search
Back to results

Remote Electronic Assessment of Survivors With Feedback Communication and Directed Referrals (REASSURE)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
REASSURE
Sponsored by
University of Wisconsin, Madison
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring low risk breast cancer, survivor, follow up care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 95 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • history of stage I, ER and/or PR positive, her2neu negative breast cancer
  • 12-36 months from diagnosis at the time of the survey assessment (for both REASSURE cohorts 1 and 2). For REASSURE cohort 1, this will translate into being 6-18 months from diagnosis at the time they are approached for the study.
  • receiving follow-up for their breast cancer with a University of Wisconsin (UW) Breast Center medical oncologist participating in the REASSURE pilot study
  • ability to complete the PRO assessment online
  • English speaker

Exclusion Criteria:

  • receipt of chemotherapy
  • non-English speakers
  • pregnancy
  • cancer recurrence (local, regional or distant) since the initial diagnosis

Sites / Locations

  • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

REASSURE Cohort 1

REASSURE Cohort 2

Arm Description

Survivors who are enrolled at time of a follow-up visit and who will be offered the REASSURE intervention at the next 6 month visit (including the opportunity to replace a visit with feedback communication).

Survivors who are enrolled prior to a follow-up visit and who will be offered the REASSURE PRO assessment and feedback communication (but not provided the opportunity to replace a visit with feedback communication).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility: Number of Eligible Participants Enrolled
The investigator's goal is a 50% recruitment rate of eligible patients
Number of survivorship symptoms/concerns that were addressed during the follow-up visit following clinician review of the REASSURE PRO assessment
The investigator's will summarize the number of domains where survivors reported symptoms/concerns and compare that to the number of domains that were addressed, either by the PRO generated recommendation or during the follow-up visit.
Number of Participants who Replace or are Eligible to Replace a Medical Oncology Follow-Up visit with Feedback Communication
The investigator's goal is to have 33% of REASSURE cohort 1 replace a follow-up visit with medical oncology with feedback communication and REASSURE cohort 2 to be eligible to replace a follow-up visit (if the full intervention had been implemented).
Number of PRO-generated Referral Recommendations that are Concordant with Medical Oncology Opinion
The investigator's goal is to have 75% of referral recommendations be concordant with medical oncology opinion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent of Survivors Who Would Recommend this Approach to other survivors
Participants will be asked to answer yes or no to the following question: "Would you recommend this approach to follow-up to other survivors?"
Number of Participants Whose Concerns Were Addressed During the Preceding Visit
Satisfaction with survivorship information measured with the Satisfaction with Information and Care Scale
Scored on a 5 point likert scale where 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = dissatisfied; 3 = neutral; 4 = satisfied; 5 = very satisfied. Higher scores indicated increased satisfaction, mean score between 1-5 will be reported.
Knowledge about survivorship issues measured with the Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS) Scale
This is an 11 item scale, measured on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3 where lower scores indicate more knowledge. Mean score between 0-3 will be reported.
Preparedness for survivorship issues measured with the Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS) Scale
This is a 5 item scale, measured on a 10-point Likert scale where higher scores indicate increased preparedness. Mean score between 1-10 will be reported.

Full Information

First Posted
September 8, 2021
Last Updated
September 6, 2022
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05047575
Brief Title
Remote Electronic Assessment of Survivors With Feedback Communication and Directed Referrals
Acronym
REASSURE
Official Title
Pilot Study of a Follow-up Intervention to Improve the Quality of Care for Low-Risk Breast Cancer Survivors
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 24, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 28, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 28, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study tests a novel, risk-stratified approach for low risk breast cancer survivor follow-up care that reduces burden for survivors and their oncologists while simultaneously delivering more comprehensive care. The intervention is called Remote Electronic Assessment of Survivors with Feedback Communication and Directed Referrals (REASSURE). 50 participants will be enrolled into 2 cohorts, 25 into cohort 1 who will experience the REASSURE intervention 6 months from enrollment and 25 into cohort 2 who will experience components of the REASSURE intervention at their next follow-up visit. Participants can expect to be on study for up to 9 months.
Detailed Description
Current follow-up care for 3 million+ breast cancer survivors is both burdensome and fails to comprehensively address survivors' needs. Survivors and oncologists value these visits because visits reassure survivors about recurrence, and support oncologists' views about their responsibilities for managing ongoing therapy. However, early-stage survivors derive less benefit from follow-up, while incurring substantial financial burdens. Further, follow-up visit time restraints prevent addressing all topics prioritized by survivors or recommended as comprehensive survivorship care. Because most low-risk breast cancer survivors will never experience a recurrence, there is a critical need to develop a novel, risk-stratified approach to follow-up that reduces burden for survivors and their oncologists while simultaneously delivering more comprehensive care. To address this gap, the team engaged stakeholders to develop an intervention for low-risk breast cancer survivors, called Remote Electronic Assessment of Survivors with Feedback Communication and Directed Referrals (REASSURE). REASSURE maintains one annual in-person oncology visit, consistent with stakeholder preferences for oncology-based follow-up. REASSURE utilizes remote patient-reported outcomes assessments to comprehensively assess symptoms, promotes practice change by providing feedback reports to oncologists and engaging primary care providers (PCPs) in survivorship care, and reduces the burden of follow-up by substituting an oncology visit for thriving survivors with reassurance messaging and encouragement to pursue preventive care. The investigators have successfully pilot tested the PRO assessment and estimate that 25% of low-risk breast cancer survivors will have symptoms requiring a follow-up visit with medical oncology. In this pilot feasibility study, the REASSURE intervention will be implemented into clinical care for the first time. Eligible survivors will be recruited and use mixed methods to accomplish four study objectives: Objective 1. Assess the feasibility of implementing REASSURE into clinical practice. Objective 2. Determine the number of survivorship symptoms/concerns that were addressed during the follow-up visit following clinician review of the REASSURE PRO assessment. Objective 3. Characterize the impact of REASSURE on healthcare utilization. Objective 4. Assess concordance between the referral recommendation generated from the PRO assessment and medical oncologist opinion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
low risk breast cancer, survivor, follow up care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
REASSURE Cohort 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Survivors who are enrolled at time of a follow-up visit and who will be offered the REASSURE intervention at the next 6 month visit (including the opportunity to replace a visit with feedback communication).
Arm Title
REASSURE Cohort 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Survivors who are enrolled prior to a follow-up visit and who will be offered the REASSURE PRO assessment and feedback communication (but not provided the opportunity to replace a visit with feedback communication).
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
REASSURE
Other Intervention Name(s)
Remote Electronic Assessment of Survivors with Feedback Communication and Directed Referrals
Intervention Description
REASSURE utilizes remote patient-reported outcomes assessments to comprehensively assess symptoms, promotes practice change by providing feedback reports to oncologists and engaging primary care providers (PCPs) in survivorship care, and reduces the burden of follow-up by substituting an oncology visit for thriving survivors with reassurance messaging and encouragement to pursue preventive care.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility: Number of Eligible Participants Enrolled
Description
The investigator's goal is a 50% recruitment rate of eligible patients
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Title
Number of survivorship symptoms/concerns that were addressed during the follow-up visit following clinician review of the REASSURE PRO assessment
Description
The investigator's will summarize the number of domains where survivors reported symptoms/concerns and compare that to the number of domains that were addressed, either by the PRO generated recommendation or during the follow-up visit.
Time Frame
up to 9 months
Title
Number of Participants who Replace or are Eligible to Replace a Medical Oncology Follow-Up visit with Feedback Communication
Description
The investigator's goal is to have 33% of REASSURE cohort 1 replace a follow-up visit with medical oncology with feedback communication and REASSURE cohort 2 to be eligible to replace a follow-up visit (if the full intervention had been implemented).
Time Frame
up to 1 year
Title
Number of PRO-generated Referral Recommendations that are Concordant with Medical Oncology Opinion
Description
The investigator's goal is to have 75% of referral recommendations be concordant with medical oncology opinion.
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Survivors Who Would Recommend this Approach to other survivors
Description
Participants will be asked to answer yes or no to the following question: "Would you recommend this approach to follow-up to other survivors?"
Time Frame
up to 9 months
Title
Number of Participants Whose Concerns Were Addressed During the Preceding Visit
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Title
Satisfaction with survivorship information measured with the Satisfaction with Information and Care Scale
Description
Scored on a 5 point likert scale where 1 = very dissatisfied; 2 = dissatisfied; 3 = neutral; 4 = satisfied; 5 = very satisfied. Higher scores indicated increased satisfaction, mean score between 1-5 will be reported.
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Title
Knowledge about survivorship issues measured with the Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS) Scale
Description
This is an 11 item scale, measured on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 to 3 where lower scores indicate more knowledge. Mean score between 0-3 will be reported.
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Title
Preparedness for survivorship issues measured with the Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS) Scale
Description
This is a 5 item scale, measured on a 10-point Likert scale where higher scores indicate increased preparedness. Mean score between 1-10 will be reported.
Time Frame
up to 6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
The Human Connection (THC) Scale Score
Description
The Relationship between the survivor and oncologist (Therapeutic Alliance) will be measured using The Human Connection Scale, a 16-item questionnaire measured on a 4 point likert scale for a total possible range of scores from 16 - 64, where higher scores indicate increased therapeutic alliance.
Time Frame
up to 9 months
Title
Impact of Event Scale Score
Description
The fear of cancer recurrence will be measured using the Impact of Event Scale, a 22-item self-report measure scored on a 5 point likert scale from 0 "not at all" to 4 "extremely", for a total possible range of scores from 0-88 where higher scores indicate increased fear of cancer recurrence.
Time Frame
up to 9 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
95 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: history of stage I, ER and/or PR positive, her2neu negative breast cancer 12-36 months from diagnosis at the time of the survey assessment (for both REASSURE cohorts 1 and 2). For REASSURE cohort 1, this will translate into being 6-18 months from diagnosis at the time they are approached for the study. receiving follow-up for their breast cancer with a University of Wisconsin (UW) Breast Center medical oncologist participating in the REASSURE pilot study ability to complete the PRO assessment online English speaker Exclusion Criteria: receipt of chemotherapy non-English speakers pregnancy cancer recurrence (local, regional or distant) since the initial diagnosis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather Neuman, MD, MS, FACS
Organizational Affiliation
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Remote Electronic Assessment of Survivors With Feedback Communication and Directed Referrals

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs