search
Back to results

Prospective Assessment of TBDx Feasibility

Primary Purpose

Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TBDx
Sponsored by
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Pulmonary Tuberculosis focused on measuring Diagnosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Persistent cough (>2 weeks) and at least one other typical symptom of pulmonary TB (fever, night sweats, malaise, recent weight loss, contact with active case, hemoptysis, chest pain, loss of appetite)
  • Provision of informed consent (FIND TB Reference Materials)
  • Provision of sputum for adequate testing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving any anti-TB medication, in the 60 days prior to testing.
  • Patients with only extra-pulmonary disease

Sites / Locations

  • Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
  • Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

TBDx

Arm Description

All samples were tested with TBDx and compared with smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF using solid and liquid culture as gold standard. Operators were blinded to all other results for a sample upon data entry.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Performance of TBDx compared to culture
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of TBDx compared to two solid (Löwenstein Jensen) and two liquid (MGIT) cultures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Training needs through questionnaire assessment
Two days of hands-on, onsite TBDx training was provided to laboratory technicians with prior experience using smear microscopy, followed by 1-day observation. Each operator performed 3-4 runs under supervision and a proficiency assessment was conducted prior to study initiation. Following study completion all technicians were given a survey to assess perception of training needs and ease of use.
Comparison of performance of TBDx on direct vs concentrated smear
Performance of TBDx in combination with Xpert MTB/RIF through analysis of two different algorithms
The performance of an algorithm combining direct TBDx as a triage test, followed by Xpert for confirmation of positive TBDx cases for the different cut-off points was assessed
User appraisal regarding ease of use, hands-on-time and perceived benefit through appraisal questionnaire
Identify potential difficulties for implementation through observation and user appraisal
Potential barriers for implementation were assessed through observation and appraisal questionnaires following study completion, taking into account total time, complexity, number of steps, etc.

Full Information

First Posted
September 9, 2016
Last Updated
September 21, 2016
Sponsor
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02912832
Brief Title
Prospective Assessment of TBDx Feasibility
Official Title
TBDx Feasibility Study: Prospective Study to Determine the Feasibility of Automated Smear Microscopy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study will be to determine the performance characteristics of TBDx with culture as a gold standard. In addition, the investigators will assess the laboratory technicians' appraisal and technical suitability of the TBDx system.
Detailed Description
This will be a blinded, prospective study to determine the performance of the TBDx system for detection of pulmonary TB in comparison to LED microscopy and culture as a gold standard. The study will involve recruitment of 300 TB suspects per site with a high workload and experienced technicians. Participants will be recruited under the FIND TB Reference Materials project and leftover sputum samples used for the assessment of the TBDx.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Keywords
Diagnosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
572 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TBDx
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All samples were tested with TBDx and compared with smear microscopy and Xpert MTB/RIF using solid and liquid culture as gold standard. Operators were blinded to all other results for a sample upon data entry.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
TBDx
Other Intervention Name(s)
Automated microscopy
Intervention Description
The TBDx is an automated platform is based on an Olympus BX41 microscope with a 40 x objective lens, fitted with an Olympus XC 10 colour camera and a movable slide stage, with an attached computer that receives high-quality digital images acquired from the camera. The computer then operates detection algorithms that segment, evaluate, and classify objects of interest in these images which can be stored for subsequent review. The platform is able to integrate an optional 200-slide automated slide loader for high volume settings. The application can capture 100, 300 or more digital fields-of-view and can provide results for positive or negative smears in 5 minutes or less.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Performance of TBDx compared to culture
Description
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of TBDx compared to two solid (Löwenstein Jensen) and two liquid (MGIT) cultures
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Training needs through questionnaire assessment
Description
Two days of hands-on, onsite TBDx training was provided to laboratory technicians with prior experience using smear microscopy, followed by 1-day observation. Each operator performed 3-4 runs under supervision and a proficiency assessment was conducted prior to study initiation. Following study completion all technicians were given a survey to assess perception of training needs and ease of use.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Comparison of performance of TBDx on direct vs concentrated smear
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Performance of TBDx in combination with Xpert MTB/RIF through analysis of two different algorithms
Description
The performance of an algorithm combining direct TBDx as a triage test, followed by Xpert for confirmation of positive TBDx cases for the different cut-off points was assessed
Time Frame
6 months
Title
User appraisal regarding ease of use, hands-on-time and perceived benefit through appraisal questionnaire
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Identify potential difficulties for implementation through observation and user appraisal
Description
Potential barriers for implementation were assessed through observation and appraisal questionnaires following study completion, taking into account total time, complexity, number of steps, etc.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Persistent cough (>2 weeks) and at least one other typical symptom of pulmonary TB (fever, night sweats, malaise, recent weight loss, contact with active case, hemoptysis, chest pain, loss of appetite) Provision of informed consent (FIND TB Reference Materials) Provision of sputum for adequate testing Exclusion Criteria: Patients receiving any anti-TB medication, in the 60 days prior to testing. Patients with only extra-pulmonary disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudia M Denkinger, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Find
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt - Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
City
Lima
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital
City
Ho Chi Minh City
Country
Vietnam

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified patient and results dataset will be made available upon publication of study findings
Links:
URL
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050173
Description
TBDx Proof of concept

Learn more about this trial

Prospective Assessment of TBDx Feasibility

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs