search
Back to results

RES Prepared With RECELL® Compared to Conventional Care for Healing of Donor Sites in Ages 1-16 Years

Primary Purpose

Skin; Deformity

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device
Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings
Sponsored by
Avita Medical
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Skin; Deformity focused on measuring Pediatric, Complex Skin Deformities

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 16 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients aged 1 through 16 years (inclusive) with a skin defect for which autografting is indicated.
  2. The area of total injury or planned defect (excluding donor sites) is 5% to 25% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA), inclusive.
  3. Two discrete donor sites of similar size (± 25%) can be created in a similar non-articulating location (excluding the scalp) with each donor site representing a minimum of 1% TBSA.
  4. The patient and family member/parent/guardian are able to complete all follow-up evaluations required by the study protocol.
  5. In the opinion of the Investigator, the patient and/or parent/guardian must be able to:

    1. Understand the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and adverse events, and
    2. Provide informed consent/assent as appropriate for study participation.
  6. The patient and/or parent/guardian agrees to abstain from any other treatment of the wound(s) for the duration of the study unless medically necessary and comply with all compulsory study procedures.
  7. The patient and/or parent/guardian agrees to abstain from enrollment in any other interventional clinical trial for the duration of the study.
  8. The patient and/or parent/guardian can read and understand instructions and give informed, voluntary, written consent.
  9. Life expectancy greater than 52 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior autograft harvest at planned study donor sites.
  2. Patients with sepsis or hemodynamic instability.
  3. The patient has an infection under active management or other dermatologic condition at the planned donor sites or treatment areas.
  4. Patient (of reasonable age) or parent/guardian is unable to follow the protocol requirements.
  5. The patient has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives.
  6. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to trypsin or compound sodium lactate for irrigation.
  7. In post-pubescent girls, pregnant or breast-feeding (pregnancy test should be performed in accordance with local institutional requirements).
  8. Enrollment in a concurrent study in which the study treatment may confound the endpoints of this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Arizona Burn Center at Maricopa Intergrated Health Systems
  • Shriners Hospital for Children, Northern California
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
  • Shriners Hospital for Children, Boston
  • Akron Children's Hospital
  • University of Washington Regional Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device

Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings

Arm Description

RECELL + Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings

Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to Complete Closure
The primary effectiveness endpoint is time, in days, to complete closure (≥95% epithelialization by blinded assessor) of study donor sites confirmed at two consecutive visits.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Donor Site Treatment Preference (Site A or Site B) Reported by Subject
Subject will be asked which donor site (A or B) they prefer (if subject is less than 8 years of age parents will be asked)
Donor Site Treatment Preference (Site A or Site B) Reported by Physician
Physician will be asked which donor site (A or B) they prefer
Comparative Itching of Study Donor Sites Performed by Asking the Child Which Donor Site (A or B) Was Itchier After Treatment
Comparative Itching of study donor sites during 1st week post treatment by asking which site was itchier after treatment
Comparative Pain of Study Donor Sites Performed by Asking the Child Which Donor Site (A or B) Was More Painful Since Treatment
Comparative pain of study donor sites during 1st week post treatment by asking the child which site was more painful since treatment
Blinded Evaluator Overall Opinion Score (1-10) Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Blinded Evaluator Overall Opinion POSAS Score of study donor sites. The Overall Opinion Score uses a 10-point scale where 10 corresponds to the worst imaginable scar.
Patient Overall Opinion Score (1-10) Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Patient Overall Opinion POSAS Score of study donor sites(reported by subject 8 years of age or older, or by parent/guardian if subject less than 8 years of age). The Overall Opinion Score uses a 10-point scale where 10 corresponds to the worst imaginable scar.

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2018
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Sponsor
Avita Medical
Collaborators
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03624192
Brief Title
RES Prepared With RECELL® Compared to Conventional Care for Healing of Donor Sites in Ages 1-16 Years
Official Title
A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of RES (Regenerative Epidermal Suspension) Prepared With the RECELL® Device Compared to Conventional Care for Healing of Donor Sites in Infants, Children and Adolescents (Aged 1-16 Years)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Study closed in response to COVID-19 and overall program objectives.
Study Start Date
September 19, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 13, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 13, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Avita Medical
Collaborators
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To evaluate whether the time to complete closure is superior for RECELL-treated split-thickness donor sites, compared with Control (standardized dressings only). The mean time for donor site healing will be compared between treatments.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Skin; Deformity
Keywords
Pediatric, Complex Skin Deformities

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Each subject serves as their own control.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
3 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
RECELL + Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings
Arm Title
Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device
Other Intervention Name(s)
RES (Regenerative Epidermal Suspension)
Intervention Description
Application of RES prepared using the RECELL® Autologous Cell Harvesting Device along with Telfa™ Clear primary and Xeroform™ secondary wound dressings
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings
Other Intervention Name(s)
Control
Intervention Description
Telfa™ Clear and Xeroform™ dressings
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Complete Closure
Description
The primary effectiveness endpoint is time, in days, to complete closure (≥95% epithelialization by blinded assessor) of study donor sites confirmed at two consecutive visits.
Time Frame
up to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Donor Site Treatment Preference (Site A or Site B) Reported by Subject
Description
Subject will be asked which donor site (A or B) they prefer (if subject is less than 8 years of age parents will be asked)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Donor Site Treatment Preference (Site A or Site B) Reported by Physician
Description
Physician will be asked which donor site (A or B) they prefer
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Comparative Itching of Study Donor Sites Performed by Asking the Child Which Donor Site (A or B) Was Itchier After Treatment
Description
Comparative Itching of study donor sites during 1st week post treatment by asking which site was itchier after treatment
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Comparative Pain of Study Donor Sites Performed by Asking the Child Which Donor Site (A or B) Was More Painful Since Treatment
Description
Comparative pain of study donor sites during 1st week post treatment by asking the child which site was more painful since treatment
Time Frame
Day 7 or 8
Title
Blinded Evaluator Overall Opinion Score (1-10) Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Description
Blinded Evaluator Overall Opinion POSAS Score of study donor sites. The Overall Opinion Score uses a 10-point scale where 10 corresponds to the worst imaginable scar.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Patient Overall Opinion Score (1-10) Using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)
Description
Patient Overall Opinion POSAS Score of study donor sites(reported by subject 8 years of age or older, or by parent/guardian if subject less than 8 years of age). The Overall Opinion Score uses a 10-point scale where 10 corresponds to the worst imaginable scar.
Time Frame
Week 24
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Investigator's (Unblinded) Assessment of Healing at All RECELL-treated Areas by Direct Observation
Description
Investigator's (unblinded) assessment of healing at all RECELL-treated areas including study donor sites by direct observation
Time Frame
Through Week 52
Title
Mean Subject Reported Pain Score Before and After Dressing Changes
Description
Mean subject (or parent/guardian) reported study donor site pain prior to and after dressing changes. Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) or Numeric Rated Pain Scale will be used based on the child's age. Both scales use a 10-point scale where 10 is the worst pain imaginable or very much pain.
Time Frame
Up to Week 4
Title
Mean Subject Reported Study Donor Site Itching Score Prior to Dressing Changes
Description
Mean subject (or parent/guardian) reported study donor site itching score prior to dressing changes using the Itch Man Scale (0-4) where 4 represents itching most terribly
Time Frame
Up to Week 4
Title
Health Care Provider's Mean Pain Score Associated With Dressing Changes at Study Donor Sites
Description
Mean pain score associated with dressing changes at study donor sites assessed by the health care provider performing the dressing change using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale. The scale is scored in a range of 0-10 with 0 representing no pain.
Time Frame
Up to Week 4
Title
Blinding Effectiveness by Asking the Blinded Evaluator Which Treatment They Think the Donor Sites (A and B) Received
Description
Blinding effectiveness by asking the Blinded Evaluator which treatment they think the donor sites (A and B) received
Time Frame
Week 4 and 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female patients aged 1 through 16 years (inclusive) with a skin defect for which autografting is indicated. The area of total injury or planned defect (excluding donor sites) is 5% to 25% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA), inclusive. Two discrete donor sites of similar size (± 25%) can be created in a similar non-articulating location (excluding the scalp) with each donor site representing a minimum of 1% TBSA. The patient and family member/parent/guardian are able to complete all follow-up evaluations required by the study protocol. In the opinion of the Investigator, the patient and/or parent/guardian must be able to: Understand the full nature and purpose of the study, including possible risks and adverse events, and Provide informed consent/assent as appropriate for study participation. The patient and/or parent/guardian agrees to abstain from any other treatment of the wound(s) for the duration of the study unless medically necessary and comply with all compulsory study procedures. The patient and/or parent/guardian agrees to abstain from enrollment in any other interventional clinical trial for the duration of the study. The patient and/or parent/guardian can read and understand instructions and give informed, voluntary, written consent. Life expectancy greater than 52 weeks. Exclusion Criteria: Prior autograft harvest at planned study donor sites. Patients with sepsis or hemodynamic instability. The patient has an infection under active management or other dermatologic condition at the planned donor sites or treatment areas. Patient (of reasonable age) or parent/guardian is unable to follow the protocol requirements. The patient has other concurrent conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator may compromise patient safety or study objectives. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to trypsin or compound sodium lactate for irrigation. In post-pubescent girls, pregnant or breast-feeding (pregnancy test should be performed in accordance with local institutional requirements). Enrollment in a concurrent study in which the study treatment may confound the endpoints of this study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arizona Burn Center at Maricopa Intergrated Health Systems
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85008
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shriners Hospital for Children, Northern California
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California at San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shriners Hospital for Children, Boston
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Akron Children's Hospital
City
Akron
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44308
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Regional Burn Center at Harborview Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

RES Prepared With RECELL® Compared to Conventional Care for Healing of Donor Sites in Ages 1-16 Years

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs