search
Back to results

Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure and Reliable Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Heart Failure Network (ROSE) Study (ROSE/RED ROSE)

Primary Purpose

Acute Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
Nesiritide
Dopamine
Sponsored by
Duke University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of heart failure as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography)
  • Prior clinical diagnosis of heart failure Must be identified within 24 hours of hospital admission (24 hour clock begins when the admission orders are placed)
  • Estimated GFR of > 15 but < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 determined by the MDRD equation
  • Male or female patient ≥18 years old
  • Willingness to provide informed consent
  • Ability to have a PICC or central line placed (if needed) within 12 hours of randomization and study drug infusion started
  • Anticipated hospitalization of at least 72 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration therapy for heart failure since initial presentation
  • Anticipated need for IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration for heart failure during this hospitalization
  • Systolic BP <90 mmHg
  • Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 9 g/dl
  • Renal replacement therapy
  • History of renal artery stenosis > 50%
  • Hemodynamically significant arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia or defibrillator shock within 4 weeks
  • Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks as defined by electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-segment depression or prominent T-wave inversion and/or positive biomarkers of necrosis (e.g., troponin) in the absence of ST-segment elevation and in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent)
  • Active myocarditis
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Greater than moderate stenotic valvular disease
  • Restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy
  • Complex congenital heart disease
  • Constrictive pericarditis
  • Non-cardiac pulmonary edema
  • Clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity
  • Need for mechanical hemodynamic support
  • Sepsis
  • Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year
  • Previous adverse reaction to the study drugs
  • Use of IV iodinated radiocontrast material in last 72 hours or planned during hospitalization
  • Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized clinical trial during this hospitalization
  • Inability to comply with planned study procedures
  • Pregnancy or nursing mothers

Sites / Locations

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Minnesota Heart Failure Network
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • University of Utah Health Sciences Center
  • University of Vermont- Fletcher Allen Health Care
  • Montreal Heart Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Low dose Dopamine

Placebo

Low Dose Nesiritide

Arm Description

Drug: Dopamine Participants will be randomized to receive low dose dopamine or placebo during first 72 hours of participation in the study

Drug: Placebo Participants will receive placebo in place of low dose dopamine or low dose nesiritide depending on randomization.

Participants could be randomized to receive low dose nesiritide or placebo during the first 72 hours in the trial.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Cystatin C
The primary Safety endpoint is change in serum cystatin C from randomization to 72 hours.
Change in Dyspnea Assessment (RED-ROSE Substudy)
To determine whether the pDSS is a more sensitive index of variability in dyspnea status than the dyspnea VAS assessed without standardization of conditions at assessment as assessed by change in Dyspnea VAS. Dyspnea VAS range -100 to + 100 Larger number is better
Decongestive Changes- RED-ROSE
To determine whether changes in pDSS or dyspnea VAS are related to the response to decongestive therapy as evidenced by fluid volume loss Fluid volume loss is defined as cumulative urinary output minus fluid intake during the first 72 hours post randomization.
Cumulative Urinary Volume
The primary efficacy endpoint is cumulative urinary volume (UV; +/- indwelling urinary catheter) at 72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Weight
Change in weight from randomization to 72 hours. Secondary Endpoint
Worst Reported Symptom Changes-RED-ROSE
To determine whether changes in worst reported symptom (WRS) (dyspnea, body swelling or fatigue) VAS (WRS-VAS) are related to the response to decongestive therapy as assessed by change in WRS VAS. WRS range -100 to + 100 Higher number is better (improved)
Change in Clinical Stability- RED-ROSE
Change in clinical stability as assessed by 60 day death, re-hospitalization or unscheduled outpatient visit
Change in Serum Creatinine
Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Area Under the Curve
Range 0 to 7200 Higher is better
Change in Heart Failure Status
Persistent or worsening heart failure defined as need for rescue therapy.
Change in Treatment Response
Treatment failure including any of the following: development of cardio-renal syndrome worsening/persistent heart failure significant hypotension requiring discontinuation of study drug significant tachycardia requiring discontinuation of study drug death
Cumulative Urinary Sodium Excretion
Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/ Serum Cystatin C Ratio
BUN measured in mg/dL Cystatin C measured in mg/L No units were used in calculated the ratio
Development of Cardio-renal Syndrome
Global Visual Analog Scale Area Under the Curve
Range 0 to 7200 Higher is better/improved

Full Information

First Posted
May 27, 2010
Last Updated
August 20, 2014
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01132846
Brief Title
Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure and Reliable Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Heart Failure Network (ROSE) Study
Acronym
ROSE/RED ROSE
Official Title
Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure and Reliable Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Heart Failure Network ROSE Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the benefits and safety of intravenous administration of low dose nesiritide or low dose dopamine in patients with congestive heart failure and kidney dysfunction. There is a substudy in a subset of subjects that is being used to determine whether the Provocative Dyspnea Severity Score (pDSS) is a more sensitive index of variability in clinical status than the dyspnea VAS assessed without standardization of conditions at assessments.
Detailed Description
Acute heart failure (AHF) is the most common cause of hospital admission in patients over age 65, accounting for 1,000,000 admissions, over 6 million hospital days, and $12 billion in costs annually. The prognosis of patients admitted with AHF is dismal, with a 20-30% readmission rate and a 20-30% mortality rate within six months after admission. Recent studies have established the prognostic importance of renal function in patients with heart failure. In patients who are hospitalized with decompensated congestive heart failure, worsening renal function is also associated with worse outcome, Various studies have estimated that 25-30% of patients hospitalized for decompensated CHF have worsening of renal function leading to prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity and mortality. Although there are no FDA approved renal adjuvant therapies for AHF, several novel adjuvant therapies for use in AHF are being investigated in randomized clinical trials. Additionally, there are currently available strategies, with the potential for improving renal function in AHF such as low dose dopamine and low dose nesiritide. However, these strategies have not been investigated. Participation in this study will last 6 months. All potential participants will undergo initial screening, which wil include a medical history, physical exam, blood draws, measurements of fluid intake and output, and questionnaires. The same evaluations and procedures will be repeated at various points during the study. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive low dose nesiritide or placebo with optimal diuretic dosing or low dose dopamine or placebo with optimal diuretic dosing. Follow-up assessments will occur at Baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, day 7 or discharge, day 60 and 6 months. Follow-up assessments will include medical history, physical exam, blood draws, measurements of fluid intake and output, questionnaires and questions about medications and changes in health. The RED ROSE substudy involves a subset of ROSE patients in looking at the dyspnea assessment. The dyspnea visual analog scale (dyspnea VAS) has been suggested to be superior to other ordinal (Likert) scales in assessment of dyspnea in acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS)1. However, there is no standardization of conditions (oxygen supplementation, position, activity) at the time of VAS assessment and thus, it may not optimally reflect the variability in dyspnea severity in AHFS patients. This insensitivity to variability at baseline and subsequent assessment may limit the ability to reflect variation in response over time and with alternate treatment strategies. A standardized and sequentially provocative assessment of dyspnea (provocative dyspnea severity score, pDSS) may better reflect variation in dyspnea severity and variation in response over time and with alternate treatment strategies. Substudy subjects will be asked to complete a provocative dyspnea assessment at baseline, 24, 48 and 72 hours. The subjects will be asked to complete a 6 minute walk assessment at the 72 hour visit.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
360 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Low dose Dopamine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Drug: Dopamine Participants will be randomized to receive low dose dopamine or placebo during first 72 hours of participation in the study
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Drug: Placebo Participants will receive placebo in place of low dose dopamine or low dose nesiritide depending on randomization.
Arm Title
Low Dose Nesiritide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants could be randomized to receive low dose nesiritide or placebo during the first 72 hours in the trial.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Participants will be randomized to receive Low dose Dopamine or placebo plus optimal diuretic or Low dose Nesiritide or placebo plus optimal diuretic.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nesiritide
Intervention Description
Active Comparator: Low Dose Nesiritide Participants randomized to the low dose nesiritide arm will receive nesiritide of 0.005 ug/kg/min or placebo during the first 72 hours in the trial.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dopamine
Intervention Description
Participants randomized to the low dose dopamine arm will receive dopamine of 2ug/kg/min or placebo during the first 72 hours in the trial.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Cystatin C
Description
The primary Safety endpoint is change in serum cystatin C from randomization to 72 hours.
Time Frame
Randomization to 72 hours
Title
Change in Dyspnea Assessment (RED-ROSE Substudy)
Description
To determine whether the pDSS is a more sensitive index of variability in dyspnea status than the dyspnea VAS assessed without standardization of conditions at assessment as assessed by change in Dyspnea VAS. Dyspnea VAS range -100 to + 100 Larger number is better
Time Frame
Baseline to 72 hours
Title
Decongestive Changes- RED-ROSE
Description
To determine whether changes in pDSS or dyspnea VAS are related to the response to decongestive therapy as evidenced by fluid volume loss Fluid volume loss is defined as cumulative urinary output minus fluid intake during the first 72 hours post randomization.
Time Frame
Baseline to 72 hours
Title
Cumulative Urinary Volume
Description
The primary efficacy endpoint is cumulative urinary volume (UV; +/- indwelling urinary catheter) at 72 hours
Time Frame
Randomization to 72 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Weight
Description
Change in weight from randomization to 72 hours. Secondary Endpoint
Time Frame
randomization to 72 hours
Title
Worst Reported Symptom Changes-RED-ROSE
Description
To determine whether changes in worst reported symptom (WRS) (dyspnea, body swelling or fatigue) VAS (WRS-VAS) are related to the response to decongestive therapy as assessed by change in WRS VAS. WRS range -100 to + 100 Higher number is better (improved)
Time Frame
Change from Baseline to 72 hours
Title
Change in Clinical Stability- RED-ROSE
Description
Change in clinical stability as assessed by 60 day death, re-hospitalization or unscheduled outpatient visit
Time Frame
Baseline to 60 days
Title
Change in Serum Creatinine
Time Frame
randomization to 72 hours
Title
Dyspnea Visual Analog Scale Area Under the Curve
Description
Range 0 to 7200 Higher is better
Time Frame
randomization to 72 hours
Title
Change in Heart Failure Status
Description
Persistent or worsening heart failure defined as need for rescue therapy.
Time Frame
randomization to 72 hours
Title
Change in Treatment Response
Description
Treatment failure including any of the following: development of cardio-renal syndrome worsening/persistent heart failure significant hypotension requiring discontinuation of study drug significant tachycardia requiring discontinuation of study drug death
Time Frame
randomization to 72 hours
Title
Cumulative Urinary Sodium Excretion
Time Frame
Randomization to 72 hours
Title
Change in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)/ Serum Cystatin C Ratio
Description
BUN measured in mg/dL Cystatin C measured in mg/L No units were used in calculated the ratio
Time Frame
Randomization to 72 hours
Title
Development of Cardio-renal Syndrome
Time Frame
Randomization to 72 hours
Title
Global Visual Analog Scale Area Under the Curve
Description
Range 0 to 7200 Higher is better/improved
Time Frame
Randomization to 72 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: A diagnosis of heart failure as defined by the presence of at least 1 symptom (dyspnea, orthopnea, or edema) AND 1 sign (rales on auscultation, peripheral edema, ascites, pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiography) Prior clinical diagnosis of heart failure Must be identified within 24 hours of hospital admission (24 hour clock begins when the admission orders are placed) Estimated GFR of > 15 but < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 determined by the MDRD equation Male or female patient ≥18 years old Willingness to provide informed consent Ability to have a PICC or central line placed (if needed) within 12 hours of randomization and study drug infusion started Anticipated hospitalization of at least 72 hours Exclusion Criteria: Received IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration therapy for heart failure since initial presentation Anticipated need for IV vasoactive treatment or ultra-filtration for heart failure during this hospitalization Systolic BP <90 mmHg Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 9 g/dl Renal replacement therapy History of renal artery stenosis > 50% Hemodynamically significant arrhythmias including ventricular tachycardia or defibrillator shock within 4 weeks Acute coronary syndrome within 4 weeks as defined by electrocardiographic (ECG) ST-segment depression or prominent T-wave inversion and/or positive biomarkers of necrosis (e.g., troponin) in the absence of ST-segment elevation and in an appropriate clinical setting (chest discomfort or anginal equivalent) Active myocarditis Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Greater than moderate stenotic valvular disease Restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy Complex congenital heart disease Constrictive pericarditis Non-cardiac pulmonary edema Clinical evidence of digoxin toxicity Need for mechanical hemodynamic support Sepsis Terminal illness (other than HF) with expected survival of less than 1 year Previous adverse reaction to the study drugs Use of IV iodinated radiocontrast material in last 72 hours or planned during hospitalization Enrollment or planned enrollment in another randomized clinical trial during this hospitalization Inability to comply with planned study procedures Pregnancy or nursing mothers
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kerry L Lee, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eugene Braunwald, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Harvard University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minnesota Heart Failure Network
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55415
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
City
Murry
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Vermont- Fletcher Allen Health Care
City
Burlington
State/Province
Vermont
ZIP/Postal Code
05401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montreal Heart Institute
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T- 1C8
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24247300
Citation
Chen HH, Anstrom KJ, Givertz MM, Stevenson LW, Semigran MJ, Goldsmith SR, Bart BA, Bull DA, Stehlik J, LeWinter MM, Konstam MA, Huggins GS, Rouleau JL, O'Meara E, Tang WH, Starling RC, Butler J, Deswal A, Felker GM, O'Connor CM, Bonita RE, Margulies KB, Cappola TP, Ofili EO, Mann DL, Davila-Roman VG, McNulty SE, Borlaug BA, Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Shah MR, Hernandez AF, Braunwald E, Redfield MM; NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Low-dose dopamine or low-dose nesiritide in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction: the ROSE acute heart failure randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2533-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282190.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32473378
Citation
Adel FW, Rikhi A, Wan SH, Iyer SR, Chakraborty H, McNulty S, Tang WHW, Felker GM, Givertz MM, Chen HH. Annexin A1 is a Potential Novel Biomarker of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure. J Card Fail. 2020 Aug;26(8):727-732. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 May 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27514750
Citation
Kelly JP, Cooper LB, Gallup D, Anstrom KJ, Chen HH, Redfield MM, O'Connor CM, Mentz RJ, Hernanadez AF, Felker GM. Implications of Using Different Definitions on Outcomes in Worsening Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;9(8):e003048. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003048.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27512103
Citation
Wan SH, Stevens SR, Borlaug BA, Anstrom KJ, Deswal A, Felker GM, Givertz MM, Bart BA, Tang WH, Redfield MM, Chen HH. Differential Response to Low-Dose Dopamine or Low-Dose Nesiritide in Acute Heart Failure With Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results From the ROSE AHF Trial (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure). Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;9(8):10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002593 e002593. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002593.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26927285
Citation
de Denus S, Rouleau JL, Mann DL, Huggins GS, Cappola TP, Shah SH, Keleti J, Zada YF, Provost S, Bardhadi A, Phillips MS, Normand V, Mongrain I, Dube MP. A pharmacogenetic investigation of intravenous furosemide in decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of three clinical trials. Pharmacogenomics J. 2017 Mar;17(2):192-200. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2016.4. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24046475
Citation
Chen HH, AbouEzzeddine OF, Anstrom KJ, Givertz MM, Bart BA, Felker GM, Hernandez AF, Lee KL, Braunwald E, Redfield MM; Heart Failure Clinical Research Network. Targeting the kidney in acute heart failure: can old drugs provide new benefit? Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF) trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):1087-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000347. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure and Reliable Evaluation of Dyspnea in the Heart Failure Network (ROSE) Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs