Propranolol Dose Escalation in Lymphedema in Patients
Primary Purpose
Primary Lymphedema
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Propranolol
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Lymphedema
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary lymphedema
- Measurable disease
- Adequate functional status: Karnofsky >50% (>age 16), Lanky >50 (<age 16),
- No prior therapy within 4 weeks of enrollment
- Adequate bone marrow, renal function, cardiac, and pulmonary function, negative pregnancy test (for women).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Secondary lymphedema
- Patients already receiving other investigational drugs
- Patients with known contraindications to receiving propranolol
- Other medical comorbidities including but not limited to: pheochromocytoma, bradycardia, bronchospasm/reactive airway disease, decompensated heart failure, heart block, ongoing active infections.
Sites / Locations
- Columbia University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Treatment
Arm Description
Patients will be given propranolol in escalating doses
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol
To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires
To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Number of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRI
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02595996
First Posted
September 18, 2015
Last Updated
September 24, 2021
Sponsor
Columbia University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02595996
Brief Title
Propranolol Dose Escalation in Lymphedema in Patients
Official Title
An Intra-patient Dose Escalation Study of Propranolol in Patients With Lymphedema
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Lack of funding
Study Start Date
June 7, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 8, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 8, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Columbia University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of patients with primary lymphedema. The primary goal is to assess patient tolerability of increasing doses of propranolol. The secondary goal is to assess lymphedema symptoms and signs in response to propranolol treatment.
Detailed Description
Lymphatic malformations (LMs) arise from abnormal development of lymphatic vasculature. Primary lymphedema is considered a form of LM. Recently, results in the investigators' laboratory demonstrated that propranolol, a pan beta-adrenergic receptor (βAR) antagonist, had cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects against cells isolated from LM tissues. Preliminary results from treating symptomatic LM patients with propranolol at a dose range from 0.7-1mg/kg/day demonstrated a 70% positive response rate, with patients reporting improvement in their symptoms.
Propranolol has been used for different indications for many years. Propranolol is accepted for use in infants with hemangiomas and supraventricular tachycardia. Hemangeol was approved by the FDA for use in infants with hemangiomas. However, βAR antagonists are not without potential adverse effects, including hypotension, bradycardia, hypoglycemia, bronchospasms, and sleep disturbances. FDA-approved dose range for treating hemangiomas in infants (>5 weeks old, >2kg) ranged from 1-3mg/kg/day in divided doses. Propranolol doses of up to 4mg/kg/day has been used for pediatric supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, the investigator's experience with propranolol use in LM patients have been at the low end of most accepted clinical indications. The investigators propose to escalate propranolol dosages up to 3mg/kg/day in this study, well below the dose ranges currently used in clinical settings.
This dose range of 0.7-1mg/kg/day was chosen for LM patients as it was the low end of dose range for infants treated with propranolol for problematic hemangiomas, a related vascular anomaly. At this dose, no significant hemodynamic adverse effects were noted in LM patients. However, when patients stopped propranolol or their dose fell below 0.7mg/kg/day, they suffered rebound worsening of their symptoms. Moreover, inflammatory events such as infections temporarily overcame the effects of 0.7-1mg/kg/day of propranolol. Thus, it is unknown whether maximum propranolol efficacy was achieved at the current dose range. The investigators propose to examine whether optimized propranolol usage for treatment of LM patients has been achieved. The primary endpoint for this study is to ascertain whether LM patients can tolerate higher doses of propranolol, as measured by known propranolol adverse effects and patient-reported symptoms. A secondary endpoint will address whether patient-reported LM symptoms and quality of life are improved with higher doses of propranolol; objective findings such as LM size on physical examination and imaging studies will be analyzed as well. In addition, LM tissue biopsies will acquired from patients before and after propranolol treatment for further analyses of disease progression.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Primary Lymphedema
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
1 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be given propranolol in escalating doses
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Propranolol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Inderal
Intervention Description
escalating doses of propranolol from 1mg/kg/day to 2mg/kg/day to 3mg/kg/day
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Patients That Tolerated Propranolol
Description
To assess whether patients tolerated propranolol
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Patients With Improved Quality of Life Based on Self-reported Questionnaires
Description
To assess subjective lymphedema symptoms improvements only - whether patients' general quality of life symptoms improved on propranolol treatment by self-reported questionnaires (SF 36)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention by Weight
Description
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by weight (BMI kg/m^2) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Number of Patients With Lower Limb Discrepancy
Description
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol by limb girth discrepancy measurement (%) - objective signs of improvement of their lymphedema
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Number of Patients With Decreased Fluid Retention on MRI
Description
To assess whether patients' lymphedema signs are improved on propranolol - the decrease in fluid retention will be calculated by the measurement of fat (a number) divide by the measurement of fluid (a number) to yield a ratio - if a patient has a lower ratio at 8 weeks than at baseline, they will be reported in this category.
Time Frame
baseline to 8 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary lymphedema
Measurable disease
Adequate functional status: Karnofsky >50% (>age 16), Lanky >50 (<age 16),
No prior therapy within 4 weeks of enrollment
Adequate bone marrow, renal function, cardiac, and pulmonary function, negative pregnancy test (for women).
Exclusion Criteria:
Secondary lymphedema
Patients already receiving other investigational drugs
Patients with known contraindications to receiving propranolol
Other medical comorbidities including but not limited to: pheochromocytoma, bradycardia, bronchospasm/reactive airway disease, decompensated heart failure, heart block, ongoing active infections.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
June K. Wu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Columbia University
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Propranolol Dose Escalation in Lymphedema in Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs