search
Back to results

Reducing Discomforts in Critically Ill Patients: the IPREA3 Study (IPREA3)

Primary Purpose

Critical Illness

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Administration of the IPREA3 questionnaire
Immediate feedback through electronic reminder messages
Targeted interventions in each ICU to reduce discomforts
Sponsored by
Dr Pierre KALFON
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Critical Illness focused on measuring Critical Care, Critical Care Nursing, Discomfort, Sleep deprivation, Noise, Thirst, Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult critically ill patients
  • ICU stay of three calendar days or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  • deceased patient in the ICU
  • ICU stay of two calendar days or less
  • patient younger than 18
  • patient under trusteeship
  • patient refusing to participate to the study
  • patient with diminished mental capacity
  • patient not understanding French sufficiently to be questioned (language barrier)
  • transfer to another ICU while mechanically ventilated
  • emergency discharge

Sites / Locations

  • CH Auxerre
  • Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
  • CH Louis Pasteur
  • CHU Beaujon APHP
  • CHU Hôpital Bocage
  • CH Douai
  • CHU Raymond Poincaré APHP
  • CH La Rochelle
  • CH Le Puy en Velay
  • CH Lens
  • CHU Edouard Herriot
  • Hôpital Européen
  • CHU Hôpital Nord
  • Clinique Ambroise Paré
  • CHU Hôpital Pasteur2
  • CHU Saint Louis APHP
  • CHU La Pitié Salpétrière APHP
  • CHU Cochin APHP
  • Hôpital Saint Joseph
  • CHU Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou APHP
  • CHU La Milétrie
  • CH Victor Provo
  • CHU NHC
  • CHU Hautepierre
  • Hôpital Saint Musse
  • CH Troyes

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Multicomponent program

Standard Care

Arm Description

Multicomponent intervention to reduce perceived discomforts in critically ill patients : the IPREA3 program

Standard care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall score of discomfort
Each discomfort-item is scored 0-10 (example 0 = no pain ; 10 = pain as bad as can be). For each individual, the overall score of discomfort is computed as the mean of the 18 scores reported for each discomfort-item multiplied by 10, yielding an overall score between 0 and 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Scores reported for each discomfort-item
Each of the 18 discomfort-items is scored 0-10 (example 0 = no thirst ; 10 = thirst as bad as can be).

Full Information

First Posted
May 11, 2015
Last Updated
March 18, 2016
Sponsor
Dr Pierre KALFON
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02442934
Brief Title
Reducing Discomforts in Critically Ill Patients: the IPREA3 Study
Acronym
IPREA3
Official Title
A Multicomponent Intervention to Reduce Perceived Discomforts in Critically Ill Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dr Pierre KALFON

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Since critically ill patients are exposed to stressful conditions, the investigators evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent program to reduce perceived discomforts in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) .
Detailed Description
The investigators conducted a cluster-randomized trial randomizing 34 ICUs. The program targeted staff members with 3 components : web-based systematic measurement of discomforts on the day of ICU discharge by institutional caregivers (nurses and assistant nurses of the participating ICU), immediate feedback through electronic reminder messages intended to caregivers, and targeted interventions in each ICU based on comparative discomfort scores monthly reported to local champions who were also responsible for staff education. The measurement of discomforts perceived by critically ill patients at the end of the ICU stay, related to the whole stay in the ICU, was performed by the bedside nurse using a specific questionnaire, the IPREA questionnaire whose construct validity, external validity, reliability, reproducibility and acceptability have been already demonstrated (Development and validation of a questionnaire for quantitative assessment of perceived discomforts in critically ill patients. Kalfon P et al, Intensive care Med 2010, 36:1751-58). The version of the IPREA questionnaire used in the study was a 18-item questionnaire : noise ; excessive light ; discomfort related to sleeping in a different bed from home ; sleep deprivation ; thirst ; hunger ; feeling of cold ; feeling of heat ; pain ; being tied down by perfusion lines, tubes or as a result of connections due to monitoring devices ; no respect for intimacy ; anxiety ; isolation ; limited visiting hours ; absence of phone ; lack of information ; shortness of breath ; and depression. The duration of the program is 6 months in each arm. Potential participants in the study were consecutive patients admitted in all the participating ICU that are divided in two groups of 17 ICUs. During October 2014, the IPREA questionnaire is administered to all potentially eligible patients hospitalized in the 34 participating ICUs without applying the program (period P1). The 17 ICUs of the group 1 do not apply the multicomponent program during 5 months (until March 2015), while the 17 ICUs of the group 2 apply the program (period P2). During April 2015, the questionnaire IPREA is administered again in both groups (period P3). From May 2015 until September 2015, the multicomponent program is only applied in the group 1 and no longer in the group 2 (period P4) in order to achieve the crossover of the intervention. During October 2015, the questionnaire IPREA is administered again in both groups (period P5). The overall score of discomfort and the scores for each item will be compared in the control arm and in the interventional arm. The control arm consists in the patients included in the group 2 during October 2014 and the patients included in the group 1 during April 2015, i.e. patients included during the month preceding the implementation of the multicomponent program. The interventional arm consists in the patients included in the group 2 during April 2015 and the patients included in the group 1 during October 2015, i.e. patients included during the last month of the period of application of the multicomponent program.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Illness
Keywords
Critical Care, Critical Care Nursing, Discomfort, Sleep deprivation, Noise, Thirst, Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
5411 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Multicomponent program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Multicomponent intervention to reduce perceived discomforts in critically ill patients : the IPREA3 program
Arm Title
Standard Care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Administration of the IPREA3 questionnaire
Intervention Description
On the day of the ICU discharge, the bedside nurse administers to the patient the 18-item IPREA questionnaire i.e the nurse asks the patient to rate the severity of each discomfort source contained in the IPREA3 questionnaire experienced during the entire stay in the ICU
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Immediate feedback through electronic reminder messages
Intervention Description
After the nurse had administered the questionnaire, warning messages are displayed on the screen corresponding to the key points to prevent the three discomforts reported with the highest scores
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Targeted interventions in each ICU to reduce discomforts
Intervention Description
These targeted interventions are implemented through the coordination of two local champions. The central coordination IPREA3 team sends each month to the local champions monthly and cumulative discomfort scores of their unit (overall score of discomfort and scores for each item) and their ranking relative to other units assigned to the interventional arm i.e applying the IPREA3 program. The local champions organize monthly meetings with the unit staff to present the results in terms of perceived discomforts measured by the IPREA questionnaire, identify main discomfort sources and actions to be conducted to reduce the discomforts reported with the highest scores in the unit and those that are most easily preventable, and assess the efficacy of already applied measures.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall score of discomfort
Description
Each discomfort-item is scored 0-10 (example 0 = no pain ; 10 = pain as bad as can be). For each individual, the overall score of discomfort is computed as the mean of the 18 scores reported for each discomfort-item multiplied by 10, yielding an overall score between 0 and 100.
Time Frame
1 Day of discharge from the ICU
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Scores reported for each discomfort-item
Description
Each of the 18 discomfort-items is scored 0-10 (example 0 = no thirst ; 10 = thirst as bad as can be).
Time Frame
1 Day of discharge from the ICU

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult critically ill patients ICU stay of three calendar days or more Exclusion Criteria: deceased patient in the ICU ICU stay of two calendar days or less patient younger than 18 patient under trusteeship patient refusing to participate to the study patient with diminished mental capacity patient not understanding French sufficiently to be questioned (language barrier) transfer to another ICU while mechanically ventilated emergency discharge
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre KALFON, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
CH CHARTRES
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CH Auxerre
City
Auxerre
ZIP/Postal Code
89000
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital de la Cavale Blanche
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29609
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Louis Pasteur
City
Chartres
ZIP/Postal Code
28018
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Beaujon APHP
City
Clichy
ZIP/Postal Code
92110
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Hôpital Bocage
City
Dijon
ZIP/Postal Code
21079
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Douai
City
Douai
ZIP/Postal Code
59507
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Raymond Poincaré APHP
City
Garches
ZIP/Postal Code
92380
Country
France
Facility Name
CH La Rochelle
City
La Rochelle
ZIP/Postal Code
17022
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Le Puy en Velay
City
Le Puy en Velay
ZIP/Postal Code
43000
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Lens
City
Lens
ZIP/Postal Code
62300
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Edouard Herriot
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69003
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Européen
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13003
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Hôpital Nord
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13005
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Ambroise Paré
City
Neuilly-sur-Seine
ZIP/Postal Code
92200
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Hôpital Pasteur2
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Saint Louis APHP
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU La Pitié Salpétrière APHP
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Cochin APHP
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75014
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint Joseph
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75014
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou APHP
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU La Milétrie
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86000
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Victor Provo
City
Roubaix
ZIP/Postal Code
59100
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU NHC
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Hautepierre
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67100
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint Musse
City
Toulon
ZIP/Postal Code
83100
Country
France
Facility Name
CH Troyes
City
Troyes
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20502874
Citation
Kalfon P, Mimoz O, Auquier P, Loundou A, Gauzit R, Lepape A, Laurens J, Garrigues B, Pottecher T, Malledant Y. Development and validation of a questionnaire for quantitative assessment of perceived discomforts in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Oct;36(10):1751-1758. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1902-9. Epub 2010 May 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33287910
Citation
Kalfon P, Boucekine M, Estagnasie P, Geantot MA, Berric A, Simon G, Floccard B, Signouret T, Fromentin M, Nyunga M, Audibert J, Ben Salah A, Mauchien B, Sossou A, Venot M, Robert R, Follin A, Renault A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Collange O, Levrat Q, Villard I, Thevenin D, Pottecher J, Patrigeon RG, Revel N, Vigne C, Azoulay E, Mimoz O, Auquier P, Baumstarck K; IPREA Study Group. Risk factors and events in the adult intensive care unit associated with pain as self-reported at the end of the intensive care unit stay. Crit Care. 2020 Dec 7;24(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03396-2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30732654
Citation
Baumstarck K, Boucekine M, Estagnasie P, Geantot MA, Berric A, Simon G, Floccard B, Signouret T, Fromentin M, Nyunga M, Sossou A, Venot M, Robert R, Follin A, Audibert J, Renault A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Collange O, Levrat Q, Villard I, Thevenin D, Pottecher J, Patrigeon RG, Revel N, Vigne C, Azoulay E, Mimoz O, Auquier P, Kalfon P; IPREA Study group. Assessment of patients' self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 7;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29181557
Citation
Kalfon P, Baumstarck K, Estagnasie P, Geantot MA, Berric A, Simon G, Floccard B, Signouret T, Boucekine M, Fromentin M, Nyunga M, Sossou A, Venot M, Robert R, Follin A, Audibert J, Renault A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Collange O, Levrat Q, Villard I, Thevenin D, Pottecher J, Patrigeon RG, Revel N, Vigne C, Azoulay E, Mimoz O, Auquier P; IPREA Study group. A tailored multicomponent program to reduce discomfort in critically ill patients: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1829-1840. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4991-x. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26880373
Citation
Kalfon P, Mimoz O, Loundou A, Geantot MA, Revel N, Villard I, Amour J, Azoulay E, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Martin C, Sharshar T, Baumstarck K, Auquier P. Reduction of self-perceived discomforts in critically ill patients in French intensive care units: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Feb 16;17:87. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1211-x.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Reducing Discomforts in Critically Ill Patients: the IPREA3 Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs