search
Back to results

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia

Primary Purpose

Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rTMS + Neuronavigation
Sponsored by
Izmir Katip Celebi University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Fibromyalgia focused on measuring Fibromyalgia, neuronavigated-rTMS, pain, stiffness, fatigue

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults (age between 18-65 years)
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to 2016 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria
  • The mean pain intensity is VAS ≥ 4/10
  • Stable treatment for at least last 3 months
  • Patients accepting participation by signing an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To have a clinical condition to be contraindicated for TMS (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, lactation, epilepsy, head trauma, history of cranial operation...)
  • The presence of malignancy
  • Systemic rheumatic diseases
  • Major orthopedic / neurological problems that limit daily life activities
  • Alcohol or drug addiction
  • Major depression / personality disorder history
  • Have received TMS treatment before
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Sites / Locations

  • Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active rTMS

Sham rTMS

Arm Description

Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).

Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale-Pain
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale-Pain
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

Full Information

First Posted
March 17, 2019
Last Updated
June 3, 2020
Sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03909009
Brief Title
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia
Official Title
Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Pain, Fatigue, Quality of Life, Cognitive Function and Mood in Fibromyalgia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 11, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 10, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 10 Hz neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on pain, stiffness, fatigue, depression/anxiety, quality of life and cognitive functions in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
Detailed Description
This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study in two-arm parallel-group design. Twenty participants will be randomized into 2 groups. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with 1:1 allocation between the active rTMS group (Group 1) and the sham-control group (Group 2). Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS)-A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). Group 2 will receive sham stimulation-A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).All patients will be evaluated with pain severity (VAS-10mm),stiffness severity (VAS-10mm), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Depression Anxiety Scale (HADS), Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-revised version (ACE-R).Patients will be questioned for the safety of treatment. Available drug therapies will be continued in both groups. Patients and clinical raters will be blinded to treatment. All patients will be reviewed by the investigator in terms of rTMS treatment safety and motor threshold determination before each treatment session and observed for possible side effects after treatment. All side effects will be recorded. Magnetic stimulation will be applied using Neurosoft-Neuro MS/D with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. rTMS therapy will be applied under the guide of neuronavigation with the following parameters: target-left DLPFC, with the %90 of the RMT, 10 Hz stimulation for 5 seconds intervals (on) with 25 seconds inter-train intervals (off), 15 minutes, 1500 pulses.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Fibromyalgia
Keywords
Fibromyalgia, neuronavigated-rTMS, pain, stiffness, fatigue

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active rTMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
Arm Title
Sham rTMS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
rTMS + Neuronavigation
Intervention Description
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
Description
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
in the second week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
Description
The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
in the sixth week
Title
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Description
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
Time Frame
in the sixth week
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness
Description
The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
in the second week
Title
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Description
Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.
Time Frame
in the second week
Title
Fatigue Severity Scale
Description
Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7)
Time Frame
in the sixth week
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Description
Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.
Time Frame
in the sixth week
Title
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised
Description
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.
Time Frame
in the sixth week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults (age between 18-65 years) Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to 2016 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria The mean pain intensity is VAS ≥ 4/10 Stable treatment for at least last 3 months Patients accepting participation by signing an informed consent form Exclusion Criteria: To have a clinical condition to be contraindicated for TMS (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, lactation, epilepsy, head trauma, history of cranial operation...) The presence of malignancy Systemic rheumatic diseases Major orthopedic / neurological problems that limit daily life activities Alcohol or drug addiction Major depression / personality disorder history Have received TMS treatment before Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ayhan Aşkın, Assoc. Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
City
İzmir
ZIP/Postal Code
35290
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25797650
Citation
Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25919472
Citation
Klein MM, Treister R, Raij T, Pascual-Leone A, Park L, Nurmikko T, Lenz F, Lefaucheur JP, Lang M, Hallett M, Fox M, Cudkowicz M, Costello A, Carr DB, Ayache SS, Oaklander AL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research. Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1601-1614. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000210.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25581213
Citation
Knijnik LM, Dussan-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Caumo W. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/papr.12276. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27150193
Citation
Hou WH, Wang TY, Kang JH. The effects of add-on non-invasive brain stimulation in fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Aug;55(8):1507-17. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew205. Epub 2016 May 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25034472
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27977465
Citation
Saltychev M, Laimi K. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Mar;40(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000207.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31901449
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Erratum In: Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1168-1169.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23079535
Citation
Baudic S, Attal N, Mhalla A, Ciampi de Andrade D, Perrot S, Bouhassira D. Unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex does not affect cognition in patients with fibromyalgia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Tekin A, Özdil E, Güleken MD, İlişer R, Bakım B, Öncü J, et al. Efficacy of HighFrequency [10 Hz] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the PrimaryMotor Cortex in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized, DoubleBlind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2014;22(1):20-26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19833552
Citation
Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32701637
Citation
Bilir I, Askin A, Sengul I, Tosun A. Effects of High-Frequency Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2):138-146. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001536.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs