search
Back to results

PREVENT Tool Study: Late Effects Clinic

Primary Purpose

Cardiovascular Disease, Childhood Obesity

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Wait-List Control
PREVENT Tool
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Cardiovascular Disease

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 19 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient Eligibility Criteria:

  • Adolescents 15 to 19 years
  • Prior diagnosis of pediatric cancer (diagnosed <21 years of age)
  • Not receiving active therapy for their cancer
  • Receiving care from the Pediatric Hematology/Oncology staff and physicians at St. Louis Children's Hospital or the St. Louis Children's Specialty Care Center (CSCC)
  • At risk for poor cardiovascular health (CVH) (BMI greater than or equal to 85th percentile)

Provider Eligibility Criteria -All providers and staff (physicians, nurses, clinic staff, clinical research associates) in the Pediatric Hematology/Oncology program at St. Louis Children's Hospital and the CSCC

Parent Eligibility Criteria

-A parent or legal guardian of a study participant. The parent or legal guardian must have been present at the clinic visit in which the PREVENT tool was administered to the study participant.

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

No Intervention

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Providers

Parents

Patients - Wait-List Control

Patients - PREVENT tool

Arm Description

All eligible providers will be sent questionnaires electronically to their email at baseline and follow-up. Providers will be invited to attend a training session to educate them on the PREVENT tool at baseline A subset of 5-10 providers will be recruited via email, at the baseline training,or by using snowball-sampling approach within the clinic to participate in qualitative in-depth interviews

-Semi-structured interviews

Complete questionnaires at baseline (administered electronically or by mail; accelerometers administered by mail). Following baseline measurement, patients will be randomized and attend their clinic visit. Follow-up measures will be administered immediately following the clinic visit (within 48 hours) and 3-months after the clinic visit electronically and by mail Up to 10 patients will also take part in semi-structured interviews A PREVENT action plan (behavior change prescription, community resources, and education) will be provided to the patient via email after the completion of the follow-up measurement.

Complete questionnaires at baseline (administered electronically or by mail; accelerometers administered by mail). Following baseline measurement, patients will be randomized and attend their clinic visit. Follow-up measures will be administered immediately following the clinic visit (within 48 hours) and 3-months after the clinic visit electronically and by mail Up to 10 patients will also take part in semi-structured interviews At the clinic visit, the provider will use PREVENT tool to discuss risk and deliver a tailored behavioral change plan inclusive of patient-centered community resources. PREVENT will calculate patient's overall risk for developing cardiovascular disease. Physical activity and food intake recommendations are tailored to current weight status and health behaviors using evidence-based recommendations.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change in Minutes of Moderate Physical Activity Per Week (From Self Report) Survey
Physical activity will be measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+, Actigraph of Ft. Walton Beach, FL). The participant will be instructed to wear the accelerometer on an elasticized belt, on the left mid-axillary line. The Actigraph is one of the most common accelerometers used for scientific purposes. Participants will be encouraged to wear the accelerometer 24-hours per day for at least 7-days, including 2 weekend days. Participants completed a brief Health Behavior & Attitudes Survey using questions from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Mean changes from baseline and 3-month follow-up were calculated as the follow-up measure minus the baseline measure, averaged across the intervention groups. Note: Actigraph measure was dropped due to university mail distribution delays during the remote work period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-reported change in minutes of physical activity became the primary outcome.
Mean Change in Minutes of Vigorous Physical Activity Per Week (From Self Report) Survey
Physical activity will be measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+, Actigraph of Ft. Walton Beach, FL). The participant will be instructed to wear the accelerometer on an elasticized belt, on the left mid-axillary line. The Actigraph is one of the most common accelerometers used for scientific purposes. Participants will be encouraged to wear the accelerometer 24-hours per day for at least 7-days, including 2 weekend days. Participants completed a brief Health Behavior & Attitudes Survey using questions from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Mean changes from baseline and 3-month follow-up were calculated as the follow-up measure minus the baseline measure, averaged across the intervention groups. Note: Actigraph measure was dropped due to university mail distribution delays during the remote work period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-reported change in minutes of physical activity became the primary outcome.
Mean Change in Number of Food Intake Behaviors Met
Patient-reported food intake behaviors (fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, sugar-sweetened beverages and snacking behaviors) are collected using a brief Health Behavior & Attitudes Survey. Responses are dichotomized into a binary yes (1)/no (0) score indicating whether or not the patient is meeting the food intake recommendation for each food group. The total number of food intake behaviors are scored on a 5 item scale (range 0-5), maximum improvement in number of behaviors=5. Mean changes from baseline and 3-month follow-up were calculated as the follow-up measure minus the baseline measure, averaged across the intervention groups.
Provider's Satisfaction of PREVENT Tool: Survey
A survey (24-questions) containing validated subscales assessed provider's satisfaction with the PREVENT tool on subscales assessing acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of the tool, and satisfaction with specific components of the tool. Items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction. Subscales were summed to generate the average across all questions (range 1-5) and was reported as overall satisfaction.
Fidelity of PREVENT Tool Implementation
Fidelity will be measured using direct observation of patient-provider interactions while using the PREVENT tool. A direct observation checklist will be used by the observer to determine the number of interactions with the PREVENT tool that were implemented as intended.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Provider's Motivation for Sustained Use of PREVENT Tool
A survey (8 questions) assessed provider's intent to change their behavior and continue using PREVENT. Questions were adapted from Legare's CPD Reaction Questionnaire and asked using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5). An average of all responses was calculated with a higher score indicating greater motivation for sustained use.
Maintenance of PREVENT Tool as Measured by Provider Perceptions of Feasibility of the Tool
Qualitative in-depth interview with providers who used the PREVENT tool. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to summarize key themes related to provider perceptions of the tool and ability to use the tool in routine clinical practice.
Maintenance of PREVENT Tool as Measured by Provider Perceptions of Ease of Use of the Tool
Qualitative in-depth interview with providers who used the PREVENT tool. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to summarize key themes related to provider perceptions of the tool and ability to use the tool in routine clinical practice.
Patient's Perceptions of Usability/Acceptability of PREVENT Tool
Semi-structured interviews with adolescent study participants (n=10).
Parent's Perceptions of Usability/Acceptability of PREVENT Tool
Semi-structured interviews with parents/guardians (n=10) of study participants.
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Mean Change in Patient's Body Mass Index (BMI)
Collected from patient's medical record. BMI z-score is a standardized calculation accounting age and sex using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Growth Charts. A z-score represents the standard deviation from the population mean. A z-score of zero represents the population mean. Mean change in BMI z-score was calculated by subtracting the baseline mean from the follow-up mean for each intervention group. A decrease in z-score is a favorable outcome.
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Collected from patient's medical record. Blood pressure is measured in mmHg. The mean change was calculated by subtracting the baseline mean from the follow-up mean for each intervention group.
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Cholesterol
Collected from patient's medical record
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Fasting Blood Glucose
Collected from patient's medical record
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Attitudes Toward Behavior Change
A survey (6-question) administered to patients will assess attitudes toward and readiness for behavior change. Questions are asked using a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0-5) with a higher score indicating more positive attitudes.
Clinic-level Capacity for Sustainability as Measured by Provider Survey
The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) will assess clinic-level readiness and capacity for sustainability of the PREVENT tool. The CSAT tool will examine organization, financial, regulatory and political factors that may influence sustainability. 10 items scored on a 7-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater capacity for sustainment. The average of the 10 items is reported (range 1-7).

Full Information

First Posted
August 11, 2020
Last Updated
April 24, 2023
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04530825
Brief Title
PREVENT Tool Study: Late Effects Clinic
Official Title
Addressing Social Determinants of Health During Clinical Care Visits to Promote Equitable Behavior Change and PREVENT Cardiovascular Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 10, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 14, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 14, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of a novel, Health Information Technology behavior change tool in a single clinic setting. The PREVENT tool is the first electronic health record (EHR)-compatible tool that both tailors evidence-based behavior change strategies and incorporates community-level data specific to each patient into routine care. The central hypothesis is that PREVENT will improve patient's attitudes towards behavior change recommendations, increase adherence to recommended behavior change and improve cardiovascular health. Fifty adolescents will be randomized to intervention or wait-list, routine care control to assess the preliminary effectiveness of PREVENT. Qualitative and quantitative methods will be used among patients, parents and providers to examine barriers to current and future implementation of the PREVENT tool to inform adoption and maintenance.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiovascular Disease, Childhood Obesity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
65 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Providers
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
All eligible providers will be sent questionnaires electronically to their email at baseline and follow-up. Providers will be invited to attend a training session to educate them on the PREVENT tool at baseline A subset of 5-10 providers will be recruited via email, at the baseline training,or by using snowball-sampling approach within the clinic to participate in qualitative in-depth interviews
Arm Title
Parents
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
-Semi-structured interviews
Arm Title
Patients - Wait-List Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Complete questionnaires at baseline (administered electronically or by mail; accelerometers administered by mail). Following baseline measurement, patients will be randomized and attend their clinic visit. Follow-up measures will be administered immediately following the clinic visit (within 48 hours) and 3-months after the clinic visit electronically and by mail Up to 10 patients will also take part in semi-structured interviews A PREVENT action plan (behavior change prescription, community resources, and education) will be provided to the patient via email after the completion of the follow-up measurement.
Arm Title
Patients - PREVENT tool
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Complete questionnaires at baseline (administered electronically or by mail; accelerometers administered by mail). Following baseline measurement, patients will be randomized and attend their clinic visit. Follow-up measures will be administered immediately following the clinic visit (within 48 hours) and 3-months after the clinic visit electronically and by mail Up to 10 patients will also take part in semi-structured interviews At the clinic visit, the provider will use PREVENT tool to discuss risk and deliver a tailored behavioral change plan inclusive of patient-centered community resources. PREVENT will calculate patient's overall risk for developing cardiovascular disease. Physical activity and food intake recommendations are tailored to current weight status and health behaviors using evidence-based recommendations.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Wait-List Control
Intervention Description
-Will receive routine clinical care. After completion of follow-up measures, control participants will receive a behavior change prescription via the PREVENT tool
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
PREVENT Tool
Intervention Description
-PREVENT is a novel Health Information Technology tool designed to promote physical activity and healthy food intake among overweight/obese adolescent patients at the point of care. PREVENT automates the delivery of personalized, evidence-based behavior change recommendations and provides an interactive map of community resources to help providers link patients to resources in their community.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change in Minutes of Moderate Physical Activity Per Week (From Self Report) Survey
Description
Physical activity will be measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+, Actigraph of Ft. Walton Beach, FL). The participant will be instructed to wear the accelerometer on an elasticized belt, on the left mid-axillary line. The Actigraph is one of the most common accelerometers used for scientific purposes. Participants will be encouraged to wear the accelerometer 24-hours per day for at least 7-days, including 2 weekend days. Participants completed a brief Health Behavior & Attitudes Survey using questions from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Mean changes from baseline and 3-month follow-up were calculated as the follow-up measure minus the baseline measure, averaged across the intervention groups. Note: Actigraph measure was dropped due to university mail distribution delays during the remote work period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-reported change in minutes of physical activity became the primary outcome.
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Mean Change in Minutes of Vigorous Physical Activity Per Week (From Self Report) Survey
Description
Physical activity will be measured using a triaxial accelerometer (Actigraph GT3X+, Actigraph of Ft. Walton Beach, FL). The participant will be instructed to wear the accelerometer on an elasticized belt, on the left mid-axillary line. The Actigraph is one of the most common accelerometers used for scientific purposes. Participants will be encouraged to wear the accelerometer 24-hours per day for at least 7-days, including 2 weekend days. Participants completed a brief Health Behavior & Attitudes Survey using questions from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Mean changes from baseline and 3-month follow-up were calculated as the follow-up measure minus the baseline measure, averaged across the intervention groups. Note: Actigraph measure was dropped due to university mail distribution delays during the remote work period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-reported change in minutes of physical activity became the primary outcome.
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Mean Change in Number of Food Intake Behaviors Met
Description
Patient-reported food intake behaviors (fruit and vegetable intake, whole grains, sugar-sweetened beverages and snacking behaviors) are collected using a brief Health Behavior & Attitudes Survey. Responses are dichotomized into a binary yes (1)/no (0) score indicating whether or not the patient is meeting the food intake recommendation for each food group. The total number of food intake behaviors are scored on a 5 item scale (range 0-5), maximum improvement in number of behaviors=5. Mean changes from baseline and 3-month follow-up were calculated as the follow-up measure minus the baseline measure, averaged across the intervention groups.
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Provider's Satisfaction of PREVENT Tool: Survey
Description
A survey (24-questions) containing validated subscales assessed provider's satisfaction with the PREVENT tool on subscales assessing acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of the tool, and satisfaction with specific components of the tool. Items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction. Subscales were summed to generate the average across all questions (range 1-5) and was reported as overall satisfaction.
Time Frame
3-months
Title
Fidelity of PREVENT Tool Implementation
Description
Fidelity will be measured using direct observation of patient-provider interactions while using the PREVENT tool. A direct observation checklist will be used by the observer to determine the number of interactions with the PREVENT tool that were implemented as intended.
Time Frame
0-3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Provider's Motivation for Sustained Use of PREVENT Tool
Description
A survey (8 questions) assessed provider's intent to change their behavior and continue using PREVENT. Questions were adapted from Legare's CPD Reaction Questionnaire and asked using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1-5). An average of all responses was calculated with a higher score indicating greater motivation for sustained use.
Time Frame
3-months
Title
Maintenance of PREVENT Tool as Measured by Provider Perceptions of Feasibility of the Tool
Description
Qualitative in-depth interview with providers who used the PREVENT tool. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to summarize key themes related to provider perceptions of the tool and ability to use the tool in routine clinical practice.
Time Frame
3-months
Title
Maintenance of PREVENT Tool as Measured by Provider Perceptions of Ease of Use of the Tool
Description
Qualitative in-depth interview with providers who used the PREVENT tool. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to summarize key themes related to provider perceptions of the tool and ability to use the tool in routine clinical practice.
Time Frame
3-months
Title
Patient's Perceptions of Usability/Acceptability of PREVENT Tool
Description
Semi-structured interviews with adolescent study participants (n=10).
Time Frame
3-months
Title
Parent's Perceptions of Usability/Acceptability of PREVENT Tool
Description
Semi-structured interviews with parents/guardians (n=10) of study participants.
Time Frame
3-months
Title
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Mean Change in Patient's Body Mass Index (BMI)
Description
Collected from patient's medical record. BMI z-score is a standardized calculation accounting age and sex using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Growth Charts. A z-score represents the standard deviation from the population mean. A z-score of zero represents the population mean. Mean change in BMI z-score was calculated by subtracting the baseline mean from the follow-up mean for each intervention group. A decrease in z-score is a favorable outcome.
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Description
Collected from patient's medical record. Blood pressure is measured in mmHg. The mean change was calculated by subtracting the baseline mean from the follow-up mean for each intervention group.
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Cholesterol
Description
Collected from patient's medical record
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Fasting Blood Glucose
Description
Collected from patient's medical record
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Impact of PREVENT Tool on Patient's Attitudes Toward Behavior Change
Description
A survey (6-question) administered to patients will assess attitudes toward and readiness for behavior change. Questions are asked using a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0-5) with a higher score indicating more positive attitudes.
Time Frame
At baseline and 3-months
Title
Clinic-level Capacity for Sustainability as Measured by Provider Survey
Description
The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) will assess clinic-level readiness and capacity for sustainability of the PREVENT tool. The CSAT tool will examine organization, financial, regulatory and political factors that may influence sustainability. 10 items scored on a 7-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater capacity for sustainment. The average of the 10 items is reported (range 1-7).
Time Frame
3-months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient Eligibility Criteria: Adolescents 12 to 19 years Prior diagnosis of pediatric cancer (diagnosed <21 years of age) Not receiving active therapy for their cancer Receiving care from the Pediatric Hematology/Oncology staff and physicians at St. Louis Children's Hospital or the St. Louis Children's Specialty Care Center (CSCC) At risk for poor cardiovascular health (CVH) (BMI greater than or equal to 85th percentile) Provider Eligibility Criteria -All providers and staff (physicians, nurses, clinic staff, clinical research associates) in the Pediatric Hematology/Oncology program at St. Louis Children's Hospital and the CSCC Parent Eligibility Criteria -A parent or legal guardian of a study participant. The parent or legal guardian must have been present at the clinic visit in which the PREVENT tool was administered to the study participant.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maura Kepper, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Links:
URL
http://www.siteman.wustl.edu
Description
Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine

Learn more about this trial

PREVENT Tool Study: Late Effects Clinic

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs