Preoperative Oestrogen in Postmenopausal Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Primary Purpose
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Linoladiol Estradiol
Placebo vaginal cream
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pelvic Organ Prolapse focused on measuring Local Oestrogen
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Postmenopausal women
- Able to read, understand and sign informed consent
- Able to apply a vaginal cream
- Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with planned and indicated prolapse surgical repair
Exclusion Criteria:
- Suspicion or history of breast cancer or other oestrogen responsive malignancies (endometrial cancer)
- unexplained abnormal vaginal bleeding
- history of deep vein thrombosis
- inherited or acquired blood clotting disorders (eg, APC resistance, Antithrombin III deficiency)
- transient ischaemic attack, myo- cardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease
- Hypersensitivity to oestrogen
- Unable to read and sign informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tulln
- Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology of the Medical University Vienna
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Linoladiol Estradiol
Placebo
Arm Description
Linoladiol Estradiol cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse
Placebo cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
subjective prolapse associated symptoms (measured with the validated German pelvic floor questionnaire)
treatment efficacy of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in comparison to placebo, measured by a subjective questionnaire. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome
Secondary Outcome Measures
operative time in minutes
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
length of stay in days
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
intraoperative blood loss in ml
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
blood circulation of the tissue (good, regular, scarce, no blood circulation)
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
separability of the tissue layers (good, regular, scarce, not possible)
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
easy separation from the bladder (yes/no)
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
easy opening of the Douglas cavity (Yes/no)
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
subjective (all domains of the pelvic floor questionnaire) outcome 3 months postoperative
possible differences regarding subjective outcome parameters between intervention and placebo-group 3 months after operation. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome.
objective (POP-Q score) outcome 3 months postoperative
possible differences regarding objective outcome parameters between intervention and placebo-group 3 months after operation. POP-Q Score (Score between 0 and 4). The POP- quantification system consists of six defined points of measurement (Aa, Ba, C,D,Ap,Bp) and three other landmarks (GH,TVL, PB). Each is measured in centimeters above the hymen (negative number) or below the hymen (positive number).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03779633
First Posted
July 29, 2018
Last Updated
November 16, 2020
Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03779633
Brief Title
Preoperative Oestrogen in Postmenopausal Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Official Title
Preoperative Locally Applied Oestrogen in Postmenopausal Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Changes in Subjective and Objective Outcome - a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 27, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 27, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Introduction With increasing age the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) rises and will increase substantially in the future according to forecasting studies. It is possible that oestrogens, alone or in combination with other forms of therapy, may assist in the management of POP by increasing collagen synthesis and thereby improving the strength of the weakened vaginal epithelium. Yet, studies investigating the effect of topical oestrogen and its impact on POP associated symptoms, both self-reported improvement and observations of objective improvement, are lacking.
Objective To evaluate the subjective efficacy concerning prolapse associated complaints measured by the German pelvic floor questionnaire (domain POP: POP-score) after preoperative use of local oestrogen compared to preoperative placebo treatment in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Further variables of interest are POP-score after 3 months, differences regarding the objective prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), surgical outcome and tissue operability assessed by the surgeon.
Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study the investigators aim to include 120 postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and indicated operative procedure. An analysis of covariance will be computed with the depending variable POP-score after 6 weeks and the independent variables group (verum versus placebo) and Pop-Score at baseline.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Keywords
Local Oestrogen
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Linoladiol Estradiol
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Linoladiol Estradiol cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Linoladiol Estradiol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Montavit ATC Code G03CA03
Intervention Description
Linoladiol Estradiol Initial dose (week 1): 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) every day for the first week Maintenance dose 1 (week 2) : 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) every 48 hours the following week.
Maintenance dose 2 (week 3-6): 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) twice per week the following 4 weeks.
Route of administration: intravaginally by means of a calibrated applicator before retiring at night Duration: 6 weeks
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo vaginal cream
Intervention Description
Initial dose (week 1): 1 application every day for the first week Maintenance dose 1 (week 2) : 1 application every 48 hours the following week.
Maintenance dose 2 (week 3-6): 1 application twice per week the following 4 weeks.
Route of administration: intravaginally by means of a calibrated applicator before retiring at night Duration: 6 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
subjective prolapse associated symptoms (measured with the validated German pelvic floor questionnaire)
Description
treatment efficacy of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in comparison to placebo, measured by a subjective questionnaire. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome
Time Frame
change from baseline POP Score at 6 weeks after treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
operative time in minutes
Description
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
Time Frame
up to 1 week postoperative
Title
length of stay in days
Description
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
Time Frame
up to 1 week postoperative
Title
intraoperative blood loss in ml
Description
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
Time Frame
up to 1 week postoperative
Title
blood circulation of the tissue (good, regular, scarce, no blood circulation)
Description
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
Time Frame
on day of surgery
Title
separability of the tissue layers (good, regular, scarce, not possible)
Description
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
Time Frame
on day of surgery
Title
easy separation from the bladder (yes/no)
Description
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
Time Frame
on day of surgery
Title
easy opening of the Douglas cavity (Yes/no)
Description
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
Time Frame
on day of surgery
Title
subjective (all domains of the pelvic floor questionnaire) outcome 3 months postoperative
Description
possible differences regarding subjective outcome parameters between intervention and placebo-group 3 months after operation. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome.
Time Frame
3 months postoperative
Title
objective (POP-Q score) outcome 3 months postoperative
Description
possible differences regarding objective outcome parameters between intervention and placebo-group 3 months after operation. POP-Q Score (Score between 0 and 4). The POP- quantification system consists of six defined points of measurement (Aa, Ba, C,D,Ap,Bp) and three other landmarks (GH,TVL, PB). Each is measured in centimeters above the hymen (negative number) or below the hymen (positive number).
Time Frame
3 months postoperative
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Postmenopausal women
Able to read, understand and sign informed consent
Able to apply a vaginal cream
Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with planned and indicated prolapse surgical repair
Exclusion Criteria:
Suspicion or history of breast cancer or other oestrogen responsive malignancies (endometrial cancer)
unexplained abnormal vaginal bleeding
history of deep vein thrombosis
inherited or acquired blood clotting disorders (eg, APC resistance, Antithrombin III deficiency)
transient ischaemic attack, myo- cardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease
Hypersensitivity to oestrogen
Unable to read and sign informed consent
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tulln
City
Tulln
ZIP/Postal Code
3430
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology of the Medical University Vienna
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26383760
Citation
Weber MA, Kleijn MH, Langendam M, Limpens J, Heineman MJ, Roovers JP. Local Oestrogen for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0136265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136265. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24947034
Citation
Rahn DD, Good MM, Roshanravan SM, Shi H, Schaffer JI, Singh RJ, Word RA. Effects of preoperative local estrogen in postmenopausal women with prolapse: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Oct;99(10):3728-36. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1216. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35443258
Citation
European Urogynaecological Association 2021 Annual Meeting | Hybrid Edition. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Apr 1;28(4):244-271. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001172. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Preoperative Oestrogen in Postmenopausal Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs