search
Back to results

PTCy and Ruxolitinib vs PTCy, Tacrolimus and MMF in MUD and Haploidentical HSCT (PTCyRuxo)

Primary Purpose

Graft-versus-host-disease, Stem Cell Transplant Complications, Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Russian Federation
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ruxolitinib
Tacrolimus
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Sponsored by
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Graft-versus-host-disease focused on measuring Graft-versus-host-disease, Prophylaxis, ruxolitinib, tacrolimus, MMF, PTCY, cyclophosphamide, unrelated donor, haploidentical donor, randomized trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Informed consent to participate in the study, signed by the patient;
  2. Diagnosis: acute lymphoblastic or acute myeloblastic leukemia;
  3. Morphological remission, defined as less than 5% of blasts by microscopy or flow cytometry with a peripheral leukocyte level of more than 1.500 μL. It is acceptable to include patients without restored platelets or erythrocytes;
  4. Indications for performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, determined by the participating center in accordance with local medical practice;
  5. Unrelated or haploidentical donor;
  6. Age 18-70 years;
  7. Functional status according to ECOG scale 0-2 score.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Repeated allogeneic transplantation, regardless of the indications for its implementation;
  2. Source of graft - umbilical cord stem cells;
  3. Any ex vivo modification of the graft with the exception of separation or washing of red blood cells;
  4. The presence of more than 5% of clonal tumor cells according to flow cytometry in the presence of morphological remission;
  5. Diagnosis: acute promyelocytic leukemia;
  6. Severe organ failure: creatinine more than 2 ULN; ALT, AST more than 5 ULN; bilirubin more than 1.5 ULN; respiratory failure more than 1 grade;
  7. Unstable hemodynamics, requiring the introduction of vasopressors;
  8. Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of randomization, determined by the level of CRP> 70 mg/l with adequate antibacterial or antifungal therapy;
  9. Rhythm disturbances that persist despite adequate antiarrhythmic therapy: a tachysystolic form of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias V gradation according to Laun, AV block of III degree;
  10. Decrease in ejection fraction according to echocardiography less than 40%;
  11. Angina of more than II functional class or unstable angina;
  12. Another severe concomitant pathology, which according to the attending physician does not allow the patient to be included in the study;
  13. Pulmonary pathology with a decrease in FEV1 of less than 60% or pulmonary diffusion capacity of less than 60%;
  14. Inability to quit smoking for up to 6 months after transplantation;
  15. Pregnancy or refusal to perform highly effective contraception for 6 months after transplantation.

    Highly effective contraceptive methods include:

    • Total abstinence: if it corresponds to the preferred and customary way of life of the patient. Periodic abstinence (for example, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation methods) and interrupted sexual intercourse are not considered acceptable methods of contraception;
    • Female sterilization (surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before the start of the therapy being studied. In the case of ovariectomy only, the reproductive status of the woman must be confirmed using a subsequent analysis of hormones;
    • Sterilization of the male partner (at least 6 months before screening). For women participating in the study, the sexual partner after a vasectomy should be the only partner;
    • Use of oral, injectable or implanted hormonal contraceptive drugs, intrauterine devices or contraceptive systems, or other forms of hormonal contraception with similar efficacy (failure rate less than 1%), for example, hormonal vaginal rings or transdermal hormonal contraceptives.
  16. Somatic or mental pathology not allowing to sign informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • National Hematology Research Center
  • RM Gorbacheva Research Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

PTCY tacrolimus MMF

PTCY ruxolitinib

Arm Description

Conditioning: fludarabine 180 mg/m2 busulfan 8-14 mg/kg per os GVHD prophylaxis: cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg day+3, +4 tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg from day+5 to 100 mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg from day+5 to 35

Conditioning: fludarabine 180 mg/m2 busulfan 8-14 mg/kg per os ruxolitinib 5 mg tid days -7 to -2 GVHD prophylaxis: cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg day+3, +4 ruxolitinib 5 mg tid days +5 to +21 ruxolitinib 5 mg bid days +22 to +150

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV
Proportion of patients with acute GVHD II-IV grade

Secondary Outcome Measures

Non-relapse mortality
Cumulative incidence of patients with mortality without hematological relapse of malignancy
Relapse incidence
Cumulative incidence of patients with relapse
Incidence of moderate and severe chronic GVHD
Cumulative incidence of patients with moderate and severe chronic GVHD according to NIH 2015 criteria
Overall survival
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death from all causes
Event-free survival
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death or relapse
Incidence of HSCT-associated adverse events (safety and toxicity)
Toxicity assessment is based on NCI CTC AE 5.0 grades. Veno-occlusive disease incidence and severity assessment is based on EBMT criteria 2016. Transplant-associated microangiopathy incidence assessment is based on Cho et al. criteria. All toxicity measurements will be aggregated as severity scores.
Primary or secondary graft failure
Cumulative incidence of patients with primary or secondary graft failure defined by the absence of donor chimerism.
Incidence of infections
Number of patients with bacteremia before engraftment, bacteremia after engraftment, severe sepsis (presence of multiple organ failure), pneumonia, soft tissue infection, invasive mycosis (probable or proven invasive aspergillosis, candidaemia, zygomycosis), reactivation of cytomegalovirus, other opportunistic viral infections

Full Information

First Posted
November 26, 2020
Last Updated
April 7, 2023
Sponsor
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04669210
Brief Title
PTCy and Ruxolitinib vs PTCy, Tacrolimus and MMF in MUD and Haploidentical HSCT
Acronym
PTCyRuxo
Official Title
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Phase II Trial to Compare Prophylaxis of Graft Versus Host Disease With Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Ruxolitinib After Post-transplant Cyclophosphamide
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
November 3, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 27, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is multicenter investigator-initiated randomized open-label phase II clinical trial to compare prophylaxis of graft versus host disease treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus ruxolitinib after post-transplant cyclophosphamide. In total 128 patients will be included in the study. After inclusion into the study and performing of transplantation patients will be randomized in 1:1 proportion in two arms (64 patients per arm): arm A will include patients who will be treated with cyclophosphamide and ruxolitinib for GVHD prophylaxis; arm B will include patients who will be treated with cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. After the end of the treatment patients will be followed-up during two years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Graft-versus-host-disease, Stem Cell Transplant Complications, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoid Leukemia
Keywords
Graft-versus-host-disease, Prophylaxis, ruxolitinib, tacrolimus, MMF, PTCY, cyclophosphamide, unrelated donor, haploidentical donor, randomized trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
128 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PTCY tacrolimus MMF
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conditioning: fludarabine 180 mg/m2 busulfan 8-14 mg/kg per os GVHD prophylaxis: cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg day+3, +4 tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg from day+5 to 100 mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg from day+5 to 35
Arm Title
PTCY ruxolitinib
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Conditioning: fludarabine 180 mg/m2 busulfan 8-14 mg/kg per os ruxolitinib 5 mg tid days -7 to -2 GVHD prophylaxis: cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg day+3, +4 ruxolitinib 5 mg tid days +5 to +21 ruxolitinib 5 mg bid days +22 to +150
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ruxolitinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
Jakavi
Intervention Description
Ruxolitinib administered during conditioning 5 mg tid before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 5 mg tid days 5-21 and 5 mg bid days 22-150 after transplantation instead of tacrolimus and MMF.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tacrolimus
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prograf
Intervention Description
Tacrolimus 0.03 mg/kg adjusted to concentrations 5-15 ng/ml from day+5 to +100
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Other Intervention Name(s)
CellCept
Intervention Description
Mycophenolate mofetil 30 mg/kg from day +5 to +35
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of acute GVHD grade II-IV
Description
Proportion of patients with acute GVHD II-IV grade
Time Frame
125 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Non-relapse mortality
Description
Cumulative incidence of patients with mortality without hematological relapse of malignancy
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Relapse incidence
Description
Cumulative incidence of patients with relapse
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Incidence of moderate and severe chronic GVHD
Description
Cumulative incidence of patients with moderate and severe chronic GVHD according to NIH 2015 criteria
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Overall survival
Description
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death from all causes
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Event-free survival
Description
Kaplan-Meier estimate of death or relapse
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Incidence of HSCT-associated adverse events (safety and toxicity)
Description
Toxicity assessment is based on NCI CTC AE 5.0 grades. Veno-occlusive disease incidence and severity assessment is based on EBMT criteria 2016. Transplant-associated microangiopathy incidence assessment is based on Cho et al. criteria. All toxicity measurements will be aggregated as severity scores.
Time Frame
125 days
Title
Primary or secondary graft failure
Description
Cumulative incidence of patients with primary or secondary graft failure defined by the absence of donor chimerism.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Incidence of infections
Description
Number of patients with bacteremia before engraftment, bacteremia after engraftment, severe sepsis (presence of multiple organ failure), pneumonia, soft tissue infection, invasive mycosis (probable or proven invasive aspergillosis, candidaemia, zygomycosis), reactivation of cytomegalovirus, other opportunistic viral infections
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent to participate in the study, signed by the patient; Diagnosis: acute lymphoblastic or acute myeloblastic leukemia; Morphological remission, defined as less than 5% of blasts by microscopy or flow cytometry with a peripheral leukocyte level of more than 1.500 μL. It is acceptable to include patients without restored platelets or erythrocytes; Indications for performing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, determined by the participating center in accordance with local medical practice; Unrelated or haploidentical donor; Age 18-70 years; Functional status according to ECOG scale 0-2 score. Exclusion Criteria: Repeated allogeneic transplantation, regardless of the indications for its implementation; Source of graft - umbilical cord stem cells; Any ex vivo modification of the graft with the exception of separation or washing of red blood cells; The presence of more than 5% of clonal tumor cells according to flow cytometry in the presence of morphological remission; Diagnosis: acute promyelocytic leukemia; Severe organ failure: creatinine more than 2 ULN; ALT, AST more than 5 ULN; bilirubin more than 1.5 ULN; respiratory failure more than 1 grade; Unstable hemodynamics, requiring the introduction of vasopressors; Uncontrolled bacterial or fungal infection at the time of randomization, determined by the level of CRP> 70 mg/l with adequate antibacterial or antifungal therapy; Rhythm disturbances that persist despite adequate antiarrhythmic therapy: a tachysystolic form of atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias V gradation according to Laun, AV block of III degree; Decrease in ejection fraction according to echocardiography less than 40%; Angina of more than II functional class or unstable angina; Another severe concomitant pathology, which according to the attending physician does not allow the patient to be included in the study; Pulmonary pathology with a decrease in FEV1 of less than 60% or pulmonary diffusion capacity of less than 60%; Inability to quit smoking for up to 6 months after transplantation; Pregnancy or refusal to perform highly effective contraception for 6 months after transplantation. Highly effective contraceptive methods include: Total abstinence: if it corresponds to the preferred and customary way of life of the patient. Periodic abstinence (for example, calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation methods) and interrupted sexual intercourse are not considered acceptable methods of contraception; Female sterilization (surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before the start of the therapy being studied. In the case of ovariectomy only, the reproductive status of the woman must be confirmed using a subsequent analysis of hormones; Sterilization of the male partner (at least 6 months before screening). For women participating in the study, the sexual partner after a vasectomy should be the only partner; Use of oral, injectable or implanted hormonal contraceptive drugs, intrauterine devices or contraceptive systems, or other forms of hormonal contraception with similar efficacy (failure rate less than 1%), for example, hormonal vaginal rings or transdermal hormonal contraceptives. Somatic or mental pathology not allowing to sign informed consent.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Hematology Research Center
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
125167
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
RM Gorbacheva Research Institute
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197022
Country
Russian Federation

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Per request to the Ethical Committee of Pavlov University with the study plan and rationale for the use of the data.

Learn more about this trial

PTCy and Ruxolitinib vs PTCy, Tacrolimus and MMF in MUD and Haploidentical HSCT

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs