search
Back to results

Rapamycin vs Methotrexate in Diffuse SSc

Primary Purpose

Systemic Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rapamycin
methotrexate
Sponsored by
University of California, Los Angeles
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Systemic Sclerosis focused on measuring Systemic sclerosis, Scleroderma, Rapamycin, Methotrexate

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Satisfy American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis Have skin thickening proximal to the elbows and/or knees (diffuse scleroderma) Cutaneous involvement for less than 5 years from the onset of the first non-Raynaud's manifestation Exclusion Criteria: Severe intractable malabsorption Chronic debilitation from any underlying disease Off putative disease modifying therapies for one month prior to entry

Sites / Locations

  • Philip Clements, MD

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Rapamycin

Methotrexate

Arm Description

Patients take oral rapamycin 6 mg daily (and dose adjusted to keep a serum trough level of 5-15 ng/ml) for one year

Methotrexate 20 mg taken orally weekly for one year

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Adverse events
Modified Rodnan Skin thickness score

Secondary Outcome Measures

Forced vital capacity
Diffusing capacity (DLCO)
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index
Mahler Dyspnea Index
Medical Outcomes Questionnaire SF-36
Patient global (VAS)
Physician global (VAS)
% responders in skin score (=>35% decrease from baseline)
% responders in HAQ-DI(=>0.22 units decrease from baseline)
% responders in FVC (=>10% decrease from baseline)
Serum rapamycin levels

Full Information

First Posted
October 14, 2005
Last Updated
April 8, 2016
Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00241189
Brief Title
Rapamycin vs Methotrexate in Diffuse SSc
Official Title
A 48-week, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Phase I/II Study of Oral Rapamycin Versus Methotrexate in Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2002 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2006 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a study to determine the safety of the immunosuppressive rapamycin in patients with systemic sclerosis with diffuse cutaneous scleroderma. The effects (both good and bad) are being compared to another group of systemic sclerosis patients receiving methotrexate
Detailed Description
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a disorder characterized by overproduction and deposition of collagen in the skin and visceral organs, abnormalities of the microcirculation, and autoimmunity. Patients who develop extensive skin thickening (diffuse cutaneous scleroderma) usually do so within the first 5 years. In add tion they are at significant risk of early death, severe involvement of heart (10%), lung (15%) and kidney (15-20%) and loss of functional capacity (moderate to severe disability in about 50% within the first few years). there is as yet no proven cure or treatment which prevents heart, lung or kidney damage, prevents disability or improves survival. In a previsou study, we treated 10 SSc patients with diffuse cutaneous scleroerma with cyclosporin A (CsA), an agent which suppresses the immune response by reducing production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-2 (IL-2). Significant improvement in skin thickening was noted in 6 of the 10 SSc patients. Unfortuantely, significant reduction in kidney function and/or new onset high blood pressure occurred in 8 of the 10. This frequency and degree of adverse events ina population already at risk of kidney failure and high blood pressure is unacceptable. More recently an immunosuppressive agent with little kidney toxicity, rapamycin, has been found to block the effects of the same pro-inflammatory cytokine as cyclosporin (IL-2) in transplant patients as part of its immunosuppressive action. Since improvement in skin thickening was seen in our patients who received CsA, we postulate that blocking the effects of IL-2 by rapamycin will also result in improvement in skin thickening in SSc patients with extensive skin thickening. There is growing evidence (from our work and the work of others) that softening thick skin in diffuse SSc is associated with improvement in hand function, joint mobility, arthritis signs, overall functional ability, and survival. The effectiveness of another immunosuppressive, methotrexate, has been compared to placebo (a dummy) in two SSc studies that had a combined total of 100 patients with estensive skin thickening. In both studies there was a trend to greater softening of the thick scleroderma skin. In one study a greater sense of general well being was also noted in the methotrexate group and in the other study the physician global assessment improved to a greater extent in the methotrexate group. Because there is a suggestion of benefit from methotrexate, the present trial evaluating rapamycin is being compared to methotrexte. During a 48 week period rapamycin and methotrexate will be taken as randomly assigned (9 patients in each arm for a total of 18 patients). Over 48 weeks, the status of these patients' scleroderma will be assessed by simple but validated techniques, including simple palpation of the skin to assess skin thickness; lung function texts, electrocardiogram and chest x-ray to assess heart and lungp; blood pressure and serum creatinine to assess kidney; 3 questionnaires (completed by patients) to assess function, quality of life and shortness of breath; and CBC, chemistries and rapamycin levels to assess safety. Statistical analysis of the courses of the two treatment groups will help us determine whether rapamycin has excessive toxicity and whether there are suggestions of efficacy of rapamycin.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Systemic Sclerosis
Keywords
Systemic sclerosis, Scleroderma, Rapamycin, Methotrexate

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
17 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Rapamycin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients take oral rapamycin 6 mg daily (and dose adjusted to keep a serum trough level of 5-15 ng/ml) for one year
Arm Title
Methotrexate
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Methotrexate 20 mg taken orally weekly for one year
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
rapamycin
Other Intervention Name(s)
rapimmune
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
methotrexate
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse events
Title
Modified Rodnan Skin thickness score
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Forced vital capacity
Title
Diffusing capacity (DLCO)
Title
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index
Title
Mahler Dyspnea Index
Title
Medical Outcomes Questionnaire SF-36
Title
Patient global (VAS)
Title
Physician global (VAS)
Title
% responders in skin score (=>35% decrease from baseline)
Title
% responders in HAQ-DI(=>0.22 units decrease from baseline)
Title
% responders in FVC (=>10% decrease from baseline)
Title
Serum rapamycin levels

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Satisfy American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic sclerosis Have skin thickening proximal to the elbows and/or knees (diffuse scleroderma) Cutaneous involvement for less than 5 years from the onset of the first non-Raynaud's manifestation Exclusion Criteria: Severe intractable malabsorption Chronic debilitation from any underlying disease Off putative disease modifying therapies for one month prior to entry
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philip J Clements, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, Los Angeles
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Philip Clements, MD
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095-1670
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19950289
Citation
Su TI, Khanna D, Furst DE, Danovitch G, Burger C, Maranian P, Clements PJ. Rapamycin versus methotrexate in early diffuse systemic sclerosis: results from a randomized, single-blind pilot study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3821-30. doi: 10.1002/art.24986.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Rapamycin vs Methotrexate in Diffuse SSc

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs