Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography
Primary Purpose
Renal Insufficiency, Diabetes Mellitus
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Renal Insufficiency focused on measuring Iodixanol, Iopamidol, computed tomography, Patients with pre-existing renal impairment and diabetes
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with a combination of diabetes mellitus (type I or II) and renal impairment who are referred for a contrast-enhanced CT examination. Exclusion Criteria: Concurrent administration of potentially nephroprotective or nephrotoxic drugs is not permitted. Patients undergoing dialysis or kidney transplantation will not be included.
Sites / Locations
- GE Healthcare
- GE Healthcare
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
Arm Description
Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL
Iopamidol 300 mg I/mL
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Assessment of the Incidence Rate of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients With Impaired Renal Function.
The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of CIN, defined as an intra-individual increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of greater than or equal to 44.2 µmol/L (greater than or equal to 0.5 mg/dL).
Subjects with a pre-contrast (baseline) serum creatinine value greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/dL for females or eGFR of less than or equal to 50 mL/min/1.73m squared, and a post-contrast serum creatinine value available on days 2 or 3, administered greater than or equal to100 mL or greater than or equal to 1.5 mL/kg bodyweight IMP, without presence of any major protocol violations, and without evidence of other causes inducing acute renal dysfunction.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Assessment of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-enhanced Multi-detector-row Helical Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination.
Overall Image Quality rated as "Excellent, Good, Sufficient or Insufficient Poor" by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00209417
First Posted
August 24, 2005
Last Updated
October 9, 2014
Sponsor
GE Healthcare
Collaborators
ABX CRO, Examination Management Services Inc., Covance, Quintiles, Inc., Averion International Corporation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00209417
Brief Title
Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography
Official Title
GEHC Has Decided Not to Provide This Detail But Will Rely on the Brief Title.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Supported by preliminary interim analysis. Not based on any safety signals in study or any quality issues that could affect efficacy of the product.
Study Start Date
June 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GE Healthcare
Collaborators
ABX CRO, Examination Management Services Inc., Covance, Quintiles, Inc., Averion International Corporation
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
It is well known that X-ray contrast media can affect kidney function in some patients, especially when administered intra-arterially, and patients who already suffer from reduced kidney function and diabetes mellitus may be at increased risk. It is widely accepted to use low-osmolar or iso-osmolar contrast media, especially in patients at risk for contrast media-induced nephropathy. However, little is known about the intravenous use of X-ray contrast media in risk patients, such as contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effects on kidney function of two contrast media, the iso-osmolar iodixanol and the low-osmolar iopamidol in patients at risk of kidney damage associated with the injection of contrast media. Due to the iso-osmolar feature, it is expected less influence on renal function following administration of iodixanol. A standard hydration procedure, based on available guidelines will be given to all patients to prevent negative effects on the kidneys. Serum creatinine (SCr ) concentrations will be measured before and up to 7 days after contrast media administration to evaluate the effects on renal function.
Detailed Description
GEHC has decided not to provide this detail
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Renal Insufficiency, Diabetes Mellitus
Keywords
Iodixanol, Iopamidol, computed tomography, Patients with pre-existing renal impairment and diabetes
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
656 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL
Arm Title
Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Iopamidol 300 mg I/mL
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Iodixanol 320-Arm 1
Other Intervention Name(s)
Visipaque
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Iopamidol 300-Arm 2
Other Intervention Name(s)
Isovue
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of the Incidence Rate of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients With Impaired Renal Function.
Description
The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of CIN, defined as an intra-individual increase in serum creatinine (SCr) of greater than or equal to 44.2 µmol/L (greater than or equal to 0.5 mg/dL).
Subjects with a pre-contrast (baseline) serum creatinine value greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and greater than or equal to 1.3 mg/dL for females or eGFR of less than or equal to 50 mL/min/1.73m squared, and a post-contrast serum creatinine value available on days 2 or 3, administered greater than or equal to100 mL or greater than or equal to 1.5 mL/kg bodyweight IMP, without presence of any major protocol violations, and without evidence of other causes inducing acute renal dysfunction.
Time Frame
From baseline up to 3 days post contrast administration.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-enhanced Multi-detector-row Helical Computed Tomography (MDCT) Examination.
Description
Overall Image Quality rated as "Excellent, Good, Sufficient or Insufficient Poor" by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.
Time Frame
Within 2, 3 and 7 days post contrast administration.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with a combination of diabetes mellitus (type I or II) and renal impairment who are referred for a contrast-enhanced CT examination.
Exclusion Criteria:
Concurrent administration of potentially nephroprotective or nephrotoxic drugs is not permitted.
Patients undergoing dialysis or kidney transplantation will not be included.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Judith A Johnson, MS, MBA
Organizational Affiliation
GE Healthcare
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GE Healthcare
City
Princeton
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08540
Country
United States
Facility Name
GE Healthcare
City
Amersham
ZIP/Postal Code
HP7 9LL
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Renal Effects of Two Iodinated Contrast Media in Patients at Risk Undergoing Computed Tomography
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs