Prospective Evaluation of Fixation of the Prime Acetabular Cup
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Prime Cup
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Hip focused on measuring radiostereometric analysis, implant migration, total hip replacement, arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- hip osteoarthritis
- scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty
- ability to provide informed consent
- over the age of 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- prior arthroplasty on the indicated joint
- individuals who do not speak or understand English
- individuals with neuromuscular disorders or cognitive impairments
- individuals ho live >100km from our centre and/or are unlikely to return for multiple follow-up appointments
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Prime Cup
Arm Description
The study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm CoCr femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Implant Migration
Migration will include translations, rotations and maximum total point motion measured between the 3D CAD models of the cup and the bone bead segment using model-based RSA software
Secondary Outcome Measures
Short Form 12
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess general health and quality of life. Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess function, stiffness and pain caused by hip or knee osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items divided into 3 subscales (function, stiffness and pain). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. The total score is calculated by summing the scores for each subscale. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Harris Hip Score
The Harris Hip Scale (HHS) was developed for the assessment of the results of hip surgery, and is intended to evaluate various hip disabilities and methods of treatment in an adult population. It is a physician-completed instrument that consists of subscales for pain severity (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 0-4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04039984
First Posted
July 29, 2019
Last Updated
March 12, 2023
Sponsor
Lawson Health Research Institute
Collaborators
University of Western Ontario, Canada
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04039984
Brief Title
Prospective Evaluation of Fixation of the Prime Acetabular Cup
Official Title
Prospective Evaluation of Fixation of the Prime Acetabular Cup
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Decided the study on this implant was no longer relevant
Study Start Date
August 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
August 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Lawson Health Research Institute
Collaborators
University of Western Ontario, Canada
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective study to compare migration of the Microport Prime acetabular cup to a well-established acetabular cup design after total hip replacement. We will enroll 30 patients with the Prime cup and compare migration, function, pain and quality of life to a historical cohort of patients whom had a different cup used during surgery.
Detailed Description
The gold standard for measurement of implant fixation over time is radiostereometric analysis (RSA). At the time of surgery, 0.8-1.0 mm Tantalum beads (typically n = 6-8 per region of interest) are inserted into the bone surrounding the implant of interest, and occasionally also into the polyethylene liner or insert of the implant. RSA exams are then acquired within the first 2 weeks post-operation, and again at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Each exam involves a stereo x-ray acquisition with a calibration unit to reconstruct the 3D location of the implant relative to the marker beads. Across each exam, the migration of the implant relative to the marker beads is tracked compared to the baseline exam acquired within the first 2 weeks. RSA is extremely precise and accurate, and is able to track migrations on the order of 10's of microns. Large early migrations within the first 1-2 years post-operation are predictive of eventual implant loosening and failure. For acetabular cups, proximal migration of greater than 1.0 mm within the first 2 years post-operation is considered unacceptable, with cups migrating between 0.2 and 1.0 mm at risk of having a revision rate exceeding 5% at 10 years.
An RSA study should be completed for any new implant under the principles of phased innovation in orthopaedics. This ensures the new device will achieve long-term, stable fixation prior to its widespread adoption. Many device manufacturers incorporate the results of the RSA migration study into their marketing material. The advantage of RSA is its high degree of accuracy and its well-established thresholds for implant migration, meaning a relatively small number of patients are required to provide meaningful results.
Several joint replacement companies (Microport excluded) have previously released new products to the marketplace without RSA evaluation and these implants have later been identified as having ingrowth problems. The scientific aim of this study is to prove efficacy of ingrowth with a recently released implant.
This study design will be a prospective cohort with a retrospective control group. The study will be conducted at a single centre (London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada) with all cases performed by a single, fellowship-trained high-volume surgeon.
The study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm Cobalt Chromium femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner. The control group will be a previously published cohort that received the Reflection cementless acetabular cup with Roughcoat coating (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN). This is a well-established cup with long-term survivorship available in multiple registries, making it an ideal comparator.
Demographic details will be recorded from each patient. Outcome scores will be collected pre-operatively and at each post-operative visit. Standard outcome scores at our centre are the Western and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short Form 12 (SF-12), and Harris Hip Score. At the time of surgery, n = 8 of 1.0 mm Tantalum beads will be inserted into the pelvis surrounding the acetabular cup. Patients will undergo post-operative supine RSA exams within 0-2 weeks (baseline exam) and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, following standardized protocols. RSA exams will be conducted at Robarts with a member of the research team escorting participants over to Robarts for each required post-operative visit.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Keywords
radiostereometric analysis, implant migration, total hip replacement, arthroplasty
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
This study design will be a prospective cohort with a retrospective control group.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Prime Cup
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The study group will receive a Prime cementless acetabular cup (manufactured by Microport located in Arlington, Tennessee). All patients will also receive a cementless Profemur femoral stem with a 32 mm CoCr femoral head, articulating on a highly crosslinked acetabular liner.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Prime Cup
Intervention Description
Patients in this group will have the Prime cementless acetabular cup used during surgery.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Implant Migration
Description
Migration will include translations, rotations and maximum total point motion measured between the 3D CAD models of the cup and the bone bead segment using model-based RSA software
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short Form 12
Description
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess general health and quality of life. Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index
Description
Patient-reported questionnaire to assess function, stiffness and pain caused by hip or knee osteoarthritis. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items divided into 3 subscales (function, stiffness and pain). The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. The total score is calculated by summing the scores for each subscale. Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Harris Hip Score
Description
The Harris Hip Scale (HHS) was developed for the assessment of the results of hip surgery, and is intended to evaluate various hip disabilities and methods of treatment in an adult population. It is a physician-completed instrument that consists of subscales for pain severity (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), absence of deformity (1 item, 0-4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). The HHS is a measure of dysfunction so the higher the score, the better the outcome for the individual. The maximum score possible is 100.
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
hip osteoarthritis
scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty
ability to provide informed consent
over the age of 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
prior arthroplasty on the indicated joint
individuals who do not speak or understand English
individuals with neuromuscular disorders or cognitive impairments
individuals ho live >100km from our centre and/or are unlikely to return for multiple follow-up appointments
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Douglas Naudie, MD
Organizational Affiliation
London Health Sciences Centre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There is currently no plan to share individual participant data.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16195075
Citation
Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Borlin N, Karrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop. 2005 Aug;76(4):563-72. doi: 10.1080/17453670510041574.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23126575
Citation
Pijls BG, Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Fiocco M, Plevier JW, Middeldorp S, Nelissen RG, Valstar ER. Early proximal migration of cups is associated with late revision in THA: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 RSA studies and 49 survivalstudies. Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):583-91. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.745353. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20888183
Citation
Malchau H, Bragdon CR, Muratoglu OK. The stepwise introduction of innovation into orthopedic surgery: the next level of dilemmas. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):825-31. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.007. Epub 2010 Oct 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23953963
Citation
Naudie DD, Somerville L, Korczak A, Yuan X, McCalden RW, Holdsworth D, Bourne RB. A randomized trial comparing acetabular component fixation of two porous ingrowth surfaces using RSA. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Prospective Evaluation of Fixation of the Prime Acetabular Cup
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs