Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Therapy for Apathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Primary Purpose
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rTMS
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis focused on measuring Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, rTMS, apathy, depression
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of definite or probable ALS according to el Escorial criteria (Brooks et al. 2000)
- Moderate or severe depression defined as the score in Beck's Depression Inventory ≥20
- Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥26
Exclusion Criteria:
- Psychiatric symptoms, which may negatively influence patient's tolerance and adherence to therapy
- Respiratory insufficiency and other complications od advanced stages of ALS, which may compromise patient's ability to undergo the study procedure
- Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes
Sites / Locations
- Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Active rTMS
Sham rTMS
Arm Description
10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Therapy will include 10 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 3000 magnetic pulses of 120% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.
Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version after rTMS, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome
Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version first follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome
Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version second follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome
Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS
Secondary Outcome Measures
Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised after rTMS, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome
Change from baseline score in Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.
Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised first follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome
Change from baseline score in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised second follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome
Change from baseline score in Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS
Beck's Depression Inventory ater rTMS, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome
Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.
Beck's Depression Inventory first follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome
Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Beck's Depression Inventory second follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome
Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03892382
First Posted
March 26, 2019
Last Updated
February 6, 2020
Sponsor
Jagiellonian University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03892382
Brief Title
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Therapy for Apathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Official Title
A Pilot Study of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improvement of Apathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Participants were not able to stay near our center for two weeks
Study Start Date
November 15, 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jagiellonian University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, affecting up to 30% of patients and affecting negatively the survival. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation.
Detailed Description
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, which negatively influences quality of life (caga et al. 2018) and is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival (Caga et al. 2016). Similarly, the depression is also a frequent complication of ALS. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions like mild cognitive impairment (Padala et al. 2018), stroke (Sasaki et al. 2017), Alzheimer disease (Nguyen et al. 2017) and schizophrenia (Prikryl et al. 2013). The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation and - as a secondary outcome - depression in patients with ALS.
Intervention will include ten daily sessions of rTMS. In each session 3000 magnetic pulses will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Stimulation intensity will equal 120% of the motor threshold value for the right first dorsal interosseus.
Assessment of apathy and of depression and daily functioning will be made before and after therapy, as well as two and four weeks later.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Keywords
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, rTMS, apathy, depression
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomly assigned to real or placebo (sham) stimulation.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Active rTMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Therapy will include 10 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 3000 magnetic pulses of 120% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.
Arm Title
Sham rTMS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
rTMS
Intervention Description
High frequency rTMS to induce the long term potentiation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version after rTMS, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS
Title
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version first follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version second follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised after rTMS, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS
Title
Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised first follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised second follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Beck's Depression Inventory ater rTMS, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS
Title
Beck's Depression Inventory first follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS
Title
Beck's Depression Inventory second follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome
Description
Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of definite or probable ALS according to el Escorial criteria (Brooks et al. 2000)
Moderate or severe depression defined as the score in Beck's Depression Inventory ≥20
Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥26
Exclusion Criteria:
Psychiatric symptoms, which may negatively influence patient's tolerance and adherence to therapy
Respiratory insufficiency and other complications od advanced stages of ALS, which may compromise patient's ability to undergo the study procedure
Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakub M Antczak, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
31503
Country
Poland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After completing the study, the details of neurophysiologic diagnostics including motor threshold, the age and gender as well as individual scores of Mini-Mental State Examination, AES-C, Beck's Depression Inventory and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised will be made available to other researchers on request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will become available after the study is published.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
On request send by e-mail: jantczak@cm-uj.krakow.pl
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11464847
Citation
Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL; World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000 Dec;1(5):293-9. doi: 10.1080/146608200300079536. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29189922
Citation
Caga J, Hsieh S, Highton-Williamson E, Zoing MC, Ramsey E, Devenney E, Ahmed RM, Kiernan MC. Apathy and its impact on patient outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol. 2018 Jan;265(1):187-193. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8688-4. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26822417
Citation
Caga J, Turner MR, Hsieh S, Ahmed RM, Devenney E, Ramsey E, Zoing MC, Mioshi E, Kiernan MC. Apathy is associated with poor prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2016 May;23(5):891-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12959. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25034472
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28161090
Citation
Nguyen JP, Suarez A, Kemoun G, Meignier M, Le Saout E, Damier P, Nizard J, Lefaucheur JP. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurophysiol Clin. 2017 Feb;47(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29331848
Citation
Padala PR, Padala KP, Lensing SY, Jackson AN, Hunter CR, Parkes CM, Dennis RA, Bopp MM, Caceda R, Mennemeier MS, Roberson PK, Sullivan DH. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for apathy in mild cognitive impairment: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.063. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23810122
Citation
Prikryl R, Ustohal L, Prikrylova Kucerova H, Kasparek T, Venclikova S, Vrzalova M, Ceskova E. A detailed analysis of the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind trial. Schizophr Res. 2013 Sep;149(1-3):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19833552
Citation
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28578330
Citation
Sasaki N, Hara T, Yamada N, Niimi M, Kakuda W, Abo M. The Efficacy of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Apathy in Chronic Stroke Patients. Eur Neurol. 2017;78(1-2):28-32. doi: 10.1159/000477440. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Therapy for Apathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs