search
Back to results

Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Pillcam SB2 and Capsocam Capsule

Primary Purpose

Anemia, Gastrointestinal Bleedings, Méléna

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
capsule endoscopies
Sponsored by
Hôpital Edouard Herriot
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Anemia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • over 18 years old
  • obscure digestive bleeding justifying capsule endoscopy
  • complete endoscopic work up including colonoscopy with ileoscopy and gastroscopy with aneathesia or sedation
  • absence of concomittent ongoing study
  • absence of occlusive symptoms of suspected Crohn's disease nor of previous small bowel radiotherapy
  • filled inform consent
  • no implanted pace maker
  • patient being affiliated to the CPAM

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 18 years old
  • oral iron within 8 days before capsule endoscopy
  • gastroparesis
  • pacemaker
  • swallowing troubles
  • presence of oclusive symptoms suspected Crohn's disease nor of previous small bowel radiotherapy
  • pregnancy or risk of pregnancy without efficient oral contraception
  • absence of written informed consent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    capsocam capsula

    Arm Description

    capsocam capsula readings

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    number of discordant films between the two capsules with two different readers
    Reading of the two capsules film is randomized order by two different readers in each center

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 21, 2013
    Last Updated
    September 18, 2023
    Sponsor
    Hôpital Edouard Herriot
    Collaborators
    Capso Vision, Inc.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01820182
    Brief Title
    Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Pillcam SB2 and Capsocam Capsule
    Official Title
    Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Pillcam SB2 and Capsocam Capsule in Patients With Obscure Digestive Bleedings
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 2012 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 2012 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hôpital Edouard Herriot
    Collaborators
    Capso Vision, Inc.

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Comparative, randomized study patients are scheduled to have two capsule endoscopies within 2 to 14 days from each other using two different endoscopies the Pillcam SB2 (Given Imaging, Israel) and the Capsocam (Capso Vision Saratoga United States) The order in which the devices are administered is randomly allocated.
    Detailed Description
    Objectives Main objective To compare the diagnostic yield of both capsules in the same patients with a satisfying concordance coefficient k>0,6 Secondary objectives To compare the sensitivity and specificity of both capsule readings To copmpare the sensitivity and specificity for specific lesions classified in terms of relevance P0 P1 P2 To check the tecnical fiability (incidence of technical issues To check the feasibility To evaluate the rate of complete small bowel examination, the small bowel transit time the capsule reading time

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Anemia, Gastrointestinal Bleedings, Méléna, Angiodysplasia, Polyps

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    73 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    capsocam capsula
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    capsocam capsula readings
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    capsule endoscopies
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Pillcam SB2, Capsocam
    Intervention Description
    Patients inclusion following inclusion criterias Randomization of capsule ingestion order Videocapsule recording by the two capsules Reading of the two capsules films in randomized order by two different readers in each center Reviewing of discordant capsule films by an expert panel
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    number of discordant films between the two capsules with two different readers
    Description
    Reading of the two capsules film is randomized order by two different readers in each center
    Time Frame
    14 days

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    90 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: over 18 years old obscure digestive bleeding justifying capsule endoscopy complete endoscopic work up including colonoscopy with ileoscopy and gastroscopy with aneathesia or sedation absence of concomittent ongoing study absence of occlusive symptoms of suspected Crohn's disease nor of previous small bowel radiotherapy filled inform consent no implanted pace maker patient being affiliated to the CPAM Exclusion Criteria: under 18 years old oral iron within 8 days before capsule endoscopy gastroparesis pacemaker swallowing troubles presence of oclusive symptoms suspected Crohn's disease nor of previous small bowel radiotherapy pregnancy or risk of pregnancy without efficient oral contraception absence of written informed consent
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Saurin JS Jean Christophe, Msd
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Prospective Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Pillcam SB2 and Capsocam Capsule

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs