search
Back to results

Pressure-enabled Delivery in Radioembolization (TriNav Study) (PEDIR)

Primary Purpose

Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard microcatheter
PEDD device
Sponsored by
Massachusetts General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Liver Cancer focused on measuring Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Known HCC or CLM that are not amenable to curative resection or thermal ablative techniques such as microwave ablation.
  • Prior clinical decision for treatment by radioembolization.
  • Disease that is visible on CT or MRI as well as measurable disease in the liver. Measurable is defined as at least one lesion in the expected treatment field that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter) as (≥1 cm) with CT scan or MRI.
  • Age ≥18 years. Because there is limited data with respect to radioembolization in patients <18 years of age with respect to tumor dosimetry and associated adverse events participants <18 years of age, children are excluded from this study.
  • ECOG performance status < 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A).
  • Life expectancy >16 weeks.
  • Suitable target artery diameter(s), defined in the TriNav labelling as 1.5 to 3.5mm vessels, based upon pre-procedural imaging.
  • Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:

    • International Normalized Ratio (INR): ≤ 1.5
    • Hemoglobin: ≥ 8.5 g/dL
    • Leukocytes: ≥2,000/mcL
    • Absolute neutrophil count: ≥1,00/mcL
    • Platelets: ≥50,000/mcL(after transfusion, if necessary)
    • Total bilirubin: ≤2.0 mg/dL
    • Albumin: ≥3 g/dL
    • AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT): ≤6 × institutional ULN
    • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR): 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Child Pugh Score A, or B7 with bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL.
  • If extrahepatic disease is present (e.g. brain metastases), such disease must be stable, under treatment, or not an imminent threat to the patient's life or quality of life.
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  • Prior to study entry women of child-bearing potential must agree to not become pregnant, nurse a baby, or use any milk expressed for 2 weeks following radioembolization. Men must agree to not father a baby for 2 months after treatment with radioembolization (This is confirmed during the consenting process and documented when the patient signs the informed consent form. The effects of Yttrium-90 and radiation associated with the procedures, radiotracers, and subsequent imaging are known to have teratogenic effects on the developing human fetus. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother breastfeeding should be discontinued for the duration of study participation.)
  • For HCC patients: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage: A, B, C.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study.
  • Unresolved toxicities related to cancer therapy that the investigator will continue and compromise patient safety.
  • History of hepatic encephalopathy; history of severe peripheral allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives, or atropine that cannot be managed medically.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness.
  • Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Prior external beam radiation treatment to the liver or prior intra-arterial liver-directed therapy including transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization or radioembolization.
  • Contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization, including bleeding diathesis or uncorrectable coagulopathy.
  • > 50% of tumor involvement of the liver.
  • Receipt of intervention for the Ampulla of Vater or compromise thereof.
  • Child-Pugh B8 or greater.
  • Evidence of thrombosis in the main portal vein.
  • For CLM patients: evidence of cirrhosis or portal hypertension.
  • For CLM: Clinically-evident ascites other than trace noted on imaging.

Sites / Locations

  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Sequence A: Standard microcatheter for Mapping #1 and PEDD device for Mapping #2.

Sequence B: PEDD device for Mapping #1 and standard microcatheter for Mapping #2.

Arm Description

Participants with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases tumors receiving standard of care radioembolization treatment will be randomly assigned to undergo a routine mapping procedure first using a standard microcatheter 2-21 days before their radioembolization treatment day. Then on day of radioembolization treatment, an extra mapping procedure using the PEDD device catheter will be done just prior to the treatment.

Participants with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases tumors receiving standard of care radioembolization treatment will be randomly assigned to undergo a routine mapping procedure first using the PEDD device catheter 2-21 days before their radioembolization treatment day. Then on day of radioembolization treatment, an extra mapping procedure using a standard microcatheter will be done just prior to the treatment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Radiotracer distribution
The primary endpoint of the study is radiotracer distribution, as measured by tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio. Using SPECT/CT images collected subsequent to radiotracer delivery in mapping procedures, the volumetric tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio of 99mTc-MAA distribution will be calculated using advanced imaging processing software, such as MIM SurePlan MRT. The T:N ratio of 99mTc-MAA delivered via the standard microcatheter will be compared to the PEDD device for each patient. The T:N ratio will be calculated for each tumor as well as in aggregate for the three largest tumors as described in Section 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mapping procedure comparison of Tumor to Normal (T:N) ratio between standard microcatheter and pressure-enabled delivery catheter
Compare the mapping procedure radiotracer T:N ratio to therapeutic microsphere T:N ratio for both the standard microcatheter and the PEDD device when both the radiotracer and therapeutic microspheres were delivered by the same catheter
Technical success of radiotracer delivery as measured by ability to deliver radiotracer
Technical success of radiotracer delivery of each catheter, where success is defined as the satisfactory positioning and delivery of radiotracer.

Full Information

First Posted
November 9, 2021
Last Updated
September 26, 2023
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
TriSalus Life Sciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05128032
Brief Title
Pressure-enabled Delivery in Radioembolization (TriNav Study)
Acronym
PEDIR
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Examine The Effects of a Pressure-Enabled Drug Delivery Device on Radiotracer Distribution Compared to a Standard Microcatheter in the Context of Radioembolization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
TriSalus Life Sciences

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if the type of catheter used in the mapping procedure prior to radioembolization improves the delivery of radioactivity to tumor(s) in participants with liver cancer. The name of the devices involved in this study are: Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System Standard 2.4F microcatheter, not otherwise specified
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center, investigator-initiated study to determine if the type of catheter used to deliver the radiotracer in the mapping procedure improves the delivery of radioactive microspheres during radioembolization treatment for liver cancer. Both catheters being used, the Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery (PEDD)/TriNav Infusion System and theStandard 2.4F microcatheter have been cleared for clinical use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Radioembolization for the treatment of liver tumors typically requires 2 separate procedures. The first procedure is called the mapping procedure. During the mapping procedure, the blood supply to the liver and tumor are evaluated with a type of x-ray called angiography. Once the optimal catheter position is determined for treatment, a "simulation" run is performed with the injection of a fluid that acts like the radiation that will be delivered to treat the tumors. This fluid is called a radiotracer. The study is looking to learn if the Pressure Enabled Drug Delivery device increases the ratio of radiotracer delivered to liver tumor tissue relative to normal liver tissue compared to a standard microcatheter. An improved delivery of radiotracer may indicate improved delivery of radioactive microspheres which may lead to improved tumor response rates and less liver toxicity The research study procedures include assessments for eligibility, study treatment including evaluations, and follow-up visits. Participants will undergo the study procedures in the normal course of their radioembolization procedure, with the addition of a second mapping procedure on the treatment day. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two mapping procedures: Sequence A or Sequence B. It is expected that about 10-20 people in total will take part in this research study. TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc., a biotechnology and medical device company, is supporting this research study by providing funding.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
Liver Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sequence A: Standard microcatheter for Mapping #1 and PEDD device for Mapping #2.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases tumors receiving standard of care radioembolization treatment will be randomly assigned to undergo a routine mapping procedure first using a standard microcatheter 2-21 days before their radioembolization treatment day. Then on day of radioembolization treatment, an extra mapping procedure using the PEDD device catheter will be done just prior to the treatment.
Arm Title
Sequence B: PEDD device for Mapping #1 and standard microcatheter for Mapping #2.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants with either hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal liver metastases tumors receiving standard of care radioembolization treatment will be randomly assigned to undergo a routine mapping procedure first using the PEDD device catheter 2-21 days before their radioembolization treatment day. Then on day of radioembolization treatment, an extra mapping procedure using a standard microcatheter will be done just prior to the treatment.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Standard microcatheter
Intervention Description
Small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PEDD device
Other Intervention Name(s)
TriNav Infusion System catheter
Intervention Description
Pressure enabled small device used for mapping as part of radioembolization procedure
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiotracer distribution
Description
The primary endpoint of the study is radiotracer distribution, as measured by tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio. Using SPECT/CT images collected subsequent to radiotracer delivery in mapping procedures, the volumetric tumor to normal liver (T:N) ratio of 99mTc-MAA distribution will be calculated using advanced imaging processing software, such as MIM SurePlan MRT. The T:N ratio of 99mTc-MAA delivered via the standard microcatheter will be compared to the PEDD device for each patient. The T:N ratio will be calculated for each tumor as well as in aggregate for the three largest tumors as described in Section 12.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mapping procedure comparison of Tumor to Normal (T:N) ratio between standard microcatheter and pressure-enabled delivery catheter
Description
Compare the mapping procedure radiotracer T:N ratio to therapeutic microsphere T:N ratio for both the standard microcatheter and the PEDD device when both the radiotracer and therapeutic microspheres were delivered by the same catheter
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Technical success of radiotracer delivery as measured by ability to deliver radiotracer
Description
Technical success of radiotracer delivery of each catheter, where success is defined as the satisfactory positioning and delivery of radiotracer.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Known HCC or CLM that are not amenable to curative resection or thermal ablative techniques such as microwave ablation. Prior clinical decision for treatment by radioembolization. Disease that is visible on CT or MRI as well as measurable disease in the liver. Measurable is defined as at least one lesion in the expected treatment field that can be accurately measured in at least one dimension (longest diameter) as (≥1 cm) with CT scan or MRI. Age ≥18 years. Because there is limited data with respect to radioembolization in patients <18 years of age with respect to tumor dosimetry and associated adverse events participants <18 years of age, children are excluded from this study. ECOG performance status < 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A). Life expectancy >16 weeks. Suitable target artery diameter(s), defined in the TriNav labelling as 1.5 to 3.5mm vessels, based upon pre-procedural imaging. Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below: International Normalized Ratio (INR): ≤ 1.5 Hemoglobin: ≥ 8.5 g/dL Leukocytes: ≥2,000/mcL Absolute neutrophil count: ≥1,00/mcL Platelets: ≥50,000/mcL(after transfusion, if necessary) Total bilirubin: ≤2.0 mg/dL Albumin: ≥3 g/dL AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT): ≤6 × institutional ULN Glomerular filtration rate (GFR): 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 Child Pugh Score A, or B7 with bilirubin ≤ 2 mg/dL. If extrahepatic disease is present (e.g. brain metastases), such disease must be stable, under treatment, or not an imminent threat to the patient's life or quality of life. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Prior to study entry women of child-bearing potential must agree to not become pregnant, nurse a baby, or use any milk expressed for 2 weeks following radioembolization. Men must agree to not father a baby for 2 months after treatment with radioembolization (This is confirmed during the consenting process and documented when the patient signs the informed consent form. The effects of Yttrium-90 and radiation associated with the procedures, radiotracers, and subsequent imaging are known to have teratogenic effects on the developing human fetus. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants secondary to treatment of the mother breastfeeding should be discontinued for the duration of study participation.) For HCC patients: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage: A, B, C. Exclusion Criteria: Chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study. Unresolved toxicities related to cancer therapy that the investigator will continue and compromise patient safety. History of hepatic encephalopathy; history of severe peripheral allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives, or atropine that cannot be managed medically. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness. Psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements. Prior external beam radiation treatment to the liver or prior intra-arterial liver-directed therapy including transarterial bland embolization, chemoembolization or radioembolization. Contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization, including bleeding diathesis or uncorrectable coagulopathy. > 50% of tumor involvement of the liver. Receipt of intervention for the Ampulla of Vater or compromise thereof. Child-Pugh B8 or greater. Evidence of thrombosis in the main portal vein. For CLM patients: evidence of cirrhosis or portal hypertension. For CLM: Clinically-evident ascites other than trace noted on imaging.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD
Phone
(617) 643-4723
Email
psutphin@partners.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD
Phone
617-643-4723
Email
psutphin@mgb.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick D Sutphin, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02245
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ammar Sarwar, MD
Phone
617-754-2523

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Contact the Partners Innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

Learn more about this trial

Pressure-enabled Delivery in Radioembolization (TriNav Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs