search
Back to results

Prognosis of Dental Implants in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Dental Implant, Primary Sjögren Syndrome

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dental implants
Sponsored by
University of Copenhagen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Implant focused on measuring Dental Implants, Primary Sjögren syndrom, Biological outcome, Technical outcome, Aesthetic outcome, Patient-reported outcome

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Age 20-70 years
  • Indication of tooth replacement with implant-supported fixed dentures
  • The test group should be without any potentially associated disease
  • pSS must be diagnosed according to the American-European Consensus Group criteria (Vitali et al., 2002):

    1. The presence of any 4 of the following 6 items, as long as either item IV (Histopathology) or VI (Serology) is positive
    2. The presence of any 3 of the 4 objective criteria items (that is, items III, IV, V, VI)

The items:

I. Ocular symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions:

  1. Have you had daily, persistent, troublesome dry eyes for more than 3 months?
  2. Do you have a recurrent sensation of sand or gravel in the eyes?
  3. Do you use tear substitutes more than 3 times a day?

II. Oral symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions:

  1. Have you had a daily feeling of dry mouth for more than 3 months?
  2. Have you had recurrently or persistently swollen salivary glands as an adult?
  3. Do you frequently drink liquids to aid in swallowing dry food?

III. Ocular signs --that is, objective evidence of ocular involvement defined as a positive result for at least one of the following two tests:

  1. Schirmer's I test, performed without anaesthesia (<5 mm in 5 minutes)
  2. Rose bengal score or other ocular dye score (>4 according to van Bijsterveld's scoring system) IV. Histopathology: In minor salivary glands (obtained through normal-appearing mucosa) focal lymphocytic sialoadenitis, evaluated by an expert histopathologist, with a focus score >1, defined as a number of lymphocytic foci (which are adjacent to normal-appearing mucous acini and contain more than 50 lymphocytes) per 4 mm2 of glandular tissue

V. Salivary gland involvement: objective evidence of salivary gland involvement defined by a positive result for at least one of the following diagnostic tests:

  1. Unstimulated whole salivary flow (<1.5 ml in 15 minutes)
  2. Parotid sialography showing the presence of diffuse sialectasias (punctate, cavitary or destructive pattern), without evidence of obstruction in the major ducts
  3. Salivary scintigraphy showing delayed uptake, reduced concentration and/or delayed excretion of tracer

VI. Autoantibodies: presence in the serum of the following autoantibodies:

1. Antibodies to Ro(SSA) or La(SSB) antigens, or both

  • The control group should match the test group according to the age, sex and treatment region and fulfill the following:
  • Normal salivary flow: unstimulated > 1.5 ml in 15 min, stimulated > 3.5 ml in 5 min
  • No ocular or oral symptoms
  • Submission of written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons with:

    1. secundary Sjögren Syndrom (sSS)
    2. severe systemic disease including severe bleeding disorder and/or conditions which put the patient at risk and/or prohibit compliance as stated by Hwang and Wang, 2006; and Hwang and Wang, 2007):
    3. previous or present bisphosphonate, Denosumab or anti-angiogenetic chemotherapeutic drugs
    4. poor bone quality according to Lekholm U & Zarb GA (1985) or diagnosed osteoporosis
    5. Heavy smokers, eqv. to 20+ cigarettes/day
    6. Noncompliance

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    Test group

    Control group

    Arm Description

    Patients with Primary Sjögren Syndrom

    Patients with Primary Sjögren Syndrom, matched to the test group

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of patients with Sjögren syndrom
    number of participants in the test group
    Number of patients without Sjögren syndrom
    number of participants in the control group
    Number of implants in each group
    number of implants in patients with or without Sjögren syndrom
    Marginal bone loss
    Marginal bone level change over the time in millimeter: radiological examinations and measurements of the marginal bone at implants mesially and distally (millimeter) and the change of the marginal bone level between different observation
    Frequency of implant sites with biological complications
    Frequency of implant sites with sign of inflammatory reactions with or without marginal bone loss (periimplantitis or peri-implant mucositis). The number of implant sites with bleeding on probing, suppuration or fistula will be registered and described.
    Sialometry
    measurement of stimulated or unstimulated saliva flow, ml/min for all participants and statistical comparison between the participants in both groups.
    Technical outcome
    The frequency of prosthetic complications such as fracture or loosening of implant-supported crowns at all implant sites in all participants and comparison between to groups
    Aesthetic outcome by Copenhagen Index Scores
    Aesthetic parameters: Symmetry/harmony, Crown morphology, Crown color match, mucosal discoloration, Papilla Index score mesially and distally Score 1, 2, 3 and 4 (socre 1 for the most optimal and socre 4 for unacceptable aesthetic outcome)
    Patient-reported outcome
    Oral Health Impact on the Quality of Life (OHIP-49 questionnaire) Response scale from 0 (never experienced problem) to 4 (problem experienced very often).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Decayed, Missing, Filled Tooth index (DMFT)
    Caries experience by calculation of total number of tooth with Decayed, Missing or Filled tooth. Less scores indicating better dental condition. Both groups will be compared and the relation to sialometry will be analyzed.
    Modified Plaque Index
    The Oral hygiene of the patients will be measured by recording the amount of the plaque on the implants and all natural teeth using the following scale: (score 1 to 4) Score 1: no visible plaque; Score 2: small amount of hardly visible plaque; Score 3: moderate amount of plaque; Score 4: abundant amount of plaque The difference in plaque index and the relation to the biological complication will be statistically analyzed in both group of participants.
    Modified Mucosal Index scores
    The sign of inflammatory reactions around the implants will be measured by using the following scores: (score 1 to 4) Score 1: normal appearance of gingiva/mucosa; Score 2: slight redness or hyperplasia; Score 3: moderate inflammation with marked redness and hyperplasia and easily bleeding by probing; Score 4: Severe inflammation with severe redness and hyperplasia and spontaneous bleeding The difference in mucosal index and the relation to the plaque index will be statistically analyzed in both group of participants.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    June 14, 2021
    Last Updated
    August 24, 2021
    Sponsor
    University of Copenhagen
    Collaborators
    ITI Foundation, Gigtforeningen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04960605
    Brief Title
    Prognosis of Dental Implants in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome
    Official Title
    Prognosis of Dental Implants in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome. A Prospective Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Active, not recruiting
    Study Start Date
    January 1, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 30, 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Copenhagen
    Collaborators
    ITI Foundation, Gigtforeningen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (PSS) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease primarily involving the salivary and lacrimal glands. Few data exist regarding survival and success rate of dental implants in patients with PSS. Although a previous study suggest lower success rate for dental implants we hypothesize that dental implants have similar survival and success rate in PSS as healthy controls. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term survival and success rate of dental implants in patients with PSS compared to the healthy controls.
    Detailed Description
    Sjögren's syndrome (SS) affects about 5% of population worldwide. Patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome (PSS) have dry mouth, oral mucosal problems, increased dental decay and problems wearing dentures. A retrospective case series indicated that implant survival rate may be reduced among SS patients. Furthermore, there is lack of scientific evidence to support success or failure of dental implants in SS-patients. The null hypothesis is that the outcome of implant treatment after 5 years is similar in patients with primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) compared to matched controls. The participants with PSS fulfilled the Copenhagen Criteria and/or the US-EU criteria for PSS, miss at least one tooth and have sufficient bone volume for a single implant insertion without bone augmentation. Recruitment of PSS patients was done via own existing databases on PSS patients as well as repeated national announcements in the Danish Dental Journal. We included 24 consecutive participants with PSS. For each participant with PSS (test group), an age, gender, and tooth-type matched healthy participant (control group) was enrolled (n=24). The surgical part of the implant treatment was carried out by two experienced maxillofacial surgeons. Straumann implants (Straumann Bone level Roxolid®) with a hydrophilic sandblasted, acid etched implant surface (SLActive) was used for all participants. If more than one implant was placed, the study implant was determined according to a randomization scheme. The inserted implants were allowed to heal for 3 months before the prosthetic part, which was carried out by two experienced prostodontists. The same prosthetic material and method was applied for all participants. The participants were recalled for baseline (2 months after prosthetic loading) and 1, 3 and 5 years examination, where the biological (marginal bone level, inflammation etc.), technical (fractures, loosening's etc.), esthetic (Copenhagen Index score) and patient-reported (Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire/OHIP-49) assessments were performed.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Dental Implant, Primary Sjögren Syndrome
    Keywords
    Dental Implants, Primary Sjögren syndrom, Biological outcome, Technical outcome, Aesthetic outcome, Patient-reported outcome

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Prospective study
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    The statistical analyses will be masked.
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    48 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Test group
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Patients with Primary Sjögren Syndrom
    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Patients with Primary Sjögren Syndrom, matched to the test group
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dental implants
    Intervention Description
    Treatment of the toothless regions with dental implants
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of patients with Sjögren syndrom
    Description
    number of participants in the test group
    Time Frame
    Five years
    Title
    Number of patients without Sjögren syndrom
    Description
    number of participants in the control group
    Time Frame
    Five years
    Title
    Number of implants in each group
    Description
    number of implants in patients with or without Sjögren syndrom
    Time Frame
    Five years
    Title
    Marginal bone loss
    Description
    Marginal bone level change over the time in millimeter: radiological examinations and measurements of the marginal bone at implants mesially and distally (millimeter) and the change of the marginal bone level between different observation
    Time Frame
    Five years
    Title
    Frequency of implant sites with biological complications
    Description
    Frequency of implant sites with sign of inflammatory reactions with or without marginal bone loss (periimplantitis or peri-implant mucositis). The number of implant sites with bleeding on probing, suppuration or fistula will be registered and described.
    Time Frame
    5 year
    Title
    Sialometry
    Description
    measurement of stimulated or unstimulated saliva flow, ml/min for all participants and statistical comparison between the participants in both groups.
    Time Frame
    5 year
    Title
    Technical outcome
    Description
    The frequency of prosthetic complications such as fracture or loosening of implant-supported crowns at all implant sites in all participants and comparison between to groups
    Time Frame
    5 years
    Title
    Aesthetic outcome by Copenhagen Index Scores
    Description
    Aesthetic parameters: Symmetry/harmony, Crown morphology, Crown color match, mucosal discoloration, Papilla Index score mesially and distally Score 1, 2, 3 and 4 (socre 1 for the most optimal and socre 4 for unacceptable aesthetic outcome)
    Time Frame
    5 year
    Title
    Patient-reported outcome
    Description
    Oral Health Impact on the Quality of Life (OHIP-49 questionnaire) Response scale from 0 (never experienced problem) to 4 (problem experienced very often).
    Time Frame
    5 years
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Decayed, Missing, Filled Tooth index (DMFT)
    Description
    Caries experience by calculation of total number of tooth with Decayed, Missing or Filled tooth. Less scores indicating better dental condition. Both groups will be compared and the relation to sialometry will be analyzed.
    Time Frame
    5 years
    Title
    Modified Plaque Index
    Description
    The Oral hygiene of the patients will be measured by recording the amount of the plaque on the implants and all natural teeth using the following scale: (score 1 to 4) Score 1: no visible plaque; Score 2: small amount of hardly visible plaque; Score 3: moderate amount of plaque; Score 4: abundant amount of plaque The difference in plaque index and the relation to the biological complication will be statistically analyzed in both group of participants.
    Time Frame
    5 years
    Title
    Modified Mucosal Index scores
    Description
    The sign of inflammatory reactions around the implants will be measured by using the following scores: (score 1 to 4) Score 1: normal appearance of gingiva/mucosa; Score 2: slight redness or hyperplasia; Score 3: moderate inflammation with marked redness and hyperplasia and easily bleeding by probing; Score 4: Severe inflammation with severe redness and hyperplasia and spontaneous bleeding The difference in mucosal index and the relation to the plaque index will be statistically analyzed in both group of participants.
    Time Frame
    5 years

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    20 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: - Age 20-70 years Indication of tooth replacement with implant-supported fixed dentures The test group should be without any potentially associated disease pSS must be diagnosed according to the American-European Consensus Group criteria (Vitali et al., 2002): The presence of any 4 of the following 6 items, as long as either item IV (Histopathology) or VI (Serology) is positive The presence of any 3 of the 4 objective criteria items (that is, items III, IV, V, VI) The items: I. Ocular symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions: Have you had daily, persistent, troublesome dry eyes for more than 3 months? Do you have a recurrent sensation of sand or gravel in the eyes? Do you use tear substitutes more than 3 times a day? II. Oral symptoms: a positive response to at least one of the following questions: Have you had a daily feeling of dry mouth for more than 3 months? Have you had recurrently or persistently swollen salivary glands as an adult? Do you frequently drink liquids to aid in swallowing dry food? III. Ocular signs --that is, objective evidence of ocular involvement defined as a positive result for at least one of the following two tests: Schirmer's I test, performed without anaesthesia (<5 mm in 5 minutes) Rose bengal score or other ocular dye score (>4 according to van Bijsterveld's scoring system) IV. Histopathology: In minor salivary glands (obtained through normal-appearing mucosa) focal lymphocytic sialoadenitis, evaluated by an expert histopathologist, with a focus score >1, defined as a number of lymphocytic foci (which are adjacent to normal-appearing mucous acini and contain more than 50 lymphocytes) per 4 mm2 of glandular tissue V. Salivary gland involvement: objective evidence of salivary gland involvement defined by a positive result for at least one of the following diagnostic tests: Unstimulated whole salivary flow (<1.5 ml in 15 minutes) Parotid sialography showing the presence of diffuse sialectasias (punctate, cavitary or destructive pattern), without evidence of obstruction in the major ducts Salivary scintigraphy showing delayed uptake, reduced concentration and/or delayed excretion of tracer VI. Autoantibodies: presence in the serum of the following autoantibodies: 1. Antibodies to Ro(SSA) or La(SSB) antigens, or both The control group should match the test group according to the age, sex and treatment region and fulfill the following: Normal salivary flow: unstimulated > 1.5 ml in 15 min, stimulated > 3.5 ml in 5 min No ocular or oral symptoms Submission of written informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: Persons with: secundary Sjögren Syndrom (sSS) severe systemic disease including severe bleeding disorder and/or conditions which put the patient at risk and/or prohibit compliance as stated by Hwang and Wang, 2006; and Hwang and Wang, 2007): previous or present bisphosphonate, Denosumab or anti-angiogenetic chemotherapeutic drugs poor bone quality according to Lekholm U & Zarb GA (1985) or diagnosed osteoporosis Heavy smokers, eqv. to 20+ cigarettes/day Noncompliance
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Mandana Hosseini
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Copenhagen
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    10531746
    Citation
    Isidor F, Brondum K, Hansen HJ, Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S. Outcome of treatment with implant-retained dental prostheses in patients with Sjogren syndrome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Sep-Oct;14(5):736-43.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    15740617
    Citation
    Pedersen AM, Bardow A, Nauntofte B. Salivary changes and dental caries as potential oral markers of autoimmune salivary gland dysfunction in primary Sjogren's syndrome. BMC Clin Pathol. 2005 Mar 1;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-5-4.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21443589
    Citation
    Hosseini M, Gotfredsen K. A feasible, aesthetic quality evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: an analysis of validity and reliability. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Apr;23(4):453-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02162.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    22563590
    Citation
    Shiboski SC, Shiboski CH, Criswell L, Baer A, Challacombe S, Lanfranchi H, Schiodt M, Umehara H, Vivino F, Zhao Y, Dong Y, Greenspan D, Heidenreich AM, Helin P, Kirkham B, Kitagawa K, Larkin G, Li M, Lietman T, Lindegaard J, McNamara N, Sack K, Shirlaw P, Sugai S, Vollenweider C, Whitcher J, Wu A, Zhang S, Zhang W, Greenspan J, Daniels T; Sjogren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance (SICCA) Research Groups. American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjogren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance cohort. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;64(4):475-87. doi: 10.1002/acr.21591.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Prognosis of Dental Implants in Patients With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs