Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy
Primary Purpose
Surgery, Arthroscopic, Analgesia, Pain, Acute
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Control
Articular Branch Block (ABB)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Surgery, Arthroscopic focused on measuring hip arthroscopy, articular branch block
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presenting for Hip Arthroscopy (Diagnostic or Therapeutic)
- Pre-operative Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for pain <8 on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergies to any of the study medications
- Anti-coagulation status (INR > 1.1, PT or APTT > 1.5 control)
- History of Hip Arthroplasty
- Infection of Hip
- Evidence of tumor
- Pregnancy
- History of diabetes with HbA1c > 10%
- Prior history of Hip Articular Branch Blockade or Hip Articular Branch PRF Ablation
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Sham Injection
Articular Branch Block (ABB)
Arm Description
20cc of Normal Saline 0.9%
20cc of 0.5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
NRS Pain Scores (NRS)
Numerical Rating Scale is a self-reported pain assessment, in which a patient indicates their current pain level experienced. Patients can rate their pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain imaginable). Higher scores indicated on this scale may indicate that a patient is experiencing higher pain intensities at that particular point in time. Whereas lower reported scores indicate that the patient is experiencing less intense or minimal pain.
Secondary Outcome Measures
The QOR-15 (Quality of Recovery)
Quality of Recovery scores will be obtained 24 hours post-operatively. Scores are reported on an 11 point scale (0 to 10), where 0 = none of the time and 10 = all of the time. Higher scores indicated on the Quality of Recovery scale represent a better recovery outcome.
Analgesic medication use
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04538105
First Posted
August 17, 2020
Last Updated
September 13, 2021
Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04538105
Brief Title
Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy
Official Title
Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Study cancelled
Study Start Date
May 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Arthroscopic hip surgeries are increasingly being performed as both diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. These procedures are considerably painful, thus requiring the proper pain management techniques in order to provide patient satisfaction and sufficient pain control. Articular branch blocks have not been evaluated for their use in hip arthroscopy, but have potential advantages of blocking the sensory innervation of the entire hip joint, with minimal impact on motor innervation compared to alternative blocks.
This current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of using preoperative fluoroscopic-guided blockade of articular branches of the femoral and obturator nerves for analgesic management of patients undergoing arthroscopy compared to a saline sham block.
The utility of pre-operative hip articular branch block (ABB) prior to hip arthroscopy will provide superior pain management postoperatively compared to a saline sham block. We hypothesize that the ABB (Articular Branch Block) will reduce the area under the NRS pain scores by time curve (AUC) and decreased oral opioid milligram equivalent use in the first 24 hours post-operatively.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgery, Arthroscopic, Analgesia, Pain, Acute
Keywords
hip arthroscopy, articular branch block
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Sham Injection
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
20cc of Normal Saline 0.9%
Arm Title
Articular Branch Block (ABB)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
20cc of 0.5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Control
Intervention Description
Saline Articular Nerve Branch Block
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Articular Branch Block (ABB)
Intervention Description
0.5% Bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 (Articular Branch Block)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
NRS Pain Scores (NRS)
Description
Numerical Rating Scale is a self-reported pain assessment, in which a patient indicates their current pain level experienced. Patients can rate their pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain imaginable). Higher scores indicated on this scale may indicate that a patient is experiencing higher pain intensities at that particular point in time. Whereas lower reported scores indicate that the patient is experiencing less intense or minimal pain.
Time Frame
24 hours post-operatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The QOR-15 (Quality of Recovery)
Description
Quality of Recovery scores will be obtained 24 hours post-operatively. Scores are reported on an 11 point scale (0 to 10), where 0 = none of the time and 10 = all of the time. Higher scores indicated on the Quality of Recovery scale represent a better recovery outcome.
Time Frame
24 hours post-operatively
Title
Analgesic medication use
Time Frame
24 hours post-operatively
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Presenting for Hip Arthroscopy (Diagnostic or Therapeutic)
Pre-operative Numeric Rating Score (NRS) for pain <8 on a 0 to 10 scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable.
Exclusion Criteria:
Allergies to any of the study medications
Anti-coagulation status (INR > 1.1, PT or APTT > 1.5 control)
History of Hip Arthroplasty
Infection of Hip
Evidence of tumor
Pregnancy
History of diabetes with HbA1c > 10%
Prior history of Hip Articular Branch Blockade or Hip Articular Branch PRF Ablation
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22336982
Citation
Colvin AC, Harrast J, Harner C. Trends in hip arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 15;94(4):e23. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01886.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27530361
Citation
Yu HC, Al-Shehri M, Johnston KD, Endersby R, Baghirzada L. Anesthesia for hip arthroscopy: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Nov;63(11):1277-90. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0718-7. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29979805
Citation
Steinhaus ME, Rosneck J, Ahmad CS, Lynch TS. Outcomes After Peripheral Nerve Block in Hip Arthroscopy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2018 Jun;47(6). doi: 10.12788/ajo.2018.0049.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18873153
Citation
GARDNER E. The innervation of the hip joint. Anat Rec. 1948 Jul;101(3):353-71. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010309. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28066735
Citation
Aprato A, Giachino M, Masse A. Arthroscopic approach and anatomy of the hip. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2016 Dec 21;6(3):309-316. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2016.6.3.309. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16822891
Citation
Byrd JW. Hip arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jul;14(7):433-44. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00006. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30393549
Citation
Philippi MT, Kahn TL, Adeyemi TF, Maak TG, Aoki SK. Extracapsular local infiltration analgesia in hip arthroscopy patients: a randomized, prospective study. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018 Sep 18;5(3):226-232. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny030. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26907370
Citation
Kay J, de Sa D, Memon M, Simunovic N, Paul J, Ayeni OR. Examining the Role of Perioperative Nerve Blocks in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2016 Apr;32(4):704-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.022. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29871372
Citation
Kapural L, Jolly S, Mantoan J, Badhey H, Ptacek T. Cooled Radiofrequency Neurotomy of the Articular Sensory Branches of the Obturator and Femoral Nerves - Combined Approach Using Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound Guidance: Technical Report, and Observational Study on Safety and Efficacy. Pain Physician. 2018 May;21(3):279-284.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23665305
Citation
Nye ZB, Horn JL, Crittenden W, Abrahams MS, Aziz MF. Ambulatory continuous posterior lumbar plexus blocks following hip arthroscopy: a review of 213 cases. J Clin Anesth. 2013 Jun;25(4):268-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 May 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24284048
Citation
Dold AP, Murnaghan L, Xing J, Abdallah FW, Brull R, Whelan DB. Preoperative femoral nerve block in hip arthroscopic surgery: a retrospective review of 108 consecutive cases. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):144-9. doi: 10.1177/0363546513510392. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24061718
Citation
Krych AJ, Baran S, Kuzma SA, Smith HM, Johnson RL, Levy BA. Utility of multimodal analgesia with fascia iliaca blockade for acute pain management following hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):843-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2665-y. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18929290
Citation
Lee EM, Murphy KP, Ben-David B. Postoperative analgesia for hip arthroscopy: combined L1 and L2 paravertebral blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2008 Sep;20(6):462-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.04.012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15322437
Citation
Keller S, Bann CM, Dodd SL, Schein J, Mendoza TR, Cleeland CS. Validity of the brief pain inventory for use in documenting the outcomes of patients with noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2004 Sep-Oct;20(5):309-18. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200409000-00005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23411725
Citation
Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22542434
Citation
Griffin DR, Parsons N, Mohtadi NG, Safran MR; Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012 May;28(5):611-6; quiz 616-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.027.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22822195
Citation
YaDeau JT, Tedore T, Goytizolo EA, Kim DH, Green DS, Westrick A, Fan R, Rade MC, Ranawat AS, Coleman SH, Kelly BT. Lumbar plexus blockade reduces pain after hip arthroscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):968-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265bacd. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Preoperative Fluoroscopy Guided Hip Articular Branch Blocks and Analgesic Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs