Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) - PFC Rotating Versus Fixed Bearing
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
P.F.C. Sigma knee arthroplasty
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Knee arthroplasty, RSA, DXA, Gait analysis, Motion analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients at Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Orthopedic Dept. referred to total knee arthroplasty.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurologic disease with impact on gait.
- Orthopaedic disease ipsilateral hip joint.
- Patients outside the age limits.
- No informed consent signed.
- Patients suffering from dementia.
- Patients primarily included, but who perioperatively has their posterior cruciate ligament injured or sacrificed.
- Patients who later develop deep venous thrombosis or infection in the operated knee.
Sites / Locations
- Silkeborg Regional Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Fixed bearing
Rotating platform
Arm Description
One of the 2 used implants.
One of the 2 used implants.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Radio Stereometric Analysis
Patients are analysed with stereo x-rays to asses implant micromigration.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Gait analysis
Motion analysis is performed prior to surgery and after 6 and 12 months follow-up. Patients serve as their own control.
DXA
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is used to asses bone mineral density (BMD) around the implant.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01150929
First Posted
June 14, 2010
Last Updated
December 22, 2022
Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Collaborators
Regionshospitalet Silkeborg, Gigtforeningen, Protesekompagniet
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01150929
Brief Title
Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) - PFC Rotating Versus Fixed Bearing
Official Title
Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty - Rotating Platform Versus Fixed Bearing Polyethylene
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2007 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Collaborators
Regionshospitalet Silkeborg, Gigtforeningen, Protesekompagniet
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether patient rehabilitation is equal for patients operated with two different knee implant designs.
The patients are randomized to treatment with either a simple hinge design implant (fixed bearing) or an implant with a mobile bearing polyethylene. This design difference might in principle enable the patients in the latter group to rehabilitate towards a more normal gait pattern.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Knee arthroplasty, RSA, DXA, Gait analysis, Motion analysis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
55 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Fixed bearing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
One of the 2 used implants.
Arm Title
Rotating platform
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
One of the 2 used implants.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
P.F.C. Sigma knee arthroplasty
Other Intervention Name(s)
PFC Sigma from DePuy International implants used.
Intervention Description
Randomization to either rotating platform or fixed bearing tibial plateau and polyethylene
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radio Stereometric Analysis
Description
Patients are analysed with stereo x-rays to asses implant micromigration.
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gait analysis
Description
Motion analysis is performed prior to surgery and after 6 and 12 months follow-up. Patients serve as their own control.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
DXA
Description
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is used to asses bone mineral density (BMD) around the implant.
Time Frame
24 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients at Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Orthopedic Dept. referred to total knee arthroplasty.
Exclusion Criteria:
Neurologic disease with impact on gait.
Orthopaedic disease ipsilateral hip joint.
Patients outside the age limits.
No informed consent signed.
Patients suffering from dementia.
Patients primarily included, but who perioperatively has their posterior cruciate ligament injured or sacrificed.
Patients who later develop deep venous thrombosis or infection in the operated knee.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kjeld Soballe, DMsc
Organizational Affiliation
Aarhus Sygehus THG
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Silkeborg Regional Hospital
City
Silkeborg
ZIP/Postal Code
8600
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Links:
URL
http://www.orthoresearch.dk
Description
Orthopedic Research Aarhus, Denmark
Learn more about this trial
Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) - PFC Rotating Versus Fixed Bearing
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs