search
Back to results

Rapid Assessment of and Prophylaxis for Influenza in Dwellers of Long-term Care Facilities (Rapid-LTCF)

Primary Purpose

Influenza, Human, Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B
Usual care
Sponsored by
University of Wisconsin, Madison
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Influenza, Human focused on measuring Long-term care facility, Elderly

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any resident of one of the 10 LTCF intervention facilities with two acute respiratory infection symptoms (rhinorrhea/runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough or fever).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    LTCF with RIDT

    LTCF Control

    Arm Description

    Nasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B (LTCF with RIDT). Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. We will collect data from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns.

    Usual care. Data will be collected from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of influenza antiviral treatment courses provided during the 4-month influenza seasons in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
    Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza treatment. The usual dose is 75 mg twice a day for 5 days.
    Number of influenza antiviral prophylaxis courses provided during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
    Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza prophylaxis. The usual dose is 75 mg daily for the duration of likely exposure
    Number of respiratory infection-related hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
    These will include all hospitalizations that include a discharge diagnosis for any respiratory infection.
    Number of all-cause hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
    All transfers of patients to the hospital will be assessed.
    Deaths during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    November 7, 2016
    Last Updated
    June 12, 2020
    Sponsor
    University of Wisconsin, Madison
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02964871
    Brief Title
    Rapid Assessment of and Prophylaxis for Influenza in Dwellers of Long-term Care Facilities
    Acronym
    Rapid-LTCF
    Official Title
    Rapid Assessment of and Prophylaxis for Influenza in Dwellers of Long-term Care Facilities
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    November 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 8, 2019 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    October 31, 2019 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Wisconsin, Madison

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    RAPID-LTCF is a stratified, block-randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a simple ARI case definition, rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with wireless transmission of results, and provision of infection control guidance when influenza is detected. Because of the nature of the intervention, blinding is not possible. Sites will be initially recruited for a study of "respiratory infections within LTCFs." After acceptance into the study, sites will be matched in terms of bed capacity, location, and other features prior to randomization.
    Detailed Description
    Project Overview: The primary goal of RAPID-LTCF is to conduct a randomized, controlled clinical trial (RCT) to assess the effect of on-site, rapid influenza detection at long-term care facilities (LTCFs) on influenza-related hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare-associated costs. The basic research question in PICO format is: Population: for residents of LTCFs across Wisconsin Intervention: does early detection of influenza coupled with infection control guidance Comparator: compared to usual care Outcomes: result in: increase early detection and reporting of influenza outbreaks? increased early antiviral treatment of influenza? increased use of antiviral prophylaxis for other at-risk residents? fewer hospitalizations during the influenza season? reduced mortality during the influenza season? lower healthcare associated costs during the influenza season? Building on two highly successful pilot QI projects-undertaken during the last two influenza seasons-that confirmed the feasibility and desirability of this approach, existing, CLIA-waived, low-complexity rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) with high sensitivity and high specificity in this population as the diagnostic platform will be used. RIDT analyzers will be configured for wireless transmission of anonymous test results to a cloud-based server for real-time access by public health. Detection of influenza at a LTCF and its transmission to public health in real time will trigger communication and advice on appropriate infection control measures to reduce in-facility transmission. This approach has high potential for limiting influenza's effect at LTCFs. Residents of LTCFs are at high risk for influenza infection due to reduced efficacy of influenza vaccines in elders, close quartering, presence of co-morbid medical conditions, and delayed response times. Consequently, outbreaks of influenza and other significant respiratory viruses easily spread within LTCFs and cause substantial morbidity and mortality in these populations. Results from this RCT will provide highly generalizable approaches using low-cost, low-complexity and easily-adapted tools and protocols for extremely early influenza detection and response. It is anticipated that early outbreak recognition and control in LTCFs will substantially reduce morbidity, mortality and healthcare associated costs in this vulnerable population. Background: At present, 1.8 million individuals live in this nation's 16,000 nursing homes and an additional 900,000 live in assisted living facilities. Significant healthcare disparities exist for these individuals; a recent study found that the largest for-profit nursing homes delivered significantly lower quality of care. Part of this disparity is reflected in the fate of those infected with influenza. Influenza and pneumonia combine to form the 8th leading cause of death in the United States. Outbreaks of influenza and other respiratory viruses are common in LTCFs and result in significant morbidity and mortality among residents. This increased morbidity and mortality is due to a combination of close quartering, residents with co-morbid medical conditions, and delays in medical response. Because of this high risk, influenza vaccination has long been recommended for all residents and health care workers in these settings. Influenza vaccines, however, can have very low efficacy in older individuals; vaccine efficacy for protection from the predominant influenza strain in 2014-2015 was estimated to be only 14% for individuals aged 50 years and older. Accordingly, elders (aged 65+) accounted for 72.4% of Wisconsin's influenza-related hospitalizations during the 2014-2015 influenza season and 63% of influenza-related ICU admissions. Moreover, across the country, the rate of attributable influenza hospitalization was 313 per 100,000 for individuals aged 65 year and older. The current practice for identifying and responding to influenza outbreaks in LTCFs is reactive and delayed. Of 41 known influenza outbreaks in LTCFs during the 2010-2011 season in New York, most were identified retrospectively through reporting of influenza hospitalizations and well before the LTCFs submitted reports to the Department of Health. The availability of CLIA-waived, low-complexity, sensitive and specific rapid influenza detection tests (RIDTs) can facilitate on-site diagnosis and early detection of an outbreak. Coupling RIDTs with wireless transmission of anonymous results directly to public health officials provides the means for extremely early and proactive outbreak recognition and intervention. Program Goal: A randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the effect of on-site RIDTs at LTCFs on subsequent influenza-related hospitalizations, deaths, and healthcare-associated costs is proposed. LTCF nursing staff will use RIDT technology to screen residents with acute respiratory infections (ARI). The proposed RIDT is a CLIA-waved, low-complexity test that uses a benign nasal swab specimen. It is configured to send test results via wireless transmission to a cloud platform. From there, data can be accessed in real-time by public health partners. Methods: Starting in January 2013, extensive experience with the Quidel SOFIA Influenza A+B system at 20 clinical sites and 7 LCTFs where the testing platform transmits influenza test results immediately to a cloud-based system with public health access has been acquired. True "real-time" availability of surveillance results are achievable. Since initiation, this highly innovative system has been working flawlessly. A plan to conduct RAPID-LTCF over three sequential influenza seasons to adapt to the uncertainties of influenza epidemiology has been proposed. Twenty LTCFs across Wisconsin will be recruited for participation and randomized, following stratification, to intervention (RIDT) or control (usual care) arms. Waived consent for on-site specimen collection from residents at the RIDT sites with acute respiratory infections has been approved by the IRB. Nasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA. Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. Data will be collected from each site regarding the number of courses of influenza antiviral medication provided for influenza treatment and for influenza prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns. An independent data monitoring and safety board will continuously review outcomes and halt the study should significant differences between the two arms emerge. Outcomes will be assessed using standard statistical methods. Significance: This program reflects the full intent of the Wisconsin Partnership Program and the Wisconsin Idea by identifying high-risk populations, and combining research, education and public health practice to reduce the disparities of care experienced by these populations. The application of cutting-edge, inexpensive, high-performing and reliable technology into a population of traditionally under-served, high-risk individuals would provide a translatable model for very early and proactive detection of, and response to influenza in LTCFs, thus allowing for appropriate medical (antiviral) and public health (in-room quarantining, enhanced personal protection equipment, prophylaxis of other residents) interventions.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Influenza, Human, Pneumonia
    Keywords
    Long-term care facility, Elderly

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    20 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    LTCF with RIDT
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Nasal swabs will be tested by nursing personnel at each intervention site using SOFIA Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B (LTCF with RIDT). Anonymous results will be sent, via wireless transmission, for daily review by the study team and public health personnel. A positive influenza detection will trigger direct communication with LTCF personnel with advice on antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, and appropriate infection control practices. We will collect data from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns.
    Arm Title
    LTCF Control
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Usual care. Data will be collected from each site regarding the prescribing of influenza antivirals for treatment and prophylaxis, number of hospitalizations, number of deaths, and associated healthcare costs during annual, dynamic, 4-month risk windows, based on Wisconsin surveillance of influenza patterns.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Sofia Fluorescent Immunoassay Analyzer Influenza A+B
    Intervention Description
    The Sofia Influenza A+B Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) uses advanced immunofluorescence-based lateral-flow technology to detect influenza A and influenza B viral nucleoprotein antigens.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Usual care
    Intervention Description
    Our team will discuss our interest in monitoring influenza antiviral treatment and prophylaxis courses, antibiotic courses, clinician and emergency room visits, respiratory infection-related hospitalizations, all-cause hospitalizations, and deaths during the anticipated 4-month influenza season over 3 years.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of influenza antiviral treatment courses provided during the 4-month influenza seasons in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
    Description
    Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza treatment. The usual dose is 75 mg twice a day for 5 days.
    Time Frame
    4 months
    Title
    Number of influenza antiviral prophylaxis courses provided during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
    Description
    Oseltamivir is the most commonly used antiviral for influenza prophylaxis. The usual dose is 75 mg daily for the duration of likely exposure
    Time Frame
    4 months
    Title
    Number of respiratory infection-related hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
    Description
    These will include all hospitalizations that include a discharge diagnosis for any respiratory infection.
    Time Frame
    4 months
    Title
    Number of all-cause hospitalizations in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF during the 4-month influenza season
    Description
    All transfers of patients to the hospital will be assessed.
    Time Frame
    4 months
    Title
    Deaths during the 4-month influenza season in RAPID-LTCF vs. control LTCF
    Time Frame
    4 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Any resident of one of the 10 LTCF intervention facilities with two acute respiratory infection symptoms (rhinorrhea/runny nose, nasal congestion, sore throat, cough or fever). Exclusion Criteria: None
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jon Temte, MD PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Wisconsin, Madison
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided

    Learn more about this trial

    Rapid Assessment of and Prophylaxis for Influenza in Dwellers of Long-term Care Facilities

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs