search
Back to results

REPRISE China - Clinical Evaluation in China

Primary Purpose

Stenoses, Aortic Valve

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lotus Edge™ Valve System
Sponsored by
Boston Scientific Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stenoses, Aortic Valve focused on measuring High risk for surgical valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 70 years.
  • Subject has documented calcific, severe native aortic stenosis with an initial AVA of <1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of <0.6 cm2/m2), and a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg or jet velocity ≥4.0 m/s or doppler velocity index ≤0.25, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics.
  • Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]).
  • Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II.
  • There is agreement by the heart team (which must include a site investigator interventionalist and a site investigator cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high operative risk for surgical valve replacement (see note below for definition of high risk, the required level of surgical assessment, and CRC confirmation) and that TAVR is appropriate. Additionally, subject has at least one of the following.

    • Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥ 8% -OR-
    • If STS < 8%, subject has at least one of the following conditions:

      • Hostile chest
      • Porcelain aorta
      • Severe pulmonary hypertension (> 60 mmHg)
      • Prior chest radiation therapy
      • Coronary artery bypass graft(s) at risk with re-operation
      • Severe lung disease (need for supplemental oxygen, FEV1 < 50% of predicted, DLCO < 60%, or other evidence of severe pulmonary dysfunction)
      • Neuromuscular disease that creates risk for mechanical ventilation or rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement
      • Orthopedic disease that creates risk for rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement
      • Childs Class A or B liver disease (subjects with Childs Class C disease are not eligible for inclusion in this trial)
      • Frailty as indicated by at least one of the following: 5-meter walk > 6 seconds, Katz ADL score of 3/6 or less, body mass index < 21, wheelchair bound, unable to live independently
      • Age ≥ 90 years
      • Other evidence that subject is at high risk for surgical valve replacement (CRC must confirm agreement with site heart team that subject meets high risk definition)
  • Heart team (which must include a cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement.
  • Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent
  • Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a congenital unicuspid aortic valve or Sievers Type 2 bicuspid aortic valve.
  • Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin elevation).
  • Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  • Subject has end-stage renal disease or has serum creatinine > 3mg/dl or has creatinine clearance rate <45ml/min.
  • Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
  • Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.
  • Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  • Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
  • Subject has platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3 (50×109/L) or > 700,000 cells/mm3 (700×109/L), or white blood cell count < 1,000 cells/mm3 (1×109/L).
  • Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel.
  • Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions
  • Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin, nickel, tantalum, titanium, or polyurethanes
  • Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment
  • Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  • Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty or pacemaker implantation, which is allowed)
  • Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization
  • Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction < 20%
  • Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices
  • Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease)
  • Subject has thick (> 5 mm) protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch
  • Subject has an enlarged ascending aorta with the diameter > 50mm
  • Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the study device delivery system as defined in the device Instructions For Use
  • Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.)
  • Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint
  • Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation
  • Subject has severe incapacitating dementia

Sites / Locations

  • Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Lotus Edge™ Valve System

Arm Description

The Lotus Edge™ Valve System is intended to improve the aortic valve function for symptomatic patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis (aortic valve area [AVA] of <1.0 cm2 or index of <0.6 cm2/m2) who are at high risk for standard surgical valve replacement.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality through 30 days post index procedure.
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient at 30 days post index procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
October 19, 2016
Last Updated
December 29, 2020
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Collaborators
Quintiles, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03084510
Brief Title
REPRISE China - Clinical Evaluation in China
Official Title
REPRISE China: REpositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of Lotus Edge™ Valve System - Clinical Evaluation in China
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
study device was recalled.
Study Start Date
February 28, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Collaborators
Quintiles, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Lotus Edge™ Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic Chinese patients with calcific, severe native aortic stenosis who are considered at high risk for surgical valve replacement.
Detailed Description
A independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) will adjudge the safety endpoint. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]). Monitor will review the source data regularly to compare the EDC to ensure the data entry can be accuracy, completeness, or representativeness. Will recruit maximum 62 subjects in maximum 6 sites Boston Scientific's Standard Operating Procedures to address operations and analysis activities, such as patient recruitment, data collection, data management, data analysis, reporting for adverse events, and change management.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stenoses, Aortic Valve
Keywords
High risk for surgical valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve replacement

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lotus Edge™ Valve System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Lotus Edge™ Valve System is intended to improve the aortic valve function for symptomatic patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis (aortic valve area [AVA] of <1.0 cm2 or index of <0.6 cm2/m2) who are at high risk for standard surgical valve replacement.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Lotus Edge™ Valve System
Intervention Description
• The Lotus Edge™ Valve System consisting of two main components: a bioprosthetic bovine pericardial aortic valve, and a delivery system Device sizes include 23 mm, 25 mm and 27 mm diameter.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
All-cause mortality
Description
All-cause mortality through 30 days post index procedure.
Time Frame
Through 30 days post index procedure
Title
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient
Description
Mean aortic valve pressure gradient at 30 days post index procedure.
Time Frame
At 30 days post index procedure
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Safety endpoints adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)
Description
Mortality: all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular Stroke: disabling and non-disabling Myocardial infarction (MI): periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure) Bleeding: life-threatening (or disabling) and major Acute kidney injury (≤7 days post index procedure): based on the AKIN System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2 Major vascular complication Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy) Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV)
Time Frame
peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 , 12, 24, 36, 48 & 60 months post index procedure
Title
Device Performance
Description
Successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the study valve, and successful retrieval of the delivery system Successful retrieval of the study valve if retrieval is attempted Successful repositioning of the study valve if repositioning is attempted Grade of aortic valve regurgitation: paravalvular, central, and combined
Time Frame
peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 , 12, 24, 36, 48 & 60 months post index procedure
Title
Procedural success
Description
device and/or procedure related serious adverse events (SAEs) and death, correct positioning of a single transcatheter valve into the proper anatomical location, intended performance of the study device (effective orifice area [EOA] >0.9 cm2 for BSA <1.6 m2 and EOA >1.1 cm2 for BSA ≥1.6 m2 plus either a mean aortic valve gradient <20 mm Hg or a peak velocity <3m/sec, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Time Frame
peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 , 12, 24, 36, 48 & 60 months post index procedure
Title
prosthetic aortic valve performance as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)
Description
assessed by an independent core laboratory, including effective orifice area, mean and peak aortic gradients, peak aortic velocity, and grade of aortic regurgitation
Time Frame
peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 , 12, 24, 36, 48 & 60 months post index procedure
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA)
Description
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification
Time Frame
peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 , 12, 24, 36, 48 & 60 months post index procedure
Title
Paravalvular aortic regurgitation
Description
Moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation (based on core lab assessment) at 30 days and 12 months
Time Frame
At 30 days and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 70 years. Subject has documented calcific, severe native aortic stenosis with an initial AVA of <1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of <0.6 cm2/m2), and a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mm Hg or jet velocity ≥4.0 m/s or doppler velocity index ≤0.25, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]). Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with NYHA Functional Class ≥ II. There is agreement by the heart team (which must include a site investigator interventionalist and a site investigator cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high operative risk for surgical valve replacement (see note below for definition of high risk, the required level of surgical assessment, and CRC confirmation) and that TAVR is appropriate. Additionally, subject has at least one of the following. Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥ 8% -OR- If STS < 8%, subject has at least one of the following conditions: Hostile chest Porcelain aorta Severe pulmonary hypertension (> 60 mmHg) Prior chest radiation therapy Coronary artery bypass graft(s) at risk with re-operation Severe lung disease (need for supplemental oxygen, FEV1 < 50% of predicted, DLCO < 60%, or other evidence of severe pulmonary dysfunction) Neuromuscular disease that creates risk for mechanical ventilation or rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement Orthopedic disease that creates risk for rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement Childs Class A or B liver disease (subjects with Childs Class C disease are not eligible for inclusion in this trial) Frailty as indicated by at least one of the following: 5-meter walk > 6 seconds, Katz ADL score of 3/6 or less, body mass index < 21, wheelchair bound, unable to live independently Age ≥ 90 years Other evidence that subject is at high risk for surgical valve replacement (CRC must confirm agreement with site heart team that subject meets high risk definition) Heart team (which must include a cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits. Exclusion Criteria: Subject has a congenital unicuspid aortic valve or Sievers Type 2 bicuspid aortic valve. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin elevation). Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment. Subject has end-stage renal disease or has serum creatinine > 3mg/dl or has creatinine clearance rate <45ml/min. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention. Subject has platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm3 (50×109/L) or > 700,000 cells/mm3 (700×109/L), or white blood cell count < 1,000 cells/mm3 (1×109/L). Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin, nickel, tantalum, titanium, or polyurethanes Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty or pacemaker implantation, which is allowed) Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction < 20% Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease) Subject has thick (> 5 mm) protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch Subject has an enlarged ascending aorta with the diameter > 50mm Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the study device delivery system as defined in the device Instructions For Use Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.) Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation Subject has severe incapacitating dementia
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhiyu Zeng, Doctor
Organizational Affiliation
BSC
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital
City
Beijing
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17259184
Citation
Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Butchart E, Dion R, Filippatos G, Flachskampf F, Hall R, Iung B, Kasprzak J, Nataf P, Tornos P, Torracca L, Wenink A; Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(2):230-68. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl428. Epub 2007 Jan 26. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19049731
Citation
Thourani VH, Myung R, Kilgo P, Thompson K, Puskas JD, Lattouf OM, Cooper WA, Vega JD, Chen EP, Guyton RA. Long-term outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a modern perspective. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Nov;86(5):1458-64; discussion 1464-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.036.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24240935
Citation
Barreto-Filho JA, Wang Y, Dodson JA, Desai MM, Sugeng L, Geirsson A, Krumholz HM. Trends in aortic valve replacement for elderly patients in the United States, 1999-2011. JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2078-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282437.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16141261
Citation
Iung B, Cachier A, Baron G, Messika-Zeitoun D, Delahaye F, Tornos P, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery? Eur Heart J. 2005 Dec;26(24):2714-20. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi471. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17126120
Citation
Varadarajan P, Kapoor N, Bansal RC, Pai RG. Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Dec;82(6):2111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.07.048.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20961243
Citation
Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, Tuzcu EM, Webb JG, Fontana GP, Makkar RR, Brown DL, Block PC, Guyton RA, Pichard AD, Bavaria JE, Herrmann HC, Douglas PS, Petersen JL, Akin JJ, Anderson WN, Wang D, Pocock S; PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 21;363(17):1597-607. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1008232. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20837923
Citation
Ben-Dor I, Pichard AD, Gonzalez MA, Weissman G, Li Y, Goldstein SA, Okubagzi P, Syed AI, Maluenda G, Collins SD, Delhaye C, Wakabayashi K, Gaglia MA Jr, Torguson R, Xue Z, Satler LF, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Lindsay J, Waksman R. Correlates and causes of death in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are not eligible to participate in a clinical trial of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S37-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.926873.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17389271
Citation
Hara H, Pedersen WR, Ladich E, Mooney M, Virmani R, Nakamura M, Feldman T, Schwartz RS. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty revisited: time for a renaissance? Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):e334-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.657098. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19049730
Citation
Dewey TM, Brown DL, Das TS, Ryan WH, Fowler JE, Hoffman SD, Prince SL, Herbert MA, Culica D, Mack MJ. High-risk patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: management and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Nov;86(5):1450-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.043.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20414120
Citation
Saia F, Marrozzini C, Dall'Ara G, Russo V, Martin-Suarez S, Savini C, Ortolani P, Palmerini T, Taglieri N, Bordoni B, Pilato E, Di Bartolomeo R, Branzi A, Marzocchi A. How many patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis excluded for cardiac surgery are eligible for transcatheter heart valve implantation? J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Oct;11(10):727-32. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328338940f.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21087744
Citation
Thomas M. The global experience with percutaneous aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov;3(11):1103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22995089
Citation
Bourantas CV, Farooq V, Onuma Y, Piazza N, Van Mieghem NM, Serruys PW. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: new developments and upcoming clinical trials. EuroIntervention. 2012 Sep;8(5):617-27. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I5A94.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8459080
Citation
Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1220-5. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90249-z.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16980116
Citation
Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006 Sep 16;368(9540):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21160056
Citation
Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Adams RJ, Berry JD, Brown TM, Carnethon MR, Dai S, de Simone G, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Greenlund KJ, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Ho PM, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, McDermott MM, Meigs JB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Rosamond WD, Sorlie PD, Stafford RS, Turan TN, Turner MB, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011 Feb 1;123(4):e18-e209. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182009701. Epub 2010 Dec 15. Erratum In: Circulation. 2011 Feb 15;123(6):e240. Circulation. 2011 Oct 18;124(16):e426.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12831818
Citation
Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, Delahaye F, Gohlke-Barwolf C, Levang OW, Tornos P, Vanoverschelde JL, Vermeer F, Boersma E, Ravaud P, Vahanian A. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(13):1231-43. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19154908
Citation
Brown JM, O'Brien SM, Wu C, Sikora JA, Griffith BP, Gammie JS. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jan;137(1):82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.015.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19185629
Citation
Chiam PT, Ruiz CE. Percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution of the technology. Am Heart J. 2009 Feb;157(2):229-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.10.003.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16880336
Citation
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176857. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2007 Apr 17;115(15):e409. Circulation. 2010 Jun 15;121(23):e443.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22300974
Citation
Holmes DR Jr, Mack MJ, Kaul S, Agnihotri A, Alexander KP, Bailey SR, Calhoon JH, Carabello BA, Desai MY, Edwards FH, Francis GS, Gardner TJ, Kappetein AP, Linderbaum JA, Mukherjee C, Mukherjee D, Otto CM, Ruiz CE, Sacco RL, Smith D, Thomas JD. 2012 ACCF/AATS/SCAI/STS expert consensus document on transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Mar 27;59(13):1200-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.001. Epub 2012 Jan 31. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

REPRISE China - Clinical Evaluation in China

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs