search
Back to results

Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A 100kV Protocol (PROTECTION-II)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tube voltage
tube voltage
Sponsored by
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Disease focused on measuring Coronary CT angiography, Radiation dose estimates

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries)
  • stable sinus rhythm
  • patient weight < 90kg or body mass index < 30 kg/m2
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-ECG triggered studies
  • non-coronary CTA studies, e.g. bypass graft CTAs, pre- or post EP studies, CABG planning studies

Sites / Locations

  • Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Reduced tube voltage of 100kV.

Standard tube voltage of 120kV.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Compared with a 120kV protocol the use of a 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.

Secondary Outcome Measures

impact of the 100kV scan protocol on quantitative image quality parameters, e.g. image noise, signal and contrast intensity, signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratios
diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values) for 120kV vs. 100 kV studies when compared with invasive coronary angiography on a per-vessel based analysis.
frequency of non-diagnostic CTA studies when comparing 120kV and 100kV

Full Information

First Posted
January 28, 2008
Last Updated
August 26, 2008
Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00611780
Brief Title
Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A 100kV Protocol
Acronym
PROTECTION-II
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A 100kV Protocol
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2008
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2008 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2009 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare radiation dose of a 100kV scan protocol to the standard 120kV scan protocol. We hypothesize that the 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior. Secondary endpoints of the study include quantitative image quality parameters, diagnostic accuracy for 120 vs.100kV studies compared to invasive angiography in patients who underwent subsequent invasive coronary angiography
Detailed Description
All patients scheduled for a coronary CT scan are screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients are included if they have stable sinus rhythm (heart rate <100 bpm) and a body weight < 90 kg or a body mass index (BMI) < 30. Informed signed consent is obtained from these patients and the CT scan is prepared. After topogram scan and the native scan for Ca-Scoring, patients are randomized in two groups with the use of sealed envelopes. After that contrast-enhanced coronary CT angiography is performed with the 120kV- or 100kV-protocol. The CT examination is evaluated by two experienced investigators on a per-vessel basis and all results and study-related data are collected in a dedicated database. For assessment of image quality, a previously established 4-point score system is used and quantitative image quality parameters are measured. A 30 day follow-up after the CT examination aims to evaluate if patients underwent invasive coronary angiography or were scheduled for a myocardial stress / perfusion test (such as stress-echocardiography, myocardial scintigraphy or stress perfusion imaging by MRI).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Disease
Keywords
Coronary CT angiography, Radiation dose estimates

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Reduced tube voltage of 100kV.
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard tube voltage of 120kV.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
tube voltage
Intervention Description
standard 120 kV
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
tube voltage
Intervention Description
reduced voltage of 100 kV
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compared with a 120kV protocol the use of a 100kV scan protocol is associated with a reduction in dose estimates of at least 20%, while the diagnostic image quality is not inferior.
Time Frame
30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
impact of the 100kV scan protocol on quantitative image quality parameters, e.g. image noise, signal and contrast intensity, signal- and contrast-to-noise-ratios
Time Frame
30 days
Title
diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values) for 120kV vs. 100 kV studies when compared with invasive coronary angiography on a per-vessel based analysis.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
frequency of non-diagnostic CTA studies when comparing 120kV and 100kV
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: patients with an indication for a coronary CT angiography (planned evaluation of the coronary arteries) stable sinus rhythm patient weight < 90kg or body mass index < 30 kg/m2 signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: non-ECG triggered studies non-coronary CTA studies, e.g. bypass graft CTAs, pre- or post EP studies, CABG planning studies
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Joerg Hausleiter, MD
Phone
+49 89 1218
Ext
1585
Email
hausleiter@dhm.mhn.de
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tanja Meyer, MD
Phone
+49 89 1218
Ext
4500
Email
meyert@dhm.mhn.de
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joerg Hausleiter, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
City
Munich
ZIP/Postal Code
80636
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joerg Hausleiter, MD
Phone
+49 89 1218-0
Ext
1585
Email
hausleiter@dhm.mhn.de
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joerg Hausleiter, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21070998
Citation
Hausleiter J, Martinoff S, Hadamitzky M, Martuscelli E, Pschierer I, Feuchtner GM, Catalan-Sanz P, Czermak B, Meyer TS, Hein F, Bischoff B, Kuse M, Schomig A, Achenbach S. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Nov;3(11):1113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.08.016.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Prospective Randomized Trial On RadiaTion Dose Estimates Of CT AngIOgraphy In PatieNts Scanned With A 100kV Protocol

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs