search
Back to results

Prophylactic Antibiotic Coated Nail to Prevent Infection: A Clinical Trial

Primary Purpose

Osteomyelitis Tibia, Tibial Fractures, Open Tibia Fracture

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Antibiotic coated intramedullary Nail
Standard Intramedullary Nail
Sponsored by
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Osteomyelitis Tibia focused on measuring Antibiotic-coated nail

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years or older
  • Gustilo Type II or III open tibia fracture requiring definitive fixation with intramedullary nail

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Allergy to vancomycin, tobramycin, or gentamicin
  • Unable to speak English or Spanish
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Prisoner
  • Unable to follow up for 12 months

Sites / Locations

  • University of Florida Gainesville
  • Florida Orthopaedic Institute
  • Atrium Health Navicent
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
  • Atrium Health Carolinas Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Atrium Health CabarrusRecruiting
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • University of Texas Houston
  • San Antonio Military Medical Center
  • Inova

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intramedullary Nail

Antibiotic Coated Intramedullary Nail

Arm Description

Traditional standard of care intramedullary (IM) nail

Intramedullary Nail coated with 2 grams of vancomycin and 560 mg gentamicin liquid.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants who develop deep surgical site infection (SSI)
Number of participants in each group who develop SSI as defined by the criteria establish by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC criteria define deep as occurring within 30 or 90 days after the procedure. However, we will continue to follow patients for 12 months and document any infections and other complications during this period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score
The RUST score ranges from a minimum score of 4 (definitely not healed) to a maximum score of 12 (completely healed). The final x-ray obtained within a 12-month period following injury will be uploaded to REDCap for review by a blinded panel of investigators from participating sites.
Percentage of Union
Union is the gradual process of bone regeneration after a fracture. Percentage of Union, as determined by the treating surgeon, will be assessed via radiographs. Recorded by surgeon as yes/no answers.
Time to Union
Captured in days
Average Time to Return to Work/Duty
number of days
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
IPAQ measures the total amount of physical activity completed in a 7 day period by calculating the minutes per week in in each physical activity level domain (walking, moderate and vigorous) by a metabolic equivalent energy (MET) expenditure estimate. Walking = 3.3 x number of walking minutes x number of walking days Moderate activity= 4.0 x number activity minutes x number of days Vigorous activity = 8 x number of activity minutes x number of days Total = Walking MET-min/wk+moderate MET-min/wk+vigorous MET-min/wk
Number of Subjects Who Have Returned to Work
Determined by asking whether subjects have returned to work
Number of Participants who Return to Operating Room (OR)
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Physical Function
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means higher physical function.
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Physical Function: Anxiety
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of anxiety.
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Depression
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of depression.
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Fatigue
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of fatigue.
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Sleep Disturbance
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of sleep disturbance.
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Pain Interference
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of pain interference.
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher ability to participate in social roles and activities.

Full Information

First Posted
June 13, 2022
Last Updated
June 30, 2023
Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05421741
Brief Title
Prophylactic Antibiotic Coated Nail to Prevent Infection: A Clinical Trial
Official Title
Prophylactic Antibiotic Coated Nail to Prevent Infection: A Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 15, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This prospective randomized clinical trial will compare outcomes between patients treated primarily with a prophylactic antibiotic coated nail and those treated with traditional standard of care intramedullary (IM) nailing.
Detailed Description
Despite significant treatment advances and protocols to prevent infection, severe open fractures of the lower extremity still have very high rates of deep infection. Infection in an active duty military population increases disability and decreases the likelihood of returning to duty. In addition, infection is one of the main factors associated with rehospitalization. Further, deep infections have not only resulted in increased disability after injury, infection is implicated as one of the main factors in late amputation. Among service members, only 20-25% with a severe open tibia fracture are able to return to active duty. Novel techniques for reducing infection are needed. The proposed study addresses the focus area of fracture-related infections, specifically the prevention of infection. This prospective randomized clinical trial will compare outcomes between patients treated primarily with a prophylactic antibiotic coated nail and those treated with traditional standard of care intramedullary (IM) nailing. This prospective randomized clinical trial will compare outcomes between patients treated primarily with a prophylactic antibiotic coated nail and those treated with traditional standard of care intramedullary (IM) nailing. The target population for the proposed study is patients with severe open tibia fractures (Type II or Type III) who require definitive fixation with intramedullary nail recruited from one of the participating sites during the index hospitalization. One group will be treated prophylactically using an antibiotic coated intramedullary nail at time of definitive fixation (1CN), while the second group will be treated with traditional standard of care intramedullary nail without antibiotic-coating (SN). Participant will be followed for 12 months (data capture including patient interviews and clinical data capture from the treatment team and medical record at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteomyelitis Tibia, Tibial Fractures, Open Tibia Fracture
Keywords
Antibiotic-coated nail

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
484 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intramedullary Nail
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Traditional standard of care intramedullary (IM) nail
Arm Title
Antibiotic Coated Intramedullary Nail
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intramedullary Nail coated with 2 grams of vancomycin and 560 mg gentamicin liquid.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Antibiotic coated intramedullary Nail
Other Intervention Name(s)
Local Gentamicin 560 Powder, Vancomycin 2gm Liquid
Intervention Description
Antibiotic coated intramedullary nail: A mixture of 40gm bag of acrylic cement, antibiotic powder (Vancomycin 2gm) and 560mg gentamicin liquid. The intramedullary is coated with the mixture using a cement gun tube.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard Intramedullary Nail
Intervention Description
Standard Intramedullary Nail
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants who develop deep surgical site infection (SSI)
Description
Number of participants in each group who develop SSI as defined by the criteria establish by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC criteria define deep as occurring within 30 or 90 days after the procedure. However, we will continue to follow patients for 12 months and document any infections and other complications during this period.
Time Frame
Day 30 through month 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographic Union Scale in Tibial fractures (RUST) score
Description
The RUST score ranges from a minimum score of 4 (definitely not healed) to a maximum score of 12 (completely healed). The final x-ray obtained within a 12-month period following injury will be uploaded to REDCap for review by a blinded panel of investigators from participating sites.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6, and month 12
Title
Percentage of Union
Description
Union is the gradual process of bone regeneration after a fracture. Percentage of Union, as determined by the treating surgeon, will be assessed via radiographs. Recorded by surgeon as yes/no answers.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
Time to Union
Description
Captured in days
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
Average Time to Return to Work/Duty
Description
number of days
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Description
IPAQ measures the total amount of physical activity completed in a 7 day period by calculating the minutes per week in in each physical activity level domain (walking, moderate and vigorous) by a metabolic equivalent energy (MET) expenditure estimate. Walking = 3.3 x number of walking minutes x number of walking days Moderate activity= 4.0 x number activity minutes x number of days Vigorous activity = 8 x number of activity minutes x number of days Total = Walking MET-min/wk+moderate MET-min/wk+vigorous MET-min/wk
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
Number of Subjects Who Have Returned to Work
Description
Determined by asking whether subjects have returned to work
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
Number of Participants who Return to Operating Room (OR)
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Physical Function
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means higher physical function.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Physical Function: Anxiety
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of anxiety.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Depression
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of depression.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Fatigue
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of fatigue.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Sleep Disturbance
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of sleep disturbance.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Pain Interference
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher level of pain interference.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12
Title
PROMIS-29 Subscale--Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities
Description
The PROMIS-29 scales will be scored using a T-score metric method. A score of 50 points represents the population average for each scale, and 10 points represent one standard deviation. Higher scores means a higher ability to participate in social roles and activities.
Time Frame
week 6, month 3, month 6 and month12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients 18 years or older Gustilo Type II or III open tibia fracture requiring definitive fixation with intramedullary nail Exclusion Criteria: Less than 18 years of age Allergy to vancomycin or gentamicin Unable to speak English or Spanish Pregnant and lactating women Prisoner Unable to follow up for 12 months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rachel Seymour, PhD
Phone
7043552000
Email
Rachel.Seymour@atriumhealth.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Christine Churchill, MA
Phone
7043552000
Email
Christine.Churchill@atriumhealth.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph Hsu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Florida Gainesville
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Talerico, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marissa Pazik
Facility Name
Florida Orthopaedic Institute
City
Temple Terrace
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33637
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa Stang
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hassan Mir, MD
Facility Name
Atrium Health Navicent
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jarrod Dumpe, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jarrod Dumpe, MD
Facility Name
University of Kentucky
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40536
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Matuszewski, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Matuszewski, MD
Facility Name
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27546
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Chen, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Malvika Choudhari
Facility Name
Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28203
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel B Seymour, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine Churchill, MA
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph R Hsu, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel B Seymour, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kevin Phelps, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Madhav Karunakar, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Sims, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laurence Kempton, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Meghan Wally, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susan Odum, PhD
Facility Name
Atrium Health Cabarrus
City
Concord
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28025
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luke Harmer, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erica Grochowski, MPH
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luke Harmer, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laura Blum, MD
Facility Name
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martha Holden
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eben Carroll, MD
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen Trochez
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Stinner, MD
Facility Name
University of Texas Houston
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Warner, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Natasha Howard
Facility Name
San Antonio Military Medical Center
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78234
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raymond Kessler, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raymond Kessler, MD
Facility Name
Inova
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22031
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohamad Ray-Zack
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Greg Gaski, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17414553
Citation
Owens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Macaitis J, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC. Characterization of extremity wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):254-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802f78fb.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22491628
Citation
Burns TC, Stinner DJ, Mack AW, Potter BK, Beer R, Eckel TT, Possley DR, Beltran MJ, Hayda RA, Andersen RC, Keeling JJ, Frisch HM, Murray CK, Wenke JC, Ficke JR, Hsu JR; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium. Microbiology and injury characteristics in severe open tibia fractures from combat. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Apr;72(4):1062-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318241f534.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12477942
Citation
Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF, Burgess AR, Webb LX, Swiontkowski MF, Sanders RW, Jones AL, McAndrew MP, Patterson BM, McCarthy ML, Travison TG, Castillo RC. An analysis of outcomes of reconstruction or amputation after leg-threatening injuries. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 12;347(24):1924-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012604.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25159355
Citation
Napierala MA, Rivera JC, Burns TC, Murray CK, Wenke JC, Hsu JR; Skeletal Trauma Research Education Consortium (STReC). Infection reduces return-to-duty rates for soldiers with Type III open tibia fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Sep;77(3 Suppl 2):S194-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000364.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17638186
Citation
Johnson EN, Burns TC, Hayda RA, Hospenthal DR, Murray CK. Infectious complications of open type III tibial fractures among combat casualties. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Aug 15;45(4):409-15. doi: 10.1086/520029. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17916782
Citation
Ficke JR, Pollak AN. Extremity War Injuries: Development of Clinical Treatment Principles. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Oct;15(10):590-5. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200710000-00003.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28323794
Citation
Section 1: Preventing and Managing Infection and Other Complications After Orthopaedic Trauma. J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S2. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000798. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21795886
Citation
Masini BD, Owens BD, Hsu JR, Wenke JC. Rehospitalization after combat injury. J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S98-102. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182218fbc.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21795878
Citation
Huh J, Stinner DJ, Burns TC, Hsu JR; Late Amputation Study Team. Infectious complications and soft tissue injury contribute to late amputation after severe lower extremity trauma. J Trauma. 2011 Jul;71(1 Suppl):S47-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318221181d.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21885998
Citation
Cross JD, Stinner DJ, Burns TC, Wenke JC, Hsu JR; Skeletal Trauma Research Consortium (STReC). Return to duty after type III open tibia fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jan;26(1):43-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821c0ec1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15227616
Citation
Bratzler DW, Houck PM; Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; American Association of Critical Care Nurses; American Association of Nurse Anesthetists; American College of Surgeons; American College of Osteopathic Surgeons; American Geriatrics Society; American Society of Anesthesiologists; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses; Ascension Health; Association of periOperative Registered Nurses; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Medical Letter; Premier; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Surgical Infection Society. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;38(12):1706-15. doi: 10.1086/421095. Epub 2004 May 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31443939
Citation
Pinto D, Manjunatha K, Savur AD, Ahmed NR, Mallya S, Ramya V. Comparative study of the efficacy of gentamicin-coated intramedullary interlocking nail versus regular intramedullary interlocking nail in Gustilo type I and II open tibia fractures. Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Oct;22(5):270-273. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28734495
Citation
Schmidmaier G, Kerstan M, Schwabe P, Sudkamp N, Raschke M. Clinical experiences in the use of a gentamicin-coated titanium nail in tibia fractures. Injury. 2017 Oct;48(10):2235-2241. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31555500
Citation
Jorge-Mora A, Amhaz-Escanlar S, Fernandez-Pose S, Garcia-Iglesias A, Mandia-Mancebo F, Franco-Trepat E, Guillan-Fresco M, Pino-Minguez J. Commercially available antibiotic-laden PMMA-covered locking nails for the treatment of fracture-related infections - A retrospective case analysis of 10 cases. J Bone Jt Infect. 2019 Jul 5;4(4):155-162. doi: 10.7150/jbji.34072. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31995226
Citation
Shiels SM, Mangum LH, Wenke JC. Revisiting the "race for the surface" in a pre-clinical model of implant infection. Eur Cell Mater. 2020 Jan 29;39:77-95. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v039a05.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24634583
Citation
Lin WT, Tan HL, Duan ZL, Yue B, Ma R, He G, Tang TT. Inhibited bacterial biofilm formation and improved osteogenic activity on gentamicin-loaded titania nanotubes with various diameters. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014 Mar 7;9:1215-30. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S57875. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27441930
Citation
Mauffrey C, Butler N, Hake ME. Fabrication of an Interlocked Antibiotic/Cement-Coated Carbon Fiber Nail for the Treatment of Long Bone Osteomyelitis. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug;30 Suppl 2:S23-4. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000587.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17414554
Citation
Thonse R, Conway J. Antibiotic cement-coated interlocking nail for the treatment of infected nonunions and segmental bone defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Apr;21(4):258-68. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31803ea9e6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28719401
Citation
Barger J, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Antibiotic-Coated Interlocking Intramedullary Nail for the Treatment of Long-Bone Osteomyelitis. JBJS Rev. 2017 Jul;5(7):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00095. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
Citation
O'Toole R, Joshi M, Carlini A, et al. Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluating Intrawound Vancomycin Powder for Reducing Surgical Site Infection After Fracture Surgery. Orthopaedic Trauma Association; 2018; Orlando, FL
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23474597
Citation
Caroom C, Tullar JM, Benton EG Jr, Jones JR, Chaput CD. Intrawound vancomycin powder reduces surgical site infections in posterior cervical fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1183-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828fcfb5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28336038
Citation
Carver DC, Kuehn SB, Weinlein JC. Role of Systemic and Local Antibiotics in the Treatment of Open Fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017 Apr;48(2):137-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28323797
Citation
O'Toole RV, Joshi M, Carlini AR, Murray CK, Allen LE, Scharfstein DO, Gary JL, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC; METRC. Local Antibiotic Therapy to Reduce Infection After Operative Treatment of Fractures at High Risk of Infection: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (VANCO Study). J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Apr;31 Suppl 1:S18-S24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000801. Erratum In: J Orthop Trauma. 2017 Sep;31(9):e308. J Orthop Trauma. 2018 May;32(5):e197.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16056035
Citation
Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Patel R. Local antibiotic delivery systems: where are we and where are we going? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Aug;(437):111-4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30270538
Citation
Shiels SM, Tennent DJ, Lofgren AL, Wenke JC. Topical rifampin powder for orthopaedic trauma part II: Topical rifampin allows for spontaneous bone healing in sterile and contaminated wounds. J Orthop Res. 2018 Dec;36(12):3142-3150. doi: 10.1002/jor.24155. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27124826
Citation
Tennent DJ, Shiels SM, Sanchez CJ Jr, Niece KL, Akers KS, Stinner DJ, Wenke JC. Time-Dependent Effectiveness of Locally Applied Vancomycin Powder in a Contaminated Traumatic Orthopaedic Wound Model. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct;30(10):531-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000617.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29781552
Citation
Shiels SM, Tennent DJ, Wenke JC. Topical rifampin powder for orthopedic trauma part I: Rifampin powder reduces recalcitrant infection in a delayed treatment musculoskeletal trauma model. J Orthop Res. 2018 Dec;36(12):3136-3141. doi: 10.1002/jor.24055. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22433752
Citation
Berger ML, Dreyer N, Anderson F, Towse A, Sedrakyan A, Normand SL. Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: the ISPOR good research practices task force report. Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):217-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.12.010.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20921481
Citation
Dreyer NA, Tunis SR, Berger M, Ollendorf D, Mattox P, Gliklich R. Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Oct;29(10):1818-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event, January 2018. National Healthcare Safety Network. 2018
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28467526
Citation
Berrios-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, Reinke CE, Morgan S, Solomkin JS, Mazuski JE, Dellinger EP, Itani KMF, Berbari EF, Segreti J, Parvizi J, Blanchard J, Allen G, Kluytmans JAJW, Donlan R, Schecter WP; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904. Erratum In: JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):803.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19996801
Citation
Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):629-32. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7c16d.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20182243
Citation
Kooistra BW, Dijkman BG, Busse JW, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. The radiographic union scale in tibial fractures: reliability and validity. J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Mar;24 Suppl 1:S81-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181ca3fd1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12900694
Citation
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381-95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20685078
Citation
Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17443116
Citation
Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S3-S11. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26179820
Citation
Schalet BD, Rothrock NE, Hays RD, Kazis LE, Cook KF, Rutsohn JP, Cella D. Linking Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) to the PROMIS((R)) Global Health Scale. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1524-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3453-9. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19051059
Citation
Selim AJ, Rogers W, Fleishman JA, Qian SX, Fincke BG, Rothendler JA, Kazis LE. Updated U.S. population standard for the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12). Qual Life Res. 2009 Feb;18(1):43-52. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9418-2. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Prophylactic Antibiotic Coated Nail to Prevent Infection: A Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs