search
Back to results

Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA) (ROSETTA)

Primary Purpose

Urinary Incontinence, Urge

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
InterStim® device
Botox® injection
Sponsored by
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Urinary Incontinence, Urge focused on measuring Refractory Urinary Urge Incontinence, Botox A®, Interstim® Device

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-pregnant adult female at least 21 years old, with no plans to become pregnant during the course of the trial) and if of child-bearing potential, with a negative pregnancy test, and if sexually active, must be using medically acceptable contraception.
  • 6 urge urinary incontinence episodes on a 3-day baseline bladder diary, with these urge incontinence episodes representing greater than 50% of the total incontinent episodes recorded.
  • Willing and able to complete all study related items and interviews.
  • Refractory urinary urge urinary incontinence: defined as (1) Persistent symptoms despite at least one or more conservative treatments (e.g. supervised behavioral therapy, supervised physical therapy); and (2)Persistent symptoms despite the use of a minimum of two anticholinergics, or unable to tolerate medication due to side effects, or has a contraindication to taking anticholinergic medication.
  • Currently not on an anticholinergic or antimuscarinic medication (e.g. oxybutynin, tolterodine, and/or fesoterodine) or be willing to stop medication for 3 weeks prior to completing baseline bladder diary and expected to remain off medications through duration of study.
  • Demonstrates ability (or have caregiver demonstrate ability) to perform clean intermittent self-catheterization.
  • Grossly neurologically normal on exam and no gross systemic neurologic conditions believed to affect urinary function.
  • Urodynamic assessment within the previous 18 months prior to enrollment or done after enrollment, prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, CVA within 6 months prior to enrollment, myasthenia gravis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, clinically significant peripheral neuropathy, and complete spinal cord injury.
  • Untreated urinary tract infection (UTI).
  • Any prior use of either study therapy for treatment of urinary urge incontinence (Botox A® or Interstim®).
  • Current participation in any other conflicting interventional research study.
  • PVR >150 ml on 2 occasions within 6 months prior to enrollment (If the PVR value was obtained by ultrasound and was ≥150 ml, the PVR will be confirmed by catheterization which will be the gold standard)
  • Subjects with knowledge of planned MRIs or diathermy, except those allowable per Medtronic guidelines.
  • Current or prior bladder malignancy.
  • Surgically altered detrusor muscle, such as augmentation cystoplasty.
  • Subjects taking aminoglycosides.
  • Currently pregnant or lactating.
  • Subjects who are on ambulatory anticoagulant therapy, including aspirin, who are unable to discontinue treatment for 24 hours prior to bladder injection and staged InterStim® procedure.
  • Serum creatinine level greater than twice the upper limit of normal within the previous year prior to enrollment.
  • Surgical treatment for stress incontinence (sling, Burch or urethral injection) or pelvic organ prolapse recommended or planned at enrollment by study investigator(s).
  • Prior stress incontinence or prolapsed surgery within the last 6 months prior to enrollment.
  • Allergy to lidocaine or bupivacaine.
  • Prior pelvic radiation.
  • Uninvestigated hematuria.
  • Greater than or equal to Stage III vaginal prolapse.
  • Known allergy to Botox A®.
  • Use of a vaginal pessary.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • University of California, San Diego, Women's Pelvic Medicine Center
  • University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
  • Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
  • Cleveland Clinic, Obstretric and Gynecology and Women Health Institute
  • Oregon Health and Science University, Kohler Pavilion
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Univesity of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital
  • Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Center for Women's Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

InterStim® device

Botox® injection

Arm Description

The FSLP InterStim® device is to be done within 3 months of enrolling/consenting. The 1st stage is lead placement into the S3 foramen with best response to stimulation. The 4 electrodes will be tested and set to an amplitude that achieves comfortable stimulation in the vaginal, perineal, or rectal sensation. If =/>50% improvement, participant will then have the 2nd stage IPG implantation, 8-18 days after last FSLP. If there is a technical problem with lead on 1st FSLP, then the participant can have a 2nd FSLP and may go on to have IPG implantation with lead replacement. The 2nd FSLP must be initiated no longer than 1 month since the initiation of the 1st FSLP. If the participant is a non-responder and there is no technical problem, then the lead is removed.

Total of 200 units of Botox A will be dissolved into 10mL of saline and injected into the bladder within 3 months of enrolling/consenting. Participants determined to have a clinical response at the 1 month visit (post 1st injection) may receive additional injections between 6-24 months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes
The primary outcome is the change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 month assessments); and is measured using 3-day bladder diaries administered monthly for the first 6 month visit period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Improvement of Bladder Function and Urinary Leakage
Proportion of subjects who report adequate improvement of their bladder function and urinary leakage with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire (PGI-I) at 6 months. Adequate improvement is defined as a rating of 1, 2, or 3 (better) on the patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Change in Overactive Bladder
Change in mean Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF) score throughout baseline to the first 6-month visit (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments). Values range from 0 to 100 with higher scores on the symptom scale indicating greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality of life scale indicating a better quality of life.
Urinary Frequency and Nocturia
Change in mean number of urinary incontinence episodes (any type) and nocturia episodes from baseline over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments) as measured by the 3 day bladder diary.
Severity of Urge Incontinence Symptoms
Severity of urge incontinence symptoms at 6 month visit period as measured by the Sandvik questionnaire. The Sandvik score is a patient-reported measure of incontinence severity as assessed on a scale of slight (1-2), moderate (3-6), severe (8-9), very severe (12) to severe (10-12) using a standard scoring algorithm.
Treatment Satisfaction (OAB-SATq Treatment Satisfaction, Adverse Effects, Treatment Endorsement, and Convenience)
Treatment satisfaction as measured by the mean Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) score at 6 months (6 month assessment). The OAB-SATq score ranges from 0 to 100 and includes 5 subscales: treatment satisfaction, side effects, treatment endorsement, convenience, and treatment preference, with higher scores reflecting better satisfaction.
Treatment Satisfaction (OAB-SATq Treatment Preference)
Treatment preference as measured by the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) at 6 months (6 month assessment).OAB-SATq treatment preference is a binary outcome that is classified as yes if a participant answers either "Slight preference for the treatment I am receiving now" or "Definitely prefer the treatment I am receiving now" to the question "Do you prefer the treatment that you received since entering this study to the treatment you received before the study?"
Quality of Life (UDI-SF)
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in mean Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-SF) score. The UDI-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress.
Quality of Life (IIQ-SF)
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-SF) score. The IIQ-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life.
Quality of Life (HUI-3)
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the Health Utility Index, Version 3 (HUI-3). The HUI 3 scale has a range from 0 to 1 with higher scores representing better health.

Full Information

First Posted
December 27, 2011
Last Updated
April 30, 2018
Sponsor
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Collaborators
Duke University, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of California, San Diego, The Cleveland Clinic, Brown University, University of New Mexico, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh, Oregon Health and Science University, RTI International, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01502956
Brief Title
Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)
Acronym
ROSETTA
Official Title
Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Collaborators
Duke University, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of California, San Diego, The Cleveland Clinic, Brown University, University of New Mexico, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh, Oregon Health and Science University, RTI International, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized, open-label, active-control trial is to compare the effectiveness of intra-detrusor botulinum toxin A (Botox A®, Allergan) versus sacral neuromodulation (InterStim®, Medtronic) for the treatment of refractory urge urinary incontinence. In addition, the study will evaluate select technical attributes of the interventions as well as the effect of these two interventions on other lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms. Hypothesis: InterStim® therapy will result in a greater reduction in daily urge urinary incontinence episodes over the 6-month follow-up period as compared to Botox A® injection. A supplemental study investigates whether biological markers including those related to inflammation and connective tissue remodeling change following treatments with Botox A® and Interstim®.
Detailed Description
Primary Aim: To compare the change from baseline in the number of urge urinary incontinence episodes (UUIE) over 6 the six month follow-up period in women randomized to sacral neuromodulation (InterStim®) therapy, versus those randomized to intra-detrusor injection with 200 units of botulinum toxin A (Botox A®). Secondary Aims: Long Term Efficacy: To compare the long-term (12 and 24 month) efficacy outcomes in women randomized to sacral neuromodulation(InterStim®) therapy, versus those randomized to intra-detrusor injection with 200 units of botulinum toxin A (Botox A®). Secondary efficacy outcomes, collected at 12 and 24 months as well as 6 months,include adequate control of their urge urinary incontinence, change in bothersome symptoms of urinary urge incontinence (UUI), severity of urge incontinence, urinary frequency, nocturia, subject satisfaction with therapy, quality of life measures and bowel and sexual function. Cost Effectiveness: To compare utilization of medical resources for cost effectiveness analysis and cost-utility between treatment groups. Treatment Safety and Burden: To assess safety profile and treatment burden of both interventions by comparing adverse event incidence between treatment arms, and also by obtaining estimates of incidence of treatment-specific safety and burden outcomes. Safety and burden outcomes for Botox A® injections include receipt of additional injections and intermittent catheterization due to voiding dysfunction/partial urinary retention. Safety and burden outcomes for InterStim® device include infection, pain, lead migration, reprogramming (and reasons for) and surgical revision (and reasons for).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Keywords
Refractory Urinary Urge Incontinence, Botox A®, Interstim® Device

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
386 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
InterStim® device
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The FSLP InterStim® device is to be done within 3 months of enrolling/consenting. The 1st stage is lead placement into the S3 foramen with best response to stimulation. The 4 electrodes will be tested and set to an amplitude that achieves comfortable stimulation in the vaginal, perineal, or rectal sensation. If =/>50% improvement, participant will then have the 2nd stage IPG implantation, 8-18 days after last FSLP. If there is a technical problem with lead on 1st FSLP, then the participant can have a 2nd FSLP and may go on to have IPG implantation with lead replacement. The 2nd FSLP must be initiated no longer than 1 month since the initiation of the 1st FSLP. If the participant is a non-responder and there is no technical problem, then the lead is removed.
Arm Title
Botox® injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Total of 200 units of Botox A will be dissolved into 10mL of saline and injected into the bladder within 3 months of enrolling/consenting. Participants determined to have a clinical response at the 1 month visit (post 1st injection) may receive additional injections between 6-24 months.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
InterStim® device
Intervention Description
Eligible subjects will complete baseline assessments, be randomized and scheduled for first stage lead placement (FSLP) InterStim®. The criterion for an initial clinical response to InterStim® therapy will be defined as a ≥50% improvement in the mean number of UUIE/day on a minimum 3 day bladder diary, completed during the 7-14 days following the first stage lead placement (FSLP). Subjects with a ≥ 50% improvement mean number of UUIE/day will be eligible to proceed with implantation of the implantable pulse generator (IPG). Subjects will then be followed monthly to determine the response to therapy.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Botox® injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Botox
Intervention Description
Eligible subjects will complete baseline assessments, be randomized and scheduled for Botox A® injection visit. Subjects who received a Botox A® injection will be assessed for a clinical response, at 1 month from injection, using the same clinical criterion (≥50% improvement in the mean number of UUIE/day on a 3 day bladder diary completed prior to the 1 month visit). Those subjects that experience a clinical response, at one month, will be eligible for a repeat Botox A® injection after 6 months, if they experience degradation of clinical effect, using the PGSC.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes
Description
The primary outcome is the change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 month assessments); and is measured using 3-day bladder diaries administered monthly for the first 6 month visit period.
Time Frame
6 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Improvement of Bladder Function and Urinary Leakage
Description
Proportion of subjects who report adequate improvement of their bladder function and urinary leakage with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire (PGI-I) at 6 months. Adequate improvement is defined as a rating of 1, 2, or 3 (better) on the patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Change in Overactive Bladder
Description
Change in mean Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF) score throughout baseline to the first 6-month visit (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments). Values range from 0 to 100 with higher scores on the symptom scale indicating greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality of life scale indicating a better quality of life.
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Urinary Frequency and Nocturia
Description
Change in mean number of urinary incontinence episodes (any type) and nocturia episodes from baseline over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments) as measured by the 3 day bladder diary.
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Severity of Urge Incontinence Symptoms
Description
Severity of urge incontinence symptoms at 6 month visit period as measured by the Sandvik questionnaire. The Sandvik score is a patient-reported measure of incontinence severity as assessed on a scale of slight (1-2), moderate (3-6), severe (8-9), very severe (12) to severe (10-12) using a standard scoring algorithm.
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Treatment Satisfaction (OAB-SATq Treatment Satisfaction, Adverse Effects, Treatment Endorsement, and Convenience)
Description
Treatment satisfaction as measured by the mean Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) score at 6 months (6 month assessment). The OAB-SATq score ranges from 0 to 100 and includes 5 subscales: treatment satisfaction, side effects, treatment endorsement, convenience, and treatment preference, with higher scores reflecting better satisfaction.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Treatment Satisfaction (OAB-SATq Treatment Preference)
Description
Treatment preference as measured by the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) at 6 months (6 month assessment).OAB-SATq treatment preference is a binary outcome that is classified as yes if a participant answers either "Slight preference for the treatment I am receiving now" or "Definitely prefer the treatment I am receiving now" to the question "Do you prefer the treatment that you received since entering this study to the treatment you received before the study?"
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Quality of Life (UDI-SF)
Description
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in mean Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-SF) score. The UDI-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress.
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Quality of Life (IIQ-SF)
Description
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-SF) score. The IIQ-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life.
Time Frame
6 Months
Title
Quality of Life (HUI-3)
Description
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the Health Utility Index, Version 3 (HUI-3). The HUI 3 scale has a range from 0 to 1 with higher scores representing better health.
Time Frame
6 Months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Non-pregnant adult female at least 21 years old, with no plans to become pregnant during the course of the trial) and if of child-bearing potential, with a negative pregnancy test, and if sexually active, must be using medically acceptable contraception. 6 urge urinary incontinence episodes on a 3-day baseline bladder diary, with these urge incontinence episodes representing greater than 50% of the total incontinent episodes recorded. Willing and able to complete all study related items and interviews. Refractory urinary urge urinary incontinence: defined as (1) Persistent symptoms despite at least one or more conservative treatments (e.g. supervised behavioral therapy, supervised physical therapy); and (2)Persistent symptoms despite the use of a minimum of two anticholinergics, or unable to tolerate medication due to side effects, or has a contraindication to taking anticholinergic medication. Currently not on an anticholinergic or antimuscarinic medication (e.g. oxybutynin, tolterodine, and/or fesoterodine) or be willing to stop medication for 3 weeks prior to completing baseline bladder diary and expected to remain off medications through duration of study. Demonstrates ability (or have caregiver demonstrate ability) to perform clean intermittent self-catheterization. Grossly neurologically normal on exam and no gross systemic neurologic conditions believed to affect urinary function. Urodynamic assessment within the previous 18 months prior to enrollment or done after enrollment, prior to randomization. Exclusion Criteria: Neurologic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson Disease, CVA within 6 months prior to enrollment, myasthenia gravis, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, clinically significant peripheral neuropathy, and complete spinal cord injury. Untreated urinary tract infection (UTI). Any prior use of either study therapy for treatment of urinary urge incontinence (Botox A® or Interstim®). Current participation in any other conflicting interventional research study. PVR >150 ml on 2 occasions within 6 months prior to enrollment (If the PVR value was obtained by ultrasound and was ≥150 ml, the PVR will be confirmed by catheterization which will be the gold standard) Subjects with knowledge of planned MRIs or diathermy, except those allowable per Medtronic guidelines. Current or prior bladder malignancy. Surgically altered detrusor muscle, such as augmentation cystoplasty. Subjects taking aminoglycosides. Currently pregnant or lactating. Subjects who are on ambulatory anticoagulant therapy, including aspirin, who are unable to discontinue treatment for 24 hours prior to bladder injection and staged InterStim® procedure. Serum creatinine level greater than twice the upper limit of normal within the previous year prior to enrollment. Surgical treatment for stress incontinence (sling, Burch or urethral injection) or pelvic organ prolapse recommended or planned at enrollment by study investigator(s). Prior stress incontinence or prolapsed surgery within the last 6 months prior to enrollment. Allergy to lidocaine or bupivacaine. Prior pelvic radiation. Uninvestigated hematuria. Greater than or equal to Stage III vaginal prolapse. Known allergy to Botox A®. Use of a vaginal pessary.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cindy Amundsen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Holly Richter, PhD, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shawn A. Menefee, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sandip Vasada, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Cleveland Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deborah L. Myers, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Brown/Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yoko Kumesu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of New Mexico
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lily Arya, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jerry Lowder, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pittsburgh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
W. Thomas Gregory, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health and Science University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dennis Wallace, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
RTI International
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susan Meikle, MD, MSPH
Organizational Affiliation
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35249-7333
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, San Diego, Women's Pelvic Medicine Center
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87131-0001
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
277707
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic, Obstretric and Gynecology and Women Health Institute
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44194
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University, Kohler Pavilion
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Univesity of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Center for Women's Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02903
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33620895
Citation
Hendrickson WK, Amundsen CL, Rahn DD, Meyer I, Bradley MS, Smith AL, Myers DL, Jelovsek JE, Lukacz ES. Comparison of 100 U With 200 U of Intradetrusor OnabotulinumToxinA for Nonneurogenic Urgency Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Mar 1;27(3):140-146. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001020.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31895722
Citation
Richter HE, Jelovsek JE, Iyer P, Rogers RG, Meyer I, Newman DK, Bradley MS, Harm-Ernandes I, Dyer KY, Wohlrab K, Mazloomdoost D, Gantz MG; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health. Characteristics Associated With Clinically Important Treatment Responses in Women Undergoing Nonsurgical Therapy for Fecal Incontinence. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;115(1):115-127. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000482. Erratum In: Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):1100.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31211964
Citation
Andy UU, Amundsen CL, Honeycutt E, Markland AD, Dunivan G, Dyer KY, Korbly NB, Bradley M, Vasavada S, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Sacral neuromodulation versus onabotulinumtoxinA for refractory urgency urinary incontinence: impact on fecal incontinence symptoms and sexual function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;221(5):513.e1-513.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Erratum In: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):124-125.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29031894
Citation
Komesu YM, Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Erickson SW, Ackenbom MF, Andy UU, Sung VW, Albo M, Gregory WT, Paraiso MF, Wallace D; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Refractory urgency urinary incontinence treatment in women: impact of age on outcomes and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):111.e1-111.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24486637
Citation
Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee S, Vasavada S, Rahn DD, Kenton K, Harvie HS, Wallace D, Meikle S. The Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation vs. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment: ROSETTA trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Mar;37(2):272-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs