RescueTEE for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest (ReTEECA Trial) (ReTEECA)
Primary Purpose
Echocardiography, Transesophageal, In-hospital Cardiac Arrest, Cardiac Arrest
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tranesophageal Echocardiography
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Echocardiography, Transesophageal focused on measuring Cardiac Arrest, Transesophageal Echocardiography, CPR, Image Guided CPR, Conventional CPR, RescueTEE
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients greater than 18 years of age;
- Intubated or permanent tracheostomy in situ;
- Experiencing extreme hemodynamic instability, cardiac arrest, or respiratory arrest and TTE is difficult or contraindicated
- Rapid response, Code calls, ECMO stat evaluation
- In-patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unsecured airway
- On-going aspiration
- History of tracheoesophageal injury
- History of tracheoesophageal fistula
- Esophagectomy
- Active upper GI bleeding
- Esophageal varices
- Ongoing hemoptysis
- Technically challenging TEE placement due to location of code - Small room, intrusive to the code team, airway trauma
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Experimental
Arm Label
Conventional ACLS
RescueTEE guided ACLS
Arm Description
Patients who have conventional ACLS during in-hospital Cardiac arrest, they will not have RescueTEE
Patients who have RescueTEE guided ACLS
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Survival
Survival to hospital discharge (SHD) - Survival is the most widely accepted endpoint in CPR and CA trials. Our trial is designed to evaluate the effect of imaging and RescueTEE guided ACLS in order to facilitate survival.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of patients surviving to End of ACLS
Count of patients surviving to End of Code
Number of patients surviving to ICU discharge
Count of patients surviving to ICU discharge
Number of patients surviving to 30 days
30 days survival for image guided RescueTEE ACLS versus conventional ACLS
Neurologically Intact Survival at 3 months
Neurologically intact survival based on modified Rankin's Score at 3 month
Neurologically Intact Survival at 6 months
Neurologically intact survival based on modified Rankin's Score at 6 month
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04220619
First Posted
August 27, 2019
Last Updated
August 14, 2023
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04220619
Brief Title
RescueTEE for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest (ReTEECA Trial)
Acronym
ReTEECA
Official Title
Rescue Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Guidance of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest Versus Conventional ACLS
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
January 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
ReTEECA Trial. Rescue TransEsophageal Echocardiography for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
This trial is aimed at studying the utility and interventional outcomes of rescue transesophageal echocardiography (RescueTEE) to aid in diagnosis, change in management, and outcomes during CPR by using a point of care RescueTEE protocol in the evaluation of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). This is an interventional prospective convenience sampled partially blinded phase II clinical trial with primary outcomes of survival to hospital discharge (SHD) with RescueTEE image guided ACLS versus conventional ACLS.
Detailed Description
This is a Phase II, single center, partially blinded, prospective, safety and efficacy pragmatic clinical trial comparing rescue transesophageal image guided ACLS versus conventional ACLS in adult patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). The ReTEECA Trial will use a recently published and validated focused 5-view RescueTEE protocol to evaluate patients with IHCA to obtain diagnostic and therapeutic information to aid in medical decision-making in a rapid fashion for those patients who are experiencing in-hospital arrest.1 Patients will be resuscitated with one of the following protocols:
Conventional ACLS with RescueTEE during IHCA. The TEE probe will be brought to the IHCA code call and placed within 10 minutes of cardiac arrest after a secured airway has been obtained. The RescueTEE team led by a physician (RescueTEE MD) and will use a predefined protocol for diagnosis and if needed intervention at the discretion of the treating physician (Code Team MD). If an intervention is performed this will be done at the discretion of the treating physician as a pragmatic and clinically evidenced intervention. The TEE probe will remain indwelling for 30 minutes or until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) whichever is earlier.
Conventional ACLS without RescueTEE during IHCA. Conventional ACLS will be driven by national American Heart Association (AHA) standardized protocols by the treating physician (Code Team MD) and code team members.
Management of the patient and ACLS will be driven pragmatically and by the local code team (Code Team MD) and not the RescueTEE team. Advice and diagnostic evidence, as able, from the RescueTEE will be provided by the RescueTEE team (RescueTEE MD). Post ROSC care will be at the discretion of the ICU team (ICU MD). The indications for using a validated published RescueTEE protocol is to study the outcome effects of an intervention that is publicly available and apply this in a real-world clinical scenario as a prospective trial.
Based on our preliminary results we hypothesize that routine use of RescueTEE guided ACLS for IHCA will expedite diagnosis, treatment, intervention, and facilitate and identify reversible causes and significantly improve survival to hospital discharge and in turn functional survival compared to standard ACLS.
Given the poor clinical outcomes of IHCA it is imperative to conduct research in this area. RescueTEE provides an avenue to help diagnose and clinically intervene on pathology during the intra-arrest period. This directly impacts the disease process, the patient, and will likely change ACLS management. There are studies that have been conducted retrospectively and prospectively that highlight the benefits of image guidance during ACLS; however, no randomized clinical trial documenting the safety and efficacy of RescueTEE has been conducted. Many institutions and hospital systems are now using RescueTEE during ACLS; however, we do not know the impact that this has had directly on survival and complications. Like many areas in medicine, a prospective clinical trial can help elucidate the direct patient benefits in terms of survival. This will offer future researchers a platform to conduct further studies on image guidance during ACLS. A prospective clinical trial is necessary to transform national guidelines and help guide evidence-based practice throughout the country.
ReTEECA Trial Hypothesis: Based on our preliminary results we hypothesize that routine use of RescueTEE guided ACLS for IHCA will expedite diagnosis, treatment, intervention, and facilitate and identify reversible causes and significantly improve survival to hospital discharge and in turn functional survival compared to standard ACLS.
ReTEECA Trial: We propose a Phase II, single center, partially blinded, intention to treat, safety and efficacy clinical trial to assess the results of routine RescueTEE guided ACLS for IHCA compared with standard ACLS. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care has the patient population, experience, expertise, and infrastructure to execute the proposed study.
Specific Aims: The goal of the study will be to use intra-arrest RescueTEE diagnostic imaging to guide the code leader in clinical management and decision-making and to therefore decrease IHCA mortality rates. Additionally, we will assess if RescueTEE guidance of intra-arrest therapies or interventions can significantly improve functionally favorable outcomes.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Echocardiography, Transesophageal, In-hospital Cardiac Arrest, Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation, ACLS, Image Guided ACLS
Keywords
Cardiac Arrest, Transesophageal Echocardiography, CPR, Image Guided CPR, Conventional CPR, RescueTEE
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Convenience Sampled, Prospective Arm1: Conventional ACLS Arm2: Image Guided RescueTEE ACLS
Masking
Care ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Conventional ACLS and Rescue TEE ALCS patients after codes will be observed for survival. Care teams will be blinded to the methodology of ACLS.
A post-hoc analysis will also be performed for independent ECHO reads.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
250 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Conventional ACLS
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients who have conventional ACLS during in-hospital Cardiac arrest, they will not have RescueTEE
Arm Title
RescueTEE guided ACLS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who have RescueTEE guided ACLS
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Tranesophageal Echocardiography
Intervention Description
RescueTEE during ACLS versus Conventional ACLS
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survival
Description
Survival to hospital discharge (SHD) - Survival is the most widely accepted endpoint in CPR and CA trials. Our trial is designed to evaluate the effect of imaging and RescueTEE guided ACLS in order to facilitate survival.
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients surviving to End of ACLS
Description
Count of patients surviving to End of Code
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
Number of patients surviving to ICU discharge
Description
Count of patients surviving to ICU discharge
Time Frame
Variable
Title
Number of patients surviving to 30 days
Description
30 days survival for image guided RescueTEE ACLS versus conventional ACLS
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Neurologically Intact Survival at 3 months
Description
Neurologically intact survival based on modified Rankin's Score at 3 month
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Neurologically Intact Survival at 6 months
Description
Neurologically intact survival based on modified Rankin's Score at 6 month
Time Frame
6 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Optimal Hand Positioning
Description
Comparing baseline hand positioning versus RescueTEE guided hand positioning during cardiac arrest.
The echocardiographer will use RescueTEE to optimize hand positioning during cardiac arrest. This information will be documented before and after changing hand positioning to determine if there was a resultant change in ROSC. We will assess if optimization of hand positioning over the area of maximal impulse (AMI) during chest compressions based on TEE results in increased likelihood of ROSC
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
Feasibility and safety of TEE probe insertion during CPR
Description
To calculate the failure rates, feasibility, and technical issues in placing TEE probes during ACLS. This will be determined by asking code leaders to fill up a follow up form to reflect a qualitative feedback to see if TEE was useful in a subjective manner. We will also calculate the time from code to TEE probe insertion and also the time for total examination. Data will be collected on the technical challenges encountered with probe placement. Post-event images will be reviewed and quality will be assessed in terms of clarity, motion artifact, and reproducibility.
Time Frame
10 minutes
Title
Image quality
Description
To document the imaging quality and diagnostic capabilities of RescueTEE during ACLS. A blinded reviewer will perform QI on the image quality. This will be a descriptive statistic looking at contrast, gain both lateral and medial gain, overgain, image depth, focus length. Numerical outcomes of which views were obtained from the 5 selected views. These will be reported as standard echocardiography image quality assessments are done for clinical practice.
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
Diagnoses of pathology in image guided ACLS
Description
Descriptive statistics: To document the range of diagnoses RescueTEE can provide during CPR in the management of in-hospital arrest or critical hemodynamic instability. The RescueTEE form competed by the echocardiographer lists several diagnoses including the following: cardiac tamponade, LV thrombus, RV thrombus, fine VF, Pulseless rhythm with echocardiographic evidence of motion (PREM) versus Pulseless rhythm with echocardiographic evidence of standstill (PRES), myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, severe hypovolemia, severe global LV dysfunction, severe global RV dysfunction, and LV free wall rupture.
Time Frame
1 hour
Title
Interventional and therapeutic support during image guided ACLS
Description
Descriptive statistics: To document and classify the role that RescueTEE can provide which leads to therapeutic guidance or intervention for the code leader during arrest situations. Information regarding the interventions will include TEE driven medication administration or procedural management. This will also be recorded as a categorical variable as; fluid given, blood given, epinephrine given, shock advised for pulseless rhythm with echocardiographic evidence of motion (PREM), calcium given, pericardiocentesis performed, ECMO cannulation completed, thrombolytics administered, or chest compressions hand positioning changed, or chest compressions terminated.
Time Frame
1 hour
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients greater than 18 years of age;
Intubated or permanent tracheostomy in situ;
Experiencing extreme hemodynamic instability, cardiac arrest, or respiratory arrest and TTE is difficult or contraindicated
Rapid response, Code calls, ECMO stat evaluation
In-patients
Exclusion Criteria:
Unsecured airway
On-going aspiration
History of tracheoesophageal injury
History of tracheoesophageal fistula
Esophagectomy
Active upper GI bleeding
Esophageal varices
Ongoing hemoptysis
Technically challenging TEE placement due to location of code - Small room, intrusive to the code team, airway trauma
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Asad Usman, MD, MPH
Phone
2676027025
Email
asad.usman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jacob Gutsche, MD
Phone
6103896605
Email
jacob.gutsche@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jacob Gutsche, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Asad A Usman, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28916478
Citation
Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble V, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, Woo M, Atkinson P, Blehar D, Brown S, Caffery T, Douglass E, Fraser J, Haines C, Lam S, Lanspa M, Lewis M, Liebmann O, Limkakeng A, Lopez F, Platz E, Mendoza M, Minnigan H, Moore C, Novik J, Rang L, Scruggs W, Raio C. A retrospective study of pulseless electrical activity, bedside ultrasound identifies interventions during resuscitation associated with improved survival to hospital admission. A REASON Study. Resuscitation. 2017 Nov;120:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25440641
Citation
Markin NW, Gmelch BS, Griffee MJ, Holmberg TJ, Morgan DE, Zimmerman JM. A review of 364 perioperative rescue echocardiograms: findings of an anesthesiologist-staffed perioperative echocardiography service. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Feb;29(1):82-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16153515
Citation
Min JK, Spencer KT, Furlong KT, DeCara JM, Sugeng L, Ward RP, Lang RM. Clinical features of complications from transesophageal echocardiography: a single-center case series of 10,000 consecutive examinations. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Sep;18(9):925-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.01.034.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29916865
Citation
Staudt GE, Shelton K. Development of a Rescue Echocardiography Protocol for Noncardiac Surgery Patients. Anesth Analg. 2019 Aug;129(2):e37-e40. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003569.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29269162
Citation
Long B, Alerhand S, Maliel K, Koyfman A. Echocardiography in cardiac arrest: An emergency medicine review. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;36(3):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.031. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27693280
Citation
Gaspari R, Weekes A, Adhikari S, Noble VE, Nomura JT, Theodoro D, Woo M, Atkinson P, Blehar D, Brown SM, Caffery T, Douglass E, Fraser J, Haines C, Lam S, Lanspa M, Lewis M, Liebmann O, Limkakeng A, Lopez F, Platz E, Mendoza M, Minnigan H, Moore C, Novik J, Rang L, Scruggs W, Raio C. Emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in out-of-hospital and in-ED cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.018. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30189783
Citation
Arntfield R, Lau V, Landry Y, Priestap F, Ball I. Impact of Critical Care Transesophageal Echocardiography in Medical-Surgical ICU Patients: Characteristics and Results From 274 Consecutive Examinations. J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):896-902. doi: 10.1177/0885066618797271. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1999032
Citation
Daniel WG, Erbel R, Kasper W, Visser CA, Engberding R, Sutherland GR, Grube E, Hanrath P, Maisch B, Dennig K, et al. Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations. Circulation. 1991 Mar;83(3):817-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.83.3.817.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29107407
Citation
Fair J, Mallin M, Mallemat H, Zimmerman J, Arntfield R, Kessler R, Bailitz J, Blaivas M. Transesophageal Echocardiography: Guidelines for Point-of-Care Applications in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;71(2):201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22226417
Citation
Shillcutt SK, Markin NW, Montzingo CR, Brakke TR. Use of rapid "rescue" perioperative echocardiography to improve outcomes after hemodynamic instability in noncardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):362-70. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.029. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30779977
Citation
Teran F, Dean AJ, Centeno C, Panebianco NL, Zeidan AJ, Chan W, Abella BS. Evaluation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using transesophageal echocardiography in the emergency department. Resuscitation. 2019 Apr;137:140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.02.013. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
RescueTEE for In-hospital Cardiac Arrest (ReTEECA Trial)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs