be enrolled and baseline data collection completed prior to randomization and surgery.
Patients and the plastic surgeon will be blinded in regards to intervention randomization. Only the oncology surgeon has knowledge of which device used for each breast flap. However, after the plastic surgeon makes the assessment of the flap, he/she will be unblinded in order to complete the reconstruction procedure using the same dissection device on the same side it was used for in the mastectomy procedure. Patient-specific surgical details will be recorded intraoperatively. Following the surgery, post-operative flap perfusion will be recorded using SPY imaging system. Surgical site drainage will be measured until drainage removal. Post-operative pain (Visual Analog Scale for Pain) and the occurrence of adverse events will be recorded up until discharge and 30-days postoperative follow up visit.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer, Mastectomy, Perfusion; Complications, Hemostasis
Keywords
Breast cancer, Mastectomy, Perfusion, Hemostasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Breast flap creation with PlasmaBlade
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
During participant's scheduled bilateral mastectomy, breast flap on one breast will be created using low thermal dissection device (PlasmaBlade) on one breast and standard Bovie cautery in the contralateral breast.
Arm Title
Breast flap creation with Bovie Cautery
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
During participant's scheduled bilateral mastectomy, breast flap will be created using standard Bovie cautery on the breast contralateral to the one that was created using PlasmaBlade.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PlasmaBlade 3.0S
Intervention Description
PlasmaBlade (Medtronic) is approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a low thermal dissection device that has shown to be associated with effective cutting, and significantly lower temperature than traditional electrosurgical dissection devices.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perfusion
Description
Plastic surgeon objectively assesses degree of perfusion with the SPY Perfusion Assessment system (intra-operative fluorescence imaging system). Plastic surgeon describes perfusion as Left better than Right, Right better than Left, or both sides equally perfused.
Time Frame
Day of Surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Drainage
Description
Patient records amount of drainage (in cc's) from each drain until drain is removed by plastic surgeon.
Time Frame
Up to 14 days post-operatively.
Title
Pain Scores
Description
Patient records pains scores using Visual Analog Scale (10cm long line upon which patients indicates level of pain)for each side at Day 1, 2, 3, 7, and 30. Scores range from 0-10. Score of 0 corresponds with 0 cm on the line and 10 corresponds with 10cm on the line. 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates most severe pain.
Time Frame
Days 1,2,3,7,30 Post-operatively
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Only enrolling women undergoing bilateral mastectomy
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Women aged 18-75 years.
Choose bilateral mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction.
Have no inflammatory breast cancers.
Have not had radiotherapy before mastectomy.
Understand the study purpose, requirements, and risks.
Be able and willing to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Active connective tissue disease.
History of, or plan to undergo irradiation of the breasts.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mehran Habibi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gedge D Rosson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Plastic, Reconstructive & Maxillofacial Surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bayview Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital Outpatient Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33742323
Citation
Habibi M, Prasath V, Dembinski R, Sacks JM, Rosson GD, Sebai ME, Mirkhaef S, Bello RJ, Siotos C, Broderick KP. Comparison of mastectomy and breast reconstruction outcomes using low thermal dissection versus traditional electrocautery: a blinded randomized trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jul;188(1):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06177-9. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Post-Operative Outcomes of Low Thermal Dissection vs. Traditional Electrosurgery
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs