search
Back to results

Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease

Primary Purpose

Huntington's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PF-02545920
PF-02545920
Placebo
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Huntington's Disease focused on measuring Huntington; chorea; total motor score; CAG repeat: total functional capacity; motor cognitive and behavioral symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • CAG repeat equal or greater than 36;
  • Total motor score equal or greater than 10;
  • Total functional capacity equal or greater than 7.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically significant neurologic disorder other than Huntington's disease;
  • Other severe acute psychiatric conditions, mania and/or psychosis;
  • History of neutropenia, and myeloproliferative disorders;

Sites / Locations

  • The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital
  • The University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
  • University of California, Irvine
  • Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center
  • UCLA Neurology Clinic
  • UCLA Radiology
  • Rocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center
  • University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
  • Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Albany Medical College
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center - Dept. of Neurology
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation Hospital Pharmacy
  • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Davis Medical Center
  • The Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
  • Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • The Centre for Huntington Disease
  • Centre for Movement Disorders
  • CHUM-Notre-Dame Hospital
  • CHUM Notre Dame, Pharmacie
  • Technische Universität München
  • Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
  • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  • Prof. Dr. Carsten Saft
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
  • Prof. Dr. med. Stephan Klebe
  • Universitat zu Lubeck
  • Philipps Universitat Marburg
  • George Huntington Institut
  • Kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum gGmbH
  • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
  • Universitatsklinikum Wuerzburg
  • Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy sp. z o.o.
  • Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp. z o.o.
  • Solumed Centrum Medyczne
  • Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii
  • NHS Grampian, Clinical Genetics Centre
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
  • John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair
  • University of Wales Hospital
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
  • Clinical Research Facility
  • University College London Hospitals Huntington's Disease Research Centre
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • The National Institute for Health Research/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility
  • St Nicholas Hospital
  • Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

20 mg PF-02545920 BID

5 mg PF-02545920 BID

Placebo BID

Arm Description

20 mg PF-02545920 BID

5 mg PF-02545920 BID

Matching placebo

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment.
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of Huntington's Disease (HD). The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The total motor score (TMS) assessed motor features of HD with standardized ratings of oculomotor function, dysarthria, chorea, dystonia, gait, and postural stability. Some items (such as chorea and dystonia) required grading each extremity (face, bucco-oral-lingual, and trunk) separately. Eye movements require both horizontal and vertical grades. The total motor impairment scores was the sum of all the individual 31 motor sub-items (each rated from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe motor impairment than lower scores. The range of TMS is 0-124.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants That Met White Blood Count (WBC) and Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Stopping Criteria
The criteria for temporary study suspension was as follow: Criterion A: WBC count <=3000 cells/mm3 but >= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1500 cells/mm3 but >= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion B: WBC <= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion C: participants who are discontinued or permanently suspended due to WBC or ANC findings; Criterion D: ANC <= 500 cells/mm3
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormalities)
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (With Normal Baseline)
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)
Absolute values were analyzed for supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), standing SBP, supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), standing DBP, supine pulse rate, and standing pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: supine SBP less than (<) 90 millimeter of mercury(mmHg); Criterion B: standing SBP < 90 mmHg; Criterion C: supine DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion D: standing DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion E: supine pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion F: supine pulse rate greater than (>)120 BPM; Criterion G: standing pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion H: standing pulse rate >120 BPM;
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)
The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum increase from baseline in supine SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum increase from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum increase from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum increase from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Decrease From Baseline)
The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum decrease from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum decrease from baseline in supine SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum decrease from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum decrease from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum decrease from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Absolute Values)
The number of participants with ECG absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization) >=300 msec; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex(time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization) >=140 msec; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) 450-<480 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval 480-<500 msec; Criterion E: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) >=500 msec
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Increase From Baseline)
Number of participants with ECG meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval increase from baseline percentage change (PctChg)>= 25/50%; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex increase from baseline PctChg >=50%; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline 30<=change<60 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline change >=60 msec.
Severity of Adverse Events Related to Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) Including Dystonia and Akathisia
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to severity; mild (not causing any significant problem, dose adjustment not required), moderate (caused problem that does not interfere significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, dose adjustment needed due to adverse event) and severe (caused problem that interferes significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, study drug stopped due to adverse event). EPS were reported AEs of dystonia and akathisia.
Change From Baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) Score of the UHDRS After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of HD. The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) was a subset of the TMS assessment. It was composed of the scoring of 7 chorea assessments (face, orobuccolingual, trunk, right and left upper extremities, right and left lower extremities). Each assessment was rated from 0 to 4 (absent to prolonged). TMC is obtained by adding up each of the separate scores, leading to max score of 28. The minimum score is 0. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms. n is the number of evaluable subjects in each visit.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Follow-up Visit
The C-SSRS captured the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide; suicide attempt; preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior; suicidal ideation; self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent. The results presented are the number of participants with completed suicide or non-fatal suicide events or behaviors. Worsening of suicidal ideation was an increase in severity of suicidal ideation from baseline.
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: "Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?". Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. n is the number of evaluable participants in each visit.

Full Information

First Posted
July 16, 2014
Last Updated
October 13, 2017
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02197130
Brief Title
Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease
Official Title
A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind Proof-of-concept Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Pf-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is a 26 week, randomized, parallel group, double blind comparison of PF-02545920 5 mg, PF-02545920 20 mg, and placebo dosed BID in the treatment of motor impairment of subjects with Huntington's Disease. A total of approximately 260 subjects are planned to be randomized in the study. Primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) after 26 weeks of treatment. secondary endpoints will include change from baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) score of the UHDRS after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score after 13 and 26 weeks of treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Huntington's Disease
Keywords
Huntington; chorea; total motor score; CAG repeat: total functional capacity; motor cognitive and behavioral symptoms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
272 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
20 mg PF-02545920 BID
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
20 mg PF-02545920 BID
Arm Title
5 mg PF-02545920 BID
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
5 mg PF-02545920 BID
Arm Title
Placebo BID
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Matching placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-02545920
Intervention Description
20 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 20 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets of 5 mg. The 20mg dose will be titrated as follow: 5mg BID for 7 days, 10mg BID for 7 days, 15 mg BID for 7 days and 20 mg BID to week 26. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PF-02545920
Intervention Description
5 mg twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each 5 mg dose will be taken as 4 tablets: one tablet of 5 mg and 3 tablets of matching placebo. The 5mg dose will not be titrated. Study drug will be provided in weekly blister cards.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching Placebo twice a day (BID) for 26 weeks. Each placebo dose will be taken as 4 tablets of matching Placebo. The placebo dose will not be titrated. Matching placebo will be provided in weekly blister cards.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Total Motor Score (TMS) Assessment of the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale (UHDRS) After 26 Weeks of Treatment.
Description
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of Huntington's Disease (HD). The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The total motor score (TMS) assessed motor features of HD with standardized ratings of oculomotor function, dysarthria, chorea, dystonia, gait, and postural stability. Some items (such as chorea and dystonia) required grading each extremity (face, bucco-oral-lingual, and trunk) separately. Eye movements require both horizontal and vertical grades. The total motor impairment scores was the sum of all the individual 31 motor sub-items (each rated from 0 to 4), with higher scores indicating more severe motor impairment than lower scores. The range of TMS is 0-124.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 26
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants That Met White Blood Count (WBC) and Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Stopping Criteria
Description
The criteria for temporary study suspension was as follow: Criterion A: WBC count <=3000 cells/mm3 but >= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1500 cells/mm3 but >= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion B: WBC <= 2000 cells/mm3 or ANC <= 1000 cells/mm3; Criterion C: participants who are discontinued or permanently suspended due to WBC or ANC findings; Criterion D: ANC <= 500 cells/mm3
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.
Time Frame
Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events
Description
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly.
Time Frame
Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormalities)
Description
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (With Normal Baseline)
Description
Following parameters were analyzed for laboratory examination: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes);coagulation (PT international ratio); liver function (total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, indirect bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT, LDH, alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin); renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, uric acid); electrolytes (calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, magnesium, phosphate); clinical chemistry (glucose, glycosylated, hemoglobin, human chorionic gonadotropin, creatine kinase); urinalysis (decimal logarithm of reciprocal of hydrogen ion activity [pH], urine specific gravity, glucose, protein, blood, ketones, nitrite).
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Absolute Values)
Description
Absolute values were analyzed for supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), standing SBP, supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), standing DBP, supine pulse rate, and standing pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs data meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: supine SBP less than (<) 90 millimeter of mercury(mmHg); Criterion B: standing SBP < 90 mmHg; Criterion C: supine DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion D: standing DBP <50 mmHg; Criterion E: supine pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion F: supine pulse rate greater than (>)120 BPM; Criterion G: standing pulse rate < 40 beats per minute(BPM); Criterion H: standing pulse rate >120 BPM;
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Increase From Baseline)
Description
The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum increase from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum increase from baseline in supine SBP greater than or equal to (>=) 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum increase from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum increase from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum increase from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern (Decrease From Baseline)
Description
The number of participants with vital signs data of maximum decrease from baseline meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum decrease from baseline in supine SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion B: maximum decrease from baseline in standing SBP >= 30 mmHg; Criterion C: maximum decrease from baseline in supine DBP >=20 mmHg; Criterion D: maximum decrease from baseline in standing DBP >=20 mmHg
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Absolute Values)
Description
The number of participants with ECG absolute values meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization) >=300 msec; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex(time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization) >=140 msec; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole, corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) 450-<480 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval 480-<500 msec; Criterion E: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) >=500 msec
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data That Met Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern(Increase From Baseline)
Description
Number of participants with ECG meeting the following criteria was reported: Criterion A: maximum PR interval increase from baseline percentage change (PctChg)>= 25/50%; Criterion B: maximum QRS complex increase from baseline PctChg >=50%; Criterion C: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline 30<=change<60 msec; Criterion D: maximum QTcF interval (Fridericia's correction) increase from baseline change >=60 msec.
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1, 28, 91, and 182
Title
Severity of Adverse Events Related to Extrapyramidal Symptoms (EPS) Including Dystonia and Akathisia
Description
Adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. AE was assessed according to severity; mild (not causing any significant problem, dose adjustment not required), moderate (caused problem that does not interfere significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, dose adjustment needed due to adverse event) and severe (caused problem that interferes significantly with usual activities or the clinical status, study drug stopped due to adverse event). EPS were reported AEs of dystonia and akathisia.
Time Frame
Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Change From Baseline in the Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) Score of the UHDRS After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
Description
The UHDRS was a clinical rating scale which has been developed by the Huntington Disease Study Group (HSG) to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of HD. The components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behavior and functional abilities. The Total Maximum Chorea (TMC) was a subset of the TMS assessment. It was composed of the scoring of 7 chorea assessments (face, orobuccolingual, trunk, right and left upper extremities, right and left lower extremities). Each assessment was rated from 0 to 4 (absent to prolonged). TMC is obtained by adding up each of the separate scores, leading to max score of 28. The minimum score is 0. The higher the score, the worse the symptoms. n is the number of evaluable subjects in each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 13, Week 26
Title
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Suicidal Behavior as Assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) From Baseline to Follow-up Visit
Description
The C-SSRS captured the occurrence, severity, and frequency of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors during the assessment period. C-SSRS assessed whether participant experienced following: completed suicide; suicide attempt; preparatory acts towards imminent suicidal behavior; suicidal ideation; self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent. The results presented are the number of participants with completed suicide or non-fatal suicide events or behaviors. Worsening of suicidal ideation was an increase in severity of suicidal ideation from baseline.
Time Frame
Day 1, 7, 14, 28, 56, 91, 133, 182 and follow-up visits (from Day 189 to 192)
Title
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score After 13 and 26 Weeks of Treatment.
Description
CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Clinician responded to a question: "Compared to your subject's condition at the beginning of treatment, how much has your subject changed?". Improvement was compared to baseline and was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. n is the number of evaluable participants in each visit.
Time Frame
Week 13 & Week 26

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: CAG repeat equal or greater than 36; Total motor score equal or greater than 10; Total functional capacity equal or greater than 7. Exclusion Criteria: Clinically significant neurologic disorder other than Huntington's disease; Other severe acute psychiatric conditions, mania and/or psychosis; History of neutropenia, and myeloproliferative disorders;
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Kirklin Clinic of UAB Hospital
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Arizona
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85054
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Arizona
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85259
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, Irvine
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92697
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center Drug Information Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA Neurology Clinic
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA Radiology
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rocky Mountain Movement Disorders Center
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University Health Neuroscience Center
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Charlestown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02129
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Albany Medical College
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center - Dept. of Neurology
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation Hospital Pharmacy
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Davis Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wexner Medical Center at the Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Centre for Huntington Disease
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6T 2B5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre for Movement Disorders
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M3B 2S7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHUM-Notre-Dame Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2L 4M1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHUM Notre Dame, Pharmacie
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4L 4M1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Technische Universität München
City
Munchen
State/Province
Bavaria
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Uniklinik RWTH Aachen
City
Aachen
ZIP/Postal Code
52074
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Prof. Dr. Carsten Saft
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44791
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
City
Erlangen
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Prof. Dr. med. Stephan Klebe
City
Freiburg
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitat zu Lubeck
City
Lubeck
ZIP/Postal Code
23562
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Philipps Universitat Marburg
City
Marburg
ZIP/Postal Code
35043
Country
Germany
Facility Name
George Huntington Institut
City
Münster
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum gGmbH
City
Taufkirchen
ZIP/Postal Code
84416
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitatsklinikum Wuerzburg
City
Wuerzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
97080
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Copernicus Podmiot Leczniczy sp. z o.o.
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80462
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp. z o.o.
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31505
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Solumed Centrum Medyczne
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60529
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02957
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NHS Grampian, Clinical Genetics Centre
City
Aberdeen
State/Province
Aberdeenshire
ZIP/Postal Code
AB25 2ZA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
City
Southampton
State/Province
Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
SO16 6YD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Oxford
State/Province
Oxfordshire
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 9DU
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Sheffield
State/Province
South Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2JF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Birmingham & Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
City
Birmingham
State/Province
West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2FG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
John Van Geest Centre for Brain Repair
City
Cambridge
ZIP/Postal Code
CB2 0PY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University of Wales Hospital
City
Cardiff
ZIP/Postal Code
CF14 4XW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G51 4TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Clinical Research Facility
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 9RT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University College London Hospitals Huntington's Disease Research Centre
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
WC1B 5EH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
WC1N 3BG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The National Institute for Health Research/Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9WL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St Nicholas Hospital
City
Newcastle Upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE3 3XT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Newcastle Magnetic Resonance Centre
City
Newcastle Upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE4 5PL
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A8241021
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of PF-02545920 In Subjects With Huntington's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs