Proton Versus Photon Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Primary Purpose
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Photon
Proton
Carbon ion
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma focused on measuring Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Proton beam therapy, Carbon-ion radiotherapy, Toxicity, Survival, Disease control
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pathologically confirmed Nasopharyngeal carcinoma(WHO II/III type).
- Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years of age.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score: 0-1.
- Adequate laboratory values within 30 dyas of enrollment to study defined as follows: 1) neutrophil > 2000/mm^3; 2) platelet > 100,000/mm^3; 3) total bilirubin < 1.5mg/dl; 4) alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase < 1.5 upper limit of normal; 5) SCr < 1.5mg/dl; creatinine clearance rate > 60ml/min.
- Willing to accept adequate contraception for women with childbearing potential.
- Willing to sign the written informed consent; Informed consent must be signed before the enrollment in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of distant metastasis.
- Received radiotherapy for head and neck before.
- Received surgery(except for biopsy) for primary lesion or cervical lymph node.
- Previous history of malignant tumor (within 5 years) or simultaneous existence of multiple primary tumors.
- Presence of diseases (such as Sjögren syndrome) that may interfere evaluation of xerostomia.
- Accompanied with severe major organ dysfunction.
- Presence of mental disease that may influence the understanding of informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Photon combined with Carbon ion
Proton combined with Carbon ion
Arm Description
The participants received photon: 56 Gy/28 Fx for high-risk area(CTVhigh), 50.4 Gy/28 Fx for lower neck low-risk area(CTVlow), plus carbon ion: 15-17.5 GyE/5 Fx for boost for visible tumors.
The participants received proton: 56 GyE/28 Fx for high-risk area(CTVhigh), 50.4 GyE/28 Fx for lower neck low-risk area(CTVlow), plus carbon ion: 15-17.5 GyE/5 Fx for boost for visible tumors.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of participants with treatment-related Xerostomia (≥Grade 2) as assessed by NCI CTCAE v4.03
CTCAE refers to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, which is one of the most frequently used criteria for toxicity grading after anti-cancer treatment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall survival of all patients
Progression-free survival of all patients
Local control
Regional control
Distant control
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v4.03
Acute and late toxicities induced by radiation therapy other than xerostomia.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04528394
First Posted
August 24, 2020
Last Updated
August 24, 2020
Sponsor
Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04528394
Brief Title
Proton Versus Photon Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Official Title
A Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluating Toxicity and Efficacy Between Proton and Photon for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 29, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of proton or photon combined with carbon ion radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Participants will be randomized to 2 arms. Arm 1, participants received photon combined with carbon ion radiotherapy group, Arm 2, participants received proton combined with carbon ion radiotherapy.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare the toxicity and therapeutic efficacy of photon or proton combined with carbon ion radiotherapy for newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Participants will be randomized to 2 arms. Arm 1 participants received photon combined with carbon ion radiotherapy (photon: 56 Gy/28 Fx, plus carbon: 15-17.5 gray equivalent [GyE]/5 Fx for boost). Arm 2, participants received proton combined with carbon ion radiotherapy (proton: 56 GyE/28 Fx, plus carbon: 15-17.5 GyE/5 Fx for boost). Adverse events will be documented according to CTCAE v4.03.The response of treatment will be evaluated according to RECIST criteria.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Keywords
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, Proton beam therapy, Carbon-ion radiotherapy, Toxicity, Survival, Disease control
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
136 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Photon combined with Carbon ion
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The participants received photon: 56 Gy/28 Fx for high-risk area(CTVhigh), 50.4 Gy/28 Fx for lower neck low-risk area(CTVlow), plus carbon ion: 15-17.5 GyE/5 Fx for boost for visible tumors.
Arm Title
Proton combined with Carbon ion
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The participants received proton: 56 GyE/28 Fx for high-risk area(CTVhigh), 50.4 GyE/28 Fx for lower neck low-risk area(CTVlow), plus carbon ion: 15-17.5 GyE/5 Fx for boost for visible tumors.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Photon
Intervention Description
Photon combined with Carbon ion in Arm 1
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Proton
Intervention Description
Proton combined with Carbon ion in Arm 2
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Carbon ion
Intervention Description
Same dose and fractionation will be used in both arms.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with treatment-related Xerostomia (≥Grade 2) as assessed by NCI CTCAE v4.03
Description
CTCAE refers to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, which is one of the most frequently used criteria for toxicity grading after anti-cancer treatment.
Time Frame
Xerostomia (≥Grade 2) occurred at 6 months after completion of radiotherapy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival of all patients
Time Frame
From randomization to death, a median of 3 years.
Title
Progression-free survival of all patients
Time Frame
From randomization to death or disease progression, a median of 3 years.
Title
Local control
Time Frame
From randomization to local failure, a median of 3 years.
Title
Regional control
Time Frame
From randomization to regional failure, a median of 3 years.
Title
Distant control
Time Frame
From randomization to distant failure, a median of 3 year.
Title
Treatment-related adverse events as assessed by NCI CTCAE v4.03
Description
Acute and late toxicities induced by radiation therapy other than xerostomia.
Time Frame
Time interval from start to 3 months after completion of radiotherapy.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Pathologically confirmed Nasopharyngeal carcinoma(WHO II/III type).
Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 70 years of age.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score: 0-1.
Adequate laboratory values within 30 dyas of enrollment to study defined as follows: 1) neutrophil > 2000/mm^3; 2) platelet > 100,000/mm^3; 3) total bilirubin < 1.5mg/dl; 4) alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase < 1.5 upper limit of normal; 5) SCr < 1.5mg/dl; creatinine clearance rate > 60ml/min.
Willing to accept adequate contraception for women with childbearing potential.
Willing to sign the written informed consent; Informed consent must be signed before the enrollment in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of distant metastasis.
Received radiotherapy for head and neck before.
Received surgery(except for biopsy) for primary lesion or cervical lymph node.
Previous history of malignant tumor (within 5 years) or simultaneous existence of multiple primary tumors.
Presence of diseases (such as Sjögren syndrome) that may interfere evaluation of xerostomia.
Accompanied with severe major organ dysfunction.
Presence of mental disease that may influence the understanding of informed consent.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lin Kong, MD
Phone
133XXX
Email
lin.kong@sphic.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jiyi Hu, MD
Phone
1333XXX
Email
jiyi.hu@sphic.org.cn
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiade Lu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center,Shanghai, SPHIC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
201315
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lin Kong, MD
Email
lin.kong@sphic.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiyi Hu, MD
Email
jiyi.hu@sphic.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiade J Lu, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual participant data including baseline characteristics, treatment information and follow-up data on toxicity, survival and disease control will be shared.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Within 5 years after the publication of the study
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data may be shared with radiation oncologists who are interested in examining the efficacy and toxicity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated with particle beam radiotherapy. Pooled analysis comparing IMRT and particle beam radiotherapy will be of particular interest. Detailed study protocol should be emailed along with the request of the data. We may carefully review the study protocol, and data will only be shared with well-designed studies.
Learn more about this trial
Proton Versus Photon Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs