RCT: Early Feeding After PEG Placement (PEG)
Primary Purpose
Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Gastrostomy
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
noFast: Start tube feeds within 1 hour of procedure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Critical Illness
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult subjects over 18 years of age
- Negative pregnancy test for women participants of child-bearing age
- Mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma patients with clinical indication for PEG tube placement
- Tolerating tube feeds at goal prior to procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with aberant gastrointestinal anatomy
- Patients with gastrointestinal motility disorders
- Patients with feeding intolerance prior to PEG tube procedure
- Pregnant women, children, or other vulnerable populations
- Clinical contraindications for PEG tube placement
- PEG performed in setting other than ICU at bedside
Sites / Locations
- Carilion Roanoke Memorial HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
No Intervention
Arm Label
noFast: Start tube feeds within 1 hour of procedure
FAST: Start tube feeds 4 hours after procedure
Arm Description
The noFAST group will have post-PEG tube feeds initiated <1 hour after the procedure. Feeds are to be initiated at the rate and with the formula the patient was tolerating prior to the procedure.
The FAST group will have post-PEG tube feeds initiated 4 hours after the procedure. Feeds are to be initiated at the rate and with the formula the patient was tolerating prior to the procedure.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Hours fasted
Number of hours patients are not receiving prescribed caloric intake
Secondary Outcome Measures
Complications
Complications associated with timing to start tube feeds after bedside PEG placement
Calorie deficit
Cumulative calorie deficit acquired as a result of peri-procedural fasting
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04110613
First Posted
September 18, 2019
Last Updated
October 18, 2021
Sponsor
Carilion Clinic
Collaborators
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04110613
Brief Title
RCT: Early Feeding After PEG Placement
Acronym
PEG
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Periprocedural Fasting in Ventilated Trauma and Surgical Intensive Care Patients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 19, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Carilion Clinic
Collaborators
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Randomized controlled trial to establish evidence on which to base timing of enteral feeding after bedside PEG placement in ventilated Trauma and Surgical ICU patients.
Detailed Description
Trauma and surgical intensive care unit(TSICU) patients supported with mechanical ventilation are at high risk for complications associated with malnutrition (Ambrosino and Clini 2004; Aubier et al. 1985; Hill et al. 1998). To mitigate this risk, therapeutic enteral nutrition(EN) is delivered via nasogastric(NGT), orogastric(OGT), or nasoenteric tube(NET) as soon as possible after admission to the intensive care unit(ICU) or upon restoration of gastrointestinal(GI) continuity. Despite these interventions, TSICU patients often suffer a calorie deficit associated with enteral nutrition interruption(ENI) for procedures or transitions in care(Peev et al. 2015; McClave et al. 2009). These periods of fasting predict quantified caloric deficit associated with complications of malnutrition(Peev et al. 2015; Segaran, Barker, and Hartle 2016). Reduction in ENI duration before and after ICU procedures has yielded decreased caloric deficits within mixed ICU populations(Segaran, Barker, and Hartle 2016).
When the need for EN is prolonged, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube(PEG) placement is a bedside procedure employed to promote progress toward rehabilitation and disposition out of the ICU. First described in 1980, the technique found its success in replacing the classic open gastrostomy performed through a laparotomy incision under general anesthesia(Gauderer, Ponsky, and Izant 1980). Approximately 100,000-125,000 PEGs are performed annually in the United States(Mendiratta et al. 2012). Despite 40 years of experience and its routine nature in modern critical care settings, there is little evidence on which to base timing of tube feeds after PEG placement in the mechanically ventilated Trauma and Surgical ICU(TSICU) population.
Pre- and post-PEG tube placement fasting practices are highly variable among surgical intensivists. There is no standard of care, despite truncated periods of periprocedural fasting described as safe in previously published retrospective and prospective observational studies. There is no evidence to support prolonged fasting after PEG placement in TSICU patients, thus an opportunity to improve patient outcomes by providing evidence that will encourage earlier feeding and a reduction in calorie deficits.The aim of the study is to encourage a standard of care among surgical intensivists that will help to mitigate the risk of malnutrition in this highly susceptible patient population.
Trauma and Surgical ICU patients undergoing bedside PEG tube placement will be randomized to one of two groups: FAST and noFAST. The FAST group will have post-PEG tube feeds initiated 4 hours after the procedure. The noFAST group will have post-PEG tube feeds initiated <1 hour after the procedure. Feeds for both are to be initiated at the rate and with the formula the patient was tolerating prior to the procedure.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Illness, Malnutrition, Gastrostomy, Procedural Sequelae, Trauma, Surgery, Mechanical Ventilation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Once scheduled for the bedside PEG procedure, patients will be randomized to either the experimental NoFAST group or the control FAST group.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1200 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
noFast: Start tube feeds within 1 hour of procedure
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The noFAST group will have post-PEG tube feeds initiated <1 hour after the procedure. Feeds are to be initiated at the rate and with the formula the patient was tolerating prior to the procedure.
Arm Title
FAST: Start tube feeds 4 hours after procedure
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The FAST group will have post-PEG tube feeds initiated 4 hours after the procedure. Feeds are to be initiated at the rate and with the formula the patient was tolerating prior to the procedure.
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
noFast: Start tube feeds within 1 hour of procedure
Intervention Description
Earliest possible initiation of tube feeding after bedside PEG tube procedure.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hours fasted
Description
Number of hours patients are not receiving prescribed caloric intake
Time Frame
24 hours before to 72 hours after the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complications
Description
Complications associated with timing to start tube feeds after bedside PEG placement
Time Frame
0-72 hours after the procedure
Title
Calorie deficit
Description
Cumulative calorie deficit acquired as a result of peri-procedural fasting
Time Frame
24 hours to 72 hours after procedure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult subjects over 18 years of age
Negative pregnancy test for women participants of child-bearing age
Mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma patients with clinical indication for PEG tube placement
Tolerating tube feeds at goal prior to procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with aberant gastrointestinal anatomy
Patients with gastrointestinal motility disorders
Patients with feeding intolerance prior to PEG tube procedure
Pregnant women, children, or other vulnerable populations
Clinical contraindications for PEG tube placement
PEG performed in setting other than ICU at bedside
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Katie L. Bower, MD
Phone
540-981-7434
Email
klbower@vt.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jordan Darden, PhD
Phone
540-529-7792
Email
jadarden@carilionclinic.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katie L Bower, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Carilion Clinic, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
City
Roanoke
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24014
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michelle Rothrock
Phone
540-985-8510
Email
mlrothrock@carilionclinic.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jordan Darden, PhD
Phone
540-529-7792
Email
jadarden@carilionclinic.org
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19398613
Citation
McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L, Cresci G; A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors; American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):277-316. doi: 10.1177/0148607109335234. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24714361
Citation
Peev MP, Yeh DD, Quraishi SA, Osler P, Chang Y, Gillis E, Albano CE, Darak S, Velmahos GC. Causes and consequences of interrupted enteral nutrition: a prospective observational study in critically ill surgical patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Jan;39(1):21-7. doi: 10.1177/0148607114526887. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28979456
Citation
Segaran E, Barker I, Hartle A. Optimising enteral nutrition in critically ill patients by reducing fasting times. J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 Feb;17(1):38-43. doi: 10.1177/1751143715599410. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6780678
Citation
Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980 Dec;15(6):872-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(80)80296-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21622036
Citation
Ali T, Le V, Sharma T, Vega KJ, Srinivasan N, Tierney WM, Rizvi S. Post-PEG feeding time: a web based national survey amongst gastroenterologists. Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Oct;43(10):768-71. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 May 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12415457
Citation
Stein J, Schulte-Bockholt A, Sabin M, Keymling M. A randomized prospective trial of immediate vs. next-day feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1656-60. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1473-5. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33348410
Citation
Gkolfakis P, Arvanitakis M, Despott EJ, Ballarin A, Beyna T, Boeykens K, Elbe P, Gisbertz I, Hoyois A, Mosteanu O, Sanders DS, Schmidt PT, Schneider SM, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 2: Peri- and post-procedural management. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021 Feb;53(2):178-195. doi: 10.1055/a-1331-8080. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18721239
Citation
Bechtold ML, Matteson ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Jiang PP, Roy PK. Early versus delayed feeding after placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2919-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02108.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24937731
Citation
Cobell WJ, Hinds AM, Nayani R, Akbar S, Lim RG, Theivanayagam S, Matteson-Kome ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: experience of early versus delayed feeding. South Med J. 2014 May;107(5):308-11. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0000000000000104.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20733512
Citation
Szary NM, Arif M, Matteson ML, Choudhary A, Puli SR, Bechtold ML. Enteral feeding within three hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: a meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;45(4):e34-8. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181eeb732.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23949988
Citation
Vyawahare MA, Shirodkar M, Gharat A, Patil P, Mehta S, Mohandas KM. A comparative observational study of early versus delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov;32(6):366-8. doi: 10.1007/s12664-013-0348-8. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16214975
Citation
Dubagunta S, Still CD, Kumar A, Makhdoom Z, Inverso NA, Bross RJ, Komar MJ, Mulhisen L, Rogers JZ, Whitmire S, Whilden B. Early initiation of enteral feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Nutr Clin Pract. 2002 Apr;17(2):123-5. doi: 10.1177/0115426502017002123.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24896841
Citation
Schneider AS, Schettler A, Markowski A, Luettig B, Kaufmann B, Klamt S, Lenzen H, Momma M, Seipt C, Lankisch T, Negm AA; *Conference presentation: 36th ESPEN Congress in Leipzig, Germany on August 31st - September 3rd, 2013. Complication and mortality rate after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy are low and indication-dependent. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul;49(7):891-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.916343. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27815525
Citation
Boullata JI, Carrera AL, Harvey L, Escuro AA, Hudson L, Mays A, McGinnis C, Wessel JJ, Bajpai S, Beebe ML, Kinn TJ, Klang MG, Lord L, Martin K, Pompeii-Wolfe C, Sullivan J, Wood A, Malone A, Guenter P; ASPEN Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition Therapy Task Force, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. ASPEN Safe Practices for Enteral Nutrition Therapy [Formula: see text]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017 Jan;41(1):15-103. doi: 10.1177/0148607116673053. Epub 2016 Nov 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24611520
Citation
Blaser AR, Starkopf J, Kirsimagi U, Deane AM. Definition, prevalence, and outcome of feeding intolerance in intensive care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Sep;58(8):914-22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12302. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24773773
Citation
ASGE Training Committee 2013-2014; Enestvedt BK, Jorgensen J, Sedlack RE, Coyle WJ, Obstein KL, Al-Haddad MA, Christie JA, Davila RE, Mullady DK, Kubiliun N, Kwon RS, Law R, Qureshi WA. Endoscopic approaches to enteral feeding and nutrition core curriculum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jul;80(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Apr 26. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15139570
Citation
Ambrosino N, Clini E. Long-term mechanical ventilation and nutrition. Respir Med. 2004 May;98(5):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.11.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3860734
Citation
Aubier M, Murciano D, Lecocguic Y, Viires N, Jacquens Y, Squara P, Pariente R. Effect of hypophosphatemia on diaphragmatic contractility in patients with acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 1985 Aug 15;313(7):420-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198508153130705.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9692116
Citation
Hill AT, Edenborough FP, Cayton RM, Stableforth DE. Long-term nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in patients with cystic fibrosis and hypercapnic respiratory failure (1991-1996). Respir Med. 1998 Mar;92(3):523-6. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90302-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9543267
Citation
Sivasothy P, Smith IE, Shneerson JM. Mask intermittent positive pressure ventilation in chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 1998 Jan;11(1):34-40. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11010034.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
RCT: Early Feeding After PEG Placement
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs