Preventive PICO on Surgical Wounds After Large Incisional Hernia Repair (PICO)
Primary Purpose
Incisional Hernia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PICO DRESSING
MEPORE dressing
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Incisional Hernia focused on measuring PICO; incisional hernia; surgical site occurrences
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over 18 years old (men and women).
- To give his consent to participation in the study.
- To have surgical prosthetic repair of large incisional hernia (type W2 or W3).
- Patients admitted to the 6th floor, G tower (Unit of Abdominal Wall surgery).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with immediate reintervention of abdominal surgery (less than 30 days from the first surgery).
- Patients after emergency surgery.
- Patients with biological prosthesis.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Hepatic cirrhosis.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital Universitari La Fe
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
patients with preventive PICO
patients with preventive MEPORE
Arm Description
PICO dressing is used in patients with incisional hernia intraoperatively
MEPORE dressing is used in patients with incisional hernia intraoperatively
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
questionnaire
data about surgical site occurrences
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03576222
First Posted
June 9, 2018
Last Updated
March 27, 2020
Sponsor
Hospital Universitario La Fe
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03576222
Brief Title
Preventive PICO on Surgical Wounds After Large Incisional Hernia Repair
Acronym
PICO
Official Title
Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Study About Effects of Preventive Negative Pressure Therapy With PICO or Standard Care Dressing (MEPORE) on Surgical Wounds After Large Incisional Hernia Repair
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 25, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Universitario La Fe
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To determine the efficacy on decreasing the rate of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing repair of large incisional hernias, after the prophylactic application of a single-use negative pressure therapy dressing (PICO), versus a conventional dressing.
Detailed Description
Hypothesis The preventive use of single-use PICO dressing reduces the complications of the surgical wound (infection and dehiscence of the surgical wound) in patients after large incisional hernia repair.
Objectives
Primary:
To determine the efficacy on decreasing the rate of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing eventration surgery, after the prophylactic application of a single-use negative pressure therapy (NPT) dressing, as opposed to a conventional dressing.
Secondary:
To report the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence during the patient's admission, at 7 days, 15 days and month after surgical repair applying a conventional dressing (MEPORE) or PICO dressing.
To quantify economic costs applying a PICO dressing versus a MEPORE dressing.
Methods:
Selection of patients Collection of the sample will be made in the Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit (La Fe Hospital), according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The surgeon will explain to the patient the objectives of the study and will give him an informed consent and will answer all the doubts about the study.
Patients will be assigned to two groups in a 1: 1 ratio. Assignment of each patient to the different groups will be done using a randomized method according to the following distribution:
Group A, it will be applied the dressing object of study (PICO)
Group B, it will be applied the conventional dressing (MEPORE).
Data collection and Study variables
For each patient, the data collection notebook designed for this purpose must be completed, which includes the following study variables:
Dependent (study outcomes)
Infection and dehiscence of surgical wound. These variables will be assessed throughout the admission and at 7 and 30 days from the hernia repair, during hospital stay, and at 15 days in the Unit.
Variables related to direct costs (hospital stay, material, antibiotic use, operating room use, etc). Other variables related to indirect costs (time of cure by nursing).
Independent
Demographic data: age, sex, BMI.
Classification ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
Risk factors abour surgical wound complications: drainage, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy, Diabetes Mellitus, cardiovascular disease, immunosuppressive treatment, active smoking, obesity, hypertension, inflammatory bowel disease.
Number of subjects 150 patients undergoing hernia repair of large incisional hernia (types W2 or W3 according to EHS classification) will be included in La Fe Hospital in Valencia from January 2017 until the recruitment of the entire sample (estimated in December 2018).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Incisional Hernia
Keywords
PICO; incisional hernia; surgical site occurrences
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
PICO dressing prevents surgical site ocurrences after abdominal Wall repair
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
intraoperative use of randomized dressing
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
146 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
patients with preventive PICO
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PICO dressing is used in patients with incisional hernia intraoperatively
Arm Title
patients with preventive MEPORE
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
MEPORE dressing is used in patients with incisional hernia intraoperatively
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PICO DRESSING
Intervention Description
USE PICO DRESSING ON SURGICAL INCISION AFTER ABDOMINAL WALL REPAIR IN THE SURGICAL ROOM
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MEPORE dressing
Intervention Description
MEPORE dressing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
questionnaire
Description
data about surgical site occurrences
Time Frame
1 YEAR
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients over 18 years old (men and women).
To give his consent to participation in the study.
To have surgical prosthetic repair of large incisional hernia (type W2 or W3).
Patients admitted to the 6th floor, G tower (Unit of Abdominal Wall surgery).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with immediate reintervention of abdominal surgery (less than 30 days from the first surgery).
Patients after emergency surgery.
Patients with biological prosthesis.
Pregnancy and lactation.
Hepatic cirrhosis.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari La Fe
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46008
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17106382
Citation
Gomoll AH, Lin A, Harris MB. Incisional vacuum-assisted closure therapy. J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(10):705-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bot.0000211159.98239.d2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25903674
Citation
Stannard JP, Zane Atkins B, O'Malley D, Singh H, Bernstein B, Fahey M, Masden D, Attinger CE. use of negative pressure therapy on closed surgical incisions: a case series. Wounds. 2009 Aug;21(8):221-8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23742125
Citation
Arroyo AA, Casanova PL, Soriano JV, Torra I Bou JE. Open-label clinical trial comparing the clinical and economic effectiveness of using a polyurethane film surgical dressing with gauze surgical dressings in the care of post-operative surgical wounds. Int Wound J. 2015 Jun;12(3):285-92. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12099. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22145641
Citation
Colli A, Camara ML. First experience with a new negative pressure incision management system on surgical incisions after cardiac surgery in high risk patients. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Dec 6;6:160. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-6-160. Erratum In: J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;7:37. Camara, Maria-Luisa [added].
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23883481
Citation
Pellino G, Sciaudone G, Candilio G, Campitiello F, Selvaggi F, Canonico S. Effects of a new pocket device for negative pressure wound therapy on surgical wounds of patients affected with Crohn's disease: a pilot trial. Surg Innov. 2014 Apr;21(2):204-12. doi: 10.1177/1553350613496906. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22015748
Citation
de Tullio D, Biondin V, Occhionorelli S. When a postsurgical dehiscence becomes a serious problem. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011 Nov;24(11):503-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000407646.05209.e2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24106562
Citation
Ingargiola MJ, Daniali LN, Lee ES. Does the application of incisional negative pressure therapy to high-risk wounds prevent surgical site complications? A systematic review. Eplasty. 2013 Sep 20;13:e49. eCollection 2013.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21868417
Citation
Wilkes RP, Kilpad DV, Zhao Y, Kazala R, McNulty A. Closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): biomechanics. Surg Innov. 2012 Mar;19(1):67-75. doi: 10.1177/1553350611414920. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19460818
Citation
Atkins BZ, Wooten MK, Kistler J, Hurley K, Hughes GC, Wolfe WG. Does negative pressure wound therapy have a role in preventing poststernotomy wound complications? Surg Innov. 2009 Jun;16(2):140-6. doi: 10.1177/1553350609334821. Epub 2009 May 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23127793
Citation
Cima R, Dankbar E, Lovely J, Pendlimari R, Aronhalt K, Nehring S, Hyke R, Tyndale D, Rogers J, Quast L; Colorectal Surgical Site Infection Reduction Team. Colorectal surgery surgical site infection reduction program: a national surgical quality improvement program--driven multidisciplinary single-institution experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jan;216(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18840089
Citation
Anderson DJ, Kaye KS, Classen D, Arias KM, Podgorny K, Burstin H, Calfee DP, Coffin SE, Dubberke ER, Fraser V, Gerding DN, Griffin FA, Gross P, Klompas M, Lo E, Marschall J, Mermel LA, Nicolle L, Pegues DA, Perl TM, Saint S, Salgado CD, Weinstein RA, Wise R, Yokoe DS. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;29 Suppl 1:S51-61. doi: 10.1086/591064. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33201116
Citation
Bueno-Lledo J, Franco-Bernal A, Garcia-Voz-Mediano MT, Torregrosa-Gallud A, Bonafe S. Prophylactic Single-use Negative Pressure Dressing in Closed Surgical Wounds After Incisional Hernia Repair: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2021 Jun 1;273(6):1081-1086. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004310.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Preventive PICO on Surgical Wounds After Large Incisional Hernia Repair
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs