search
Back to results

Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds (PRIMA)

Primary Purpose

Incisional Hernia Occurence

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mesh supported closure
primary closure
mesh supported closure
Sponsored by
Erasmus Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Incisional Hernia Occurence focused on measuring incisional hernia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Every elective midline laparotomy for patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and patients with a BMI of more than 27.
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Emergency procedure
  • Inclusion in other trials
  • Aortic reconstruction for obstructive disease
  • Life expectancy less than 24 months
  • Pregnant women

Sites / Locations

  • Wilhelminenspital
  • Berlin-Charite Universitatsklinikum
  • Hamburg-Eppefdorf Universitatsklinikum
  • Heidelberg University Medical Center
  • Munchen University Medical Center
  • Erasmus Medical Center
  • IJsselland Ziekenhuis
  • Scheper Ziekenhuis
  • Maasstad Ziekenhuis
  • Sint Franciscus Gasthuis
  • Maxima Medisch Centrum
  • Isala klinieken

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

3

Arm Description

primary closure of the midline

onlay mesh supported closure

sublay mesh supported closure

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

incisional hernia occurence

Secondary Outcome Measures

complications
post-operative pain
quality of life

Full Information

First Posted
September 26, 2008
Last Updated
October 27, 2016
Sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Collaborators
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Aesculap AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00761475
Brief Title
Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds
Acronym
PRIMA
Official Title
Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds; a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Collaborators
Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Aesculap AG

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Incisional hernia is the most frequently seen long term complication in surgery causing much morbidity and even mortality in patients. Despite studies on the optimal closing technique for laparotomies, the risk for incisional hernia after midline incision remains about 5-20 %. Major risk factors for incisional hernia after a laparotomy, like obesity, steroid use, malnutrition, smoking and connective tissue disorders, are known. Despite this knowledge, there has not yet been developed a sufficient method for prevention. One specific group of high risk patients are patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The relationship between aortic aneurysm and other abdominal wall hernias, like inguinal hernias, has been reported. Retrospective and prospective studies have shown an average risk for incisional hernia after AAA repair of 31.6 %. Another high risk group is the group of obese patients. Patients with a BMI of more than 27 have a high risk of developing an incisional hernia after midline incision with an incidence of 22% after 12 months. Considering only 50 % of incisional hernia will be clinically evident in the first 12 months, the total incidence will be above 30%. This high risk group of patients with obesitas and aneurysmatic disease can benefit most from prevention. Some small studies have been performed to evaluate the usefulness and safety of primary laparotomy wound closure with the aid of prosthetic mesh. These studies show a very low risk for incisional hernias and a low infection rate, even when used in contaminated wounds such as colostomal surgery. However, there has not been performed an adequate randomized controlled trial to study the prevention of incisional hernias. Our hypothesis is that incisional hernia prevention with use of prosthetic mesh after laparotomy is effective in patients with aortic aneurysm and in obese patients with a BMI of more than 27.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Incisional Hernia Occurence
Keywords
incisional hernia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
480 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
primary closure of the midline
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
onlay mesh supported closure
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
sublay mesh supported closure
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
mesh supported closure
Intervention Description
onlay mesh supported closure midline laparotomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
primary closure
Intervention Description
primary closure of the midline
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
mesh supported closure
Intervention Description
sublay mesh supported closure midline laparotomy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
incisional hernia occurence
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
complications
Time Frame
1 month
Title
post-operative pain
Time Frame
1 month
Title
quality of life
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Every elective midline laparotomy for patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and patients with a BMI of more than 27. Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Age < 18 years Emergency procedure Inclusion in other trials Aortic reconstruction for obstructive disease Life expectancy less than 24 months Pregnant women
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
J.F. Lange, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Erasmus Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Wilhelminenspital
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Berlin-Charite Universitatsklinikum
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Hamburg-Eppefdorf Universitatsklinikum
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Heidelberg University Medical Center
City
Heidelberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Munchen University Medical Center
City
Munchen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Erasmus Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
State/Province
Zuid-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
IJsselland Ziekenhuis
City
Capelle a/d IJssel
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Scheper Ziekenhuis
City
Emmen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maasstad Ziekenhuis
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Maxima Medisch Centrum
City
Veldhoven
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Isala klinieken
City
Zwolle
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28641875
Citation
Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik REGJM, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Timman R, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon JA, Schuhmacher C, Mihaljevic A, Izbicki JR, Fikatas P, Knebel P, Fortelny RH, Kleinrensink GJ, Lange JF, Jeekel HJ; PRIMA Trialist Group. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):567-576. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6. Epub 2017 Jun 20. Erratum In: Lancet. 2017 Aug 5;390(10094):554.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24983993
Citation
Timmermans L, Eker HH, Steyerberg EW, Jairam A, de Jong D, Pierik EG, Lases SS, van der Ham AC, Dawson I, Charbon J, Schuhmacher C, Izbicki JR, Neuhaus P, Knebel P, Fortelny R, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture with primary glued mesh augmentation to prevent incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):276-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000798.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24499111
Citation
Nieuwenhuizen J, Eker HH, Timmermans L, Hop WC, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF; PRIMA Trialist Group. A double blind randomized controlled trial comparing primary suture closure with mesh augmented closure to reduce incisional hernia incidence. BMC Surg. 2013 Oct 28;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-48.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Primary Mesh Closure of Abdominal Midline Wounds

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs