PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE)
Primary Purpose
Chest Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Coronary Angiography
Stress Echocardiogram
Nuclear Stress Test
Exercise Electrocardiogram
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Chest Pain focused on measuring chest pain, coronary artery disease, CAD
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- new or worsening chest pain suspicious for clinically significant coronary artery disease (CAD)
- no prior evaluation for this episode of symptoms
- planned non-invasive testing for diagnosis
- men age ≥55 years
- men age ≥45 years with increased probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) due to either (A. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) requiring medical treatment OR Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) defined as documented >50% peripheral arterial stenosis treated medically or invasively OR cerebrovascular disease (stroke, documented > 50% carotid stenosis treated medically or invasively) OR B. At least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors: 1-Ongoing tobacco use, 2-Hypertension, 3-Abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI) defined as less than <0.9, 4-Dyslipidemia
- women age ≥65 years
- women age ≥50 years with increased probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) due to either (A. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) requiring medical treatment OR Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) defined as documented >50% peripheral arterial stenosis treated medically or invasively OR cerebrovascular disease (stroke, documented > 50% carotid stenosis treated medically or invasively) OR B. At least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors: 1-Ongoing tobacco use, 2-Hypertension, 3-Abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI) defined as less than <0.9, 4-Dyslipidemia
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL within the past 90 days
- Negative urine/serum pregnancy test for female subjects of child-bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed or suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring hospitalization or urgent or emergent testing; Elevated troponin or creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB)
- Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition systolic blood pressure (BP) < 90 mmHg, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, or persistent resting chest pain felt to be ischemic despite adequate therapy)
- Known coronary artery disease (CAD) with prior Myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or any angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) ≥50% lesion in a major epicardial vessel
- Any invasive coronary angiography or non-invasive anatomic or functional cardiovascular (CV) test for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), including coronary tomographic angiography (CTA) and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), within the previous twelve (12) months
- Known significant congenital, valvular (> moderate) or cardiomyopathic process (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or reduced systolic left ventricular function (LVEF) ≤ 40%)) which could explain cardiac symptoms
- Contraindication to undergoing a coronary tomographic angiography (CTA), including but not limited to: a. Allergy to iodinated contrast agent, b. Unable to receive beta blockers unless heart rate < 65 beats per minute, c. Pregnancy
- Life expectancy < 2 years
- Unable to provide written informed consent or participate in long-term follow-up
Sites / Locations
- Duke University Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Functional diagnostic tests
Anatomic diagnostic test
Arm Description
Stress Echocardiogram Nuclear Stress Test Exercise Electrocardiogram
Coronary Angiography
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time to Primary Endpoint
Time to primary endpoint as defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), major complications from cardiovascular (CV) procedures or testing, and unstable angina hospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Time to Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Unstable Angina Hospitalization
Time to this secondary endpoint as defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina hospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time to Death or Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time to this secondary endpoint as defined as a composite of death and myocardial infarction (MI). The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time to Major Complications From Cardiovascular (CV) Procedures
Time to this secondary endpoint as defined as a composite of major complications from cardiovascular procedures and testing (stroke, bleeding, anaphylaxis, renal failure). The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time to Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Unstable Angina (UA), Complications, No Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Time to primary endpoint as defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), major complications from cardiovascular (CV) procedures or testing, unstable angina hospitalization, and no coronary artery disease (CAD). The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Percentage of Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Events Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Within 90 Days Following Participant Randomization
Percentage of Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Events Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Within 90 Days Following Participant Randomization
Medical Cost
Assess and compare total medical cost for the two diagnostic testing arms by intention to treat at both 90 days and 3 years cumulative.
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Duke Activity Status Index
Participant score in Quality of Life as measured by Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). DASI measures a person's functional capacity based on a 12-item questionnaire that correlates with peak O2 uptake during exercise testing. The DASI is a self-administered questionnaire that measures a patient's functional capacity. It can be used to get a rough estimate of a patient's peak oxygen uptake. The maximum score for the DASI is 58.2 (better functional ability/capacity) and the minimum score is 0 (worse functional ability/capacity).
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Seattle Angina Scale Anginal Frequency Subscale
Participant score Quality of Life measured by Seattle Angina Scale Anginal Frequency Subscale utilizing the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). SAQ: 19-item, 5-6-point Likert, questionnaire measuring 5 dimensions of coronary artery disease: Anginal Stability: whether symptoms are changing. Anginal Frequency: how often patient having symptoms Physical Limitation: how much condition hampers ability to do what he wants.Treatment Satisfaction: how well patient understands care. Disease Perception: impact of condition on interpersonal relationships. Each dimension assigns response an value, beginning with 1 for response at the lowest level of functioning & summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest scale. Higher score suggest symptoms more stable & less frequent, condition has less impact on activities, increased satisfaction with treatment, & perception of disease has less impact on interpersonal relationships.
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Seattle Anginal Quality of Life Subscale
Participant score Quality of Life measured by Seattle Angina Scale Anginal Frequency Subscale utilizing the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). SAQ: 19-item, 5-6-point Likert, questionnaire measuring 5 dimensions of coronary artery disease: Anginal Stability: whether symptoms are changing. Anginal Frequency: how often patient having symptoms Physical Limitation: how much condition hampers ability to do what he wants.Treatment Satisfaction: how well patient understands care. Disease Perception: impact of condition on interpersonal relationships. Each dimension assigns response an value, beginning with 1 for response at the lowest level of functioning & summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest scale. Higher score suggest symptoms more stable & less frequent, condition has less impact on activities, increased satisfaction with treatment, & perception of disease has less impact on interpersonal relationships.
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Complete Resolution of Symptoms That Led to the Initial Testing
Percentage of participants with improvement in Quality of Life as measured by complete resolution of the symptoms that led to initial testing
Cumulative Radiation Exposure Within 90 Days
Cumulative radiation exposure from all cardiovascular diagnostic tests and procedures performed within 90 days after randomization.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01174550
First Posted
August 2, 2010
Last Updated
February 2, 2016
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01174550
Brief Title
PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain
Acronym
PROMISE
Official Title
PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain - The PROMISE Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A prospective multicenter imaging study for evaluation of chest pain. Objective is to determine whether an initial non-invasive anatomic imaging strategy with coronary CT angiography (CTA) will improve clinical outcomes in subjects with symptoms concerning for coronary artery disease relative to an initial functional testing strategy (usual care). Study hypothesis: initial anatomic testing strategy will provide information that will result in superior long-term health outcomes as compared to an initial functional testing strategy.
Detailed Description
Pragmatic randomized trial of clinical effectiveness of diagnostic testing strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD), to be performed in outpatient settings including acute and primary care and cardiology offices. Qualifying patients presenting with new or worsening symptoms suspicious for clinically significant CAD who require diagnostic testing and have not been previously evaluated will be randomized to an initial strategy of either anatomic or functional testing. All subsequent decisions regarding additional testing, medications and/or procedures will be at the discretion of the responsible clinical care team Within the functional testing arm, the subject's care team will select the specific test to be performed (exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), stress nuclear, or stress echocardiogram (echo)) consistent with 'usual care' in that practice setting. The subject's care team will be provided with 'Information sheets' summarizing current standards for test interpretation and preventive care, but specific medical treatment will not be mandated by the trial.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chest Pain
Keywords
chest pain, coronary artery disease, CAD
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10003 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Functional diagnostic tests
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Stress Echocardiogram Nuclear Stress Test Exercise Electrocardiogram
Arm Title
Anatomic diagnostic test
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Coronary Angiography
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Coronary Angiography
Intervention Description
Use of standard equipment for usual-care testing
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Stress Echocardiogram
Intervention Description
Use of standard equipment for usual-care testing
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Nuclear Stress Test
Intervention Description
Use of standard equipment for usual-care testing
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise Electrocardiogram
Intervention Description
Use of standard equipment for usual-care testing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Primary Endpoint
Description
Time to primary endpoint as defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), major complications from cardiovascular (CV) procedures or testing, and unstable angina hospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Unstable Angina Hospitalization
Description
Time to this secondary endpoint as defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina hospitalization. The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months
Title
Time to Death or Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Description
Time to this secondary endpoint as defined as a composite of death and myocardial infarction (MI). The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months
Title
Time to Major Complications From Cardiovascular (CV) Procedures
Description
Time to this secondary endpoint as defined as a composite of major complications from cardiovascular procedures and testing (stroke, bleeding, anaphylaxis, renal failure). The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months
Title
Time to Death, Myocardial Infarction (MI), Unstable Angina (UA), Complications, No Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Description
Time to primary endpoint as defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), major complications from cardiovascular (CV) procedures or testing, unstable angina hospitalization, and no coronary artery disease (CAD). The Kaplan-Meier events rates (cumulative percentage of participants with an event) were estimated for the anatomic and functional diagnostic test groups.
Time Frame
90 days, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, 30 months, 36 months, 42 months
Title
Percentage of Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Events Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Within 90 Days Following Participant Randomization
Description
Percentage of Invasive Cardiac Catheterization Events Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Within 90 Days Following Participant Randomization
Time Frame
Up to 90 days following participant randomization
Title
Medical Cost
Description
Assess and compare total medical cost for the two diagnostic testing arms by intention to treat at both 90 days and 3 years cumulative.
Time Frame
90 days and 3 years cumulative
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Duke Activity Status Index
Description
Participant score in Quality of Life as measured by Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). DASI measures a person's functional capacity based on a 12-item questionnaire that correlates with peak O2 uptake during exercise testing. The DASI is a self-administered questionnaire that measures a patient's functional capacity. It can be used to get a rough estimate of a patient's peak oxygen uptake. The maximum score for the DASI is 58.2 (better functional ability/capacity) and the minimum score is 0 (worse functional ability/capacity).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months 24 months
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Seattle Angina Scale Anginal Frequency Subscale
Description
Participant score Quality of Life measured by Seattle Angina Scale Anginal Frequency Subscale utilizing the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). SAQ: 19-item, 5-6-point Likert, questionnaire measuring 5 dimensions of coronary artery disease: Anginal Stability: whether symptoms are changing. Anginal Frequency: how often patient having symptoms Physical Limitation: how much condition hampers ability to do what he wants.Treatment Satisfaction: how well patient understands care. Disease Perception: impact of condition on interpersonal relationships. Each dimension assigns response an value, beginning with 1 for response at the lowest level of functioning & summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest scale. Higher score suggest symptoms more stable & less frequent, condition has less impact on activities, increased satisfaction with treatment, & perception of disease has less impact on interpersonal relationships.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 month, 12 month, 24 month
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Seattle Anginal Quality of Life Subscale
Description
Participant score Quality of Life measured by Seattle Angina Scale Anginal Frequency Subscale utilizing the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). SAQ: 19-item, 5-6-point Likert, questionnaire measuring 5 dimensions of coronary artery disease: Anginal Stability: whether symptoms are changing. Anginal Frequency: how often patient having symptoms Physical Limitation: how much condition hampers ability to do what he wants.Treatment Satisfaction: how well patient understands care. Disease Perception: impact of condition on interpersonal relationships. Each dimension assigns response an value, beginning with 1 for response at the lowest level of functioning & summing across items within each of the 5 scales. Scale scores transformed to 0-100 range by subtracting the lowest scale. Higher score suggest symptoms more stable & less frequent, condition has less impact on activities, increased satisfaction with treatment, & perception of disease has less impact on interpersonal relationships.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by Complete Resolution of Symptoms That Led to the Initial Testing
Description
Percentage of participants with improvement in Quality of Life as measured by complete resolution of the symptoms that led to initial testing
Time Frame
6 month, 12 month 24 month
Title
Cumulative Radiation Exposure Within 90 Days
Description
Cumulative radiation exposure from all cardiovascular diagnostic tests and procedures performed within 90 days after randomization.
Time Frame
90 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
new or worsening chest pain suspicious for clinically significant coronary artery disease (CAD)
no prior evaluation for this episode of symptoms
planned non-invasive testing for diagnosis
men age ≥55 years
men age ≥45 years with increased probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) due to either (A. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) requiring medical treatment OR Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) defined as documented >50% peripheral arterial stenosis treated medically or invasively OR cerebrovascular disease (stroke, documented > 50% carotid stenosis treated medically or invasively) OR B. At least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors: 1-Ongoing tobacco use, 2-Hypertension, 3-Abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI) defined as less than <0.9, 4-Dyslipidemia
women age ≥65 years
women age ≥50 years with increased probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) due to either (A. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) requiring medical treatment OR Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) defined as documented >50% peripheral arterial stenosis treated medically or invasively OR cerebrovascular disease (stroke, documented > 50% carotid stenosis treated medically or invasively) OR B. At least one of the following cardiovascular risk factors: 1-Ongoing tobacco use, 2-Hypertension, 3-Abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI) defined as less than <0.9, 4-Dyslipidemia
Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dL within the past 90 days
Negative urine/serum pregnancy test for female subjects of child-bearing potential
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnosed or suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring hospitalization or urgent or emergent testing; Elevated troponin or creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB)
Hemodynamically or clinically unstable condition systolic blood pressure (BP) < 90 mmHg, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias, or persistent resting chest pain felt to be ischemic despite adequate therapy)
Known coronary artery disease (CAD) with prior Myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or any angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) ≥50% lesion in a major epicardial vessel
Any invasive coronary angiography or non-invasive anatomic or functional cardiovascular (CV) test for detection of coronary artery disease (CAD), including coronary tomographic angiography (CTA) and exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), within the previous twelve (12) months
Known significant congenital, valvular (> moderate) or cardiomyopathic process (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or reduced systolic left ventricular function (LVEF) ≤ 40%)) which could explain cardiac symptoms
Contraindication to undergoing a coronary tomographic angiography (CTA), including but not limited to: a. Allergy to iodinated contrast agent, b. Unable to receive beta blockers unless heart rate < 65 beats per minute, c. Pregnancy
Life expectancy < 2 years
Unable to provide written informed consent or participate in long-term follow-up
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pamela S Douglas, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27701
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data will be submitted to the NHLBI according to their guidelines which state"The data sets must be submitted to the study NHLBI study Program Official no later than 3 years after the end of the clinical activity (final patient follow-up, etc.) or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first. Data are prepared by the study coordinating center and sent to the PO for review prior to release."
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35926901
Citation
Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Lu MT, Bittner DO, Emami H, Puchner SB, Meyersohn NM, Ivanov AV, Adami EC, Voora D, Ginsburg GS, Januzzi JL, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U. Coronary Atherosclerosis, Cardiac Troponin, and Interleukin-6 in Patients With Chest Pain: The PROMISE Trial Results. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Aug;15(8):1427-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.03.016. Epub 2022 May 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35369715
Citation
Lowenstern A, Alexander KP, Pagidipati NJ, Hill CL, Pellikka PA, Cooper LS, Alhanti B, Hoffmann U, Mark DB, Douglas PS. Presenting Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Disease Evaluation: Association With Noninvasive Test Results and Clinical Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 May;15(5):e008298. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008298. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35110385
Citation
Fordyce CB, Hill CL, Mark DB, Alhanti B, Pellikka PA, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Physician judgement in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease and adverse events in chest pain patients. Heart. 2022 May 12;108(11):860-867. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320275.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33558267
Citation
Kammerlander AA, Mayrhofer T, Ferencik M, Pagidipati NJ, Karady J, Ginsburg GS, Lu MT, Bittner DO, Puchner SB, Bihlmeyer NA, Meyersohn NM, Emami H, Shah SH, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U; PROMISE Investigators. Association of Metabolic Phenotypes With Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Stable Chest Pain. Diabetes Care. 2021 Apr;44(4):1038-1045. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1760. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32707340
Citation
Meyersohn NM, Mayrhofer T, Corey KE, Bittner DO, Staziaki PV, Szilveszter B, Hallett T, Lu MT, Puchner SB, Simon TG, Foldyna B, Voora D, Ginsburg GS, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Ferencik M. Association of Hepatic Steatosis With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Independent of Coronary Artery Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;19(7):1480-1488.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32268807
Citation
Goyal A, Pagidipati N, Hill CL, Alhanti B, Udelson JE, Picard MH, Pellikka PA, Hoffmann U, Mark DB, Douglas PS. Clinical and Economic Implications of Inconclusive Noninvasive Test Results in Stable Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Apr;13(4):e009986. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009986. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31738382
Citation
Lowenstern A, Alexander KP, Hill CL, Alhanti B, Pellikka PA, Nanna MG, Mehta RH, Cooper LS, Bullock-Palmer RP, Hoffmann U, Douglas PS. Age-Related Differences in the Noninvasive Evaluation for Possible Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;5(2):193-201. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4973.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31601728
Citation
Litwin SE, Coles A, Hill CL, Alhanti B, Pagidipati N, Lee KL, Pellikka PA, Mark DB, Udelson JE, Cooper L, Tardif JC, Hoffmann U, Douglas PS; PROMISE investigators. Discordances between predicted and actual risk in obese patients with suspected cardiac ischaemia. Heart. 2020 Feb;106(4):273-279. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314503. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30954400
Citation
Litwin SE, Coles A, Pagidipati N, Lee KL, Pellikka PA, Mark DB, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Effects of obesity on noninvasive test results in patients with suspected cardiac ischemia: Insights from the PROMISE trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30819356
Citation
Sharma A, Coles A, Sekaran NK, Pagidipati NJ, Lu MT, Mark DB, Lee KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Hoffmann U, Douglas PS. Stress Testing Versus CT Angiography in Patients With Diabetes and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 5;73(8):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.056.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30712364
Citation
Jang JJ, Bhapkar M, Coles A, Vemulapalli S, Fordyce CB, Lee KL, Udelson JE, Hoffmann U, Tardif JC, Jones WS, Mark DB, Sorrell VL, Espinoza A, Douglas PS, Patel MR; PROMISE Investigators. Predictive Model for High-Risk Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007940. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007940.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30678753
Citation
Januzzi JL Jr, Suchindran S, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Ferencik M, Coles A, Tardif JC, Ginsburg GS, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Single-Molecule hsTnI and Short-Term Risk in Stable Patients With Chest Pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 29;73(3):251-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.065. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1269-1274.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30529930
Citation
Pagidipati NJ, Coles A, Hemal K, Lee KL, Dolor RJ, Pellikka PA, Mark DB, Patel MR, Litwin SE, Daubert MA, Shah SH, Hoffmann U, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Sex differences in management and outcomes of patients with stable symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease: Insights from the PROMISE trial. Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30190030
Citation
Adamson PD, Newby DE, Hill CL, Coles A, Douglas PS, Fordyce CB. Comparison of International Guidelines for Assessment of Suspected Stable Angina: Insights From the PROMISE and SCOT-HEART. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Sep;11(9):1301-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.06.021.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29550314
Citation
Januzzi JL Jr, Suchindran S, Coles A, Ferencik M, Patel MR, Hoffmann U, Ginsburg GS, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. High-Sensitivity Troponin I and Coronary Computed Tomography in Symptomatic Outpatients With Suspected CAD: Insights From the PROMISE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun;12(6):1047-1055. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Mar 14. Erratum In: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jan;14(1):318.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29322167
Citation
Ferencik M, Mayrhofer T, Bittner DO, Emami H, Puchner SB, Lu MT, Meyersohn NM, Ivanov AV, Adami EC, Patel MR, Mark DB, Udelson JE, Lee KL, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U. Use of High-Risk Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Detection for Risk Stratification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the PROMISE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;3(2):144-152. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4973.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29178815
Citation
Lu MT, Meyersohn NM, Mayrhofer T, Bittner DO, Emami H, Puchner SB, Foldyna B, Mueller ME, Hearne S, Yang C, Achenbach S, Truong QA, Ghoshhajra BB, Patel MR, Ferencik M, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U. Central Core Laboratory versus Site Interpretation of Coronary CT Angiography: Agreement and Association with Cardiovascular Events in the PROMISE Trial. Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):87-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017172181. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29089344
Citation
Sharma A, Sekaran NK, Coles A, Pagidipati NJ, Hoffmann U, Mark DB, Lee KL, Al-Khalidi HR, Lu MT, Pellikka PA, Truong QA, Douglas PS. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain Patients: Insights From the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 31;6(11):e007019. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007019. Erratum In: J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Dec 2;6(12):e004218.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28965093
Citation
Ladapo JA, Coles A, Dolor RJ, Mark DB, Cooper L, Lee KL, Goldberg J, Shapiro MD, Hoffmann U, Douglas PS. Quantifying sociodemographic and income disparities in medical therapy and lifestyle among symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study in North America. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 29;7(9):e016364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016364.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28847895
Citation
Budoff MJ, Mayrhofer T, Ferencik M, Bittner D, Lee KL, Lu MT, Coles A, Jang J, Krishnam M, Douglas PS, Hoffmann U; PROMISE Investigators. Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium in the PROMISE Study (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation. 2017 Nov 21;136(21):1993-2005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030578. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28838846
Citation
Lu MT, Douglas PS, Udelson JE, Adami E, Ghoshhajra BB, Picard MH, Roberts R, Lee KL, Einstein AJ, Mark DB, Velazquez EJ, Carter W, Ridner M, Al-Khalidi HR, Hoffmann U. Safety of coronary CT angiography and functional testing for stable chest pain in the PROMISE trial: A randomized comparison of test complications, incidental findings, and radiation dose. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):373-382. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28389572
Citation
Hoffmann U, Ferencik M, Udelson JE, Picard MH, Truong QA, Patel MR, Huang M, Pencina M, Mark DB, Heitner JF, Fordyce CB, Pellikka PA, Tardif JC, Budoff M, Nahhas G, Chow B, Kosinski AS, Lee KL, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain). Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):2320-2332. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024360. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28199464
Citation
Fordyce CB, Douglas PS, Roberts RS, Hoffmann U, Al-Khalidi HR, Patel MR, Granger CB, Kostis J, Mark DB, Lee KL, Udelson JE; Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) Investigators. Identification of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Deriving Minimal Value From Noninvasive Testing: The PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool, A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;2(4):400-408. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5501. Erratum In: JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1256.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27733347
Citation
Ladapo JA, Hoffmann U, Lee KL, Coles A, Huang M, Mark DB, Dolor RJ, Pelberg RA, Budoff M, Sigurdsson G, Severance HW, Douglas PS. Changes in Medical Therapy and Lifestyle After Anatomical or Functional Testing for Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Oct 12;5(10):e003807. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003807.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27214597
Citation
Mark DB, Federspiel JJ, Cowper PA, Anstrom KJ, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Davidson-Ray L, Daniels MR, Cooper LS, Knight JD, Lee KL, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Economic Outcomes With Anatomical Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Jul 19;165(2):94-102. doi: 10.7326/M15-2639. Epub 2016 May 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27143676
Citation
Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sheng S, Baloch KN, Daniels MR, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Cooper LS, Lee KL, Douglas PS; PROMISE Investigators. Quality-of-Life Outcomes With Anatomic Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing Strategies in Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the PROMISE Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2016 May 24;133(21):1995-2007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020259. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25773919
Citation
Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Patel MR, Mark DB, Al-Khalidi HR, Cavanaugh B, Cole J, Dolor RJ, Fordyce CB, Huang M, Khan MA, Kosinski AS, Krucoff MW, Malhotra V, Picard MH, Udelson JE, Velazquez EJ, Yow E, Cooper LS, Lee KL; PROMISE Investigators. Outcomes of anatomical versus functional testing for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1291-300. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1415516. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24890527
Citation
Douglas PS, Hoffmann U, Lee KL, Mark DB, Al-Khalidi HR, Anstrom K, Dolor RJ, Kosinski A, Krucoff MW, Mudrick DW, Patel MR, Picard MH, Udelson JE, Velazquez EJ, Cooper L; PROMISE investigators. PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial. Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):796-803.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.promisetrial.org
Description
PROMISE trial web site
Learn more about this trial
PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs