search
Back to results

Rasagiline Rescue in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial (R2)

Primary Purpose

Alzheimer's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rasagiline
Placebo
Sponsored by
The Cleveland Clinic
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alzheimer's Disease

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females 50 to 90 of age inclusive.
  • Diagnosis of probable AD (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria)
  • Positive fluoro-deoxyglucose PET ([18F]-FDG PET) scan compatible with AD as determined by the ADM Diagnostics LLC (ADMdx) Criteria at screening
  • Mini Mental Status Exam = 12 - 22 (inclusive)
  • Must have a study partner who is able and willing to comply with all required study procedures.
  • Have at least eight years of education and should have previously (in pre-AD condition) been capable of reading, writing, and communicating effectively with others in English.
  • If receiving therapy with a cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, the dose of these agents has been stable for at least 3 months prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any non-AD neurological disease
  • MRI findings indication of a non-AD diagnosis
  • Screening laboratory studies that are 1.5 times above or below the highest and lowest range of normal for each test respectively
  • History of melanoma; history of malignancy within the past five years with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell cancer, in-situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate cancer

Sites / Locations

  • Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health
  • Cleveland Clinic Main Campus
  • Cleveland Clinic Lakewood Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Placebo

Rasagiline

Arm Description

Subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive Rasagiline or the matching placebo 24-week double blind treatment. Subjects will take one 0.5 mg Rasagiline tablet or the matching placebo once a day on Baseline (Day 1) through Week 4. The dose will be titrated up to one 1 mg tablet or the matching placebo once a day starting on Week 5 until the Week 28 (end of treatment visit).

Subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive Rasagiline or the matching placebo 24-week double blind treatment. Subjects will take one 0.5 mg Rasagiline tablet or the matching placebo once a day on Baseline (Day 1) through Week 4. The dose will be titrated up to one 1 mg tablet or the matching placebo once a day starting on Week 5 until the Week 28 (end of treatment visit).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Regional Glucose Metabolism Between Week 24 and Baseline as Measured by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET).
The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline to week 24 in FDG-PET as measured by Standard Uptake Units Regional (SUVR) in several pre-specified brain regions including the medial temporal, lateral temporal, posterior cingulate - precuneus, inferior parietal, middle frontal, anterior cingulate, and striatum. The SUVR change was calculated by subtracting the value at 24 weeks from baseline values. Negative values indicate increased hypometabolism (i.e. worsening of cell function).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in ADAS-Cog 11 (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive 11) Score
The ADAS-Cog 11 (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive 11) is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation, and praxis. A higher score indicates more impairment. Scores from the original portion of the test range from 0 (best) to 70 (worse). We used total ADAS-Cog 11 scores, which is a sum of individual subscales. We calculated the change by subtracting the ADAS Cog score at week 24 from baseline score. A positive change indicates cognitive worsening.
Change in MMSE (Mini Mental Status Examination) Score
Measure Description: The MMSE (Mini Mental Status Examination) is a brief, frequently used screening instrument for AD drug studies. The MMSE evaluates orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two overlapping pentagons. A lower score indicates more cognitive impairment. The highest score is 30, range is between 0 (severe impairment) and 30 (cognitively normal). We calculated the change in scores by subtracting week 24 score from baseline. A negative score indicates clinical worsening.
Change in ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living) Score
Measure Description: The ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living) is an activities-of-daily-living inventory developed by the ADCS to assess functional performance in participants with AD. Using a structured interview format, study partners are queried as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the past 4 weeks and their level of performance. The ADCS-ADL provides a total score from 0-78, with a lower score indicating greater severity. We calculated change by subtracting scores on week 24 test from the baseline score. A negative score indicates worsening ability to complete ADLs.
Change in NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) Score
Measure Description: The behavioral outcome measure for this trial is the NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory). The NPI evaluates both the frequency and severity of 10 neuropsychiatric disturbances. Frequency assessments range from 1 (occasionally, less than once per week) to 4 (very frequently, once or more per day or continuously) as well as severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The overall score is calculated by summing the severity and frequency of the subscale measures. The range of scores is 0-40. A score of 0 indicates no behavioral impairment and a score of 40 indicates severe behavioral impairment. We calculated change by subtracting Week 24 scores from baseline scores. A positive change indicates behavioral worsening.
Change in Digit Span
Measure Description: The Digit Span consists of repetition of increasing long strings of digits presented at 1 per second as read by the examiner and repeated by the subject.The score is the maximum number of digits the patient can repeat until they fail twice in a row. The reverse digit span is identical to the forward digit span except that the patient repeats the presented digits in reverse order. The score is the maximum number of digits the patient can repeat in reverse order until they fail twice in a row. Each correct response is worth one point with a maximum total score of 28. A higher score is better. We calculated change by subtracting week 24 score from baseline score. A negative score indicates worse performance over the course of study.
Change in COWAT (Controlled Oral Word Association Test) Score
Measure Description: Study participants are instructed, "I want to see how many words you can say beginning with a certain letter in one minute." The study participant's responses are recorded on the worksheet. Study participants are then given an additional one minute for each of two different letters using similar instructions. The score is the total number of acceptable words for the three trials combined. A higher score represents better performance. Responses are then judged for their acceptability (example for the use of proper nouns, numbers, repetitions and stem word with a different ending). The score is the total number of acceptable words for the three trials combined. A higher score represents better performance. We calculated change by subtracting week 24 scores from baseline scores. A negative score indicates worse performance.
Change in QoL-AD (Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease) Score
Measure Description: The QoL-AD (Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease) is a commonly used 13 item QoL scale that assesses items specific to QoL in patients with cognitive impairment. It is administered to the research partner with answers for the patient. Points are assigned to each item as follows: poor = 1, fair = 2, good = 3, excellent = 4.The total score is the sum of all 13 items. The range of score is from 0-52. We calculated the change by subtracting the scores on week 24 score from baseline. A negative value indicates worsening quality of life.

Full Information

First Posted
February 5, 2015
Last Updated
October 21, 2020
Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02359552
Brief Title
Rasagiline Rescue in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial
Acronym
R2
Official Title
A 24-week, Three-site, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Proof-of-concept Study to Evaluate Rasagiline in the Regional Brain Metabolism on FDG PET in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 29, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 4, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase II, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, proof of concept three-site study, to evaluate the effect of Rasagiline in the regional brain metabolism on 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET).
Detailed Description
The study consists of two phases: a 24 week double blind placebo controlled treatment period and a 4 week follow up period. Patients will be randomized in a 1: 1 ratio at baseline to receive either Rasagiline or matching placebo The study drug will be given as 0.5 mg dose once daily for the 4 weeks, then increases to 1 mg daily for the next 20 weeks. A total of 50 subjects will be enrolled: 25 will receive Rasagiline and 25 will receive matching placebo for the 24-week treatment period. Primary objective is to determine if exposure to 1 mg of Rasagiline daily is associated with improved regional brain metabolism in the treatment group compared to the placebo group in Alzheimer's Disease patients

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alzheimer's Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive Rasagiline or the matching placebo 24-week double blind treatment. Subjects will take one 0.5 mg Rasagiline tablet or the matching placebo once a day on Baseline (Day 1) through Week 4. The dose will be titrated up to one 1 mg tablet or the matching placebo once a day starting on Week 5 until the Week 28 (end of treatment visit).
Arm Title
Rasagiline
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive Rasagiline or the matching placebo 24-week double blind treatment. Subjects will take one 0.5 mg Rasagiline tablet or the matching placebo once a day on Baseline (Day 1) through Week 4. The dose will be titrated up to one 1 mg tablet or the matching placebo once a day starting on Week 5 until the Week 28 (end of treatment visit).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rasagiline
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Regional Glucose Metabolism Between Week 24 and Baseline as Measured by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET).
Description
The primary outcome measure is the change from baseline to week 24 in FDG-PET as measured by Standard Uptake Units Regional (SUVR) in several pre-specified brain regions including the medial temporal, lateral temporal, posterior cingulate - precuneus, inferior parietal, middle frontal, anterior cingulate, and striatum. The SUVR change was calculated by subtracting the value at 24 weeks from baseline values. Negative values indicate increased hypometabolism (i.e. worsening of cell function).
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in ADAS-Cog 11 (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive 11) Score
Description
The ADAS-Cog 11 (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive 11) is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation, and praxis. A higher score indicates more impairment. Scores from the original portion of the test range from 0 (best) to 70 (worse). We used total ADAS-Cog 11 scores, which is a sum of individual subscales. We calculated the change by subtracting the ADAS Cog score at week 24 from baseline score. A positive change indicates cognitive worsening.
Time Frame
Mean change in scores from baseline to week 24
Title
Change in MMSE (Mini Mental Status Examination) Score
Description
Measure Description: The MMSE (Mini Mental Status Examination) is a brief, frequently used screening instrument for AD drug studies. The MMSE evaluates orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two overlapping pentagons. A lower score indicates more cognitive impairment. The highest score is 30, range is between 0 (severe impairment) and 30 (cognitively normal). We calculated the change in scores by subtracting week 24 score from baseline. A negative score indicates clinical worsening.
Time Frame
Mean change in scores from baseline to week 24
Title
Change in ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living) Score
Description
Measure Description: The ADCS-ADL (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living) is an activities-of-daily-living inventory developed by the ADCS to assess functional performance in participants with AD. Using a structured interview format, study partners are queried as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the past 4 weeks and their level of performance. The ADCS-ADL provides a total score from 0-78, with a lower score indicating greater severity. We calculated change by subtracting scores on week 24 test from the baseline score. A negative score indicates worsening ability to complete ADLs.
Time Frame
Mean change in scores from baseline to week 24
Title
Change in NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) Score
Description
Measure Description: The behavioral outcome measure for this trial is the NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory). The NPI evaluates both the frequency and severity of 10 neuropsychiatric disturbances. Frequency assessments range from 1 (occasionally, less than once per week) to 4 (very frequently, once or more per day or continuously) as well as severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The overall score is calculated by summing the severity and frequency of the subscale measures. The range of scores is 0-40. A score of 0 indicates no behavioral impairment and a score of 40 indicates severe behavioral impairment. We calculated change by subtracting Week 24 scores from baseline scores. A positive change indicates behavioral worsening.
Time Frame
Mean change in scores from baseline to week 24
Title
Change in Digit Span
Description
Measure Description: The Digit Span consists of repetition of increasing long strings of digits presented at 1 per second as read by the examiner and repeated by the subject.The score is the maximum number of digits the patient can repeat until they fail twice in a row. The reverse digit span is identical to the forward digit span except that the patient repeats the presented digits in reverse order. The score is the maximum number of digits the patient can repeat in reverse order until they fail twice in a row. Each correct response is worth one point with a maximum total score of 28. A higher score is better. We calculated change by subtracting week 24 score from baseline score. A negative score indicates worse performance over the course of study.
Time Frame
Mean change in scores from baseline to week 24
Title
Change in COWAT (Controlled Oral Word Association Test) Score
Description
Measure Description: Study participants are instructed, "I want to see how many words you can say beginning with a certain letter in one minute." The study participant's responses are recorded on the worksheet. Study participants are then given an additional one minute for each of two different letters using similar instructions. The score is the total number of acceptable words for the three trials combined. A higher score represents better performance. Responses are then judged for their acceptability (example for the use of proper nouns, numbers, repetitions and stem word with a different ending). The score is the total number of acceptable words for the three trials combined. A higher score represents better performance. We calculated change by subtracting week 24 scores from baseline scores. A negative score indicates worse performance.
Time Frame
Mean change in scores from baseline to week 24
Title
Change in QoL-AD (Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease) Score
Description
Measure Description: The QoL-AD (Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease) is a commonly used 13 item QoL scale that assesses items specific to QoL in patients with cognitive impairment. It is administered to the research partner with answers for the patient. Points are assigned to each item as follows: poor = 1, fair = 2, good = 3, excellent = 4.The total score is the sum of all 13 items. The range of score is from 0-52. We calculated the change by subtracting the scores on week 24 score from baseline. A negative value indicates worsening quality of life.
Time Frame
This assessment will be performed at the Baseline and Week 24 visits.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Males or females 50 to 90 of age inclusive. Diagnosis of probable AD (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) Positive fluoro-deoxyglucose PET ([18F]-FDG PET) scan compatible with AD as determined by the ADM Diagnostics LLC (ADMdx) Criteria at screening Mini Mental Status Exam = 12 - 22 (inclusive) Must have a study partner who is able and willing to comply with all required study procedures. Have at least eight years of education and should have previously (in pre-AD condition) been capable of reading, writing, and communicating effectively with others in English. If receiving therapy with a cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, the dose of these agents has been stable for at least 3 months prior to screening Exclusion Criteria: Any non-AD neurological disease MRI findings indication of a non-AD diagnosis Screening laboratory studies that are 1.5 times above or below the highest and lowest range of normal for each test respectively History of melanoma; history of malignancy within the past five years with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell cancer, in-situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate cancer
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey L Cummings, MD, ScD
Organizational Affiliation
The Cleveland Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Main Campus
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Lakewood Hospital
City
Lakewood
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44107
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
6496779
Citation
Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1202204
Citation
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9236950
Citation
Galasko D, Bennett D, Sano M, Ernesto C, Thomas R, Grundman M, Ferris S. An inventory to assess activities of daily living for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11 Suppl 2:S33-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9153155
Citation
Cummings JL. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology. 1997 May;48(5 Suppl 6):S10-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.5_suppl_6.10s.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Rasagiline Rescue in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs