search
Back to results

RECTAL BOOST Study (RECTAL BOOST)

Primary Purpose

Rectal Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Boost
Sponsored by
UMC Utrecht
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring Rectal cancer, Locally advanced rectal cancer, Radiotherapy, Boost, Dose-escalation, Pathological complete response, Response

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant in the PLCRC project (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02070146)
  • Informed consent obtained for being offered experimental interventions within the PLCRC project
  • Informed consent obtained for questionnaires on patient reported outcomes within the PLCRC project
  • WHO: 0-2
  • Indication for chemoradiation based on primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis (TNM) stage
  • Referred for chemoradiation
  • No contra-indication for MRI
  • Tumor distance from ano-rectal transition ≤10 cm

Exclusion criteria

  • <18 years
  • No indication for chemoradiation according to Dutch guidelines based on TNM staging.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy
  • At least one contra-indication for Capecitabine administration (based on Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-deficiency, bloodcount, liver malfunction, renal failure (Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min), medical history such as recent cardiac events
  • Recent pregnancy ≤ 1 year ago
  • Inadequate understanding of the Dutch language in speech and/or writing

Sites / Locations

  • University Medical Center Utrecht

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Boost

Standard chemoradiation

Arm Description

Boost radiation consists of 5 fractions of 3 Gy (total 15 Gy) delivered to the tumor (Gross Tumor Volume) additional to standard chemoradiation of 50 Gy with Capecitabine.

Standard chemoradiation consisting of 25 x 2 Gy (total 50 Gy) with Capecitabine.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complete response rate
The primary endpoint is complete response either defined as pathological complete response (pCR) in patients who undergo surgery, assessed by standardized pathologic examination of the surgical specimen, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) after chemoradiation in patients who opted for a wait and see approach.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Outcomes are assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (v4.0).
Patient reported quality of life
at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Patient reported outcome (Quality of life (QoL)) is measured by validated questionnaires. QoL: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR-29 (these acronyms indicate cancer and colorectal cancer specific questionnaires.
Tumor response on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
During (week 2) and after (7-8 weeks post) chemoradiation tumor response is assessed by (several) MRI (sequences such as T1, T2 and DWI).
Patient reported workability
validated questionnaires. Patient reported outcome (workability) is measured by Workability index.
Surgical complication
Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit criteria for surgical complication. This includes wound-infection, wound-healing (time), hospitalization (time), supportive treatment.
(disease-free) survival
Survival is measured, as well as other clinical data, in the PICNIC Cohort (ProspectIve data CollectioN Initiative on Colorectal cancer) reviewed by Dutch Medical Ethics Committee @ University Medical Center Utrecht, under number 12-510.

Full Information

First Posted
September 18, 2013
Last Updated
September 24, 2019
Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01951521
Brief Title
RECTAL BOOST Study
Acronym
RECTAL BOOST
Official Title
RandomizEd Controlled Trial for Pre-operAtive Dose-escaLation BOOST in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Collaborators
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Randomized controlled trial in which the effect is investigated of a radiation boost in addition to standard chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on complete response rate defined as pathological complete response, in those who undergo surgery, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (2y-LRFS), in those who opted for a wait and see approach. Secondary objectives are adverse events due to chemoradiation (acute, perioperative and late toxicity), tumor response assessed with MRI, the impact of the boost on local and distant recurrence and survival as well as patient-reported quality of life and workability. The need for this comprehensive study is emphasized by the sub-optimal (radiation-) methods, heterogeneity between and poor reporting in the few previous trials in this field.
Detailed Description
Rationale: The current treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists of pre-operative chemoradiation treatment (CRT) (50 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions) followed by surgical resection, according to T-/N-stage, circumferential resection margin (CRM) and tumor localization (see table 1). After this neo-adjuvant treatment approximately 15% of patients show pathological complete response (pCR), i.e.no residual tumor in the resected specimen on pathologic examination. Patients with pCR have a lower risk of local and distant recurrences and significantly longer disease-free and overall survival. Furthermore, in these patients surgery could possibly have been omitted. Selected patients with a clinical complete response (cCR), defined prior to surgery by rectoscopy, rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may opt for an organ-preserving therapy, a so called wait and see approach. Response to chemoradiation occurs in a dose dependent fashion. Therefore, recent trials aimed to improve prognosis by radiation dose-escalation that resulted in improved pCR rates. Toxicity rates associated with radiation doses above 60 Gy are manageable and differ between studies; from increased to comparable or even lower toxicity. Moreover, dose escalation may increase the proportion of patients eligible for organ-preserving therapy. Objective: We study whether addition of a radiation boost to standard chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer increases the complete response rate defined as pathological complete response, in those who undergo surgery, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (2y-LRFS), in those who opted for a wait and see approach. Secondary objectives are adverse events due to chemoradiation (acute, perioperative and late toxicity), tumor response assessed with MRI, the impact of the boost on local and distant recurrence and survival as well as patient-reported quality of life and workability. The need for this comprehensive study is emphasized by the sub-optimal (radiation-) methods, heterogeneity between and poor reporting in the few previous trials in this field. Study design: Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial, nested within a prospective cohort according to the 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trial' (cmRCT) design. Study population: Rectal cancer patients participating in a prospective cohort (the PLCRC project) and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the rectum whom will undergo chemoradiation based on clinical criteria (see table 1 section 1.2.1). Intervention: An irradiation boost of 15 Gy delivered to the gross tumor volume (GTV) in 5 fractions in addition to the standard chemoradiation treatment of 50 Gy. Thereby increasing the total GTV dose to 65 Gy. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is complete response either defined as pathological complete response (pCR) in patients who undergo surgery, assessed by standardized pathologic examination of the surgical specimen, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) after chemoradiation in patients who opted for a wait and see approach. Secondary outcomes are treatment acute, perioperative and late toxicity, tumor response assessed with MRI, patient-reported quality of life and workability, local recurrence and (disease-specific) survival.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
Keywords
Rectal cancer, Locally advanced rectal cancer, Radiotherapy, Boost, Dose-escalation, Pathological complete response, Response

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
cohort multiple randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
128 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Boost
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Boost radiation consists of 5 fractions of 3 Gy (total 15 Gy) delivered to the tumor (Gross Tumor Volume) additional to standard chemoradiation of 50 Gy with Capecitabine.
Arm Title
Standard chemoradiation
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard chemoradiation consisting of 25 x 2 Gy (total 50 Gy) with Capecitabine.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Boost
Intervention Description
External Beam radiation delivered using intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) planning, consisting of 15 Gy (in 5 sequential fractions).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete response rate
Description
The primary endpoint is complete response either defined as pathological complete response (pCR) in patients who undergo surgery, assessed by standardized pathologic examination of the surgical specimen, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) after chemoradiation in patients who opted for a wait and see approach.
Time Frame
pathologic examination following surgery, at aproximately 13-15 weeks (control arm) or 14-16 weeks (boost arm) after randomization or clinical complete respons of 2 years after first response assessment.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).
Description
Outcomes are assessed according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (v4.0).
Time Frame
Until surgery at 8-10 weeks post chemoradiation (which is 13-15 weeks (control) or 14-16 weeks (boost) post randomization
Title
Patient reported quality of life
Description
at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Patient reported outcome (Quality of life (QoL)) is measured by validated questionnaires. QoL: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and CR-29 (these acronyms indicate cancer and colorectal cancer specific questionnaires.
Time Frame
at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment.
Title
Tumor response on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Description
During (week 2) and after (7-8 weeks post) chemoradiation tumor response is assessed by (several) MRI (sequences such as T1, T2 and DWI).
Time Frame
at week 2 during chemoradiation and week 7 post chemoradiation.
Title
Patient reported workability
Description
validated questionnaires. Patient reported outcome (workability) is measured by Workability index.
Time Frame
at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment.
Title
Surgical complication
Description
Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit criteria for surgical complication. This includes wound-infection, wound-healing (time), hospitalization (time), supportive treatment.
Time Frame
untill 30 days after surgery, which is 17-19 weeks (control) or 18-20 weeks (boost) post randomization
Title
(disease-free) survival
Description
Survival is measured, as well as other clinical data, in the PICNIC Cohort (ProspectIve data CollectioN Initiative on Colorectal cancer) reviewed by Dutch Medical Ethics Committee @ University Medical Center Utrecht, under number 12-510.
Time Frame
up to death of included patients, for a maximum of 60 years post-randomization.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria Participant in the PLCRC project (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02070146) Informed consent obtained for being offered experimental interventions within the PLCRC project Informed consent obtained for questionnaires on patient reported outcomes within the PLCRC project WHO: 0-2 Indication for chemoradiation based on primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis (TNM) stage Referred for chemoradiation No contra-indication for MRI Tumor distance from ano-rectal transition ≤10 cm Exclusion criteria <18 years No indication for chemoradiation according to Dutch guidelines based on TNM staging. Inflammatory bowel disease Prior pelvic radiotherapy At least one contra-indication for Capecitabine administration (based on Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)-deficiency, bloodcount, liver malfunction, renal failure (Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min), medical history such as recent cardiac events Recent pregnancy ≤ 1 year ago Inadequate understanding of the Dutch language in speech and/or writing
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
HM Verkooijen, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M. Berbee, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Radiation-Oncology, MAASTRO clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medical Center Utrecht
City
Utrecht
ZIP/Postal Code
3584 CX
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34634436
Citation
Verweij ME, Hoendervangers S, Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, Berbee M, Buijsen J, Roodhart J, Reerink O, Pronk A, Consten ECJ, Smits AB, Heikens JT, van Grevenstein WHMU, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HLM. Impact of Dose-Escalated Chemoradiation on Quality of Life in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: 2-Year Follow-Up of the Randomized RECTAL-BOOST Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Mar 1;112(3):694-703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.052. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32565319
Citation
Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, Berbee M, Lacle MM, Arensman R, Raicu MG, Wessels FJ, Verdult J, Roodhart J, Reerink O, Hoendervangers S, Buijsen J, Grabsch HI, Pronk A, Consten ECJ, Smits AB, Heikens JT, Appelt AL, van Grevenstein WMU, Verkooijen HM, Intven MPW. Efficacy of Dose-Escalated Chemoradiation on Complete Tumor Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (RECTAL-BOOST): A Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):1008-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31866471
Citation
Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, May AM, Berbee M, Intven MPW, Verkooijen HM. The trials within cohorts design facilitated efficient patient enrollment and generalizability in oncology setting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;120:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.015. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25888548
Citation
Burbach JP, Verkooijen HM, Intven M, Kleijnen JP, Bosman ME, Raaymakers BW, van Grevenstein WM, Koopman M, Seravalli E, van Asselen B, Reerink O. RandomizEd controlled trial for pre-operAtive dose-escaLation BOOST in locally advanced rectal cancer (RECTAL BOOST study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Feb 22;16:58. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0586-4.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://plcrc.nl/
Description
The PLCRC Project

Learn more about this trial

RECTAL BOOST Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs