search
Back to results

Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinomas (Phase II Trial) (LAPC)

Primary Purpose

Pancreas Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Particle-therapy using protons or carbon ions
Blood sampling
Magnetic resonance imaging
Computertomography
18-F-FluorDesoxyGlukose Positron Emission Tomography-Computer Tomography (18F-FDG-PET-CT)
Sponsored by
EBG MedAustron GmbH
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Pancreas Cancer focused on measuring Particle Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated radiotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has histologically or cytological confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (cases with radiological findings suspicious of pancreatic cancer AND elevated CA 19-9 may be enrolled even without positive cytology)
  • The patient is not candidate for radical surgical resection because of one or more of the following reasons:

    1. the patient is staged as locally advanced and with unresectable disease according to the international consensus definition. Specific criteria are: there is involvement of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein with bilateral narrowing/occlusion, exceeding the inferior border of the duodenum; or tumor contact/invasion of 180 or more degree of the superior mesenteric artery or of the truncus coeliacus; or tumor contact/invasion of the proper hepatic artery/ celiac artery; or tumor contact or invasion of the aorta.
    2. the patient is not a candidate for radical surgery because of radiographic or biochemical (CA 19-9) progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy despite being initially classified as resectable or borderline resectable according to the international consensus definition.
    3. the patient is not candidate for radical surgery because of cN+ stage
  • The patient is not candidate to (further) neoadjuvant chemotherapy because of one or more of the following reasons:

    1. the patient is not fit for chemotherapy
    2. the patient has progressed under chemotherapy
    3. the patient has received neoadjuvant chemotherapy but is judged still not a candidate for explorative surgery.
  • Negative staging for distant metastasis
  • Age > 18 years
  • Karnofsky index ≥ 70
  • No tumor infiltration of stomach or duodenum
  • The patient is informed of the diagnosis and is able to give informed consent (Ability of patient to understand character and individual consequences of the study protocol)
  • Women of fertile age must have adequate conception prevention measures and must not breast feed
  • Signed Informed Consent (must be available before study inclusion)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-exocrine tumors
  • Major medical or psychiatric comorbidities that contraindicate radiotherapy
  • Presence of distant metastasis
  • Pregnancy or unwilling to do adequate conception prevention
  • Lactating and unwilling to discontinue lactation
  • Men of procreative potential not willing to use effective means of contraception
  • Metallic prosthesis or other conditions - IF it prevents an adequate imaging for target volume definition or treatment planning at the discretion of the treating institution contraindicate radiotherapy e.g. active infections in the area
  • Previous abdominal radiotherapy
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment at discretion of treating institution
  • Patient refusal

Sites / Locations

  • EBG MedAustron GmbHRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Particle radiotherapy

Arm Description

According to the radiation plan using protons or carbon ions (between 25 and a maximum of 40 Gy). Planning Target Volume 1 : 25 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) in 5 fractions of 5 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) Planning Target Volume 2 : A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) will be delivered to the Planning Target Volume 2: 40 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) in 5 fractions of 8 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Locoregional tumor control
Rate of locoregional tumor control at two year will be evaluated radiologically. This endpoint will be measured with the actuarial approach.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Loco-regional progression-free survival
This endpoint will be measured with the actuarial approach. It will be assessed as the union of locoregional control and survival. Patient with loco regional recurrence will be considered failures. Deceased patient will also be considered failures. Patient lost to follow-up without evidence of locoregional recurrence will be censored. Distant metastasis and peritoneal carcinosis will be irrelevant respect to this endpoint.
Overall survival
This endpoint will be measured with the actuarial approach. All deaths will be considered failures, patient lost to follow-up will be censored.
Incidence of CTCAE v5.0 G4-5 toxicity
This endpoint will be scored as gross rate. The investigator will measure the number of patients experiencing at least one toxicity >= Grade 4 and >= Grade 5 and the number of events >= Grade 4 and >= Grade 5. The crude number will be divided by the total number of patients treated.
Patient reported Health-related Quality of Life, measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep)
Quality of life will be measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) before radiation therapy and at each follow-up. The FACT-Hep has 27 (+ a subscale with 18 additional) questions, each of which is answered using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Questions are phrased so that higher numbers indicate a better health state, leading to some items being reverse-scored. Questions measure the respondents' health state over the last 7 days in four subscales: Physical Well-Being (7 questions), Social/Family Well-Being (7 questions), Emotional Well-Being (6 questions), and Functional Well-being (7 questions). This disease-specific version of the FACT-Hep contain these four core subscales, with additional (18) questions appended to address disease-specific factors. The higher the score the better the Quality of Life.
Patient reported Health-related Quality of Life, measured with European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30
Quality of life will be measured with EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 before radiation therapy and at each follow-up. Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Patient reported Health-related Quality of Life, measured with Brief Pain Inventory
Quality of life will be measured with Brief Pain Inventory before radiation therapy and at each follow-up. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a measurement tool for assessing clinical pain.The interference items were now presented with 0-10 scales, with 0=no interference and 10=interferes completely.
Incidence of CTCAE v5.0 Grade 2 - Grade 5 acute, subacute and late toxicities
The number of events, their grade and their time course will be measured.

Full Information

First Posted
December 16, 2021
Last Updated
August 25, 2022
Sponsor
EBG MedAustron GmbH
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05191940
Brief Title
Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinomas (Phase II Trial)
Acronym
LAPC
Official Title
Phase II Trial of Hypo-fractionated Highly Conformal Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinomas
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
EBG MedAustron GmbH

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is an interventional, single-arm, open-label study with high dose short course radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
Detailed Description
This is an interventional, open label, trial of definitive hypofractionated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Within this study radiotherapy shall be delivered with active scanning particle-therapy using proton- or carbon ions radiotherapy. Particle therapy will be performed with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) treating a larger target volume, including elective lymph node stations and neural plexus, at a lower dose and boosting macroscopic disease. The investigator will explore the efficacy of these treatment in a real world scenario in which patients are allowed to receive standard systemic treatment and standard surgical treatment (if conversion to resectability is achieved). However, and in order to record and to gain better understanding of the influence of systemic therapies on the outcomes parameters of this study, patients will be sub-stratified in 3 groups: i) patients receiving FOLFIRINOX, ii) patients receiving Gemcitabine + Nanoparticle Albumin Bound Paclitaxel (NAB-Paclitaxel), iii) patients receiving other systemic therapies or not receiving antineoplastic systemic therapy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreas Cancer
Keywords
Particle Radiotherapy, Hypofractionated radiotherapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Particle radiotherapy
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
According to the radiation plan using protons or carbon ions (between 25 and a maximum of 40 Gy). Planning Target Volume 1 : 25 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) in 5 fractions of 5 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) Planning Target Volume 2 : A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) will be delivered to the Planning Target Volume 2: 40 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) in 5 fractions of 8 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness).
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Particle-therapy using protons or carbon ions
Intervention Description
According to the radiation plan (between 25 and a maximum of 40 Gy). Planning Target Volume 1 : 25 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) in 5 fractions of 5 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) Planning Target Volume 2 : A simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) will be delivered to the Planning Target Volume 2: 40 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness) in 5 fractions of 8 Gy (Relative Biological Effectiveness).
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Blood sampling
Intervention Description
Evaluation before treatment-start, after treatment and follow-up period.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic resonance imaging
Intervention Description
For treatment planning as well as for follow-up radiological tumor assessment.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Computertomography
Intervention Description
For treatment planning as well as for follow-up radiological tumor assessment.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
18-F-FluorDesoxyGlukose Positron Emission Tomography-Computer Tomography (18F-FDG-PET-CT)
Intervention Description
For treatment planning as well as for follow-up radiological tumor assessment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Locoregional tumor control
Description
Rate of locoregional tumor control at two year will be evaluated radiologically. This endpoint will be measured with the actuarial approach.
Time Frame
At two year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Loco-regional progression-free survival
Description
This endpoint will be measured with the actuarial approach. It will be assessed as the union of locoregional control and survival. Patient with loco regional recurrence will be considered failures. Deceased patient will also be considered failures. Patient lost to follow-up without evidence of locoregional recurrence will be censored. Distant metastasis and peritoneal carcinosis will be irrelevant respect to this endpoint.
Time Frame
104 weeks after therapy
Title
Overall survival
Description
This endpoint will be measured with the actuarial approach. All deaths will be considered failures, patient lost to follow-up will be censored.
Time Frame
Maximal 109 weeks
Title
Incidence of CTCAE v5.0 G4-5 toxicity
Description
This endpoint will be scored as gross rate. The investigator will measure the number of patients experiencing at least one toxicity >= Grade 4 and >= Grade 5 and the number of events >= Grade 4 and >= Grade 5. The crude number will be divided by the total number of patients treated.
Time Frame
From enrollment to six months after radiation therapy initiation
Title
Patient reported Health-related Quality of Life, measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep)
Description
Quality of life will be measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) before radiation therapy and at each follow-up. The FACT-Hep has 27 (+ a subscale with 18 additional) questions, each of which is answered using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). Questions are phrased so that higher numbers indicate a better health state, leading to some items being reverse-scored. Questions measure the respondents' health state over the last 7 days in four subscales: Physical Well-Being (7 questions), Social/Family Well-Being (7 questions), Emotional Well-Being (6 questions), and Functional Well-being (7 questions). This disease-specific version of the FACT-Hep contain these four core subscales, with additional (18) questions appended to address disease-specific factors. The higher the score the better the Quality of Life.
Time Frame
Maximal 109 weeks
Title
Patient reported Health-related Quality of Life, measured with European Organization for Research and Treatment (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30
Description
Quality of life will be measured with EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 before radiation therapy and at each follow-up. Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients. A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / quality of life (QoL) represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Time Frame
Maximal 109 weeks
Title
Patient reported Health-related Quality of Life, measured with Brief Pain Inventory
Description
Quality of life will be measured with Brief Pain Inventory before radiation therapy and at each follow-up. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) is a measurement tool for assessing clinical pain.The interference items were now presented with 0-10 scales, with 0=no interference and 10=interferes completely.
Time Frame
Maximal 109 weeks
Title
Incidence of CTCAE v5.0 Grade 2 - Grade 5 acute, subacute and late toxicities
Description
The number of events, their grade and their time course will be measured.
Time Frame
104 weeks after therapy

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient has histologically or cytological confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (cases with radiological findings suspicious of pancreatic cancer AND elevated CA 19-9 may be enrolled even without positive cytology) The patient is not candidate for radical surgical resection because of one or more of the following reasons: the patient is staged as locally advanced and with unresectable disease according to the international consensus definition. Specific criteria are: there is involvement of portal vein/superior mesenteric vein with bilateral narrowing/occlusion, exceeding the inferior border of the duodenum; or tumor contact/invasion of 180 or more degree of the superior mesenteric artery or of the truncus coeliacus; or tumor contact/invasion of the proper hepatic artery/ celiac artery; or tumor contact or invasion of the aorta. the patient is not a candidate for radical surgery because of radiographic or biochemical (CA 19-9) progression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy despite being initially classified as resectable or borderline resectable according to the international consensus definition. the patient is not candidate for radical surgery because of cN+ stage The patient is not candidate to (further) neoadjuvant chemotherapy because of one or more of the following reasons: the patient is not fit for chemotherapy the patient has progressed under chemotherapy the patient has received neoadjuvant chemotherapy but is judged still not a candidate for explorative surgery. Negative staging for distant metastasis Age > 18 years Karnofsky index ≥ 70 No tumor infiltration of stomach or duodenum The patient is informed of the diagnosis and is able to give informed consent (Ability of patient to understand character and individual consequences of the study protocol) Women of fertile age must have adequate conception prevention measures and must not breast feed Signed Informed Consent (must be available before study inclusion) Exclusion Criteria: Non-exocrine tumors Major medical or psychiatric comorbidities that contraindicate radiotherapy Presence of distant metastasis Pregnancy or unwilling to do adequate conception prevention Lactating and unwilling to discontinue lactation Men of procreative potential not willing to use effective means of contraception Metallic prosthesis or other conditions - IF it prevents an adequate imaging for target volume definition or treatment planning at the discretion of the treating institution contraindicate radiotherapy e.g. active infections in the area Previous abdominal radiotherapy Severe hepatic or renal impairment at discretion of treating institution Patient refusal
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Piero Fossati, M.D.
Phone
+43 664 80878
Ext
408
Email
piero.fossati@medaustron.at
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Piero Fossati, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
EBG MedAustron GmbH
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
EBG MedAustron GmbH
City
Wiener Neustadt
State/Province
Niederösterreich
ZIP/Postal Code
2700
Country
Austria
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Piero Fossati, M.D.
Phone
+43 2622 26 100
Ext
408
Email
piero.fossati@medaustron.at
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Piero Fossati, M.D.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinomas (Phase II Trial)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs