search
Back to results

Protreat-Trial: Prophylactic Antiemetic Treatment of Opioid-induced Nausea and Vomiting (OINV) in Palliative Care (ProTreat)

Primary Purpose

Nausea, Vomiting, Pain

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Palonosetron Hydrochloride
Placebo
Sponsored by
Gerhild Becker
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Nausea

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged ≥18 years
  2. Opioid naïve (no opioids intake within last 72 hours) patients in whom opioid therapy (WHO III) is started to treat cancer pain;
  3. Palliative (not curable) cancer pain patients;
  4. The latest laboratory values before registration meet the following criteria: Potassium within normal range: 3,5 - 5,1 mmol/l;
  5. Patients must have a score for nausea on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) < 3 at screening visit;
  6. Patients under risk for QT prolongation (e.g. history of cardiac disease, receiving concomitant medication known to cause QT-prolongation, electrolyte abnormalities must show an Electrocardiogram with no QTc prolongation (QTc men> 460 msec; women >440msec);
  7. Written informed consent obtained according to international guidelines and local laws;
  8. Ability of patient to understand nature, importance, and individual consequences of clinical trial;
  9. Patients must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient's death is imminent (judged by the "surprise" question of the treating physician or nurse: "Would you be surprised if this patient died within the next 7 days?"); If the answer is "no", trial subject cannot participate;
  2. Participation in the trial considered inappropriate based on the patient's physical, social, psychological, or spiritual condition (judgement of treating physician or nurse);
  3. Patients if they had other known acute reasons for nausea and/or emesis, e.g.:

    1. were undergoing chemotherapy < 72 h before or during the study treatment period;
    2. were undergoing radiotherapy to the skull or abdomen < 72 h before or during the study treatment period;
    3. were undergoing surgical procedures or non-invasive procedures under general anaesthesia < 72 h before or during the study treatment period;
    4. a score for nausea on a 0-10 numeric rating scale ≥ 3 at screening visit;
    5. other reason;
  4. Patients with contraindications or hypersensitivity to opioids or palonosetron, fructose, soya, lactose or peanut intolerance;
  5. Patients unable to take oral medications;
  6. Patients undergoing dialyses treatment;
  7. Known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs, or alcohol;
  8. Current or planned pregnancy, nursing period;
  9. Patients who are sexually active and unwilling to use highly effective contraceptive methods. The following contraceptive methods with a Pearl Index lower than 1% are regarded as highly effective:

    1. Oral hormonal contraception ('pill')
    2. Dermal hormonal contraception
    3. Vaginal hormonal contraception (NuvaRing®)
    4. Contraceptive plaster
    5. Long-acting injectable contraceptives
    6. Implants that release progesterone (Implanon®)
    7. Tubal ligation (female sterilisation)
    8. Intrauterine devices that release hormones (hormone spiral)
    9. Double barrier methods

    This means that the following are not regarded as safe: condom plus spermicide, simple barrier methods (vaginal pessaries, condom, and female condoms), copper spirals, the rhythm method, basal temperature method, and the withdrawal method (coitus interruptus).

    Except: Female patients who are surgically sterilised by hysterectomy or who are expected to be postmenopausal are eligible for this trial. A lack of menstruation of at least 12 months will be considered as a proof to be postmenopausal.

    Men must agree to use a latex condom during sexual contact with females of childbearing potential while participating in this study even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy.

    Patients must abstain from donating blood, semen, or sperm during participation in the study.

  10. Simultaneous participation in any other interventional clinical trial within the last 14 days before the start of this trial; simultaneous participation in registry and diagnostic trials is allowed;
  11. Patients without legal German language capacity who are unable to understand the nature, significance and consequences of the trial or any other co-existing medical or psychological condition that will preclude participation in the study;
  12. Persons who are in a relationship of dependence/employment with the sponsor or the investigator will be excluded.

Sites / Locations

  • Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, University of Freiburg

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Palonosetron Hydrochloride

Placebo

Arm Description

Palonosetron (500µg): single dose per os 1-2 hours before the start of opioid-therapy (WHO III)

Placebo: single dose per os 1-2 hours before the start of opioid-therapy (WHO III)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of the study design
Rates of patient recruitment per month, screening failures, drop-out from the trial.
Number of patients who show no relevant increase of nausea
Number of patients who show no relevant increase of nausea after starting opioid therapy at any of the following 6 days. Nausea scores are assessed on an increasing 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, 0 meaning that the symptom is absent and 10 that it is of the worst possible severity according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Schedule (ESAS). Relevant is an increase on this NRS ≥1, which reflects the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for nausea

Secondary Outcome Measures

Complete response of OINV
Complete response defined as no emetic episodes, no nausea, no rescue anti-emetic. Comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Time to OINV
Time to emetic episodes or nausea or rescue antiemetic after randomisation, comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Nausea
Occurrence and severity of nausea rated by the participants on a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo. Nausea scores are assessed on an increasing 11-point numerical scale from 0 to 10, 0 meaning that the symptom is absent and 10 that it is of the worst possible severity according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Schedule (ESAS).
Vomiting
Occurrence of vomiting, comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Pain control
Daily opioid intake and pain score rated by the participants on a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Pain scores are assessed on an increasing 11-point numerical scale from 0 to 10, 0 meaning that the symptom is absent and 10 that it is of the worst possible severity according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Schedule (ESAS)
Rescue anti-emetics
The use of rescue anti-emetics, comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Participant's burden by nausea, pain, constipation and headache
Assessed by a questionnaire: Patients are asked to assign the burden of their symptoms to one of 4 categories: not at all, a little, strongly, extremely strongly
Severity of constipation
Stool consistency and frequency, bowel function index (BFI)
Symptom preferences
Patients were asked to rank 5 possible symptoms (tumor pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation, headache) from their most undesired to their most acceptable symptom. Rated by the participants at day 6 and compared to baseline.
Percentage of participants reporting any grade 3 adverse event (AE) or any serious adverse event (SAE) from patients from the time of the signed ICF to the end of the study.
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event (AE) can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Patient satisfaction with the study drug
Patients are asked to rate speed of action of the study drug received, the satisfaction with the overall control of nausea and emesis using 4 categories (very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) and the and willingness to use the study drug again (yes, no, unknown). Rated by the participants at day 6.

Full Information

First Posted
March 2, 2022
Last Updated
March 29, 2022
Sponsor
Gerhild Becker
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05315999
Brief Title
Protreat-Trial: Prophylactic Antiemetic Treatment of Opioid-induced Nausea and Vomiting (OINV) in Palliative Care
Acronym
ProTreat
Official Title
Protreat-Trial: Prophylactic Antiemetic Treatment of Opioid-induced Nausea and Vomiting (OINV) in Palliative Care: A Randomized Controlled Phase II Feasibility Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
May 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Gerhild Becker

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Palliative cancer patients with tumor pain often suffer from nausea and vomiting when starting pain therapy with opioids. The objective of the clinical pilot trial is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron in the prophylactic treatment of opioid-induced nausea and vomiting.
Detailed Description
Pain is one of the most common and debilitating symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and opioids are the main stay of treatment for cancer pain. However, initiation of opioid-therapy is frequently hindered by OINV. OINV is a highly distressing symptom and can affect medication compliance, enteral absorption, and quality of life.This Phase II feasibility study is conducted to assess the feasibility of the prophylactic antiemetic treatment of OINV with palonosetron in comparison to placebo. The objective is to investigate the feasibility of patient recruitment and implementation of the study design as well as to obtain an initial estimate of the antiemetic efficacy and safety of prophylactic treatment of OINV with palonosetron compared to placebo. A total of 30 palliative patients starting an opioid-therapy (WHO III) for cancer pain will be randomly assigned to receive either a single dose of placebo or palonosetron. Safety and efficiency assessment are based on patient reports regarding OINV, pain and safety parameters during the following 6 days.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nausea, Vomiting, Pain, Advanced Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Palonosetron Hydrochloride
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Palonosetron (500µg): single dose per os 1-2 hours before the start of opioid-therapy (WHO III)
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo: single dose per os 1-2 hours before the start of opioid-therapy (WHO III)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Palonosetron Hydrochloride
Intervention Description
Palonosetron (500µg): single dose per os 1-2 hours before the start of opioid-therapy (WHO III)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo: single dose per os 1-2 hours before the start of opioid-therapy (WHO III)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of the study design
Description
Rates of patient recruitment per month, screening failures, drop-out from the trial.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of patients who show no relevant increase of nausea
Description
Number of patients who show no relevant increase of nausea after starting opioid therapy at any of the following 6 days. Nausea scores are assessed on an increasing 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) from 0 to 10, 0 meaning that the symptom is absent and 10 that it is of the worst possible severity according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Schedule (ESAS). Relevant is an increase on this NRS ≥1, which reflects the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for nausea
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete response of OINV
Description
Complete response defined as no emetic episodes, no nausea, no rescue anti-emetic. Comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Time to OINV
Description
Time to emetic episodes or nausea or rescue antiemetic after randomisation, comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Nausea
Description
Occurrence and severity of nausea rated by the participants on a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo. Nausea scores are assessed on an increasing 11-point numerical scale from 0 to 10, 0 meaning that the symptom is absent and 10 that it is of the worst possible severity according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Schedule (ESAS).
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Vomiting
Description
Occurrence of vomiting, comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Pain control
Description
Daily opioid intake and pain score rated by the participants on a 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Pain scores are assessed on an increasing 11-point numerical scale from 0 to 10, 0 meaning that the symptom is absent and 10 that it is of the worst possible severity according to the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Schedule (ESAS)
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Rescue anti-emetics
Description
The use of rescue anti-emetics, comparing Palonosetron treatment with placebo
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Participant's burden by nausea, pain, constipation and headache
Description
Assessed by a questionnaire: Patients are asked to assign the burden of their symptoms to one of 4 categories: not at all, a little, strongly, extremely strongly
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Severity of constipation
Description
Stool consistency and frequency, bowel function index (BFI)
Time Frame
day1 and day 6
Title
Symptom preferences
Description
Patients were asked to rank 5 possible symptoms (tumor pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation, headache) from their most undesired to their most acceptable symptom. Rated by the participants at day 6 and compared to baseline.
Time Frame
day1 and day 6
Title
Percentage of participants reporting any grade 3 adverse event (AE) or any serious adverse event (SAE) from patients from the time of the signed ICF to the end of the study.
Description
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event (AE) can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time Frame
day 1 to day 6
Title
Patient satisfaction with the study drug
Description
Patients are asked to rate speed of action of the study drug received, the satisfaction with the overall control of nausea and emesis using 4 categories (very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied) and the and willingness to use the study drug again (yes, no, unknown). Rated by the participants at day 6.
Time Frame
day 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients aged ≥18 years Opioid naïve (no opioids intake within last 72 hours) patients in whom opioid therapy (WHO III) is started to treat cancer pain; Palliative (not curable) cancer pain patients; The latest laboratory values before registration meet the following criteria: Potassium within normal range: 3,5 - 5,1 mmol/l; Patients must have a score for nausea on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) < 3 at screening visit; Patients under risk for QT prolongation (e.g. history of cardiac disease, receiving concomitant medication known to cause QT-prolongation, electrolyte abnormalities must show an Electrocardiogram with no QTc prolongation (QTc men> 460 msec; women >440msec); Written informed consent obtained according to international guidelines and local laws; Ability of patient to understand nature, importance, and individual consequences of clinical trial; Patients must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements. Exclusion Criteria: Patient's death is imminent (judged by the "surprise" question of the treating physician or nurse: "Would you be surprised if this patient died within the next 7 days?"); If the answer is "no", trial subject cannot participate; Participation in the trial considered inappropriate based on the patient's physical, social, psychological, or spiritual condition (judgement of treating physician or nurse); Patients if they had other known acute reasons for nausea and/or emesis, e.g.: were undergoing chemotherapy < 72 h before or during the study treatment period; were undergoing radiotherapy to the skull or abdomen < 72 h before or during the study treatment period; were undergoing surgical procedures or non-invasive procedures under general anaesthesia < 72 h before or during the study treatment period; a score for nausea on a 0-10 numeric rating scale ≥ 3 at screening visit; other reason; Patients with contraindications or hypersensitivity to opioids or palonosetron, fructose, soya, lactose or peanut intolerance; Patients unable to take oral medications; Patients undergoing dialyses treatment; Known or persistent abuse of medication, drugs, or alcohol; Current or planned pregnancy, nursing period; Patients who are sexually active and unwilling to use highly effective contraceptive methods. The following contraceptive methods with a Pearl Index lower than 1% are regarded as highly effective: Oral hormonal contraception ('pill') Dermal hormonal contraception Vaginal hormonal contraception (NuvaRing®) Contraceptive plaster Long-acting injectable contraceptives Implants that release progesterone (Implanon®) Tubal ligation (female sterilisation) Intrauterine devices that release hormones (hormone spiral) Double barrier methods This means that the following are not regarded as safe: condom plus spermicide, simple barrier methods (vaginal pessaries, condom, and female condoms), copper spirals, the rhythm method, basal temperature method, and the withdrawal method (coitus interruptus). Except: Female patients who are surgically sterilised by hysterectomy or who are expected to be postmenopausal are eligible for this trial. A lack of menstruation of at least 12 months will be considered as a proof to be postmenopausal. Men must agree to use a latex condom during sexual contact with females of childbearing potential while participating in this study even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy. Patients must abstain from donating blood, semen, or sperm during participation in the study. Simultaneous participation in any other interventional clinical trial within the last 14 days before the start of this trial; simultaneous participation in registry and diagnostic trials is allowed; Patients without legal German language capacity who are unable to understand the nature, significance and consequences of the trial or any other co-existing medical or psychological condition that will preclude participation in the study; Persons who are in a relationship of dependence/employment with the sponsor or the investigator will be excluded.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Arlette Tais, Dr.
Phone
+49 761 270-34438
Email
arlette.tais@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerhild Becker, Prof. Dr. med.
Organizational Affiliation
Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinic for Palliative Care, Medical Center, University of Freiburg
City
Freiburg
ZIP/Postal Code
D-79106
Country
Germany
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gerhild Becker, Prof.
Phone
+49 761 270 - 95412
Email
gerhild.becker@uniklinik-freiburg.de

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Protreat-Trial: Prophylactic Antiemetic Treatment of Opioid-induced Nausea and Vomiting (OINV) in Palliative Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs