search
Back to results

Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual Minority Youth

Primary Purpose

Substance Abuse

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Free2b
Attention-Placebo
Sponsored by
Columbia University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Substance Abuse focused on measuring sexual minorities, prevention, web-based intervention, substance use, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial, adolescence

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • teenagers between the ages of 15-17 years old
  • identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or unsure of sexual orientation
  • speak and read English
  • access to a private desktop, laptop, or tablet with broadband internet access

Exclusion:

- Lives outside the United States of America

Sites / Locations

  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention

Control

Arm Description

9 sessions and website with entertainment features and resources

website with entertainment features and resources

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean scores for Goal Setting
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Goal Setting
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Goal Setting
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Goal Setting
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Problem Solving
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Problem Solving
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Problem Solving
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Problem Solving
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Coping
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Coping
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Coping
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Coping
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Assertiveness
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Assertiveness
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Assertiveness
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Assertiveness
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.

Full Information

First Posted
May 14, 2019
Last Updated
October 19, 2022
Sponsor
Columbia University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03954535
Brief Title
Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual Minority Youth
Official Title
Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual-Minority Youth
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 15, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Columbia University
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The planned randomized clinical trial will longitudinally test a tailored, web-based drug abuse prevention program with a nationwide sample of 15- to 17-year-old sexual minority youth (youth who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or unsure of their sexual orientation).
Detailed Description
The randomized controlled trial will include at least 890 sexual-minority youth from the United States. Study participants will be 15- to 17-year-old youth recruited from Facebook/Instagram. All youth will complete pretest measures online. Intervention-arm youth will then interact with the 9-session program; youth in the control arm will have access to an attention-placebo website. All youth will then complete posttest measures (immediately following intervention completion and estimated to be approximately 5 months after study onset) and 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up measures. Across posttest and annual follow-up measurement occasions, data analyses will examine rates of 30-day drug use between study arms. The investigators will also examine intervention effects on mediator variables associated with drug use and assess the extent to which changes in mediator variables explain differences in drug use between arms. Youth assigned to the intervention arm will have access to 9 intervention sessions delivered online. The sessions will be housed on a website with entertainment features youth seek: life hacks, features on LGBTQ leaders, fortunes, horoscopes, inspiring quotes, and health-related resources. To ensure that youths' expectations for study participation are equivalent across arms and to account for the non-active components of the experimental intervention, the investigators designed the attention-placebo arm. Youth assigned to the attention-placebo arm will have access to the website with entertainment features: life hacks, features on LGBTQ leaders, fortunes, horoscopes, inspiring quotes, and health-related resources.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Substance Abuse
Keywords
sexual minorities, prevention, web-based intervention, substance use, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial, adolescence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1216 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
9 sessions and website with entertainment features and resources
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
website with entertainment features and resources
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Free2b
Intervention Description
The intervention will consist of a website and 9 sessions. The intervention sessions will facilitate youths' acquisition of personal and social cognitive-behavioral skills. The intervention will focus on goal setting, decision making, enhancing self-worth, coping with stress, combating distorted thinking, communication skills, using alcohol and other drugs and a review session. Each session will require approximately 20 minutes and must be finished in a single sitting. Sessions will be delivered on a weekly basis. The website will include entertainment features and resources.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Attention-Placebo
Intervention Description
Access to the website with entertainment features and resources - but no session content.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth drank alcohol in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth binge drank in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth smoked cigarettes in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth smoked marijuana in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth vaped any substance in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Number of times youth used hard drugs in the past month
Description
Participants will be asked to report the numbers of times they have used the substance in the past month.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Description
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Description
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Description
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Goal Setting
Description
The goal setting scale is a 5-item measure assessing the degree to which youth set and work on goals. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 0 = low goal setting to 3 = higher goal setting; higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Description
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Description
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Description
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Problem Solving
Description
The problem solving scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth employ skills to solve problems. The mean score will be calculated. Index scores range from 1 = high problem solving to 4 = low problem solving; lower scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Description
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Description
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Description
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Self-Esteem
Description
The self-esteem scale is a 10-item measure assessing youths' feelings of self-worth and value. Means scores will be calculated. Index scores ranges from 1 = higher self-esteem to 4 = lower self-esteem; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Description
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Description
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Description
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Perceived Stress
Description
The perceived stress scale is an 8-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel overwhelmed by stress. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = low perceived stress to 3 = high perceived stress; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Coping
Description
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Coping
Description
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Coping
Description
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Coping
Description
The coping scale is a 6-item measure assessing the degree to which youth feel they can manage the difficulties in their life. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high coping skills to 3 = poor coping skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Description
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Description
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Description
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Peer Drug use
Description
The peer drug use scale is a 7-item measuring that asks youth to indicate the number of close friends who have used various substances in the past month. Mean scores will be calculate. Index score range from 0 = no peer use to 3 = all peers use; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Description
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Description
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Description
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Self-Efficacy
Description
The self-efficacy scale is a 7-item measuring youths' perceived ability to handle difficult life situations. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = high self-efficacy to 4 = low self-efficacy; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Description
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Description
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Description
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Drug Refusal Skills
Description
The drug refusal scale is a 15-item measure assessing the likelihood of youth using various refusal strategies when offered to use alcohol, cigarettes, or marijuana. Means scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = high refusal skills to 5 = poor refusal skills; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Description
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Description
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Description
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Assertiveness
Description
The assertiveness scale is a 3-item measure assessing how well youth believe they assert themselves. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 1 = low assertiveness to 5 = high assertiveness; higher scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Description
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
an average of 5 months from study onset
Title
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Description
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
1-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Description
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
2-year follow-up
Title
Mean scores for Consequences of Substance Use
Description
The consequences of substance use scale is a 13-item measure assessing how often youths' substance use has caused them trouble with the law, family, friends, and academics. Mean scores will be calculated. Index score range from 0 = zero times to 10 = ten or more times; lower scores indicate better outcomes.
Time Frame
3-year follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: teenagers between the ages of 15-17 years old identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or unsure of sexual orientation speak and read English access to a private desktop, laptop, or tablet with broadband internet access Exclusion: - Lives outside the United States of America
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Traci M. Schwinn, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Preventing Drug Abuse Among Sexual Minority Youth

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs