search
Back to results

Preventing Psychological Distress and Suicidal Behaviours: a Web-based and Mobile Suicide Prevention Intervention in the General Population (PRINTEMPS)

Primary Purpose

Suicide and Depression, Psychological Distress, Anxiety Disorders

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Promotion of the e-health tool by local authorities
Promotion of the e-health tool by local authorities and GPs
Sponsored by
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Suicide and Depression focused on measuring Health promotion, Local authorities involvement, Suicide and attempted suicide, Primary prevention, Psychological Distress

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >18 years
  • living in one of the 42 french local authority participating to the trial
  • volunteer
  • access to internet (smartphone/tablet/computer)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years

Sites / Locations

  • Faculté de Médecine Paris Diderot Paris 7Recruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Control group

Group experimental 1 promotion

Group experimental 2 promotion

Arm Description

Local authorities allocated to this group won't implement any promotion of the e-health tool for the 12 first months. Free access to StopBlues.

Local authorities allocated to this group will have to implement the promotion of the e-health tool: the promotion at the local authority level. They will promote the e-health tool using their usual communication methods (local newspapers, local website, bulletin and billboards, posters in the local shops and in the bus stops…). Free access to StopBlues.

Local authorities allocated to this group will have to implement promotion of the e-health tool: the promotion at local authority and GPs' waiting room level. Local authorities will promote the e-health tool using their usual communication methods (local newspapers, local website, bulletin and billboards, posters in the local shops and in the bus stops...). (similarly to group experimental1) as well as leaflets and posters in GPs' waiting room. Free access to StopBlues.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of suicides - Short term
The number of completed suicides will be extracted from the database of the Epidemiology center on medical causes of deaths (CépiDc) for each local authority participating.
Number of suicide attempts - Short term
The number of attempted suicides will be extracted from the national database of public and private hospital admissions (PMSI-MCO) and the national emergency database (Oscour).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of suicides - Long term
The number of completed suicides will be extracted from the database of the Epidemiology center on medical causes of deaths (CépiDc) for each local authority participating.
Number of suicide attempts - Long term
The number of attempted suicides will be extracted from the national database of public and private hospital admissions (PMSI-MCO) and the national emergency database (Oscour).
Costs
Fixed costs for the development of the intervention including promotions tools, semi-fixed costs for the implementation of the program by local authorities and GPs, costs of suicidal acts.
Level of health-related quality of life and associated utility of StopBlues users
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the quality of life questionnaire Short Form-12 (SF-12).
Level of psychological pain of StopBlues users
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
Level of depression of StopBlues users
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Level of anxiety of StopBlues users
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the General Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7).
Level of suicidal risk of StopBlues users
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the 6 questions on the suicidal risk of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Simplified (MINI-S). The MINI-S is not available at registration, it will be triggered when results to GHQ-12, PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7 are considered showing a suicidal risk for the user.
Help-seeking behaviors and implementation of supportive activities into daily life of StopBlues users
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with an ad hoc questionnaire adapted from the general health-seeking questionnaire (GHSQ).
Level of depression (for StopBlues users coming for a relative)
Collected at the user level with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS). It has 10 questions, quoted from 0 to 6.
Intention to seek help of StopBlues users
French traduction of the first question of the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire -Original Version (GHSQ).
Intensity of the participation to the application and website
Number of downloads and connections for each zip codes of local authorities included in the trial.
Length of use to the application and website
Time-lapse between the inscription and the last connection to the application or website.
Proportion of StopBlues users who came to know the e-health tool through the different communication channels
Collected at the user level with a specific question: "How did you get to know about the StopBlues program?" . 1/ By public display 2/ In public places (employment center, library ...) 3/ On my city website 4/ By the press 5/ Through social networks 6/ At merchants 7/ At my pharmacist 8/ At my GP 9/ At another health professional (physiotherapist, medical specialist ...) 10/Through relationships (friends, families, neighbors ...) 11/ Other
Proportion of StopBlues users who came for a relative
The proportion of users who subscribed for a relative and not for themselves.
StopBlues users with a safety plan
The proportion of users who filled up a safety plan.

Full Information

First Posted
April 20, 2018
Last Updated
January 23, 2020
Sponsor
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Collaborators
National Agency of Public Health, Centre Collaborateur OMS pour la recherche et la formation en santé mentale, Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France, UMR INSERM 1246 - SPHERE MethodS in Patients-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03565562
Brief Title
Preventing Psychological Distress and Suicidal Behaviours: a Web-based and Mobile Suicide Prevention Intervention in the General Population
Acronym
PRINTEMPS
Official Title
Preventing Psychological Distress and Suicidal Behaviours: a Web-based and Mobile Suicide Prevention Intervention in the General Population
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Collaborators
National Agency of Public Health, Centre Collaborateur OMS pour la recherche et la formation en santé mentale, Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France, UMR INSERM 1246 - SPHERE MethodS in Patients-centered outcomes and HEalth ResEarch

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
An interventional research study will be undertaken to assess the effectiveness of the promotion at the local level of an e-health tool for suicide and psychological distress prevention (the StopBlues application and website). This trial is a cluster-randomized, parallel group, controlled intervention study with local authorities as the unit of randomization. Local authorities will be randomly assigned to one of the following three arms: local authorities not promoting the e-health tool (control group); local authorities promoting the e-health tool without general practitioners (GPs) involvement; local authorities promoting the e-health tool including GPs' waiting room. The trial will last 24 months and after a 12-month post-randomization period, local authorities from the control group will be allowed for a further 12-month period to launch their promotional campaign supported by the research team through regular contacts and additional technical and financial resources (intensively sustained promotion). This will facilitate the recruitment of clusters as well as their adherence to the intervention during the first 12-month period. The main criterion will be the number of suicidal acts at nine months. Data will be collected both at the local authority level and at the individual e-health tool user level.
Detailed Description
Context France is one of the Western European countries most affected by suicide, which is associated with a high societal cost. Recently, a European project aiming to develop best practice for suicide prevention has recommended the development of web-based interventions and the French national plan for actions against suicide has supported the development of reference websites for suicide prevention. However, web-based interventions should be associated with effective promotional efforts to ensure awareness but also to improve receptiveness among and around those who could benefit from such a resource. Previous work has shown that local authorities are appropriate actors for promoting prevention measures against suicide and that 20% of individuals attempting suicide visit their GP the day before their attempt. Research objectives The primary objective of our trial is to assess the effectiveness of the tailored promotion at local level of an e-health tool and to compare the effectiveness at 12 months of two types of local promotion (with or without involving GPs' waiting room) on suicidal acts. The secondary objectives are to assess the cost-effectiveness and to run a budgetary impact analysis of the intervention. Moreover, our secondary objectives are to assess the effectiveness of the promotion on the intensity of utilization of StopBlues by the three types of users (living in a city without promotion or with promotion or reinforced promotion), on their help-seeking behavior, on their implementation of supportive activities into their daily life and on the evolution of users level of psychological impairment. An additional form of promotion (intensively sustained promotion) will be implemented after 12 months in the control group and evaluated using the same primary outcome measure. In parallel, the long-term effectiveness of the two main types of local promotion (with or without a passive involvement of GPs through their waiting room) will also be assessed. Methodology The detailed content of the e-health tool and the promotional tools to be made available to local authorities and GPs was determined through literature reviews and focus groups with experts and users. A cluster-randomized, parallel group, controlled intervention study with local authorities as the unit of randomization will be set up. Local authorities can either be cities or a grouping of cities ("communauté de communes"), based on the local health governance of each area. If several adjacent local authorities volunteer individually to participate in the trial, they will be considered as a unique local authority. Volunteer local authorities will be randomly assigned to one of the following three arms: those not promoting the e-health tool (control group); those promoting the e-health tool without involving GPs' waiting rooms; those promoting the e-health tool involving GPs' waiting rooms. The trial will last 24 months and local authorities will be able to switch arm if they so wish after 12 months and launch an 'intensively sustained promotion'. This will facilitate recruitment of local authorities as well as their adherence to the intervention. Data will be collected both at the local authority level and at the individual user level. • Expected results The investigators anticipate that the promotion of the e-health intervention will lead to a greater difference in the number of suicidal acts in the local authorities where it is implemented over the trial period. Furthermore, it should also result in a higher reduction of psychological distress and in an increased intensity and length of use of the e-health tool. The promotion may also lead members of the population with moderate level of psychological distress, who may not otherwise be seeking help, to access the e-health tool and should also facilitate help-seeking behaviors and implementation of supportive activities into their daily life. The intensively sustained promotion should lead to higher rates of connexion and by then to a higher reduction of psychological distress and in an increased intensity and length of use of the e-health tool. Moreover, this project will give information on the relevance of our promotion model for primary prevention of psychological distress. Indeed, if the findings are satisfactory, this model and the formalized networks for promotion within local authorities may facilitate development of additional primary prevention measures both for mental disorders and other health issues.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Suicide and Depression, Psychological Distress, Anxiety Disorders, Local Authorities Promotion
Keywords
Health promotion, Local authorities involvement, Suicide and attempted suicide, Primary prevention, Psychological Distress

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
cluster randomized, open parallel groups , controlled intervention study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Local authorities allocated to this group won't implement any promotion of the e-health tool for the 12 first months. Free access to StopBlues.
Arm Title
Group experimental 1 promotion
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Local authorities allocated to this group will have to implement the promotion of the e-health tool: the promotion at the local authority level. They will promote the e-health tool using their usual communication methods (local newspapers, local website, bulletin and billboards, posters in the local shops and in the bus stops…). Free access to StopBlues.
Arm Title
Group experimental 2 promotion
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Local authorities allocated to this group will have to implement promotion of the e-health tool: the promotion at local authority and GPs' waiting room level. Local authorities will promote the e-health tool using their usual communication methods (local newspapers, local website, bulletin and billboards, posters in the local shops and in the bus stops...). (similarly to group experimental1) as well as leaflets and posters in GPs' waiting room. Free access to StopBlues.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Promotion of the e-health tool by local authorities
Other Intervention Name(s)
StopBlues
Intervention Description
Local authorities participating in the trial will select a referent person who will be in charge of the implementation and follow-up of the promotion. A promotion toolkit with recommendations, posters, web banners, leaflets and ready-made messages and press articles will be provided to the local authorities.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Promotion of the e-health tool by local authorities and GPs
Other Intervention Name(s)
StopBlues
Intervention Description
In those local authorities, GPs will participate passively to the promotion of the e-health tool, by providing posters and leaflets in their waiting rooms.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of suicides - Short term
Description
The number of completed suicides will be extracted from the database of the Epidemiology center on medical causes of deaths (CépiDc) for each local authority participating.
Time Frame
At month 9
Title
Number of suicide attempts - Short term
Description
The number of attempted suicides will be extracted from the national database of public and private hospital admissions (PMSI-MCO) and the national emergency database (Oscour).
Time Frame
At month 9
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of suicides - Long term
Description
The number of completed suicides will be extracted from the database of the Epidemiology center on medical causes of deaths (CépiDc) for each local authority participating.
Time Frame
At the end of the trial (month 18)
Title
Number of suicide attempts - Long term
Description
The number of attempted suicides will be extracted from the national database of public and private hospital admissions (PMSI-MCO) and the national emergency database (Oscour).
Time Frame
At the end of the trial (month 18)
Title
Costs
Description
Fixed costs for the development of the intervention including promotions tools, semi-fixed costs for the implementation of the program by local authorities and GPs, costs of suicidal acts.
Time Frame
At 9 months and at the end of the trial (month 18)
Title
Level of health-related quality of life and associated utility of StopBlues users
Description
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the quality of life questionnaire Short Form-12 (SF-12).
Time Frame
At registration, and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after
Title
Level of psychological pain of StopBlues users
Description
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12).
Time Frame
At registration, and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Title
Level of depression of StopBlues users
Description
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame
At registration, and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Title
Level of anxiety of StopBlues users
Description
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the General Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7).
Time Frame
At registration, and then at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months
Title
Level of suicidal risk of StopBlues users
Description
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with the 6 questions on the suicidal risk of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Simplified (MINI-S). The MINI-S is not available at registration, it will be triggered when results to GHQ-12, PHQ-9 and/or GAD-7 are considered showing a suicidal risk for the user.
Time Frame
At first filling and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after
Title
Help-seeking behaviors and implementation of supportive activities into daily life of StopBlues users
Description
Collected through self-assessment at the user level with an ad hoc questionnaire adapted from the general health-seeking questionnaire (GHSQ).
Time Frame
At registration, and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after
Title
Level of depression (for StopBlues users coming for a relative)
Description
Collected at the user level with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS). It has 10 questions, quoted from 0 to 6.
Time Frame
At registration
Title
Intention to seek help of StopBlues users
Description
French traduction of the first question of the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire -Original Version (GHSQ).
Time Frame
At registration for users coming for a relative, and at registration and 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after for users coming for themselves
Title
Intensity of the participation to the application and website
Description
Number of downloads and connections for each zip codes of local authorities included in the trial.
Time Frame
At month 9 and 18 (end of the trial)
Title
Length of use to the application and website
Description
Time-lapse between the inscription and the last connection to the application or website.
Time Frame
At month 9 and 18 (end of the trial)
Title
Proportion of StopBlues users who came to know the e-health tool through the different communication channels
Description
Collected at the user level with a specific question: "How did you get to know about the StopBlues program?" . 1/ By public display 2/ In public places (employment center, library ...) 3/ On my city website 4/ By the press 5/ Through social networks 6/ At merchants 7/ At my pharmacist 8/ At my GP 9/ At another health professional (physiotherapist, medical specialist ...) 10/Through relationships (friends, families, neighbors ...) 11/ Other
Time Frame
At registration
Title
Proportion of StopBlues users who came for a relative
Description
The proportion of users who subscribed for a relative and not for themselves.
Time Frame
At registration
Title
StopBlues users with a safety plan
Description
The proportion of users who filled up a safety plan.
Time Frame
At month 9 and 18 (end of the trial)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: >18 years living in one of the 42 french local authority participating to the trial volunteer access to internet (smartphone/tablet/computer) Exclusion Criteria: <18 years
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Karine Chevreul, MD, PhD
Phone
003340274148
Email
printemps@urc-eco.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karine Chevreul, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Faculté de Médecine Paris Diderot Paris 7
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karine Chevreul, MD, PhD
Phone
(0)140274148
Email
karine.chevreul@urc-eco.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathleen Turmaine, MD
Phone
(0)140275285
Email
kathleen.turmaine@urc-eco.fr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
Citation
Bertolote J, Fleischmann A. A global perspective on the magnitude of suicide mortality. The Oxford Textbook of Suicidology and Suicide Prevention: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wasserman D., Wasserman C.; 2009. p. 91 98.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Marie-Claude Mouquet, Bellamy V. Suicides et tentatives de suicide en France. Etude et Résultats. Mai 2006;(488).
Results Reference
background
Citation
O'Dea D, Tucker S. The cost of suicide to society. Wellington: Ministry of Health. 2005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17722690
Citation
Kennelly B. The economic cost of suicide in Ireland. Crisis. 2007;28(2):89-94. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910.28.2.89.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23849295
Citation
du Roscoat E, Beck F. Efficient interventions on suicide prevention: a literature review. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013 Aug;61(4):363-74. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.01.099. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22206200
Citation
Warnet S. [New national program for the prevention of suicide]. Rev Infirm. 2011 Nov;(175):4. No abstract available. French.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé. Décret n° 2013-809 du 9 septembre 2013 portant création de l'Observatoire National du Suicide. 2013
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19275980
Citation
Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009 Feb 20;11(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1035.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15298993
Citation
Dickerson S, Reinhart AM, Feeley TH, Bidani R, Rich E, Garg VK, Hershey CO. Patient Internet use for health information at three urban primary care clinics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Nov-Dec;11(6):499-504. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1460. Epub 2004 Aug 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23939459
Citation
Haga SM, Drozd F, Brendryen H, Slinning K. Mamma mia: a feasibility study of a web-based intervention to reduce the risk of postpartum depression and enhance subjective well-being. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Aug 12;2(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2659.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21398335
Citation
Monshat K, Vella-Brodrick D, Burns J, Herrman H. Mental health promotion in the Internet age: a consultation with Australian young people to inform the design of an online mindfulness training programme. Health Promot Int. 2012 Jun;27(2):177-86. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar017. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19705659
Citation
Allen J, Mohatt G, Fok CC, Henry D; People Awakening Team. Suicide prevention as a community development process: understanding circumpolar youth suicide prevention through community level outcomes. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2009 Jun;68(3):274-91. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v68i3.18328.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21309827
Citation
Bean G, Baber KM. Connect: an effective community-based youth suicide prevention program. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2011 Feb;41(1):87-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278X.2010.00006.x. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24130673
Citation
Ono Y, Sakai A, Otsuka K, Uda H, Oyama H, Ishizuka N, Awata S, Ishida Y, Iwasa H, Kamei Y, Motohashi Y, Nakamura J, Nishi N, Watanabe N, Yotsumoto T, Nakagawa A, Suzuki Y, Tajima M, Tanaka E, Sakai H, Yonemoto N. Effectiveness of a multimodal community intervention program to prevent suicide and suicide attempts: a quasi-experimental study. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e74902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074902. eCollection 2013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19861027
Citation
Pearson A, Saini P, Da Cruz D, Miles C, While D, Swinson N, Williams A, Shaw J, Appleby L, Kapur N. Primary care contact prior to suicide in individuals with mental illness. Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Nov;59(568):825-32. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X472881.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16707028
Citation
Hegerl U, Althaus D, Schmidtke A, Niklewski G. The alliance against depression: 2-year evaluation of a community-based intervention to reduce suicidality. Psychol Med. 2006 Sep;36(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1017/S003329170600780X. Epub 2006 May 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20813223
Citation
Chabaud F, Debarre J, Serazin C, Bouet R, Vaiva G, Roelandt JL. [Study of population profiles in relation to the level of suicide risk in France: Study "Mental health in the general population"]. Encephale. 2010;36(3 Suppl):33-8. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7006(10)70016-6. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22951546
Citation
Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20332509
Citation
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8792901
Citation
Schmidtke A, Bille-Brahe U, DeLeo D, Kerkhof A, Bjerke T, Crepet P, Haring C, Hawton K, Lonnqvist J, Michel K, Pommereau X, Querejeta I, Phillipe I, Salander-Renberg E, Temesvary B, Wasserman D, Fricke S, Weinacker B, Sampaio-Faria JG. Attempted suicide in Europe: rates, trends and sociodemographic characteristics of suicide attempters during the period 1989-1992. Results of the WHO/EURO Multicentre Study on Parasuicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996 May;93(5):327-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1996.tb10656.x.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Réseau OSCOUR® / Surveillance syndromique - SurSaUD® / Veille et alerte / Dossiers thématiques / Accueil [Internet]. Disponible sur: http://www.invs.sante.fr/Dossiers-thematiques/Veille-et-alerte/Surveillance-syndromique-SurSaUD-R/Reseau-OSCOUR-R
Results Reference
background
Citation
HAS. Choix méthodologiques pour l'évaluation économique à la HAS. 2011
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35451977
Citation
Turmaine K, Dumas A, Chevreul K; PRINTEMPS Consortium. Conditions for the Successful Integration of an eHealth Tool "StopBlues" Into Community-Based Interventions in France: Results From a Multiple Correspondence Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 22;24(4):e30218. doi: 10.2196/30218.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32571432
Citation
Gandre C, Le Jeannic A, Vinet MA, Turmaine K, Courtet P, Roelandt JL, Vaiva G, Giraudeau B, Alberti C, Chevreul K. The PRINTEMPS study: protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the local promotion of a smartphone application and associated website for the prevention of suicidal behaviors in the adult general population in France. Trials. 2020 Jun 22;21(1):553. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04464-2.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Preventing Psychological Distress and Suicidal Behaviours: a Web-based and Mobile Suicide Prevention Intervention in the General Population

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs