search
Back to results

Prediction of Treatment Response at 6 Months by Combinatorial Analysis of Serum Biomarkers in Biotherapy Naive SpA (PRESHUM)

Primary Purpose

Spondylitis, Ankylosing

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adalimumab
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Grenoble
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Spondylitis, Ankylosing focused on measuring TNF inhibitor, Adalimumab, Spondyloarthritis, Biomarkers analysis, Personalized medicine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with spondyloarthritis validating ASAS or modified New York criteria for which adalimumab treatment is indicated, and performing the pre-biotherapy assessment;
  • Between 18 and 70 years old;
  • Biotherapy naive;
  • Who can be regularly monitored for 6 months;
  • Able to take all the treatment;
  • Effective contraception for patients of childbearing age (oral contraceptive, intrauterine device, implant, spermicide, surgical sterilization or abstinence) during the study and at least for 5 months after the last injection;
  • Able to read and understand the terms of the protocol;
  • Having dated and signed the informed consent form of the trial;
  • Affiliated to a social security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having a contraindication to an anti-TNF;
  • Surgical operation scheduled during the trial;
  • Having difficulty understanding the French language;
  • Having impaired upper functions (dementia of Alzheimer type, etc...);
  • Psycho-social instability incompatible with regular follow-up (homeless, addictive behavior, history of psychiatric pathology or any other comorbidity which would make a free and informed consent impossible or limit adherence to the protocol);
  • Having previously received a biotherapy. There is no other exclusion criteria taking into account prior therapies and the duration of these therapies;
  • Described in articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-8 of the Personal Status Code: pregnant, parturient and nursing women; persons in detention by judicial or administrative decision; adults subject to a legal protection order;
  • Already participating in interventional research.

Sites / Locations

  • CH de Belfort
  • CHU de Besançon
  • CHRU de Clermont-Ferrand
  • CHU de Saint-Etienne
  • CHU de Grenoble

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Adalimumab

Arm Description

Adalimumab is not the experimental study drug. This treatment justifies the inclusion of patients and is used in accordance with its marketing authorization. The patients will be seen as part of their follow-up consultation in Rheumatology. Modality of administration: The baseline visit should take place no more than 4 weeks before the start of adalimumab treatment, 40mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneously, in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics. At baseline and 6 months follow-up visits, a single blood draw for the biomarker dosage will be added to the standard patient health care follow-up. The clinical examination will also be performed at these two visits, and the clinical response will be assessed after 6 months of adalimumab treatment at M6 follow-up visit.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Measurement of disease activity: AS-DAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis - Disease Activity Score)
The primary endpoint is the clinically important ASAS response corresponding to a variation in ASDAS CRP ≥ 1.1.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Measurement of BASDAI response (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index)
The major clinical ASAS response corresponds to a variation in ASDAS CRP (C-reactive protein) ≥ 2,0 and the major clinical BASDAI 50 response. The BASDAI 50 response means an improvement of the BASDAI score by 50% or more. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in mg/l and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in mm at the first hour.
Biomarkers analysis for personalized medicine
Blood draw for selected biomarkers analysis (M0): the dosage data will be used to search for biomarkers associated with successful treatment in order to generate an algorithm predicting the response to adalimumab at 6 months, and to define the metrological properties on this cohort. Blood draw for selected biomarkers analysis (M6): we know little about the mechanisms underlying the effect of adalimumab treatment at 6 months in spondyloarthritis, particularly on the biomarker profile. In order to identify possible differences in the profile of selected biomarkers between patients treated with adalimumab at 6 months and biotherapy naive patients (at baseline) and to study the individual variations of the response to this treatment, blood samples will also be collected at 6 months. By using proteomic profiles, the analysis and the comparison of predictive factors at M0 and M6 could be very useful.

Full Information

First Posted
February 15, 2018
Last Updated
March 16, 2021
Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Collaborators
SINNOVIAL
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03561649
Brief Title
Prediction of Treatment Response at 6 Months by Combinatorial Analysis of Serum Biomarkers in Biotherapy Naive SpA
Acronym
PRESHUM
Official Title
Prediction of Adalimumab Treatment Response at 6 Months by Combinatorial Analysis of Serum Biomarkers in Biotherapy Naive Spondyloarthritis: Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 14, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 14, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 7, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Collaborators
SINNOVIAL

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main objective of this trial is to search for biomarkers associated with the success of adalimumab treatment in order to generate an algorithm to predict the response to this treatment at 6 months in spondyloarthritis and to define its metrological properties on this cohort. The algorithm will allow to better target patients who will have an important benefit/risk ratio for adalimumab treatment.
Detailed Description
The general prevalence of spondyloarthritis (SpA) is 0.5% of the Caucasian population and that of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is 0.3% in France. First-line treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is insufficiently effective in more than half of AS patients in hospitals. These patients are then treated with "anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha" (anti-TNFα). The use of these bio-drugs increasing each year, they become a significant public health and economic challenge. Their development is just beginning, because they are among the largest providers of pharmacy innovations. The two main cost-drivers appear to be, on the most advanced forms of inflammatory rheumatism, the use of appropriate care structures or services and surgery, especially knee and hip surgery. Among patients treated with biotherapy, clinical practice shows that about one-third (33%) will not respond to selected biopharmaceuticals as these biologics are often prescribed empirically, mainly because of the lack of criteria based on scientific evidence and availability of tools able to predict the response or non-response to these molecules. Until now, there is no algorithm which can predict the response to biotherapies like adalimumab. The aim of this trial is to search for biomarkers associated with the success of adalimumab treatment in order to generate an algorithm predicting the response to this treatment at 6 months for patients with SpA. This algorithm will be set up from patients' biological and clinical data available after 6 months of adalimumab treatment. A number of 50 patients seems to be statistically sufficient to assess the probability of response or non response to adalimumab in SA with the defined algorithm. A logistic regression model will be used by incorporating the set of available variables. Then it will be necessary to set up a validation study to determine the metrological properties of the algorithm on an independent cohort.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spondylitis, Ankylosing
Keywords
TNF inhibitor, Adalimumab, Spondyloarthritis, Biomarkers analysis, Personalized medicine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Adalimumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Adalimumab is not the experimental study drug. This treatment justifies the inclusion of patients and is used in accordance with its marketing authorization. The patients will be seen as part of their follow-up consultation in Rheumatology. Modality of administration: The baseline visit should take place no more than 4 weeks before the start of adalimumab treatment, 40mg every 2 weeks, subcutaneously, in accordance with Summary of Product Characteristics. At baseline and 6 months follow-up visits, a single blood draw for the biomarker dosage will be added to the standard patient health care follow-up. The clinical examination will also be performed at these two visits, and the clinical response will be assessed after 6 months of adalimumab treatment at M6 follow-up visit.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Adalimumab
Intervention Description
This trial will be conducted by rheumatologists who can follow patients with SpA and conduct this trial in good conditions and in accordance with regulatory and legal recommendations.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Measurement of disease activity: AS-DAS (Ankylosing Spondylitis - Disease Activity Score)
Description
The primary endpoint is the clinically important ASAS response corresponding to a variation in ASDAS CRP ≥ 1.1.
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Measurement of BASDAI response (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index)
Description
The major clinical ASAS response corresponds to a variation in ASDAS CRP (C-reactive protein) ≥ 2,0 and the major clinical BASDAI 50 response. The BASDAI 50 response means an improvement of the BASDAI score by 50% or more. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in mg/l and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in mm at the first hour.
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
Biomarkers analysis for personalized medicine
Description
Blood draw for selected biomarkers analysis (M0): the dosage data will be used to search for biomarkers associated with successful treatment in order to generate an algorithm predicting the response to adalimumab at 6 months, and to define the metrological properties on this cohort. Blood draw for selected biomarkers analysis (M6): we know little about the mechanisms underlying the effect of adalimumab treatment at 6 months in spondyloarthritis, particularly on the biomarker profile. In order to identify possible differences in the profile of selected biomarkers between patients treated with adalimumab at 6 months and biotherapy naive patients (at baseline) and to study the individual variations of the response to this treatment, blood samples will also be collected at 6 months. By using proteomic profiles, the analysis and the comparison of predictive factors at M0 and M6 could be very useful.
Time Frame
At baseline and 6 months later

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with spondyloarthritis validating ASAS or modified New York criteria for which adalimumab treatment is indicated, and performing the pre-biotherapy assessment; Between 18 and 70 years old; Biotherapy naive; Who can be regularly monitored for 6 months; Able to take all the treatment; Effective contraception for patients of childbearing age (oral contraceptive, intrauterine device, implant, spermicide, surgical sterilization or abstinence) during the study and at least for 5 months after the last injection; Able to read and understand the terms of the protocol; Having dated and signed the informed consent form of the trial; Affiliated to a social security scheme. Exclusion Criteria: Patients having a contraindication to an anti-TNF; Surgical operation scheduled during the trial; Having difficulty understanding the French language; Having impaired upper functions (dementia of Alzheimer type, etc...); Psycho-social instability incompatible with regular follow-up (homeless, addictive behavior, history of psychiatric pathology or any other comorbidity which would make a free and informed consent impossible or limit adherence to the protocol); Having previously received a biotherapy. There is no other exclusion criteria taking into account prior therapies and the duration of these therapies; Described in articles L.1121-5 to L.1121-8 of the Personal Status Code: pregnant, parturient and nursing women; persons in detention by judicial or administrative decision; adults subject to a legal protection order; Already participating in interventional research.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Athan BAILLET, MD, PHD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Grenoble
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CH de Belfort
City
Belfort
ZIP/Postal Code
90016
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Besançon
City
Besançon
ZIP/Postal Code
25030
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU de Clermont-Ferrand
City
Clermont-Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63003
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Saint-Etienne
City
Saint-Etienne
ZIP/Postal Code
42055
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU de Grenoble
City
Échirolles
ZIP/Postal Code
38434
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22272322
Citation
Aaltonen KJ, Virkki LM, Malmivaara A, Konttinen YT, Nordstrom DC, Blom M. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of existing TNF blocking agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030275. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12922954
Citation
Baeten D, Kruithof E, Van den Bosch F, Van den Bossche N, Herssens A, Mielants H, De Keyser F, Veys EM. Systematic safety follow up in a cohort of 107 patients with spondyloarthropathy treated with infliximab: a new perspective on the role of host defence in the pathogenesis of the disease? Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Sep;62(9):829-34. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.829.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20100792
Citation
Baillet A, Trocme C, Berthier S, Arlotto M, Grange L, Chenau J, Quetant S, Seve M, Berger F, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. Synovial fluid proteomic fingerprint: S100A8, S100A9 and S100A12 proteins discriminate rheumatoid arthritis from other inflammatory joint diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Apr;49(4):671-82. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep452. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12794835
Citation
Brandt J, Khariouzov A, Listing J, Haibel H, Sorensen H, Grassnickel L, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J, Braun J. Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jun;48(6):1667-75. doi: 10.1002/art.11017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11555723
Citation
Braun J, de Keyser F, Brandt J, Mielants H, Sieper J, Veys E. New treatment options in spondyloarthropathies: increasing evidence for significant efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2001 Jul;13(4):245-9. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200107000-00001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11955536
Citation
Braun J, Brandt J, Listing J, Zink A, Alten R, Golder W, Gromnica-Ihle E, Kellner H, Krause A, Schneider M, Sorensen H, Zeidler H, Thriene W, Sieper J. Treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis with infliximab: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Lancet. 2002 Apr 6;359(9313):1187-93. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08215-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12922952
Citation
Braun J, Pham T, Sieper J, Davis J, van der Linden S, Dougados M, van der Heijde D; ASAS Working Group. International ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Sep;62(9):817-24. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.817.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15187239
Citation
Braun J, Sieper J. Biological therapies in the spondyloarthritides--the current state. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Sep;43(9):1072-84. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh205. Epub 2004 Jun 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22841580
Citation
Claudepierre P, Wendling D, Breban M, Goupillle P, Dougados M. Ankylosing spondylitis, spondyloarthropathy, spondyloarthritis, or spondylarthritis: what's in a name? Joint Bone Spine. 2012 Dec;79(6):534-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jul 28. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16447247
Citation
Haibel H, Rudwaleit M, Brandt HC, Grozdanovic Z, Listing J, Kupper H, Braun J, Sieper J. Adalimumab reduces spinal symptoms in active ankylosing spondylitis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results of a fifty-two-week open-label trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Feb;54(2):678-81. doi: 10.1002/art.21563. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21221193
Citation
Hennigan S, Ackermann C, Kavanaugh A. Adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy. Core Evid. 2008 Jul 31;2(4):295-305.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18535115
Citation
Kavanaugh A, Klareskog L, van der Heijde D, Li J, Freundlich B, Hooper M. Improvements in clinical response between 12 and 24 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on etanercept therapy with or without methotrexate. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Oct;67(10):1444-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.094524. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7979927
Citation
Lyngberg KK, Harreby M, Bentzen H, Frost B, Danneskiold-Samsoe B. Elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients on steroid treatment tolerate physical training without an increase in disease activity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Nov;75(11):1189-95. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90003-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21068095
Citation
Machado P, Landewe R, Lie E, Kvien TK, Braun J, Baker D, van der Heijde D; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):47-53. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.138594. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17787039
Citation
Madland TM, Larsen A, Brun JG. S100 proteins calprotectin and S100A12 are related to radiographic changes rather than disease activity in psoriatic arthritis with low disease activity. J Rheumatol. 2007 Oct;34(10):2089-92. Epub 2007 Sep 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8761194
Citation
McIntosh E. The cost of rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1996 Aug;35(8):781-90. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/35.8.781.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26002025
Citation
Maksymowych WP. Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Jul;27(4):343-8. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000180.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26269397
Citation
Maksymowych WP, Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Braun J, Citera G, Van den Bosch F, Logeart I, Wajdula J, Jones H, Marshall L, Bonin R, Pedersen R, Vlahos B, Kotak S, Bukowski JF. Clinical and MRI responses to etanercept in early non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 48-week results from the EMBARK study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1328-35. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207596. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27790037
Citation
Mounach A, El Maghraoui A. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in ankylosing spondylitis. Open Access Rheumatol. 2014 Aug 13;6:83-90. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S44550. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12922951
Citation
Pham T, van der Heijde D, Calin A, Khan MA, van der Linden S, Bellamy N, Dougados M; ASAS Working Group. Initiation of biological agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: results of a Delphi study by the ASAS Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Sep;62(9):812-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.812.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9685427
Citation
Trocme C, Gaudin P, Berthier S, Barro C, Zaoui P, Morel F. Human B lymphocytes synthesize the 92-kDa gelatinase, matrix metalloproteinase-9. J Biol Chem. 1998 Aug 7;273(32):20677-84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20677.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18664547
Citation
Trocme C, Marotte H, Baillet A, Pallot-Prades B, Garin J, Grange L, Miossec P, Tebib J, Berger F, Nissen MJ, Juvin R, Morel F, Gaudin P. Apolipoprotein A-I and platelet factor 4 are biomarkers for infliximab response in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Aug;68(8):1328-33. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.093153. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11920412
Citation
Van Den Bosch F, Kruithof E, Baeten D, Herssens A, de Keyser F, Mielants H, Veys EM. Randomized double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor alpha (infliximab) versus placebo in active spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Mar;46(3):755-65. doi: 10.1002/art.511.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14534471
Citation
Wendling D, Claudepierre P, Lohse A, Toussirot E, Breban M. [Therapeutic use of anti-TNF-alpha agents in spondyloarthropathies]. Presse Med. 2003 Oct 4;32(32):1517-24. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10366114
Citation
Yelin E, Wanke LA. An assessment of the annual and long-term direct costs of rheumatoid arthritis: the impact of poor function and functional decline. Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jun;42(6):1209-18. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:63.0.CO;2-M.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Prediction of Treatment Response at 6 Months by Combinatorial Analysis of Serum Biomarkers in Biotherapy Naive SpA

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs