RElevance of UltraSonography for Assessing Salivary Gland Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) (REUSSI-SSc)
Primary Purpose
Systemic Sclerosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Minor Salivary gland Biopsy
ARFI
MSG US
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Systemic Sclerosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over eighteen years old;
- Fulfilling 2013 ACR classification criteria for Systemic sclerosis (Van den Hoogen et al. 2013);
- 60 patients with subjective sicca symptoms reported by a standardised questionnaire (Vitali C et al. 2002);
- 15 patients without sicca symptoms;
- Who has signed an informed consent
- Benefiting from a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Treatment: current (or in the past 6 months) immunosuppressive treatment by rituximab or cyclophosphamide (representing less than 5% of SSc patients in the investigator's centres);
- Current (or in the past 6 months) treatment with drugs with anti-cholinergic properties (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and anti-histaminic inhibitors (hydroxyzine));
- Current treatment with antiplatelet aggregates
- Anti-vitamin K treatment (increasing risk of bleeding during minor salivary gland biopsy); and oral anti-coagulant
- Known abnormal coagulation (prolonged aPPT(activated partial thromboplastin time) and / or PT (Prothrombin time ( <70%)), or known thrombocytopenia (<150,000 platelets / mm3)
- Known secondary sicca symptoms : history of head-and-neck radiotherapy, hepatitis C infection, AIDS, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, graft-vs-host disease and IgG4(Isotype's immunoGlobulin G4)-related disease;
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding mothers;
- Known intolerance/allergy to xylocain injection;
- Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision), inability to consent.
Sites / Locations
- CHU Brest Service de Rhumatologie
- CHU rennes
- CHU Tours, Service de médecine interne
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Patients reporting subjective sicca symptoms
Patients without subjective sicca symptoms
Arm Description
HAQ(Health Assessment Questionnaire) Score, bilateral schirmer 's test, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, blood sample for immunologic evaluation
HAQ(Health Assessment Questionnaire) score, bilateral schirmer 's test, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, blood sample for immunologic evaluation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands based on Salaffi's composite score.
each MSG will be scored as followed:
grade 0 = normal homogeneous glands;
grade 1 = Homogenous borders, slightly heterogeneous parenchyma,
grade 2 = Homogenous borders, multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring < 2 mm,
grade 3 = multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring 2-6 mm or irregular borders or invisible posterior part of the gland;
grade 4 = unstructured glandular parenchyma with multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring >6 mm or calcifications with echogenic bands.
In each patient, 4 grades can be obtained (1 grade per gland);
the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-16) will be the Salaffi's score.
A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 16 the worse
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands based on bilateral ARFI(Acoustic radiation force Impulse) elastometry
Secondary Outcome Measures
Variants of the Salaffi score
Scores of Hocevar,based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.
Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 12 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-48) will be the Hocevar's score. A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 48 the worse.
Variants of the Salaffi score
Scores of Milic,based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.
Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 3 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-12) will be the Milic's score. A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 12 the worse.
Variants of the Salaffi score
Scores Jousse-Joulin / Cornec constituting , based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.
Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 4 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-16) will be the Jousse-Joulin/Cornec's score.
A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 16 the worse.
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with standardized histological characterization of the Chisholm score.
Chisholm'score will evaluate the number of lymphocytic foci/4mm2 grade 1 : none or slight, grade 2 : less than 50 lymphocytes and histocytes, grade 3 : one focus with at least 50 lymphocytes, grade 4 : More than one focus with at least 50 lymphocytes,
Grade 1 has the best outcome, grade 4 the worse.
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with standardized characterization of the focus score.
Focus score : the number of mononuclear cell infiltrates containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,
Focus score 0 = no mononuclear cell infiltrate containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,
Focus score =1 or >1 : one or more mononuclear cell infiltrates containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,
Focus score 0 has the best outcome Focus score =1 or >1 has the worse outcome
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with evaluation of fibrosis assessed from F1 to F4
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren according to salivary flow test
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren according to Schirmer test.
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
forms of the disease
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
duration of evolution of the disease
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
visceral damage : Presence or absence of pulmonary involvement on CT scan, Presence or absence of pulmonary arterial hypertension on echocardiography.
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
immunological data : Positivity of : Anti SSA(Anti Sjögren Syndrom A) antibodies,Anti SSb(Anti Sjögren syndrom B) antibodies,Anti Topoisomerase antibodies, Anti Centromere antibodies, Anti RNA polymerase III antibodies
Using Indirect ImmunoFluorescence (IFI) ( as binary parameter (positive or negative)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04001556
First Posted
April 1, 2019
Last Updated
April 4, 2022
Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04001556
Brief Title
RElevance of UltraSonography for Assessing Salivary Gland Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
Acronym
REUSSI-SSc
Official Title
RElevance of UltraSonography for Assessing Salivary Gland Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 4, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 4, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
As fibrosis of salivary glands is supposed to be the main mechanism involved in Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated sicca syndrome, Ultrasonography , biopsy and measuring gland elasticity (by ARFI (Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse)) in SSc patients could also constitute a relevant method to assess the potential alterations of echostructure of major salivary glands and the fibrosis of Salivary Glands in this disease.
Detailed Description
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune chronic disorder characterised by vascular hyper-reactivity and fibrosis of the skin as well as internal organs. Intimal hyperplasia, endothelial dysfunction and occlusive vasculopathy are the underlying basis of these chronic vascular damages. The expression of the vasculopathy especially includes Raynaud phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DUs), gastro-intestinal involvement and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Sicca syndrome is clinically characterised by dryness of the eyes (xerophthalmia) and mouth (xerostomia). The prevalence of sicca symptoms is up to 70% in prospective series of SSc patients. Sicca syndrome is supposed to be primarily related to glandular fibrosis. The prevalence of primary Sjögren Syndrome (pSS) among SSc patients, as defined by the American-European Consensus Group criteria is around 15%. Sicca syndrome is therefore a frequent feature in SSc and constitutes an important cause of quality of life's impairment in SSc If studies have already evaluated clinical and histological alterations of minor salivary glands secondary to sicca syndrome in SSc , only few studies used the recent ACR(American College of Rheumatology) 2013 classification criteria for SSc to select patients. SGUS(Salivary Gland UltraSonography) evaluation in SSc has never been assessed to date. Potential alterations of MSG (Major Salivary Gland) echostructure in SSc have never been described to date. The performances and reliability of SGUS to assessed MSG involvement in SSc are still to be determined. As fibrosis of salivary glands is supposed to be the main mechanism involved in SSc-associated sicca syndrome, measuring salivary-gland elasticity using ARFI-ultrasonography in SSc patients could also constitute a relevant method to assess the fibrosis of MSG in this disease. A cross-sectional pilot study is therefore needed to explore these relevant questions about sicca syndrome in SSc.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Systemic Sclerosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
cross-sectionnal pilot study
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The examiner performin the evaluation of ultrasound features of the main salivary glands will not have acess at the first part of patient evaluation.
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
75 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Patients reporting subjective sicca symptoms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
HAQ(Health Assessment Questionnaire) Score, bilateral schirmer 's test, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, blood sample for immunologic evaluation
Arm Title
Patients without subjective sicca symptoms
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
HAQ(Health Assessment Questionnaire) score, bilateral schirmer 's test, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate, blood sample for immunologic evaluation
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Minor Salivary gland Biopsy
Intervention Description
Minor salivary gland biopsy with injection of lidocain
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
ARFI
Intervention Description
Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse on Major Salivary Glands
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
MSG US
Intervention Description
Ultrasonography of Major Salivary Glands
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands
Description
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands based on Salaffi's composite score.
each MSG will be scored as followed:
grade 0 = normal homogeneous glands;
grade 1 = Homogenous borders, slightly heterogeneous parenchyma,
grade 2 = Homogenous borders, multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring < 2 mm,
grade 3 = multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring 2-6 mm or irregular borders or invisible posterior part of the gland;
grade 4 = unstructured glandular parenchyma with multiple hypoechogenic areas measuring >6 mm or calcifications with echogenic bands.
In each patient, 4 grades can be obtained (1 grade per gland);
the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-16) will be the Salaffi's score.
A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 16 the worse
Time Frame
up to six months (at evaluation visit)
Title
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands
Description
Ultrasonography characteristics of major salivary glands based on bilateral ARFI(Acoustic radiation force Impulse) elastometry
Time Frame
up to six months (at evaluation visit)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Variants of the Salaffi score
Description
Scores of Hocevar,based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.
Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 12 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-48) will be the Hocevar's score. A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 48 the worse.
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Variants of the Salaffi score
Description
Scores of Milic,based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.
Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 3 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-12) will be the Milic's score. A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 12 the worse.
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Variants of the Salaffi score
Description
Scores Jousse-Joulin / Cornec constituting , based on the same ultrasound parameters but with a weighting different from that of Salaffi in the calculation of the score.
Echostructure of the four salivary glands will be graded 0 to 4 ; the sum of these 4 grades (range 0-16) will be the Jousse-Joulin/Cornec's score.
A score of 0 has the best outcome, of 16 the worse.
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Description
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with standardized histological characterization of the Chisholm score.
Chisholm'score will evaluate the number of lymphocytic foci/4mm2 grade 1 : none or slight, grade 2 : less than 50 lymphocytes and histocytes, grade 3 : one focus with at least 50 lymphocytes, grade 4 : More than one focus with at least 50 lymphocytes,
Grade 1 has the best outcome, grade 4 the worse.
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Description
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with standardized characterization of the focus score.
Focus score : the number of mononuclear cell infiltrates containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,
Focus score 0 = no mononuclear cell infiltrate containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,
Focus score =1 or >1 : one or more mononuclear cell infiltrates containing at least 50 inflammatory cells in a 4 mm2 glandular section,
Focus score 0 has the best outcome Focus score =1 or >1 has the worse outcome
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Biopsy of the minor salivary glands
Description
Biopsies of the minor salivary glands with evaluation of fibrosis assessed from F1 to F4
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren
Description
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren according to salivary flow test
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren
Description
Evaluation of the presence or absence of objective criteria of Sjogren according to Schirmer test.
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Description
forms of the disease
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Description
duration of evolution of the disease
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Description
visceral damage : Presence or absence of pulmonary involvement on CT scan, Presence or absence of pulmonary arterial hypertension on echocardiography.
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
Title
Clinical evaluation of systemic scleroderma lesions
Description
immunological data : Positivity of : Anti SSA(Anti Sjögren Syndrom A) antibodies,Anti SSb(Anti Sjögren syndrom B) antibodies,Anti Topoisomerase antibodies, Anti Centromere antibodies, Anti RNA polymerase III antibodies
Using Indirect ImmunoFluorescence (IFI) ( as binary parameter (positive or negative)
Time Frame
up to six months (evaluation visit)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients over eighteen years old;
Fulfilling 2013 ACR classification criteria for Systemic sclerosis (Van den Hoogen et al. 2013);
60 patients with subjective sicca symptoms reported by a standardised questionnaire (Vitali C et al. 2002);
15 patients without sicca symptoms;
Who has signed an informed consent
Benefiting from a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
Treatment: current (or in the past 6 months) immunosuppressive treatment by rituximab or cyclophosphamide (representing less than 5% of SSc patients in the investigator's centres);
Current (or in the past 6 months) treatment with drugs with anti-cholinergic properties (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and anti-histaminic inhibitors (hydroxyzine));
Current treatment with antiplatelet aggregates
Anti-vitamin K treatment (increasing risk of bleeding during minor salivary gland biopsy); and oral anti-coagulant
Known abnormal coagulation (prolonged aPPT(activated partial thromboplastin time) and / or PT (Prothrombin time ( <70%)), or known thrombocytopenia (<150,000 platelets / mm3)
Known secondary sicca symptoms : history of head-and-neck radiotherapy, hepatitis C infection, AIDS, sarcoidosis, amyloidosis, graft-vs-host disease and IgG4(Isotype's immunoGlobulin G4)-related disease;
Pregnancy or breastfeeding mothers;
Known intolerance/allergy to xylocain injection;
Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship, or supervision), inability to consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick JEGO, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital of Rennes
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU Brest Service de Rhumatologie
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU rennes
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35000
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Tours, Service de médecine interne
City
Tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37000
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10813292
Citation
Salaffi F, Argalia G, Carotti M, Giannini FB, Palombi C. Salivary gland ultrasonography in the evaluation of primary Sjogren's syndrome. Comparison with minor salivary gland biopsy. J Rheumatol. 2000 May;27(5):1229-36.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15741192
Citation
Hocevar A, Ambrozic A, Rozman B, Kveder T, Tomsic M. Ultrasonographic changes of major salivary glands in primary Sjogren's syndrome. Diagnostic value of a novel scoring system. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jun;44(6):768-72. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh588. Epub 2005 Mar 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20059370
Citation
Milic VD, Petrovic RR, Boricic IV, Radunovic GL, Pejnovic NN, Soldatovic I, Damjanov NS. Major salivary gland sonography in Sjogren's syndrome: diagnostic value of a novel ultrasonography score (0-12) for parenchymal inhomogeneity. Scand J Rheumatol. 2010 Mar;39(2):160-6. doi: 10.3109/03009740903270623.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26667216
Citation
Jousse-Joulin S, Milic V, Jonsson MV, Plagou A, Theander E, Luciano N, Rachele P, Baldini C, Bootsma H, Vissink A, Hocevar A, De Vita S, Tzioufas AG, Alavi Z, Bowman SJ, Devauchelle-Pensec V; US-pSS Study Group. Is salivary gland ultrasonography a useful tool in Sjogren's syndrome? A systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 May;55(5):789-800. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev385. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23108632
Citation
Cornec D, Jousse-Joulin S, Pers JO, Marhadour T, Cochener B, Boisrame-Gastrin S, Nowak E, Youinou P, Saraux A, Devauchelle-Pensec V. Contribution of salivary gland ultrasonography to the diagnosis of Sjogren's syndrome: toward new diagnostic criteria? Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Jan;65(1):216-25. doi: 10.1002/art.37698.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
RElevance of UltraSonography for Assessing Salivary Gland Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs