Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer (CTS-179)
Primary Purpose
Rectal Cancer
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
open rectal resection
laparoscopic rectal resection
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring rectal cancer, laparoscopic assisted resection, open resection, preoperative chemoradiation, randomized trial
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Mid to low rectal cancer (within 9cm from AV, measured by RS)
- Histologically proven adenocarcinoma
- Locally advanced (T3, determined by CT, MRI and TRUS)
- Completion of preoperative chemoradiation
- Age: 18-80
- Hb ≥ 10g/dl, WBC≥ 3,000/mm3, Plt≥ 100,000/mm3
- Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dl
- Adequate cardiopulmonary function
- Informed consent from patient or patient's relative
Exclusion Criteria:
- Metastasis in liver, lung, brain, bone, paraaortic LN, subclavicular LN, inguinal LN
- Second primary malignancy (except CIS of the cervix or adequately treated skin cancer or prior malignancy treated more than 5 years ago without recurrence)
- Cardiopulmonary dysfunction
- Active, uncontrolled infection
- Active, uncontrolled psychosis
Sites / Locations
- National Cancer Center, Korea
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
open rectal resection
laparoscopic rectal resection
Arm Description
conventional open resection
laparoscopic rectal resection
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Disease free survival
Secondary Outcome Measures
Anorectal function
Overall survival
Quality of life
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00470951
First Posted
May 7, 2007
Last Updated
August 16, 2012
Sponsor
National Cancer Center, Korea
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00470951
Brief Title
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
Acronym
CTS-179
Official Title
A Comparison for Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Surgery for Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiation- Randomized Prospective Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2014 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National Cancer Center, Korea
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The investigators designed the randomized prospective trial of comparing open and laparoscopic resection in locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation in order to determine the oncologic and functional efficacy of laparoscopic rectal resection.
Detailed Description
Title: A comparison for laparoscopically assisted and open surgery for advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation - randomized prospective trial
Principal investigator: Jae Hwan Oh Co-investigator: Seung Yong Jeong, Sung Bum Kang, Hyo Seong Choi, Seok-Byung Lim
Purpose of the study: To compare efficacy of laparoscopic and open resection for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation
Specific aims
comparison of oncologic outcomes
comparison of quality of life
comparison of anorectal function
Materials Rectal cancer <9cm from anal verge, measured by rigid sigmoidoscopy histologically proven adenocarcinoma locally advanced (T3), determined by CT, transrectal ultrasonography, MRI without any contraindication for general anesthesia,operation and chemoradiation Completion of preoperative chemoradiation
Statistics
Sample size calculation for non-inferiority trial: 340
Disease free survival: Log-rank test,Cox regression analysis
QOL and anorectal function: Repeated measured ANCOVA
Methods
operation time of operation : 6-8 weeks after end of preoperative chemoradiation surgical technique standard total mesorectal excision and high ligation of inferior mesenteric vessels
preoperative chemoradiation chemotherapy: 2 cycles of 5-FU (400 mg/m2/day) + LV (20 mg/m2/day) IV bolus, for 3 days in 1st & 5th wks of RT or Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 p.o. bid during RT RT:45 Gy/ 25 fractions to the pelvis, 5.4 Gy/ 3 fractions boost to the primary tumor over 5.5 wks
postoperative chemotherapy 4 cycles of 5-FU (400 mg/m2/day) + LV (20 mg/m2/day) IV bolus, for 5 days, 4 wks interval
oncologic outcomes
Short-term outcomes Surgical length of incision op time blood loss intraoperative complications conversion rate Pathological resection margins (proximal, distal, circumferential) number of harvested lymph nodes length of resected bowel tumor regression grade (Dworak's grading) TNM staging Perioperative recovery duration of use of parenteral narcotics initiation of peristalsis initiation of oral intake duration of hospital stay 30-day postoperative mortality morbidity
Long-term outcomes Primary end point Disease free survival (3 years after surgery) Secondary end points Overall survival Local recurrence Distant metastasis Port-site and wound site recurrence
Quality of life Urinary function Duration of urinary catheterization Residual urine volume at discharge International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Male sexual function International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Female sexual function Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) QOL assessment EORTC QLQ C30 EORTC QLQ CR38
Anorectal function Anorectal manometry Maximum Resting Pressure Maximum Squeezing Pressure High Pressure Zone Sphincter Length Sensory Threshold Rectal Capacity Rectal Compliance Rectoanal Inhibitory Reflex Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI)
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
Keywords
rectal cancer, laparoscopic assisted resection, open resection, preoperative chemoradiation, randomized trial
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
340 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
open rectal resection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
conventional open resection
Arm Title
laparoscopic rectal resection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
laparoscopic rectal resection
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
open rectal resection
Intervention Description
open rectal resection
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
laparoscopic rectal resection
Intervention Description
laparoscopic assisted rectal resection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease free survival
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Anorectal function
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
3 year, 5 year
Title
Quality of life
Time Frame
preop, postop 3mo, posop 1 yr, 3yr, 5yr
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Immunologic response
Time Frame
preop, postop 2hr, postop 1day, 5day
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Mid to low rectal cancer (within 9cm from AV, measured by RS)
Histologically proven adenocarcinoma
Locally advanced (T3, determined by CT, MRI and TRUS)
Completion of preoperative chemoradiation
Age: 18-80
Hb ≥ 10g/dl, WBC≥ 3,000/mm3, Plt≥ 100,000/mm3
Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dl
Adequate cardiopulmonary function
Informed consent from patient or patient's relative
Exclusion Criteria:
Metastasis in liver, lung, brain, bone, paraaortic LN, subclavicular LN, inguinal LN
Second primary malignancy (except CIS of the cervix or adequately treated skin cancer or prior malignancy treated more than 5 years ago without recurrence)
Cardiopulmonary dysfunction
Active, uncontrolled infection
Active, uncontrolled psychosis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jae Hwan Oh, M.D., ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
National Cancer Center, Korea
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Cancer Center, Korea
City
Goyang
State/Province
Gyeonggi
ZIP/Postal Code
410-769
Country
Korea, Republic of
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33894918
Citation
Park JW, Kang SB, Hao J, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Jeong SY, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): 10-year follow-up of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;6(7):569-577. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00094-7. Epub 2021 Apr 23. Erratum In: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;7(3):e7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30456502
Citation
Park JS, Kang H, Park SY, Kim HJ, Woo IT, Park IK, Choi GS. Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2975-2981. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6563-8. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24837215
Citation
Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Jun;15(7):767-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0. Epub 2014 May 15. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17 (7):e270.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
20610322
Citation
Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jul;11(7):637-45. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Randomized Prospective Trial for Laparoscopic vs Open Resection for Rectal Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs