search
Back to results

Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Primary Purpose

Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Degenerative Disc Disease, Degeneration Spine

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Limited decompressions at adjacent segment with asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis
Responsible segments fused
Sponsored by
Peking University Third Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis focused on measuring Adjacent segment degeneration, Adjacent segment disease, Pre-existing degeneration, Limited decompression

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A clear diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis, and surgical level of L4-S1 (The levels to be operated on were decided by matching the clinical symptomatology with the radiological findings of the spinal levels that needed decompression);
  • Patients have asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis (cerebrospinal fluid occlusion grade=1) at adjacent segment.
  • Failed at least eight weeks conservative treatment;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable factors (slip, rotation, lateral bending, etc.) in adjacent segment L3/4;
  • Preoperative sagittal and coronal imbalance of the spine;
  • Lumbar infection and/or tumor diseases;
  • A previous history of lumbar fusion surgery.

Sites / Locations

  • Peking University Third HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

NS Group

LD Group

Arm Description

NS Group includes patients who simply receive responsible segments fused (L4-S1).

LD Group includes patients who receive responsible segments fused (L4-S1) plus limited decompression at adjacent segment (L3/4).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Adjacent segment degeneration
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Adjacent segment degeneration
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Adjacent segment degeneration
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Adjacent segment degeneration
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Adjacent segment disease
ASDis is defined as clinical and radiographic evidence of degenerative spinal disease (disc degeneration, stenosis, or spondylolisthesis) on the level adjacent to the index fusion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disability
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (0-100) is used to assess disability.
Back pain
The Visual Analog Scale (0-10) is used to evaluate back pain.
Leg pain
The Visual Analog Scale (0-10) is used to evaluate leg pain.

Full Information

First Posted
July 8, 2020
Last Updated
September 16, 2020
Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04469387
Brief Title
Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Official Title
Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment With Pre-existing Spinal Canal Stenosis Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: a Prospective Interventional Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2032 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Peking University Third Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective single-center study. Patients requiring posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for degenerative disease are prospectively enrolled and followed. Patients enrolled in this study have asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis at adjacent segment. This study will focus on the effects of preventative limited decompression at adjacent segment.
Detailed Description
Adjacent segment pathologies (ASP), including radiological adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after lumbar fusion surgeries have been troubling complications. The development of ASDis greatly reduces postoperative quality of life, and revision surgery may be required in severe cases. Several risk factors for ASP have been reported, such as age, sex, pre-existing adjacent degeneration, multilevel fusions, sagittal imbalance, the type of fusion, facet tropism and laminar inclination. Previous studies have reported asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis (SCS) as a risk factor for ASDis that requires additional surgery. Appropriate strategy needs to be explored for the treatment of asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis. Limited decompressions, including partial laminotomy and flavectomy, have been proved to have the role of enlargement in spinal canal. Therefore, we hypothesize that limited decompressions at adjacent segment with asymptomatic pre-existing SCS will have the preventive effect on ASP. This prospective study will be limited to patients with the same preoperative pathology, the same fusion segments (L4-5 and L5-S1), the same fusion technique (PLIF). Dynamic X-ray and MRI examinations of lumbar will be completed to evaluate the imaging manifestations of the responsible and adjacent segments before surgery. Patients with asymptomatic pre-existing canal stenosis factors (cerebrospinal fluid occlusion grade 1) at L3/4 segment will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups according to different strategies. NS Group includes patients who simply receive responsible segments fused (L4-S1). LD Group includes patients who receive responsible segments fused (L4-S1) plus limited decompression at adjacent segment (L3/4). In terms of limited decompression at the adjacent segment, partial laminotomy, flavectomy, and bilateral medial facetectomies up to the pedicle will be performed. Complete laminectomy and destroy of posterior ligament complex will be avoided. The patient's age, gender, preoperative body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of anesthesia (ASA grade) will be recorded during the hospital stay. Surgical data including operation time, blood loss, perioperative complications (including cerebrospinal fluid leakage, wound infection, postoperative neurological dysfunction, and perioperative secondary surgery, cardiopulmonary complication, cerebral infarction/hemorrhage, etc.), and length of hospital stay are also recorded. Preoperative clinical function questionnaires, including visual analog scale (VAS) of low back, VAS of the legs, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores for patients were completed on admission for surgery without any assistance. All the patients enrolled will finished the follow-up from date of surgery at 1,2, 5 and 10 years. The clinical outcomes and ASP will be recorded.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, Degenerative Disc Disease, Degeneration Spine
Keywords
Adjacent segment degeneration, Adjacent segment disease, Pre-existing degeneration, Limited decompression

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NS Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
NS Group includes patients who simply receive responsible segments fused (L4-S1).
Arm Title
LD Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
LD Group includes patients who receive responsible segments fused (L4-S1) plus limited decompression at adjacent segment (L3/4).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Limited decompressions at adjacent segment with asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis
Intervention Description
In terms of limited decompression at the adjacent segment, partial laminotomy, flavectomy, and bilateral medial facetectomies up to the pedicle will be performed. Complete laminectomy and destroy of posterior ligament complex will be avoided.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Responsible segments fused
Intervention Description
In terms of responsible segments fused, L4-5 and L5-S1 were fused using posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adjacent segment degeneration
Description
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery
Title
Adjacent segment degeneration
Description
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Time Frame
24 months after surgery
Title
Adjacent segment degeneration
Description
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Time Frame
60 months after surgery
Title
Adjacent segment degeneration
Description
ASDeg is defined as follows according to manifestations on X-rays and MRI changing from baseline : (1) Progression ≥1 grade in SCS or L3/4 disc degeneration; (2)Alteration of L3/4 disc herniation, Hiz and vacuum sign; (3) Progression of ≥ 3 mm in vertebral slippage, a change of ≥ 10° in the intervertebral angle on flexion and extension lateral radiograph, or scoliosis deformity on coronal plane.
Time Frame
120 months after surgery
Title
Adjacent segment disease
Description
ASDis is defined as clinical and radiographic evidence of degenerative spinal disease (disc degeneration, stenosis, or spondylolisthesis) on the level adjacent to the index fusion.
Time Frame
The entire study process, up to 120 months after surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability
Description
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (0-100) is used to assess disability.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery; 24 months after surgery; 60 months after surgery; 120 months after surgery.
Title
Back pain
Description
The Visual Analog Scale (0-10) is used to evaluate back pain.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery; 24 months after surgery; 60 months after surgery; 120 months after surgery.
Title
Leg pain
Description
The Visual Analog Scale (0-10) is used to evaluate leg pain.
Time Frame
12 months after surgery; 24 months after surgery; 60 months after surgery; 120 months after surgery.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A clear diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis, and surgical level of L4-S1 (The levels to be operated on were decided by matching the clinical symptomatology with the radiological findings of the spinal levels that needed decompression); Patients have asymptomatic pre-existing spinal canal stenosis (cerebrospinal fluid occlusion grade=1) at adjacent segment. Failed at least eight weeks conservative treatment; Exclusion Criteria: Unstable factors (slip, rotation, lateral bending, etc.) in adjacent segment L3/4; Preoperative sagittal and coronal imbalance of the spine; Lumbar infection and/or tumor diseases; A previous history of lumbar fusion surgery.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Zhuo Ran Sun, Dr.
Phone
+8618610292513
Email
puh3_szr@outlook.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wei Shi Li, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Third Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Peking University Third Hospital
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100191
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Da Zou, M.D.
Email
zd_puth@163.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We will make the clinical study report available for half a year after the publication of the results of the study.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The IPD will become available for half a year after the publication of the results of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The IPD is available to the readers of the journal in which our research is published. The corresponding author of the published papers will review the requests.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22885827
Citation
Lawrence BD, Wang J, Arnold PM, Hermsmeyer J, Norvell DC, Brodke DS. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S123-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826d60d8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28288396
Citation
Zhong ZM, Deviren V, Tay B, Burch S, Berven SH. Adjacent segment disease after instrumented fusion for adult lumbar spondylolisthesis: Incidence and risk factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 May;156:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26863261
Citation
Alentado VJ, Lubelski D, Healy AT, Orr RD, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Predisposing Characteristics of Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jul 15;41(14):1167-1172. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001493.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22460400
Citation
Hikata T, Kamata M, Furukawa M. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and efficacy of simultaneous decompression surgery for symptomatic adjacent segment disease. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Apr;27(2):70-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31824e5292.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31431873
Citation
Matsumoto T, Okuda S, Nagamoto Y, Sugiura T, Takahashi Y, Iwasaki M. Effects of Concomitant Decompression Adjacent to a Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Segment on Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes: Comparative Analysis 5 Years After Surgery. Global Spine J. 2019 Aug;9(5):505-511. doi: 10.1177/2192568218803324. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21286714
Citation
Lee GY, Lee JW, Choi HS, Oh KJ, Kang HS. A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Aug;40(8):1033-9. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1102-x. Epub 2011 Feb 1. Erratum In: Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Aug;40(8):1127. Guen, Young Lee [corrected to Lee, Guen Young]; Joon, Woo Lee [corrected to Lee, Joon Woo]; Hee, Seok Choi [corrected to Choi, Hee Seok]; Kyoung-Jin, Oh [corrected to Oh, Kyoung-Jin]; Heung, Sik Kang [corrected to Kang, Heung Sik].
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25839385
Citation
Nakashima H, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Ohara T, Suzuki Y, Saito T, Nohara A, Tauchi R, Ohta K, Hamajima N, Imagama S. Adjacent Segment Disease After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Based on Cases With a Minimum of 10 Years of Follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul 15;40(14):E831-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000917.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs