search
Back to results

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Versus ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellators

Primary Purpose

Uterine Myomas

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX
Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with ROTOCUT G1
Sponsored by
University Magna Graecia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Uterine Myomas focused on measuring laparoscopy, myomectomy, myomas, morcellator, supracervical hysterectomy, surgery, symptomatic uterine myomas

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic uterine leiomyomas with main diameter over 5 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major medical conditions
  • Endocrinologic diseases
  • Current or past, acute or chronic psychiatric disorders
  • Premenstrual syndrome
  • Use of drugs influencing cognition, vigilance and/or mood within six months of the study enrolment
  • Hypoechoic or calcified leiomyomas at ultrasound
  • Associated lesions in the uterus and adnexa at ultrasound
  • Pattern of hyperplasia with cytologic atypia in the endometrial biopsy
  • Abnormal Papanicolau smear test
  • Positive urine pregnancy test result

Sites / Locations

  • University Magna Graecia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX

Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Morcellament time

Secondary Outcome Measures

Total operative time
Feasibility [subjective score of difficulty]
Blood loss
Post-operative complications
Postoperative pain
Hospital stay
Time to return to full activity and/or work

Full Information

First Posted
August 26, 2008
Last Updated
November 2, 2010
Sponsor
University Magna Graecia
Collaborators
Johnson & Johnson
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00743080
Brief Title
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Versus ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellators
Official Title
GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Tissue Morcellator vs. ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellator: a Randomized Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2008
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
January 2010 (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University Magna Graecia
Collaborators
Johnson & Johnson

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To date, laparoscopic approach may apply to several gynecologic diseases. Among the recent advances in laparoscopy an important role was assumed by the methods of tissue extraction. In particular electronic power morcellators have become instruments of large use in surgical practice. The tissue morcellator is an endoscopic instrument indicated for cutting, coring and extracting tissue in operative laparoscopy, and it has a pivotal role during specific gynaecologic procedures as well as myomectomy and hysterectomy. The main advantages offered by electronic morcellator consist in reduction of operative time and of risk in hernia formation, this last due to the absence of fascia's tearing or stretching. Recently, a new generation of tissue morcellator has been commercialized. In particular, GYNECARE MORCELLEX (Ethicon-Johnson & Johnson Gateway, US) and ROTOCUT G1 (Karl Storz, Culver City, CA, US) are two tissue morcellators currently available. These instruments seem to offer advantages over the previous models in terms of precision, speed and durability. The most useful of this features seems to be the higher speed, in particular it has been calculated that they morcellate tissues approximately four times faster than those of the previous generation. The high speed that characterizes this new morcellator potentially results in reduced operative time with consequent benefits in other surgical outcomes such as postoperative pain and recovery time. Even if both morcellator seems to be high-quality instruments, no study was designed until now to compare these two tools in a prospective fashion.
Detailed Description
Patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas will be assessed for eligibility and will be enrolled in the present protocol-study. At entry, in each woman age, parity, body mass index (BMI), menopausal, socioeconomic and work status, symptoms related to the gynecologic disease, previous major surgical laparotomies, and associated medical condition will be assessed. All eligible patients will be randomized in single blocks using a central computer generating randomization lists (University of Catanzaro). The subjects will be assigned to one of four subgroups of surgical treatment, i.e. group A1 myomectomies performed using GYNECARE MORCELLEX, group A2 supracervical hysterectomies performed using GYNECARE MORCELLEX, group B1 myomectomies performed using ROTOCUT G1 and group B2 supracervical hysterectomies performed using ROTOCUT G1. Before surgery, for each patient gynaecological and rectal examination, Papanicolau smear test, ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic assessment with endometrial biopsy will be performed. For each surgical intervention the following parameters will be recorded: duration of surgical procedures, intra-operative blood loss, amount of blood transfusion, intra-operative complications, number of laparotomic conversion, postoperative pain, post-operative complications, hospital stay, and time to return to full activity and/or work. Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle and a P value of 0.05 or less will be considered significant.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Uterine Myomas
Keywords
laparoscopy, myomectomy, myomas, morcellator, supracervical hysterectomy, surgery, symptomatic uterine myomas

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX
Intervention Description
Laparoscopic myomectomy with GYNECARE MORCELLEX: Laparoscopic approach. Longitudinal incision close to the midline of myoma. Identification of cleavage plane. Enucleation of myoma. Suturing myometrial. Removal of myoma with a automatic morcellator (GYNECARE MORCELLEX). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using GYNECARE MORCELLEX: Laparoscopic approach. Use of bipolar diathermy and scissor starting with the round ligament and then the utero-ovarian ligament, otherwise the infundibulopelvic ligament in case of removal of adnexa. Identification, desiccation with polar diathermy, and transection of the uterine vessels. Repetition of the procedure on the contra-lateral side. Opening of vagina just below uterine vessels using an unipolar needle. Removal of uterus by means of GYNECARE MORCELLEX. Abdominal cavity irrigation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic myomectomy and supracervical hysterectomy with ROTOCUT G1
Intervention Description
Laparoscopic myomectomy with ROTOCUT G1: Laparoscopic approach. Longitudinal incision close to the midline of myoma. Identification of cleavage plane. Enucleation of myoma. Suturing myometrial. Removal of myoma with a automatic morcellator (ROTOCUT G1). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using ROTOCUT G1: Laparoscopic approach. Use of bipolar diathermy and scissor starting with the round ligament and then the utero-ovarian ligament, otherwise the infundibulopelvic ligament in case of removal of adnexa. Identification, desiccation with polar diathermy, and transection of the uterine vessels. Repetition of the procedure on the contra-lateral side. Opening of vagina just below uterine vessels using an unipolar needle. Removal of uterus by means of ROTOCUT G1. Abdominal cavity irrigation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Morcellament time
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total operative time
Title
Feasibility [subjective score of difficulty]
Title
Blood loss
Title
Post-operative complications
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Postoperative pain
Title
Hospital stay
Title
Time to return to full activity and/or work
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic uterine leiomyomas with main diameter over 5 cm Exclusion Criteria: Major medical conditions Endocrinologic diseases Current or past, acute or chronic psychiatric disorders Premenstrual syndrome Use of drugs influencing cognition, vigilance and/or mood within six months of the study enrolment Hypoechoic or calcified leiomyomas at ultrasound Associated lesions in the uterus and adnexa at ultrasound Pattern of hyperplasia with cytologic atypia in the endometrial biopsy Abnormal Papanicolau smear test Positive urine pregnancy test result
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fulvio Zullo, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, - Viale Europa Loc. Germaneto 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Magna Graecia
City
Catanzaro
ZIP/Postal Code
88100
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20226407
Citation
Zullo F, Falbo A, Iuliano A, Oppedisano R, Sacchinelli A, Annunziata G, Venturella R, Materazzo C, Tolino A, Palomba S. Randomized controlled study comparing the Gynecare Morcellex and Rotocut G1 tissue morcellators. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.11.009.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)Comparing GYNAECARE MORCELLEX Versus ROTOCUT GI Tissue Morcellators

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs