search
Back to results

Premedication With Simethicone or Simethicone Plus N-acetylcysteine in Improving Visibility During Upper Endoscopy (PRUE)

Primary Purpose

Stomach Neoplasms

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Chile
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Water (Placebo)
Simethicone
N-acetylcysteine 500 mg
N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg
Sponsored by
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Stomach Neoplasms focused on measuring Acetylcysteine, Simethicone, Stomach Neoplasms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnostic upper endoscopy performed for medical indications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upper gastrointestinal surgery
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Deep sedation with propofol
  • Indication of therapeutic endoscopy
  • Emergency endoscopy
  • Patients with a history of

    • Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    • Caustic ingestion
    • Pregnancy
    • Diabetes mellitus
    • Asthma
    • Allergic reactions to medication

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Clinico Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

No Intervention

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Control

Water

Simethicone

N-acetylcysteine 500 mg + Simethicone

N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg + Simethicone

Arm Description

Standard upper endoscopy withouth premedication

100 mL of water, 20 minutes before upper endoscopy

Simethicone 200 mg, in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination

N-acetylcysteine 500 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination

N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visibility at upper endoscopy
The antrum, proximal part of the greater curvature, distal part of the greater curvature and the gastric fundus were assessed separately in terms of visibility mucosa. He scored from 1 to 4 each zone according to a score of visibility, as defined in previous publications by Chang et al. The sum of the scores from the four locations was defined as the total mucosal visibility score (TMVS) for each patient

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
July 26, 2012
Last Updated
April 6, 2018
Sponsor
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01653171
Brief Title
Premedication With Simethicone or Simethicone Plus N-acetylcysteine in Improving Visibility During Upper Endoscopy
Acronym
PRUE
Official Title
Effectiveness of Premedication With Simethicone or Simethicone Plus N-acetylcysteine vs. Placebo in Improving Visibility During Upper Endoscopy.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether premedication with Simethicone or Simethicone plus N-acetylcysteine are effective improving visibility during Upper endoscopy compared with use of water or no preparation.
Detailed Description
While globally there has been a downward trend in the incidence of gastric cancer, it remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the world. In Chile is the leading cause of death from malignant tumors in both sexes, and is recognized as a problem and public health priority in our country. Detection of gastric cancer in early stages has a huge impact on healing and therefore the prognosis of patients. In countries like Japan, where the incidence of this neoplasm is one of the highest in the world, mass screening programs have failed to demonstrate significant impact at the population level, there is a body of evidence to support endoscopic screening especially with the advent of new minimally invasive procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric cancers detected in early stages. In our country, it is estimated that about half of the patients already have lymph node metastases or involvement of adjacent organs at diagnosis. The best way to reduce disease burden from this disease would be through primary prevention interventions or effective early detection. For this purpose the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the method of choice to examine the gastric mucosa in search of early lesions, and this is the point where adequate visibility of the mucosa is overriding. Mucus, foam and bubbles accumulated in the gastrointestinal tract mucosa interfere with adequate endoscopic visualization and thus represent risk of failing to diagnose early lesions. For this reason is that various anti-foam agents, anti-bubbles are widely used in endoscopic centers mainly in Japan, where its use is almost a rule, unlike the West where its use is limited by the theoretical risk of aspiration. Simethicone has been proven as a good anti-foam agent prior to endoscopy to remove mucus and bubbles. It has also been studied in other scenarios such as colonoscopy as an additive in the preparation of the colon to eliminate bubbles in endoscopic capsule for small bowel preparation as well as Endoscopic Ultrasound which reduces artifacts and increases the accuracy of the study. Currently N-acetylcysteine, a mucolytic agent, either alone or in combination with Simethicone has proven effective in removing mucus and gastric bubbles when used 20 minutes prior to the upper endoscopy, improving the visualization of the gastric mucosa. Other agents such as pronase have also been described as useful in this task are not yet available in our area. In the context of the relevance of gastric cancer in our environment, our low rate of early cancer detection and the absence of national policies on the preparation and agents that may improve visualization of the mucosa, this study aims to compare the effect of products available in our country in preparation for an endoscopy in order to improve visualization of the mucosa and increase the chance of recognizing early lesions.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stomach Neoplasms
Keywords
Acetylcysteine, Simethicone, Stomach Neoplasms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
230 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard upper endoscopy withouth premedication
Arm Title
Water
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
100 mL of water, 20 minutes before upper endoscopy
Arm Title
Simethicone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Simethicone 200 mg, in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
Arm Title
N-acetylcysteine 500 mg + Simethicone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
N-acetylcysteine 500 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
Arm Title
N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg + Simethicone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Water (Placebo)
Other Intervention Name(s)
(Placebo)
Intervention Description
Water 100 mL
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Simethicone
Other Intervention Name(s)
Flapex, Andromaco, Chile
Intervention Description
200 mg (5 mL) in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
N-acetylcysteine 500 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mucolítico, Sanitas, Chile
Intervention Description
500 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
N-acetylcysteine 1000 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mucolítico, Sanitas, Chile
Intervention Description
1000 mg + Simethicone 200 mg in water for up to 100 mL, to take 20 minutes prior to examination
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visibility at upper endoscopy
Description
The antrum, proximal part of the greater curvature, distal part of the greater curvature and the gastric fundus were assessed separately in terms of visibility mucosa. He scored from 1 to 4 each zone according to a score of visibility, as defined in previous publications by Chang et al. The sum of the scores from the four locations was defined as the total mucosal visibility score (TMVS) for each patient
Time Frame
During diagnostic upper endoscopy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnostic upper endoscopy performed for medical indications Exclusion Criteria: Upper gastrointestinal surgery Gastric Cancer Deep sedation with propofol Indication of therapeutic endoscopy Emergency endoscopy Patients with a history of Upper gastrointestinal bleeding Caustic ingestion Pregnancy Diabetes mellitus Asthma Allergic reactions to medication
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adolfo Parra-Blanco, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Esteban Glasinovic, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Catolica
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hugo Monrroy, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roberto Candia, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
City
Santiago
State/Province
Region Metropolitana
ZIP/Postal Code
833-0024
Country
Chile

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11857360
Citation
Lambert R, Guilloux A, Oshima A, Pompe-Kirn V, Bray F, Parkin M, Ajiki W, Tsukuma H. Incidence and mortality from stomach cancer in Japan, Slovenia and the USA. Int J Cancer. 2002 Feb 20;97(6):811-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10150.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
1305308
Citation
Csendes A, Smok G, Medina E, Salgado I, Rivera R, Quitral M. [Clinical course characteristics of gastric cancer 1958-1990]. Rev Med Chil. 1992 Jan;120(1):36-42. Spanish.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15888773
Citation
McColl KE. Screening for early gastric cancer. Gut. 2005 Jun;54(6):740-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.058461. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16937471
Citation
Tashiro A, Sano M, Kinameri K, Fujita K, Takeuchi Y. Comparing mass screening techniques for gastric cancer in Japan. World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug 14;12(30):4873-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i30.4873.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9643813
Citation
Everett SM, Axon AT. Early gastric cancer: disease or pseudo-disease? Lancet. 1998 May 2;351(9112):1350-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)04365-7. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11156645
Citation
Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001 Feb;48(2):225-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.2.225.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15818423
Citation
Chavez Rossell M. [Endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer: from Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD)]. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2005 Jan-Mar;25(1):76-92. Spanish.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15738894
Citation
Federation nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer. [Recommendations for clinical practice: 2004 Standards, Options and Recommendations for management of patients with adenocarcinomas of the stomach (excluding cardial and other histological forms of cancer) Federation nationale des centres de lutte contre le cancer]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2005 Jan;29(1):41-55. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(05)80692-x. No abstract available. French.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22142434
Citation
Yoon H, Kim N, Lee HS, Shin CM, Park YS, Lee DH, Park DJ, Kim HH, Jung HC. Effect of endoscopic screening at 1-year intervals on the clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;27(5):928-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07038.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20148732
Citation
Bhandari P, Green S, Hamanaka H, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Oda I, Gotoda T. Use of Gascon and Pronase either as a pre-endoscopic drink or as targeted endoscopic flushes to improve visibility during gastroscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled, blinded trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;45(3):357-61. doi: 10.3109/00365520903483643.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
365670
Citation
McDonald GB, O'Leary R, Stratton C. Pre-endoscopic use of oral simethicone. Gastrointest Endosc. 1978 Nov;24(6):283. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(78)73542-x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
1479177
Citation
Banerjee B, Parker J, Waits W, Davis B. Effectiveness of preprocedure simethicone drink in improving visibility during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a double-blind, randomized study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992 Oct;15(3):264-5. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
3292345
Citation
McNally PR, Maydonovitch CL, Wong RK. The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy: a double-blind randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988 May-Jun;34(3):255-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71324-3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19554657
Citation
Tongprasert S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Rattanasiri S. Improving quality of colonoscopy by adding simethicone to sodium phosphate bowel preparation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun 28;15(24):3032-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3032.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15044883
Citation
Albert J, Gobel CM, Lesske J, Lotterer E, Nietsch H, Fleig WE. Simethicone for small bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy: a systematic, single-blinded, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Apr;59(4):487-91. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)00003-3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19198022
Citation
Fang YH, Chen CX, Zhang BL. Effect of small bowel preparation with simethicone on capsule endoscopy. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2009 Jan;10(1):46-51. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0820148.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17230616
Citation
Chang CC, Chen SH, Lin CP, Hsieh CR, Lou HY, Suk FM, Pan S, Wu MS, Chen JN, Chen YF. Premedication with pronase or N-acetylcysteine improves visibility during gastroendoscopy: an endoscopist-blinded, prospective, randomized study. World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan 21;13(3):444-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i3.444.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12170403
Citation
Kuo CH, Sheu BS, Kao AW, Wu CH, Chuang CH. A defoaming agent should be used with pronase premedication to improve visibility in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2002 Jul;34(7):531-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33220.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16266222
Citation
Sanchez del Rio A, Alarcon Fernandez O, Baudet JS, Sainz Menendez Z, Socas Mendez M. Reliability of the Spanish version of a brief questionnaire on patient satisfaction with gastrointestinal endoscopy. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2005 Aug;97(8):554-61. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082005000800003. English, Spanish.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10343249
Citation
Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. From the ASGE. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jun;49(6):845-53. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Premedication With Simethicone or Simethicone Plus N-acetylcysteine in Improving Visibility During Upper Endoscopy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs