Real Time 3D Imaging and Surrogate Bone Model

Comparison of Acetabular Shell Position Using 3D Planning vs. Standard Preoperative Planning: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This is an observer-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial to define the efficacy of a new technology developed at the Cleveland Clinic to improve the positioning of the acetabular shell in total hip arthroplasty.The proposed study will enroll patients that have consented to total hip arthroplasty with or without screw fixation for treatment of hip pathology. This treatment is standard of care. Patients will receive standard of care pre- and post-operative care and placement of standard of care implants all of which are commercially available and FDA approved for general use for the clinical indications used in these patients. The only difference in treatment between the groups will be the use of a surrogate bone model to help assist the surgeon visualize the ideal placement of the acetabular component. Diagnostic testing performed specifically related to this study consists of obtaining one pre-operative and one post-operative CT scan. The post-operative scan is to be performed within two weeks of surgery. The investigators predict that those patients with 3D imaging and bone model will have better acetabular shell placement than those with standard preoperative planning.

The plan is enroll 44 subjects (22 in the standard surgery group and 22 in the experimental surgical group) into this randomized clinical trial. All subjects will have the standard of care indications for THA and will give informed consent for both the surgery and participation in this study. Enrollment will occur as part of the routine office evaluation and will be obtained by the treating surgeon or by the research assistant. Four surgeons (Wael Barsoum, Trevor Murray, Carlos Higuera, and Michael Bloomfield) with surgical experience in total hip arthroplasty will perform the procedures in this study. All subjects within each surgeon's practice who qualify for participation in this study will be approached. Subjects will be enrolled at least 10 days prior to the date of surgery. Ten days is the minimum time necessary to obtain a pre-operative CT scan for surgical planning and to manufacture the surrogate bone model. Patients who are not approached during regular office visits will be contacted by phone and if they are interested, they will be scheduled to arrive to the radiology department to sign the informed consent and receive the preoperative CT scan. Subjects will be randomized into either the experimental or control group at the time of consent by the study coordinator. Subjects in the experimental group will have their pre-operative planning done using the 3D surgical simulator and surrogate bone model will be available for the surgeon during surgery. Subjects in the control group will have their pre-operative planning done using plain film x-ray and two-dimensional (2D) templates. Eligible subjects for inclusion in the study will be able to receive a pelvic CT scan at the Cleveland Clinic. Additionally, we will obtain standard of care pre- and post-operative x-rays (AP view). For subjects randomized into the experimental group, their CT scan DICOM images will be uploaded into the Cleveland Clinic developed surgical simulator specifically designed for THA at least 10 days prior to surgery. For each experimental subject, the Cleveland Clinic pre-operative planning software will be used to define the optimal size and location of the acetabular components (acetabular shell, and the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene bearing - UHMWPE). The treating surgeon will virtually place the implant in the simulator software. The specification for shell placement will vary depending on the subject's individual pathology and pelvic morphology, but is expected to fall within the range of 10-35 degrees of anteversion and 30-50 degrees of abduction. In the control group, each surgeon will use their standard methods of pre-operative planning using the pre-operative x-rays. To prepare the acetabulum and place the implants on the day of surgery, surgeons will use standard surgical alignment instruments provided by the manufacturer of the implant. For the experimental group, the surgeon will use CT scan and a 3D preoperative planning software to place the implants virtually. The surgeons are provided with a surrogate bone model with a fabricated acetabular implant placed in the same orientation as was planned in the surgical simulator software, and will use standard surgical instruments provided by the manufacturer of the implant. The images obtained from the post-operative CT scans will be uploaded into the simulator software for 3D reconstruction. The 3D image of the post-operative pelvis with the implants will be superimposed onto the image of the pre-operative pelvis with the virtually placed implants. Using measurement tools within the software we will compare the position of the actual acetabular component placed in the patient with the desired position specified by the plan. The measurements that will be made are for angular orientations in 3D space (anteversion and inclination). Measurements are accurate to within a fraction of a degree.

3D imaging & surrogate bone model to assist with acetabular shell placement. Different that standard of care preoperative imaging

A CT scan of all patients will be obtained within 2 weeks of surgery to measure placement (acetabular version & inclination measured in degrees) of the acetabular shell

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects to be included in this protocol will be adult males and females of all races and socioeconomic status meeting the following criteria: Primary, unilateral Total hip arthroplasty (THA) 18 to 85 years old at time of surgery Able to get a pre- and post-operative CT scan at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus at least 10 days prior to surgery Exclusion Criteria: Significant metal in the joint that results in metal artifact on the pre--operative CT scan, thereby compromising the ability to visualize the acetabulum on the pre-operative simulator. Pregnancy Incarceration Condition deemed by physician or medical staff to be non-conducive to patient's ability to complete the study, or a potential risk to the patient's health and well-being.

Codsi MJ, Bennetts C, Gordiev K, Boeck DM, Kwon Y, Brems J, Powell K, Iannotti JP. Normal glenoid vault anatomy and validation of a novel glenoid implant shape. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):471-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.08.010. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

Scalise JJ, Bryan J, Polster J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. Quantitative analysis of glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis using three-dimensional computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;17(2):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.013. Epub 2008 Jan 22.

Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Iannotti JP. The three-dimensional glenoid vault model can estimate normal glenoid version in osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008 May-Jun;17(3):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

Scalise JJ, Codsi MJ, Bryan J, Brems JJ, Iannotti JP. The influence of three-dimensional computed tomography images of the shoulder in preoperative planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Nov;90(11):2438-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01341.

Eisler T, Svensson O, Tengstrom A, Elmstedt E. Patient expectation and satisfaction in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jun;17(4):457-62. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31245.

Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):579-86. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11223.

Older J. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Sep;17(6):675-80. doi: 10.1054/arth.2002.31973.

Phillips CB, Barrett JA, Losina E, Mahomed NN, Lingard EA, Guadagnoli E, Baron JA, Harris WH, Poss R, Katz JN. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):20-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00004.

Parvizi J, Wade FA, Rapuri V, Springer BD, Berry DJ, Hozack WJ. Revision hip arthroplasty for late instability secondary to polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:66-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218751.14989.a6.

Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1788-92.

Dorr LD, Wolf AW, Chandler R, Conaty JP. Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983 Mar;(173):151-8.

McCollum DE, Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Dec;(261):159-70.

Robinson RP, Simonian PT, Gradisar IM, Ching RP. Joint motion and surface contact area related to component position in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jan;79(1):140-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6842.

Mahomed NN, Barrett JA, Katz JN, Phillips CB, Losina E, Lew RA, Guadagnoli E, Harris WH, Poss R, Baron JA. Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):27-32. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00005.

Hafez MA, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB, Sherman KP. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific templating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Mar;444:184-92. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201148.06454.ef.